<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>WayneTatum's Comments</title>
    <description>WayneTatum's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/3171211/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title> If the rumors of a Facebook (FB) phone are true, investors should consider abandoning ship, says Henry Blodget. The company would have to face intense and entrenched competition to establish itself in a field that could hurt its own margins in a move that smacks of defensive desperation. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/338651?source=feed#comment-5923971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5923971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LOL. It amazes me how many people hate FB without any logical reasoning. Let us address the most important facts<br/><br/>1) Facebook has over 900 million users, If we account for individuals with multiple accounts where still in the hundreds of millions. That is nearly a billion potential customer base and growing that the FB brand can market their phone too. Obviously, we must account for those who can actually afford the smart phone to begin with, however, I'm not sure of anyone else with a larger list to market to. <br/><br/>2) &quot;The Future is Mobile.&quot; No programmer can deny this, the smart phone market is growing fast, the 3rd worlds are buying them more than desktops, even Africa is seeing exponential increase and they are spending large fractions of their minute salaries to purchase data. Smart phones and mobile apps are the future period.<br/><br/>3) Facebook is your identity on the web. It always amuses me how often the haters brag about deleting their profile, yet FB continues to grow, lol. Why not stop using technology all together? More and more websites are offering FB as the alternative login for their websites. This is your ID on the web and it isn't stopping anytime soon. <br/><br/>4) Competition. Facebook came first period. It offered a clean user interface that was simple and engaging allowing people to interact with family and friends. At first it was reserved to those invited but it was set apart because it came first. That's it. No other company is taking it over anytime soon, they have time to figure things out.<br/><br/>The stock may continue to decrease for a little bit but the company's long term strategy, so long as they are able to execute it with precision will ensure this stock does very well in the next 5 years. So yeah, keep hating and bringing it down so I can buy :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 01:54:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LOL. It amazes me how many people hate FB without any logical reasoning. Let us address the most important facts<br/><br/>1) Facebook has over 900 million users, If we account for individuals with multiple accounts where still in the hundreds of millions. That is nearly a billion potential customer base and growing that the FB brand can market their phone too. Obviously, we must account for those who can actually afford the smart phone to begin with, however, I'm not sure of anyone else with a larger list to market to. <br/><br/>2) &quot;The Future is Mobile.&quot; No programmer can deny this, the smart phone market is growing fast, the 3rd worlds are buying them more than desktops, even Africa is seeing exponential increase and they are spending large fractions of their minute salaries to purchase data. Smart phones and mobile apps are the future period.<br/><br/>3) Facebook is your identity on the web. It always amuses me how often the haters brag about deleting their profile, yet FB continues to grow, lol. Why not stop using technology all together? More and more websites are offering FB as the alternative login for their websites. This is your ID on the web and it isn't stopping anytime soon. <br/><br/>4) Competition. Facebook came first period. It offered a clean user interface that was simple and engaging allowing people to interact with family and friends. At first it was reserved to those invited but it was set apart because it came first. That's it. No other company is taking it over anytime soon, they have time to figure things out.<br/><br/>The stock may continue to decrease for a little bit but the company's long term strategy, so long as they are able to execute it with precision will ensure this stock does very well in the next 5 years. So yeah, keep hating and bringing it down so I can buy :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 Widely Held Beliefs You Ought To Challenge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/621021/comments?source=feed#comment-5923571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5923571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In regards to Iran, they aren't building a bomb. At the expense of losing credibility with my comment I must quote the president of Iran,  &quot;Did having nuclear weapons prevent the collapse of the soviet union?&quot; No.  The nuke is mostly a political tool used to wage economic and political war against less influential nations. The Iranians aren't any much of a threat than Iraq and their mysterious WMD's. What do people suppose Iran, a nation that has no foreign military bases, who hasn't been to war since the Iraq - Iran war to do with a bomb? Mind you, it was Iraq who initiated that war to begin with. So what are we to believe the Iranians want to do? Randomly strike Israel? And then what? Please. The Israelis seem to be the only nation suspected of containing nukes in the middle east. They along with India are the only 2 nations who refuse to join the Non Proliferation Treaty. It's clear, Israel refuses to be transparent, Iran has been transparent, yet the U.S and Israel continue their manipulation of the IAEA. What else is new?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 01:42:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In regards to Iran, they aren't building a bomb. At the expense of losing credibility with my comment I must quote the president of Iran,  &quot;Did having nuclear weapons prevent the collapse of the soviet union?&quot; No.  The nuke is mostly a political tool used to wage economic and political war against less influential nations. The Iranians aren't any much of a threat than Iraq and their mysterious WMD's. What do people suppose Iran, a nation that has no foreign military bases, who hasn't been to war since the Iraq - Iran war to do with a bomb? Mind you, it was Iraq who initiated that war to begin with. So what are we to believe the Iranians want to do? Randomly strike Israel? And then what? Please. The Israelis seem to be the only nation suspected of containing nukes in the middle east. They along with India are the only 2 nations who refuse to join the Non Proliferation Treaty. It's clear, Israel refuses to be transparent, Iran has been transparent, yet the U.S and Israel continue their manipulation of the IAEA. What else is new?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 Widely Held Beliefs You Ought To Challenge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/621021/comments?source=feed#comment-5923561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5923561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In regards to Iran, they aren't building a bomb. At the expense of losing credibility with my comment I must quote the president of Iran,  &quot;Did have having nuclear weapons prevent the collapse of the soviet union?&quot; No.  The nuke is mostly a political tool used to wage economic and political war against less influential nations. The Iranians aren't any much of threat than Iraq and their mysterious WMD's. What do people suppose Iran, a nation that has no foreign military bases, who hasn't been to war since the Iraq - Iran war to do with a bomb? Mind you, it was Iraq who initiated that war to begin with. So what are we to believe the Iranians want to do? Randomly strike Israel? And then what? Please. The Israelis seem to be the only nation suspected of containing nukes in the middle east. They along with India are the only 2 nations who refuse to join the Non Proliferation Treaty. It's clear, Israel refuses to be transparent, Iran has been transparent, yet the U.S and Israel continue their manipulation of the IAEA. What else is new?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 01:41:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In regards to Iran, they aren't building a bomb. At the expense of losing credibility with my comment I must quote the president of Iran,  &quot;Did have having nuclear weapons prevent the collapse of the soviet union?&quot; No.  The nuke is mostly a political tool used to wage economic and political war against less influential nations. The Iranians aren't any much of threat than Iraq and their mysterious WMD's. What do people suppose Iran, a nation that has no foreign military bases, who hasn't been to war since the Iraq - Iran war to do with a bomb? Mind you, it was Iraq who initiated that war to begin with. So what are we to believe the Iranians want to do? Randomly strike Israel? And then what? Please. The Israelis seem to be the only nation suspected of containing nukes in the middle east. They along with India are the only 2 nations who refuse to join the Non Proliferation Treaty. It's clear, Israel refuses to be transparent, Iran has been transparent, yet the U.S and Israel continue their manipulation of the IAEA. What else is new?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
