CautiousInvestor

Sobering Stat: ARMS Index Indicates Market Is at Peak, Not Bottom

A host of the technical indicators I use have been warnings but this market is being driven by historically unique forces, including massive deficits and proportionate liquidity injections, or is being supported my the machinations of the Fed. In either case, what in the past have proven to be useful tools are being compromised, if not castrated, in the current setting.

The market is clearly overbought and has risen to unsustainable levels. It was first better than expected earnings, then it was the growth of China, then it was about housing and other reports, then it was we sold a few more cars through the clunker program and now we are starting to take stock of the basics. They have remained unchanged and over the long-run these cannot be abrogated by either liquidity or complicity.

Growth in China is in serious jeopardy and central authorities are genuinely concerned about creation of excess capacity and speculation in commodities, casino's and equities. Recent policy actions, designed to mute some of the excesses, has been initiated over concern of these excesses and the larger unspoken concern over the financial health of the economy. Corporations with deteriorating earnings are borrowing more money; under usual conditions they would be denied additional credit. In parallel, banks are concealing non-performing loans through rolling them over. Some smart people, including Micheal Grant, think China is a ticking time bomb.

Meanwhile, stateside, the core problems of underemployment, consumer spending and bankiing sector health remain unchanged.
To an extent consumer spending and underemployment are intertwined; but even if consumers, who have jobs, were not frightened by the economy and the administration's policies they would still want to save and liquidate debt therby containing spending. Prospects for the unemployed are miserable and, unfortunately, government and the apparatchiks of MSM do nothing to either clarify or correct the resports released federal departments and agencies. The bottom line is hiring is still trending down amid a growing potential labor force.

If China follows the path of Japan, the model country that could do no wrong until 1989, and the US consumer spending continues to contract, what will be the catalyst to spur growth and profits? Many times people when confronted by such a question will resort to bromides that touch upon ingenuity, creativity and innovation but it is easy to forget that these essential qualities must be nurtured.
A solid investment environment depends on a strong and stable currency, restrained federal spending, less harmful legislation, dependable contract law, limits on taxation and countercyclical capital regulation.

In my humble view things, when looking around the corner, appear rather bleak.

Key Factors Driving the Market

While not disagreeing with anything said, what I have observed is broad, alternating themes of (1) reflation which is accompanied by strength in commodities and equities and (2) deflation which is accompanied by strength in the dollar and US Treasuries.

These relationships can be see here:

stockcharts.com/charts...

TARP: Bailout or Money Pit?

I think the problem is larger than money; I think the fundamental problem is that investors do not believe the administration has a viable plan to restore stability to the banking system and systematically deal with the core issues facing the sector.

Under both Bush and Obama, the TARP program has lacked clear goals, has been implemented in piece meal fashion and has suffered from lack of transparency. From the very beginning, the U.S. government made the mistake of addressing each major bank failure differently: aiding the takeover of Bear Sterns by JPMorgan, allowing Lehman Brothers to go bankrupt and then dumping $180 billion into AIG.

Under Geithner, there has been his underwhelming perfromance as a speaker and his inability to inspire confidence by communicating a thoughtful, comprehensive plan. Details of the stress test were slow to materialize and then there were the nagging questions of which capital ratios were to be used in guaging solvency. And there is the suggestion that purchases of preferred shares will be calibrated as losses occur.

Finally, when the government increased its stake in Citi to 36% and infused more capital into AIG, the markets took this to mean the problems are large, never ending and too big to be fixed. TARP has lost credibility with the market.