<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>dook's Comments</title>
    <description>dook's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/3226731/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>More on the Goldman downgrade of Apple (AAPL): Believing an imminent dividend hike/share repurchase could set a floor under the stock price, Goldman is less optimistic about the "timing and impact" of the next product cycle - needed if the stock is going to be an outperformer over the coming year. "The stock's upside potential should be more limited than we previously anticipated." Shares +0.25% premarket.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/919781?source=feed#comment-17106661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17106661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Goldman's history re: AAPL reminds me of a quote from Lenin at the height of the Russian revolution: &quot;I must find where the people are going, so I can lead them.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:11:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Goldman's history re: AAPL reminds me of a quote from Lenin at the height of the Russian revolution: &quot;I must find where the people are going, so I can lead them.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Caterpillar's (CAT -1.5%) retail sales of machines -13% Y/Y in three months to February vs -12% in three months to January, with AsiaPacific -26% in Dec-Feb, North America -12%, EMEA -9%, Latin America +3%. Power Systems sales -7% in February period, as in January period; electric power -8%, industrial -25%, transport +15%, petroleum -8%. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/899301?source=feed#comment-16542111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16542111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What bothers me about CAT results and outlook is the implication for the world economy. Is CAT telling us that world growth is seriously in decline? I think the message is clear: the bullishness of investment advisors and brokers is self-serving and not reflective of the real situation.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:03:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What bothers me about CAT results and outlook is the implication for the world economy. Is CAT telling us that world growth is seriously in decline? I think the message is clear: the bullishness of investment advisors and brokers is self-serving and not reflective of the real situation.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Molycorp's (MCP) Q4 results: Revenues rose 1.1% Y/Y to $134M vs. $161M analyst consensus. Sees H1 financial performance slightly weaker than H2 2012, but expects global supply and demand for rare earth oxides will approach a healthier balance during 2013, and pricing within many key applications of rare earths will be beneficial to both customers and suppliers. MCP +1.8% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/889621?source=feed#comment-16304821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16304821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Molycorp suffers from the opacity of its future. No sooner do rare earth prices go up than they go down. The outlook for rare earths is not bad in the macro, but the China factor messes it up. Molycorp is a total crap shoot. Having lost a lot of money on it, I feel a certain degree of qualification for my opinions. Let someone else fool around with it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:40:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Molycorp suffers from the opacity of its future. No sooner do rare earth prices go up than they go down. The outlook for rare earths is not bad in the macro, but the China factor messes it up. Molycorp is a total crap shoot. Having lost a lot of money on it, I feel a certain degree of qualification for my opinions. Let someone else fool around with it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mobile app stores will generate $25B in revenue this year and 35% of this total ($8.8B) will involve tablet apps, predicts ABI. iOS (AAPL), whose monetization edge over Android (GOOG) is well-documented, is expected to account for 65% of sales - assuming&amp;nbsp; a 30% cut, that translates into $4.88B in revenue for Apple. Android is seen accounting for 27% of revenue ($2B for Google), and all other platforms 8%. ABI predicts iOS will make up 33% of smartphone downloads and 75% of tablet downloads, and Android 58% and 17%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890301?source=feed#comment-16301971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16301971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Whatever the details of APPL operations and outlook, this kind of Alpha comment is among the few that reflect on the actual value of AAPL. Morgan Stanley's explanation that growth mutual funds have been  shucking out AAPL as no longer being a growth stock makes sense, but its severe devaluation is more a market phenomenon that a reflection of value.<br/>Everyone is throwing darts at AAPL, but they will over time have to admit that it is one of the greatest companies of our era.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:07:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Whatever the details of APPL operations and outlook, this kind of Alpha comment is among the few that reflect on the actual value of AAPL. Morgan Stanley's explanation that growth mutual funds have been  shucking out AAPL as no longer being a growth stock makes sense, but its severe devaluation is more a market phenomenon that a reflection of value.<br/>Everyone is throwing darts at AAPL, but they will over time have to admit that it is one of the greatest companies of our era.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bio-Reference Labs (BRLI -0.6%) slips on a negative article from short-seller The Street Sweeper. The gist of the article says that the company is likely to be faced with a flood of denials from some of the largest health insurance companies in the country, and that growth projections are overly optimistic.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/855951?source=feed#comment-15596861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15596861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[BRLI's broad geographic coverage and focus on difficult lab solutions differentiates them from most other labs. Their growth outlook, in my opinion, is promising, and the valuation, low.<br/>Taking the advice of short sellers is usually counterproductive.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:28:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[BRLI's broad geographic coverage and focus on difficult lab solutions differentiates them from most other labs. Their growth outlook, in my opinion, is promising, and the valuation, low.<br/>Taking the advice of short sellers is usually counterproductive.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This morning's spike in shares of Westport Innovations (WPRT +7.6%) on takeover speculation gains momentum into the close. Chatter centers around potential interest from Cummins (CMI +0.3%), already involved in a JV that accounts for much of WPRT's medium-term profits.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/832521?source=feed#comment-15060371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15060371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Westport has a broader line of nat gas engines than does Cummins and has close ties with several OEMs. They are already joined at the hip and Cummins can easily afford to make it 100 percent, benefiting shareholders of both companies.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:10:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Westport has a broader line of nat gas engines than does Cummins and has close ties with several OEMs. They are already joined at the hip and Cummins can easily afford to make it 100 percent, benefiting shareholders of both companies.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Street showed no mercy to Nuance (NUAN -18.5%) in response to its EPS miss and forecast for multiple quarters of weakness in healthcare and EMEA sales. Goldman thinks Nuance's goal of $1B in FY13 healthcare sales is now at risk, and Needham (downgrading to Hold) is concerned about guidance for a 200-250 bps FY13 gross margin drop, worse than a prior forecast. Management suggested on the earnings call it's counting on clinical documentation software sales and PC/mobile OEM deals to drive future growth.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/816701?source=feed#comment-14778491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14778491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[When NUAN fell more than eighteen percent, it more than took into account the outlook for the company, reflecting the fragile psychology of traders in this market. It is still the same company, dominant in its field and with a bright long term future. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:39:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When NUAN fell more than eighteen percent, it more than took into account the outlook for the company, reflecting the fragile psychology of traders in this market. It is still the same company, dominant in its field and with a bright long term future. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can Xerox Be Liked Again By Investors?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1071271/comments?source=feed#comment-12739451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12739451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Patience is not a prominent feature of the current market, and XRX may suffer from that characteristic for a long time. When long term investment was popular, XRX would have been doing much better in the market. As it is, the company is not part of the casino.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:37:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Patience is not a prominent feature of the current market, and XRX may suffer from that characteristic for a long time. When long term investment was popular, XRX would have been doing much better in the market. As it is, the company is not part of the casino.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Consider Selling Apple Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1069481/comments?source=feed#comment-12709161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12709161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<br/>One could choke on all the feces being put out by AAPL bears. There are a lot of so-called investors with an interest in the stock's decline, and a lot of profit takers that are trying to beat higher capital gain rates. The truth is simple: AAPL is a powerful, creative and very successful company whose stock is cheap. The idea that the company has lost it's creativity is ludicrous. May the short sellers be squeezed until their pips squeak.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:29:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<br/>One could choke on all the feces being put out by AAPL bears. There are a lot of so-called investors with an interest in the stock's decline, and a lot of profit takers that are trying to beat higher capital gain rates. The truth is simple: AAPL is a powerful, creative and very successful company whose stock is cheap. The idea that the company has lost it's creativity is ludicrous. May the short sellers be squeezed until their pips squeak.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diamond Foods (DMND): FQ1 EPS of $0.24 beats by $0.01. Revenue of $258.5M (-10.5% Y/Y) misses by $16M. Shares +2.1% AH. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/724171?source=feed#comment-12703681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12703681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[DMND is all about the odds of whether the company can revive its past successes based its attractive brands. The earnings report suggests that the company will have the opportunity to do that. If, as I think, the brands have considerable upside potential, the stock is a sound value at the current price.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:54:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[DMND is all about the odds of whether the company can revive its past successes based its attractive brands. The earnings report suggests that the company will have the opportunity to do that. If, as I think, the brands have considerable upside potential, the stock is a sound value at the current price.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Topeka's Brian White says the Apple-dependent Taiwanese suppliers in his "Apple Monitor" collectively saw a 15% M/M sales increase in November. That's well above the 4% averaged over the last 7 years, something White attributes to the strength of Apple's (AAPL -0.6%) fall product refresh. The Apple uber-bull reiterates a Buy and $1,111 PT. (previous)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/711631?source=feed#comment-12460501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12460501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The main problems for AAPL are a bad image cultivated by bears and the media, and the immense profits stored up by many investors. With capital gains tax likely to go up, holders are encouraged to sell. With the end of the year or modestly before, the tax issue will go away, and the news that AAPL sales and profits continue on a strong upward path will restore AAPL to its former highly respected position.<br/>Even the Jefferies downgrade was with a target price of 800 dollars!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:46:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The main problems for AAPL are a bad image cultivated by bears and the media, and the immense profits stored up by many investors. With capital gains tax likely to go up, holders are encouraged to sell. With the end of the year or modestly before, the tax issue will go away, and the news that AAPL sales and profits continue on a strong upward path will restore AAPL to its former highly respected position.<br/>Even the Jefferies downgrade was with a target price of 800 dollars!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Molycorp (MCP +15.7%) soars, taking the rest of the rare earth sector with it (AVL +6.2%, REE +11%, REMX +1.7%). Traders describe the move as the continuation of a short squeeze in Molycorp - whose shares dropped below 6 in mid-November after being in the mid-30s 7 months earlier. Adding fuel is a report Interactive Brokers has said there is insufficient stock available for short sales.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/710491?source=feed#comment-12450111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12450111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Manxbuilder, for laying out the charges against the system. You should add high frequency trading to the list, which distorts the market and hurts average investors. If regulators and Congress were capable of independent action, these abuses would have been long ago remedied.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:08:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Manxbuilder, for laying out the charges against the system. You should add high frequency trading to the list, which distorts the market and hurts average investors. If regulators and Congress were capable of independent action, these abuses would have been long ago remedied.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Freeport's (FCX) mega-deal for McMoRan (MMR) and Plains (PXP) looks "incestuous" to Jim Mueller: Just for starters, PXP owns 31.5% of MMR and CEO James Flores sits on its board; MMR CEO Jim Bob Moffett is chairman of FCX; B.M. Rankin, a co-founder of FCX with Moffett, sits on MMR&amp;rsquo;s board. With such a web of relationships, how much independent due diligence was done in reaching the deal?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/702931?source=feed#comment-12295691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12295691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The deal has a dubious smell. Somebody, tell us why it is worthwhile for FCX shareholders.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:36:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The deal has a dubious smell. Somebody, tell us why it is worthwhile for FCX shareholders.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In its conference call on the purchase of McMoRan (MMR +82.2%) and Plains Exploration (PXP +26.1%), Freeport McMoRan's (FCX -13.5%) Richard Adkerson says the deal is an add-on to its mining business and not a diversion from current strategy, and FCX will continue to look for new mining opportunities. With margins and cash flows strong, FCX anticipates continuing its current dividend.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/701771?source=feed#comment-12281481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12281481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[When a company pays the average target price for companies that are not doing well, there has to be a loss of value to the acquirer, which will hopefully be made up over the next year, but a markdown of the acquirer is called for. For patient investors, FCX is promising, but this will not be a near-term, or even medium-term winner. I would stand aside and look to buy when the timing may be more favorable.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:59:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When a company pays the average target price for companies that are not doing well, there has to be a loss of value to the acquirer, which will hopefully be made up over the next year, but a markdown of the acquirer is called for. For patient investors, FCX is promising, but this will not be a near-term, or even medium-term winner. I would stand aside and look to buy when the timing may be more favorable.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diamond Foods (DMND) -18.7% AH after restating results for FY10 and FY11, and reporting results for the first 3 quarters of FY12 (ended in July). Sales for the first 3 quarters totaled $757.4M (+3.5% Y/Y) and EPS amounted to $0.53, down from a restated $1.54 for the year-ago period. Gross margin fell 480 bps Y/Y to 18.1% thanks to (surprise, surprise) a drop in walnut crop deliveries and higher walnut costs. Diamond expects to report FY12 sales of $950M-$975M vs. FY11's $966.7M. Also, two board members are stepping down, and walnut grower Bill Tos is joining.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/666311?source=feed#comment-11613701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11613701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[DMND is a case of confusing indicators. The brands have value.<br/>The management seems to have been reformed. Question: how can the brands be converted to net income that supports the stock price.<br/>In light of all that has happened to DMND, it is difficult for the average investor to estimate where the variables will end up. At this moment, it may be best to stay away.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:58:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[DMND is a case of confusing indicators. The brands have value.<br/>The management seems to have been reformed. Question: how can the brands be converted to net income that supports the stock price.<br/>In light of all that has happened to DMND, it is difficult for the average investor to estimate where the variables will end up. At this moment, it may be best to stay away.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cummins (CMI): Q3 EPS of $1.86 misses by $0.04. Revenue of $4.1B (-11% Y/Y) misses by $50M. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/624921?source=feed#comment-11097571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11097571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Let's face it......we are at a trough in cyclical earnings and the stock prices reflect that fact. The question is whether this is a real trough or a fake that will give way to a lower trough. Short covering obscures what the serious market is thinking. In the end, only time will tell whether the current trough is the last one that cyclicals will have to face. I suspect that it is too early to declare the troughing over.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:16:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Let's face it......we are at a trough in cyclical earnings and the stock prices reflect that fact. The question is whether this is a real trough or a fake that will give way to a lower trough. Short covering obscures what the serious market is thinking. In the end, only time will tell whether the current trough is the last one that cyclicals will have to face. I suspect that it is too early to declare the troughing over.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Westport Innovations (WPRT) -11.3% premarket after cutting its full-year revenue forecast in a corporate update released Monday. The developer of engine and fuel systems technologies lowered guidance to $340M-$350M from prior $400M-$425M and $412M analyst consensus, citing feedback from OEM and fleet customers in North America and automotive OEM customers in Europe.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/625101?source=feed#comment-11074491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11074491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[WPRT should not trade on quarterly results. The deal with Tata Motors announced a little while ago, along with the strong ties with other OEMs is much more an indicator of future and present value.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:46:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[WPRT should not trade on quarterly results. The deal with Tata Motors announced a little while ago, along with the strong ties with other OEMs is much more an indicator of future and present value.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Business Friendly Features In iOS 6 And What They Say About The New 'Surface' Threat</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/958851/comments?source=feed#comment-11022861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11022861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I would bet on AAPL in all of its markets, including enterprise. Microsoft has recorded a history in recent years of getting in its own way, doing too much following and not enough leading. Their terrible ad campaigns give point to their failure to generate dynamic cachet.....just the opposite of AAPL.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:22:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I would bet on AAPL in all of its markets, including enterprise. Microsoft has recorded a history in recent years of getting in its own way, doing too much following and not enough leading. Their terrible ad campaigns give point to their failure to generate dynamic cachet.....just the opposite of AAPL.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Apple: Cash balance stood at $121.3B at end of FQ4. 4.9M Macs shipped (+1% Y/Y). iPhone (main profit engine) units +58% Y/Y and revenue +56% (up from +28% and +22% in FQ3). iPad units +26% and revenue +9%, a major slowdown partly caused by inventory changes. Mac desktop units -24%, notebooks +9%. iPod units -19% and revenue -26%. Implied iPhone ASP of $636 ($625 in FQ3), iPad ASP of $536 ($538 in FQ3). Apple has resumed trading and is down 0.9% AH - some bad news was clearly priced in. CC at 5PM ET (webcast).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/614131?source=feed#comment-10908851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10908851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The stock is dominated by a lot of ignorant people, many of them high speed traders who serve as parasites on the auction process. In the case of AAPL, the only smart course is to focus of the actual results of their business and on the outlook for the Christmas quarter and beyond.<br/>The bears have their own motives and their own tactics: the rest of us will be the ultimate beneficiaries of the AAPL juggernaut.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:29:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The stock is dominated by a lot of ignorant people, many of them high speed traders who serve as parasites on the auction process. In the case of AAPL, the only smart course is to focus of the actual results of their business and on the outlook for the Christmas quarter and beyond.<br/>The bears have their own motives and their own tactics: the rest of us will be the ultimate beneficiaries of the AAPL juggernaut.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sterne Agee's Shaw Wu does his best to defend Apple (AAPL -0.2%) in the face of its recent selloff. Supply chain checks indicate iPhone 5 demand remains strong and production appears to be improving, though Wu thinks lead times remain fixed at 3-4 weeks. He believes a consensus for 17M-18M FQ4 (Sep. quarter) iPad sales could prove high, but argues there could be upside to FQ1 estimates thanks to the iPad Mini. (Nomura)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/577101?source=feed#comment-10340791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10340791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There has to be a large number of short sellers in AAPL, and they are busy on line to poor mouth the company.  When the current sinking spell reverses course, the stock could move up very fast. It's not the fundamentals that are hurting the stock; it's Casino.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:10:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There has to be a large number of short sellers in AAPL, and they are busy on line to poor mouth the company.  When the current sinking spell reverses course, the stock could move up very fast. It's not the fundamentals that are hurting the stock; it's Casino.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It takes quite a crystal ball to see three years into the future, even for Caterpillar (CAT), so investors may want to look closely at CAT&amp;rsquo;s near-term concerns. On that score, CAT told analysts this week that dealer inventory reductions are ahead of expectations and could result in lower FY12 revenue guidance by ~$2B. One positive note: CAT said it won't reduce the dividend, even in a downturn.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/556411?source=feed#comment-9862541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9862541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If this were an investors' market, the news on CAT would not be so bad. Unfortunately, this is a computer driven traders' market, where value is secondary to headlines, short term trends and short selling algorithms. <br/>If you have courage for this kind of market and you are an investor,  you could do a lot worse that CAT. Good luck.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:15:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If this were an investors' market, the news on CAT would not be so bad. Unfortunately, this is a computer driven traders' market, where value is secondary to headlines, short term trends and short selling algorithms. <br/>If you have courage for this kind of market and you are an investor,  you could do a lot worse that CAT. Good luck.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) roundup: 1) HTC, which has a relatively weak patent hand, says it has no plans to settle with Apple following the Samsung verdict. The fact Apple doesn't seem interested in seriously negotiating with Android OEMs could be a reason why. 2) Delta Air Lines (DAL) plans to deploy 4,500 iPads at its 3 airport hubs to provide information and food/beverage services to travelers. 3) Apple is reportedly planning an AirPlay upgrade that will allow music to be streamed to speakers via Bluetooth instead of Wi-Fi.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/514191?source=feed#comment-8918721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8918721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have been around the block in investing, from Scudder to T Rowe Price and am now a cool handed 85-year old Luke. Treasury yields should tell you that common stocks are the place to be. AAPL is the preferred choice in that spectrum.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:33:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have been around the block in investing, from Scudder to T Rowe Price and am now a cool handed 85-year old Luke. Treasury yields should tell you that common stocks are the place to be. AAPL is the preferred choice in that spectrum.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) roundup: 1) HTC, which has a relatively weak patent hand, says it has no plans to settle with Apple following the Samsung verdict. The fact Apple doesn't seem interested in seriously negotiating with Android OEMs could be a reason why. 2) Delta Air Lines (DAL) plans to deploy 4,500 iPads at its 3 airport hubs to provide information and food/beverage services to travelers. 3) Apple is reportedly planning an AirPlay upgrade that will allow music to be streamed to speakers via Bluetooth instead of Wi-Fi.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/514191?source=feed#comment-8918581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8918581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The sum of all the noise is that AAPL is the Big Gorilla on the block and the momentum is moving in their favor. All the negative commentary is from shorts and contrarian advisors who have gotten behind the curve.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:29:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The sum of all the noise is that AAPL is the Big Gorilla on the block and the momentum is moving in their favor. All the negative commentary is from shorts and contrarian advisors who have gotten behind the curve.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Come on. This is farce," says tech legal site Groklaw, incredulous Apple-Samsung jurors took only 21 hours to deliberate over a 700-question form one lawyer says would take him 3 days to understand. Groklaw is also unimpressed with contradictory statements from jurors, several verdict inconsistencies, and the fact jurors reached a decision without reading a 109-page instruction form (.pdf). Some lawyers are predicting this case will reach the Supreme Court, due to the issues it raises about UI and design patents. (more)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/507251?source=feed#comment-8778821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8778821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The crap is flying through the air in connection with the Apple/Samsung court decision. Bottom line: Samsung copied Apple on a fast uncreative track and has been caught at it. Anyone who thinks Samsung has a case is probably short Apple.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:10:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The crap is flying through the air in connection with the Apple/Samsung court decision. Bottom line: Samsung copied Apple on a fast uncreative track and has been caught at it. Anyone who thinks Samsung has a case is probably short Apple.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"The hype concerns us, as it sounds vaguely familiar to another decade," says Oracle Research's Laurence Balter, explaining his downgrade of Apple (AAPL -1.4%). Balter is also worried about slowing sales growth, high expectations, and margin risks related to Apple's rumored entry into the TV and set-top box markets.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/499801?source=feed#comment-8631651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8631651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The problem with AAPL is not the law of large numbers or the possibility of lower margins. The problem is that some observers prefer to be contrarian. Someday, they will be right, but not right now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:16:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The problem with AAPL is not the law of large numbers or the possibility of lower margins. The problem is that some observers prefer to be contrarian. Someday, they will be right, but not right now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>As Samsung (SSNLF.PK) continues making counter-arguments in its closely-watched California trial with Apple (AAPL), Judge Lucy Koh is calling on the combatants to try once more to reach a settlement."I see risk here for both sides if we go to a verdict," says Koh: her rulings have shown a pro-Apple tilt thus far, but the case will ultimately be decided by a jury. A prior meeting between Apple and Samsung's CEOs apparently failed to accomplish anything.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/489271?source=feed#comment-8439141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8439141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We can moralize about the evils of copycatting, but whether legally or illegally, intense competition is to be expected for successful technologies. Legal proceedings may slow the flood of imitation, but in the end, most IT discoveries will become commodities. For Apple, it will be necessary to run very fast just to stay even and even faster to stay ahead.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:16:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We can moralize about the evils of copycatting, but whether legally or illegally, intense competition is to be expected for successful technologies. Legal proceedings may slow the flood of imitation, but in the end, most IT discoveries will become commodities. For Apple, it will be necessary to run very fast just to stay even and even faster to stay ahead.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We've seen plenty of leaked pictures of components going into the next iPhone (AAPL). But as Jay Yarow points out, we haven't seen any yet of the widely-rumored iPad Mini. That's leading Yarow and others to think the Mini hasn't entered production and won't launch next month, as many rumors indicate the next iPhone will. Schematics indicate Apple is looking to make the Mini thinner than the regular iPad.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/486751?source=feed#comment-8419961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8419961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Speculation on what Apple is doing is interesting, but I am more concerned with how the law of diminishing returns will affect the company's future. At some point, smaller and thinner and faster will begin to get tired and the related devices will be commoditized. Are we getting close to that point, I wonder.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:47:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Speculation on what Apple is doing is interesting, but I am more concerned with how the law of diminishing returns will affect the company's future. At some point, smaller and thinner and faster will begin to get tired and the related devices will be commoditized. Are we getting close to that point, I wonder.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
