faackanders2's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/323670/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/155436-top-10-clunkers-and-new-cars-purchased?source=feed#comment-625835 625835

On Aug 11 08:00 PM rps50 wrote:

> Look at all them Ford Explorers still on the road after all them
> years of service and I bet they had over 200,000 miles on them. Speaks
> for itself]]> Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:58:17 -0400

On Aug 11 08:00 PM rps50 wrote:

> Look at all them Ford Explorers still on the road after all them
> years of service and I bet they had over 200,000 miles on them. Speaks
> for itself]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/155436-top-10-clunkers-and-new-cars-purchased?source=feed#comment-625832 625832 Perhaps they should split trucks and cars, to have a better comparison.


On Aug 11 12:40 PM User 469923 wrote:

> The top 10 Fuel Efficient and environmentally friendly list is hard
> to believe. I would even call it bunk. Mercedes isn't known for fuel
> efficiency, quite the opposite. Jeep? I don't know a Jeep that gets
> good fuel economy. Where is Chevy? They have more fuel efficient
> models than anyone. I don't know that BMW is that fuel efficient
> either. This study is bogus based on the research I've seen.]]> Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:52:14 -0400 Perhaps they should split trucks and cars, to have a better comparison.


On Aug 11 12:40 PM User 469923 wrote:

> The top 10 Fuel Efficient and environmentally friendly list is hard
> to believe. I would even call it bunk. Mercedes isn't known for fuel
> efficiency, quite the opposite. Jeep? I don't know a Jeep that gets
> good fuel economy. Where is Chevy? They have more fuel efficient
> models than anyone. I don't know that BMW is that fuel efficient
> either. This study is bogus based on the research I've seen.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/116728-obama-insists-cars-improve-fuel-efficiency-by-40?source=feed#comment-368240 368240

On Jan 27 10:56 AM Mike Inmich wrote:

> Will the advocates of CAFE and the California plan please answer
> the question: why not us ea gas tax like Europe, Japan, and many
> other questions have done for decades?
>
> I fear the answer is that this direct tax will make the voters unhappy.
> Using the big bad auto companies, who hide 100 mpg carburetors under
> their desks, to collect taxes if much mor epolitically expedient.
>
>
> Note that if the goal is reduction of fossile fuel a gas tax will
> also:
> reduce length of trips, affect existing cars as well as new ones,
> increase car-poolng, affect other uses of fossile fuel like home
> heat, and millions of other market driven solutions. With the modifed
> price of fossile fuel all of this will be achieved with market /
> pricing efficiency.
>
> CAFE has the affect of disproportionate impact on US based auto companies
> who make commercial pickup trucks. (why doesn't Mack truck have to
> meet CAFE?). The California law has an exception for small companies,
> all of which are foreign, which is no surprise since this crowd hates
> all things American, except Obama, for now.
>
> Gas tax yes. CAFE no!]]> Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:54:12 -0500

On Jan 27 10:56 AM Mike Inmich wrote:

> Will the advocates of CAFE and the California plan please answer
> the question: why not us ea gas tax like Europe, Japan, and many
> other questions have done for decades?
>
> I fear the answer is that this direct tax will make the voters unhappy.
> Using the big bad auto companies, who hide 100 mpg carburetors under
> their desks, to collect taxes if much mor epolitically expedient.
>
>
> Note that if the goal is reduction of fossile fuel a gas tax will
> also:
> reduce length of trips, affect existing cars as well as new ones,
> increase car-poolng, affect other uses of fossile fuel like home
> heat, and millions of other market driven solutions. With the modifed
> price of fossile fuel all of this will be achieved with market /
> pricing efficiency.
>
> CAFE has the affect of disproportionate impact on US based auto companies
> who make commercial pickup trucks. (why doesn't Mack truck have to
> meet CAFE?). The California law has an exception for small companies,
> all of which are foreign, which is no surprise since this crowd hates
> all things American, except Obama, for now.
>
> Gas tax yes. CAFE no!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/111680-offer-ford-a-bridge-loan-to-buy-gm-assets?source=feed#comment-335012 335012 Both Ford and GM are attemtping to get back to their core, by shedding Volvo, Saab, and Saturn.
P.S. GM aquiring Chrysler would also likely take them down faster. They need to solve their own issues first, and fast!]]> Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:29:44 -0500 Both Ford and GM are attemtping to get back to their core, by shedding Volvo, Saab, and Saturn.
P.S. GM aquiring Chrysler would also likely take them down faster. They need to solve their own issues first, and fast!]]>