Top 10 'Clunkers' and New Cars Purchased [View article]
If it was on the buy list that would be something, but it topped the turn in list, which implies people were looking for a reason to turn them in.
On Aug 11 08:00 PM rps50 wrote:
> Look at all them Ford Explorers still on the road after all them > years of service and I bet they had over 200,000 miles on them. Speaks > for itself
Top 10 'Clunkers' and New Cars Purchased [View article]
Is this a subjective customer poll, or an objective look at CAFE and Metro-Highway label? It may also penalize companies that sell trucks, if compared against companies that only sell cars. Perhaps they should split trucks and cars, to have a better comparison.
On Aug 11 12:40 PM User 469923 wrote:
> The top 10 Fuel Efficient and environmentally friendly list is hard > to believe. I would even call it bunk. Mercedes isn't known for fuel > efficiency, quite the opposite. Jeep? I don't know a Jeep that gets > good fuel economy. Where is Chevy? They have more fuel efficient > models than anyone. I don't know that BMW is that fuel efficient > either. This study is bogus based on the research I've seen.
Top 10 'Clunkers' and New Cars Purchased [View article]
On Aug 11 08:00 PM rps50 wrote:
> Look at all them Ford Explorers still on the road after all them
> years of service and I bet they had over 200,000 miles on them. Speaks
> for itself
Top 10 'Clunkers' and New Cars Purchased [View article]
Perhaps they should split trucks and cars, to have a better comparison.
On Aug 11 12:40 PM User 469923 wrote:
> The top 10 Fuel Efficient and environmentally friendly list is hard
> to believe. I would even call it bunk. Mercedes isn't known for fuel
> efficiency, quite the opposite. Jeep? I don't know a Jeep that gets
> good fuel economy. Where is Chevy? They have more fuel efficient
> models than anyone. I don't know that BMW is that fuel efficient
> either. This study is bogus based on the research I've seen.