<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>orderartwork's Comments</title>
    <description>orderartwork's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/3256991/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8495961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8495961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I suggest you try Spotify, which has 16 times more songs for you select now!!!.<br/><br/>I believe Sirius-XM will provide much better quality of song when you drive since there is signal interference or signal missing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:35:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I suggest you try Spotify, which has 16 times more songs for you select now!!!.<br/><br/>I believe Sirius-XM will provide much better quality of song when you drive since there is signal interference or signal missing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8495771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8495771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I shorted P at $12.20 on May 24 and partly covered my short position by about $9.9. Then I shorted more by $11.50. I had posted the fact in message board when I shorted. You can check P message board.<br/><br/>I will keep my short position until 2013 to save my profit tax.<br/><br/>I do not think P can touch $12.2 again.<br/><br/>I 100% agree BTIG target $3.75, which I think still overvalue. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:27:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I shorted P at $12.20 on May 24 and partly covered my short position by about $9.9. Then I shorted more by $11.50. I had posted the fact in message board when I shorted. You can check P message board.<br/><br/>I will keep my short position until 2013 to save my profit tax.<br/><br/>I do not think P can touch $12.2 again.<br/><br/>I 100% agree BTIG target $3.75, which I think still overvalue. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8495641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8495641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[By the way,when I shorted P, I told fact in message board. You can check it!!!!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:24:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[By the way,when I shorted P, I told fact in message board. You can check it!!!!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8495501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8495501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[the fact is that the Short interest has been increasing, 43.5% of Float now. There have been more shorters when P was under $11 from the newest short interest. If a company is shorted by 43.5% of float, most shorters are professional institutes. Though short squeeze is possible, that shares will be down further is much more possible.<br/><br/>There must be reason for Short 43.5% of Float.<br/> Please not worry about shorters, there will be more shorters and they will make money.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:18:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[the fact is that the Short interest has been increasing, 43.5% of Float now. There have been more shorters when P was under $11 from the newest short interest. If a company is shorted by 43.5% of float, most shorters are professional institutes. Though short squeeze is possible, that shares will be down further is much more possible.<br/><br/>There must be reason for Short 43.5% of Float.<br/> Please not worry about shorters, there will be more shorters and they will make money.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8495431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8495431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I shorted P at $12.20 on May 24 and partly covered my short position by about $9.9. Then I shorted more by $11.50.<br/><br/>I will keep my short position until 2013 to save my profit tax.<br/><br/>I do not think P can touch $12.2 again.<br/><br/>I 100% agree BTIG target $3.75, which I  think still overvalue.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:15:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I shorted P at $12.20 on May 24 and partly covered my short position by about $9.9. Then I shorted more by $11.50.<br/><br/>I will keep my short position until 2013 to save my profit tax.<br/><br/>I do not think P can touch $12.2 again.<br/><br/>I 100% agree BTIG target $3.75, which I  think still overvalue.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8495131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8495131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are wrong. the short interest was not highest level.<br/>Short interest has been increasing, 43.5% of Float now. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:01:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are wrong. the short interest was not highest level.<br/>Short interest has been increasing, 43.5% of Float now. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8495071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8495071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes, you are righ. <br/><br/>However, the fact is that the Short interest has been increasing, 43.5% of Float  now. There have been more shorters when P was under $11 from the newest short interest. If a company is shorted by 43.5% of float, most shorters are professional institutes. Though short squeeze is possible, that shares will be down further is much more possible.<br/><br/>There must be reason for Short 43.5% of Float. <br/><br/>For me, I think the fair price for P should be under $3, which BTIG though its value when P's IPO.<br/><br/>So there is enough space for shorting, this is why short interest has been increasing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:59:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes, you are righ. <br/><br/>However, the fact is that the Short interest has been increasing, 43.5% of Float  now. There have been more shorters when P was under $11 from the newest short interest. If a company is shorted by 43.5% of float, most shorters are professional institutes. Though short squeeze is possible, that shares will be down further is much more possible.<br/><br/>There must be reason for Short 43.5% of Float. <br/><br/>For me, I think the fair price for P should be under $3, which BTIG though its value when P's IPO.<br/><br/>So there is enough space for shorting, this is why short interest has been increasing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8159201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8159201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Even for speculative stock, is it too expensive that the stock's forward pe is 200? Further most people do not believe it will be profitable in next year as forward earning. P may never be profit. I do not think P worth &quot;speculative&quot; now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 05:30:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Even for speculative stock, is it too expensive that the stock's forward pe is 200? Further most people do not believe it will be profitable in next year as forward earning. P may never be profit. I do not think P worth &quot;speculative&quot; now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8159141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8159141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Updated:<br/>Listener hours:<br/>1.12 billion July， 1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>6.13% July，5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.9 million July，54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 05:21:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Updated:<br/>Listener hours:<br/>1.12 billion July， 1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>6.13% July，5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.9 million July，54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8157131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8157131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So you compare google with P. Do you know how many pe was when google IPO and now, compared with P? When google was IPO, it was proved business model and profit. How about P????]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 01:11:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So you compare google with P. Do you know how many pe was when google IPO and now, compared with P? When google was IPO, it was proved business model and profit. How about P????]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8156641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8156641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sorry I do not make my point clear. When we talk about p/s compared with other internet Media companies, most of their contents are free. Since P has very high content fee, we should consider P's content fee when we compare p/s with other internet companies.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:39:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sorry I do not make my point clear. When we talk about p/s compared with other internet Media companies, most of their contents are free. Since P has very high content fee, we should consider P's content fee when we compare p/s with other internet companies.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8156451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8156451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[40.5% of Float has been shorted now and you will see more short rate soon. See you under $5.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:33:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[40.5% of Float has been shorted now and you will see more short rate soon. See you under $5.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8121931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8121931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi, ColdConks:<br/>Would you please have pity on this poor Growtheport? You are the winner.  It looks like he has been loser by long P. When we see P under $5, it will be more pitiful if he still hold P as his lifetime investment opportunity.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 01:16:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi, ColdConks:<br/>Would you please have pity on this poor Growtheport? You are the winner.  It looks like he has been loser by long P. When we see P under $5, it will be more pitiful if he still hold P as his lifetime investment opportunity.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8121201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8121201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[40.5% of Float has been shorted now and huge insider selling for $9. <br/><br/>Look its chart, newer high has been lower, newer low has been lower.<br/><br/>both 50-Day Moving Average,200-Day Moving Average and EMA for 50days and 200 days are moving lower.<br/><br/>People with basic investment knowledge will know that it is the time to short P, with anti- Social Media Bubble market trend now.<br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:26:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[40.5% of Float has been shorted now and huge insider selling for $9. <br/><br/>Look its chart, newer high has been lower, newer low has been lower.<br/><br/>both 50-Day Moving Average,200-Day Moving Average and EMA for 50days and 200 days are moving lower.<br/><br/>People with basic investment knowledge will know that it is the time to short P, with anti- Social Media Bubble market trend now.<br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8120981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8120981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think he has no way to match your professional or educational pedigree, which every one in the board knows, period!!!!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:07:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think he has no way to match your professional or educational pedigree, which every one in the board knows, period!!!!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8120931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8120931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Do you think whether current forward 200 PE had priced your high risk/reward? You had paid forward 200 PE now!!!!, which none in the world knows whether P can even earn penny in the future. P has never been earning a penny for over 10 years since its beginning. That is your lifetime investment?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:01:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Do you think whether current forward 200 PE had priced your high risk/reward? You had paid forward 200 PE now!!!!, which none in the world knows whether P can even earn penny in the future. P has never been earning a penny for over 10 years since its beginning. That is your lifetime investment?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8120811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8120811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Do you want 16 times more songs to select? Spotify has  16 times more songs than Pandora. Do you think discover software is big deal for Spotify? Spotify will make the software better and better, not mentioning Spotify's &quot;like&quot; function, not Pandora fake &quot;like&quot; . That is reason why yahoo pick Spotify, not Pandora.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:50:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Do you want 16 times more songs to select? Spotify has  16 times more songs than Pandora. Do you think discover software is big deal for Spotify? Spotify will make the software better and better, not mentioning Spotify's &quot;like&quot; function, not Pandora fake &quot;like&quot; . That is reason why yahoo pick Spotify, not Pandora.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It Is Time To Short Pandora</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/777621/comments?source=feed#comment-8120721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8120721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[P has fake p/s since most of its sale will be paid to royalty, which really can not count as normal sale. If you want count p/s, it may had better use P/(Sale - royalties). You will see P has crazy p/s number, not mention its crazy forward 200 pe, which none is really sure whether P can earn penny. At least P has never been earning penny for 10 years since its business beginning.<br/><br/>Let's see its real numbers:<br/><br/>Listener hours:<br/>1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March<br/><br/><br/>Real operation numbers For Pandora<br/><br/>Sum:<br/>Total Revenue: 58% YOY Growth<br/>while: 4Q2011=81,326;1Q2012 80,784,<br/>Total Revenue decreased from last quarter compared with 4Q2011.<br/>Any growth more? doubting.<br/><br/>Total Op. Costs: 80% YOY Growth<br/>Cost of Revenue: 59%; YOY Growth<br/>Product Development: 51%,YOY Growth<br/>Marketing Sales: 81%,YOY Growth<br/>GA:53%,YOY Growth<br/>Content Acquisition : 91%,YOY Growth]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:37:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[P has fake p/s since most of its sale will be paid to royalty, which really can not count as normal sale. If you want count p/s, it may had better use P/(Sale - royalties). You will see P has crazy p/s number, not mention its crazy forward 200 pe, which none is really sure whether P can earn penny. At least P has never been earning penny for 10 years since its business beginning.<br/><br/>Let's see its real numbers:<br/><br/>Listener hours:<br/>1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March<br/><br/><br/>Real operation numbers For Pandora<br/><br/>Sum:<br/>Total Revenue: 58% YOY Growth<br/>while: 4Q2011=81,326;1Q2012 80,784,<br/>Total Revenue decreased from last quarter compared with 4Q2011.<br/>Any growth more? doubting.<br/><br/>Total Op. Costs: 80% YOY Growth<br/>Cost of Revenue: 59%; YOY Growth<br/>Product Development: 51%,YOY Growth<br/>Marketing Sales: 81%,YOY Growth<br/>GA:53%,YOY Growth<br/>Content Acquisition : 91%,YOY Growth]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8120411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8120411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Listener hours:<br/>1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March<br/><br/><br/>Real operation numbers For Pandora<br/><br/>Sum:<br/>Total Revenue: 58% YOY Growth<br/>while: 4Q2011=81,326;1Q2012 80,784,<br/>Total Revenue decreased from last quarter compared with 4Q2011.<br/>Any growth more? doubting.<br/><br/>Total Op. Costs: 80% YOY Growth<br/>Cost of Revenue: 59%; YOY Growth<br/>Product Development: 51%,YOY Growth<br/>Marketing Sales: 81%,YOY Growth<br/>GA:53%,YOY Growth<br/>Content Acquisition : 91%,YOY Growth]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:24:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Listener hours:<br/>1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March<br/><br/><br/>Real operation numbers For Pandora<br/><br/>Sum:<br/>Total Revenue: 58% YOY Growth<br/>while: 4Q2011=81,326;1Q2012 80,784,<br/>Total Revenue decreased from last quarter compared with 4Q2011.<br/>Any growth more? doubting.<br/><br/>Total Op. Costs: 80% YOY Growth<br/>Cost of Revenue: 59%; YOY Growth<br/>Product Development: 51%,YOY Growth<br/>Marketing Sales: 81%,YOY Growth<br/>GA:53%,YOY Growth<br/>Content Acquisition : 91%,YOY Growth]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8120141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8120141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[40.5% of Float has been shorted now and huge insider selling for $9. Look it chart, newer high has been lower, newer low has been lower. <br/><br/>both 50-Day Moving Average,200-Day Moving Average and 	EMA for 50days and 200 days are moving lower.<br/><br/>Only fool will buy Pandora for $9 now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:11:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[40.5% of Float has been shorted now and huge insider selling for $9. Look it chart, newer high has been lower, newer low has been lower. <br/><br/>both 50-Day Moving Average,200-Day Moving Average and 	EMA for 50days and 200 days are moving lower.<br/><br/>Only fool will buy Pandora for $9 now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora: Gaining Audience, Losing Value?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/782011/comments?source=feed#comment-8120031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8120031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<br/><br/>the current Pandora royalties pay schedule set by SoundExchange is set to increase each year until 2016, go through 2015.<br/><br/>Do you think  Pandora cash can support it survive until 2016, with burning cash over 10 millions, lost $20 million last quarter only!!!!, left 80.59 million cash only!!!!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:03:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<br/><br/>the current Pandora royalties pay schedule set by SoundExchange is set to increase each year until 2016, go through 2015.<br/><br/>Do you think  Pandora cash can support it survive until 2016, with burning cash over 10 millions, lost $20 million last quarter only!!!!, left 80.59 million cash only!!!!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Like some other Internet names, Pandora (P -4.9%) is falling hard. Rival Spotify announced over the weekend U.S. users had listened to over 13B tracks through its service in the 12 months following its U.S. launch, and that 27.8B tracks had been shared (many of them via Facebook's Open Graph). Pandora, for its part, reported this morning its cumulative audience in the coveted 18-49 demographic rose 6% from March to June, to 25.3M listeners (per Triton Research). </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/429311?source=feed#comment-7690441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7690441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Last month, its Share of total U.S. radio listening is down and share in June was increased only by 0.03% compared its top share in April.<br/><br/>This month its listen hours is down too.<br/><br/>It looks like all of its metrics will be down in the future because of competition, not mentioning its crazy pe which should mantain high growth.<br/><br/>Listener hours:<br/>1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March<br/><br/><br/>Real operation numbers For Pandora<br/><br/>Sum:<br/>Total Revenue: 58% YOY Growth<br/>while: 4Q2011=81,326;1Q2012 80,784,<br/>Total Revenue decreased from last quarter compared with 4Q2011.<br/>Any growth more? doubting.<br/><br/>Total Op. Costs: 80% YOY Growth<br/>Cost of Revenue: 59%; YOY Growth<br/>Product Development: 51%,YOY Growth<br/>Marketing Sales: 81%,YOY Growth<br/>GA:53%,YOY Growth<br/>Content Acquisition : 91%,YOY Growth]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 03:55:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Last month, its Share of total U.S. radio listening is down and share in June was increased only by 0.03% compared its top share in April.<br/><br/>This month its listen hours is down too.<br/><br/>It looks like all of its metrics will be down in the future because of competition, not mentioning its crazy pe which should mantain high growth.<br/><br/>Listener hours:<br/>1.08B June (down),1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>5.98% June, 5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>54.5M June, 53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March<br/><br/><br/>Real operation numbers For Pandora<br/><br/>Sum:<br/>Total Revenue: 58% YOY Growth<br/>while: 4Q2011=81,326;1Q2012 80,784,<br/>Total Revenue decreased from last quarter compared with 4Q2011.<br/>Any growth more? doubting.<br/><br/>Total Op. Costs: 80% YOY Growth<br/>Cost of Revenue: 59%; YOY Growth<br/>Product Development: 51%,YOY Growth<br/>Marketing Sales: 81%,YOY Growth<br/>GA:53%,YOY Growth<br/>Content Acquisition : 91%,YOY Growth]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Like some other Internet names, Pandora (P -4.9%) is falling hard. Rival Spotify announced over the weekend U.S. users had listened to over 13B tracks through its service in the 12 months following its U.S. launch, and that 27.8B tracks had been shared (many of them via Facebook's Open Graph). Pandora, for its part, reported this morning its cumulative audience in the coveted 18-49 demographic rose 6% from March to June, to 25.3M listeners (per Triton Research). </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/429311?source=feed#comment-7690371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7690371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Which Pandora analyst should you believe?     <br/><br/>When Pandora IPO:<br/>Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='Citigroup Inc.'>C</a>) analyst Mark Mahaney buy rating and $25 price target as a main underwriter on Pandora's IPO;<br/>It's also no surprise that fellow underwriters William Blair and Wells Fargo Securities also initiated coverage of Pandora on Monday with outperform ratings. Stifel Nicolaus, another underwriter on the initial public offering, started coverage today with a hold rating on Pandora.<br/><br/>Similarly, IPO underwriter Morgan Stanley (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ms' title='Morgan Stanley'>MS</a>) began coverage of Pandora with a hold rating with concerns about the company's path to profitability. Still, with a target price of $20, Morgan Stanley analysts are predicting some upside to the stock.<br/><br/>This hasn't dissuaded JPMorgan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='JPMorgan Chase & Co.'>JPM</a>) analyst Doug Anmuth from initiating the stock with an overweight rating and $22 price target, as he believes strong user growth will be followed by greater mobile monetization.<br/><br/>Outside of Pandora's underwriters, the story is much different. The stock has a few other fans on Wall Street who rate it buy, but firms like Albert Fried &amp; Co, Capstone Investments, and BTIG say investors should dump shares.<br/><br/><br/>BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield has a 12-month price target of $5.50, saying that while the company offers a &quot;great consumer service,&quot; its business model &quot;does not scale in the same way as other successful Internet businesses.&quot;<br/><br/><br/>Similarly, Albert Fried research director Rich Tullo praises Pandora as a great service, but notes that &quot;great companies do not always offer attractive returns for equity investors. We have concerns about Pandora's financial statements in the near term and its long-term ability to monetize its user base.&quot; Tullo has a sell rating.<br/><br/><br/>Capstone Investments analyst Paul Meeks is also bearish with a sell rating. Meeks says &quot;it's an Internet shell game,&quot; arguing that management, underwriters and Pandora bulls stay focused on the growth of users and listener hours while ignoring profits and cash flow.<br/><br/><br/>That shouldn't come as a surprise for a company struggling with the same problems Internet companies have struggled with for more than a decade: Will user growth lead to more revenue, and can that revenue be turned into profit?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 03:45:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which Pandora analyst should you believe?     <br/><br/>When Pandora IPO:<br/>Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='Citigroup Inc.'>C</a>) analyst Mark Mahaney buy rating and $25 price target as a main underwriter on Pandora's IPO;<br/>It's also no surprise that fellow underwriters William Blair and Wells Fargo Securities also initiated coverage of Pandora on Monday with outperform ratings. Stifel Nicolaus, another underwriter on the initial public offering, started coverage today with a hold rating on Pandora.<br/><br/>Similarly, IPO underwriter Morgan Stanley (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ms' title='Morgan Stanley'>MS</a>) began coverage of Pandora with a hold rating with concerns about the company's path to profitability. Still, with a target price of $20, Morgan Stanley analysts are predicting some upside to the stock.<br/><br/>This hasn't dissuaded JPMorgan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='JPMorgan Chase & Co.'>JPM</a>) analyst Doug Anmuth from initiating the stock with an overweight rating and $22 price target, as he believes strong user growth will be followed by greater mobile monetization.<br/><br/>Outside of Pandora's underwriters, the story is much different. The stock has a few other fans on Wall Street who rate it buy, but firms like Albert Fried &amp; Co, Capstone Investments, and BTIG say investors should dump shares.<br/><br/><br/>BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield has a 12-month price target of $5.50, saying that while the company offers a &quot;great consumer service,&quot; its business model &quot;does not scale in the same way as other successful Internet businesses.&quot;<br/><br/><br/>Similarly, Albert Fried research director Rich Tullo praises Pandora as a great service, but notes that &quot;great companies do not always offer attractive returns for equity investors. We have concerns about Pandora's financial statements in the near term and its long-term ability to monetize its user base.&quot; Tullo has a sell rating.<br/><br/><br/>Capstone Investments analyst Paul Meeks is also bearish with a sell rating. Meeks says &quot;it's an Internet shell game,&quot; arguing that management, underwriters and Pandora bulls stay focused on the growth of users and listener hours while ignoring profits and cash flow.<br/><br/><br/>That shouldn't come as a surprise for a company struggling with the same problems Internet companies have struggled with for more than a decade: Will user growth lead to more revenue, and can that revenue be turned into profit?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iHeartRadio Grows Even More: How Will This Impact Sirius XM And Pandora?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/687651/comments?source=feed#comment-7021011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7021011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Can Pandora growth below support forward 200 PE?<br/>I wonder whether Pandora numbers will be down for June.<br/><br/>Listener hours: <br/>   1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>   5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>   53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:58:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Can Pandora growth below support forward 200 PE?<br/>I wonder whether Pandora numbers will be down for June.<br/><br/>Listener hours: <br/>   1.10 billion May, 1.06 billion April, 1 billion March;<br/><br/>Share of total U.S. radio listening:<br/>   5.80% May (down), 5.95% April, 5.79% March<br/><br/>Active listeners:<br/>   53.3 million May, 51.9 million April, 51 million March]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora Goes On The Offensive, Takes It To Traditional Radio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/615131/comments?source=feed#comment-6403721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6403721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<br/><br/>Here are some real numbers of Pandora, You will know !!!!!<br/><br/>*Revenue may have been up YOY, but compared to last quarter, revenue DECREASED.<br/><br/>*Expenses grew 80% YOY, 13% from last quarter<br/><br/>*Loss from Operations grew 294% (!!) YOY, and 150% from last quarter<br/><br/>*Net losses grew 200% YOY, and 147% from last quarter<br/><br/>*Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders at ($0.12), up from ($0.06) last quarter.<br/><br/>*Cash decreased 11% in one quarter<br/><br/>The only reason this quarter looked &quot;good&quot; was due to P management lowballing the hell out of their FY12 guidance, so that when they &quot;beat&quot; their own crap guidance, they looked &quot;good&quot;. It's a ruse, and it will all come to light this year. Just wait until the YOY results are comparisons between periods AFTER the hype and exposure they gained from the IPO. Listener hours and active listeners are starting to decelerate each quarter, and only show such large increases YOY because the prior year figures were before the exposure from the IPO.<br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:41:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<br/><br/>Here are some real numbers of Pandora, You will know !!!!!<br/><br/>*Revenue may have been up YOY, but compared to last quarter, revenue DECREASED.<br/><br/>*Expenses grew 80% YOY, 13% from last quarter<br/><br/>*Loss from Operations grew 294% (!!) YOY, and 150% from last quarter<br/><br/>*Net losses grew 200% YOY, and 147% from last quarter<br/><br/>*Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders at ($0.12), up from ($0.06) last quarter.<br/><br/>*Cash decreased 11% in one quarter<br/><br/>The only reason this quarter looked &quot;good&quot; was due to P management lowballing the hell out of their FY12 guidance, so that when they &quot;beat&quot; their own crap guidance, they looked &quot;good&quot;. It's a ruse, and it will all come to light this year. Just wait until the YOY results are comparisons between periods AFTER the hype and exposure they gained from the IPO. Listener hours and active listeners are starting to decelerate each quarter, and only show such large increases YOY because the prior year figures were before the exposure from the IPO.<br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora Goes On The Offensive, Takes It To Traditional Radio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/615131/comments?source=feed#comment-6365651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6365651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Pandora Shares Down Sharply; Threatened By Songza?<br/><br/><br/>Is Pandora facing a serious new threat to its position in online music from Songza?<br/><br/>The online radio company’s shares are trading sharply lower Tuesday after BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield – who has been bearish on Pandora since the company went public (before, even) – today notes that “Pandora investors should be concerned” about a rapid surge in popularity of Songza, a curated music app offered on for iPad and iPhone. (There’s also a Web version.) He notes that the app which is currently the #1 overall free iPad app in popularity, and the #2 most popular free iPhone app. (We’re talking over all here, not just music apps.)<br/><br/>Greenfield notes that since Songza launched its iPad app on June 7, there have been 542,000 installs.<br/><br/>“Unlike Pandora and many of the other Internet music services that began life on the Web, Songza was engineered with a complete focus on the mobile/tablet environment,” he writes in a blog post. ”In many ways Songza’s simplicity and focus on mobile life, reminds us of what drove Instagram’s success, as consumer Web activity shifts far faster than expected from computers to mobile devices.”<br/><br/>Greenfield is especially keen on the Songza “concierge feature,” which “allows you to easily incorporate music into whatever your current activity is, without the need to build/start a playlist each time and then fine tune that playlist.” So you can choose from a variety of pre-set playlists, like “Singing in the Shower,” or “Working Out,” or “Morning Commute.”<br/><br/>“Songza is focused on simplicity as it is built for a mobile environment, so listening only takes a few clicks, rather than having to type in the name of an artist letter-by-letter to start a playlist,” he writes. “There are no audio ads and no full screen display/video ad takeovers, only  display ads which appear at the bottom of the screen, with the goal of leveraging its knowledge of your lifestyle and interests to build an e-commerce business over time.”<br/><br/>Greenfield’s point is that Songza offers a pretty compelling alternative to Pandora, and without audio commercials (at least so far.)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:03:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pandora Shares Down Sharply; Threatened By Songza?<br/><br/><br/>Is Pandora facing a serious new threat to its position in online music from Songza?<br/><br/>The online radio company’s shares are trading sharply lower Tuesday after BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield – who has been bearish on Pandora since the company went public (before, even) – today notes that “Pandora investors should be concerned” about a rapid surge in popularity of Songza, a curated music app offered on for iPad and iPhone. (There’s also a Web version.) He notes that the app which is currently the #1 overall free iPad app in popularity, and the #2 most popular free iPhone app. (We’re talking over all here, not just music apps.)<br/><br/>Greenfield notes that since Songza launched its iPad app on June 7, there have been 542,000 installs.<br/><br/>“Unlike Pandora and many of the other Internet music services that began life on the Web, Songza was engineered with a complete focus on the mobile/tablet environment,” he writes in a blog post. ”In many ways Songza’s simplicity and focus on mobile life, reminds us of what drove Instagram’s success, as consumer Web activity shifts far faster than expected from computers to mobile devices.”<br/><br/>Greenfield is especially keen on the Songza “concierge feature,” which “allows you to easily incorporate music into whatever your current activity is, without the need to build/start a playlist each time and then fine tune that playlist.” So you can choose from a variety of pre-set playlists, like “Singing in the Shower,” or “Working Out,” or “Morning Commute.”<br/><br/>“Songza is focused on simplicity as it is built for a mobile environment, so listening only takes a few clicks, rather than having to type in the name of an artist letter-by-letter to start a playlist,” he writes. “There are no audio ads and no full screen display/video ad takeovers, only  display ads which appear at the bottom of the screen, with the goal of leveraging its knowledge of your lifestyle and interests to build an e-commerce business over time.”<br/><br/>Greenfield’s point is that Songza offers a pretty compelling alternative to Pandora, and without audio commercials (at least so far.)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora Goes On The Offensive, Takes It To Traditional Radio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/615131/comments?source=feed#comment-6365631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6365631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Pandora provides internet radio services and has 70% share of the total U.S. internet radio industry. The company makes money via advertising and paid subscriptions on its website, mobile and other platforms while paying the content acquisition costs (royalties) to the music companies for user played radio content. The growth in 1Q2012 revenue was primarily offset by an increase in content acquisition costs.<br/><br/>Moreover, Pandora has been unable to monetize its large user base of 150 million, and the sustainability of its business model is questionable, given the historical financial performance. We expect the growth in earnings to decline further and recommend selling the stock. Risks to Pandora include a falling active user base, decrease in the number of listening hours, less spending by clients on advertising, and increasing content acquisition costs.<br/><br/>Pandora (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/p' title='Pandora Media'>P</a>) has been unable to monetize its large user base of 150 million. The sustainability of the business model is questionable given the historical financial performance. We expect the growth in earnings to halt and recommend a short position.<br/><br/>Author:<br/>Qineqt:Team of investment professionals including former hedge fund manager, trader and analyst at top tier $10 billion hedge fund. Members include investment professionals who oversaw research and trading organization of 50+. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:02:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pandora provides internet radio services and has 70% share of the total U.S. internet radio industry. The company makes money via advertising and paid subscriptions on its website, mobile and other platforms while paying the content acquisition costs (royalties) to the music companies for user played radio content. The growth in 1Q2012 revenue was primarily offset by an increase in content acquisition costs.<br/><br/>Moreover, Pandora has been unable to monetize its large user base of 150 million, and the sustainability of its business model is questionable, given the historical financial performance. We expect the growth in earnings to decline further and recommend selling the stock. Risks to Pandora include a falling active user base, decrease in the number of listening hours, less spending by clients on advertising, and increasing content acquisition costs.<br/><br/>Pandora (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/p' title='Pandora Media'>P</a>) has been unable to monetize its large user base of 150 million. The sustainability of the business model is questionable given the historical financial performance. We expect the growth in earnings to halt and recommend a short position.<br/><br/>Author:<br/>Qineqt:Team of investment professionals including former hedge fund manager, trader and analyst at top tier $10 billion hedge fund. Members include investment professionals who oversaw research and trading organization of 50+. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora Goes On The Offensive, Takes It To Traditional Radio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/615131/comments?source=feed#comment-6116361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6116361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Right now, Pandora appears to be paraphrasing the old business joke by &quot;losing money on every song, but making it up in volume.&quot; Yes, revenue grew 58% year-over-year in the most recent quarter; but content acquisition costs -- ie, royalties paid for streaming rights -- nearly doubled. As a result, on a non-GAAP basis, net loss more than tripled.<br/><br/>With the company's royalty costs fixed through 2015, a 79% growth in the company's sales force (according to the Q1 conference call), revenue growth from labor intensive local sales which is real joke and lower revenue per user coming from the so-called &quot;modest upward&quot; trend&quot; toward mobile usage, how Pandora will be profitable in the short term remains a mystery. Yet the company guided for breakeven performance through the final three quarters of fiscal 2013, a target that seems at first glance unlikely to be reached. Even Maxim Group's John Tinker, who has a &quot;Buy&quot; rating on the stock (and a $17 price target), noted after Q1 that &quot;a time lag between translation of growth in listener hours to ARPU may affect earnings in the near term.&quot; <br/><br/>Total listener hours grew by 93% year-over-year showing that revenue only grew roughly half as fast as usage. For this reason, content acquisition costs grew by $26.7M while revenue only grew by $29.7M. Not a good sign when a music station can barely outgrow content costs. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:42:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Right now, Pandora appears to be paraphrasing the old business joke by &quot;losing money on every song, but making it up in volume.&quot; Yes, revenue grew 58% year-over-year in the most recent quarter; but content acquisition costs -- ie, royalties paid for streaming rights -- nearly doubled. As a result, on a non-GAAP basis, net loss more than tripled.<br/><br/>With the company's royalty costs fixed through 2015, a 79% growth in the company's sales force (according to the Q1 conference call), revenue growth from labor intensive local sales which is real joke and lower revenue per user coming from the so-called &quot;modest upward&quot; trend&quot; toward mobile usage, how Pandora will be profitable in the short term remains a mystery. Yet the company guided for breakeven performance through the final three quarters of fiscal 2013, a target that seems at first glance unlikely to be reached. Even Maxim Group's John Tinker, who has a &quot;Buy&quot; rating on the stock (and a $17 price target), noted after Q1 that &quot;a time lag between translation of growth in listener hours to ARPU may affect earnings in the near term.&quot; <br/><br/>Total listener hours grew by 93% year-over-year showing that revenue only grew roughly half as fast as usage. For this reason, content acquisition costs grew by $26.7M while revenue only grew by $29.7M. Not a good sign when a music station can barely outgrow content costs. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora Goes On The Offensive, Takes It To Traditional Radio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/615131/comments?source=feed#comment-6116241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6116241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually I shorted P on $12.20 on May 24. I have my words here and put my money on my mouth. P will never touch 12 again in at least 2 years!!!<br/><br/>If any friend shorted P, I do not think you should worry about it. Please look its chart, perfect going down chart, newer high has been lower high,and newer low has been lower low.<br/><br/>Look 5 days chart, from averge $11,to $10.4, $10.20, then $10.<br/>I do not think it will hold $10. I belive it will go below last lowest $7.83, may see it under $5. <br/><br/><br/>I may just keep my P short position to next year to delay my profit tax for next year trading.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:21:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually I shorted P on $12.20 on May 24. I have my words here and put my money on my mouth. P will never touch 12 again in at least 2 years!!!<br/><br/>If any friend shorted P, I do not think you should worry about it. Please look its chart, perfect going down chart, newer high has been lower high,and newer low has been lower low.<br/><br/>Look 5 days chart, from averge $11,to $10.4, $10.20, then $10.<br/>I do not think it will hold $10. I belive it will go below last lowest $7.83, may see it under $5. <br/><br/><br/>I may just keep my P short position to next year to delay my profit tax for next year trading.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora Goes On The Offensive, Takes It To Traditional Radio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/615131/comments?source=feed#comment-6115761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6115761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Rocco:<br/><br/>Here is how growing mobile listening killing Pandora:<br/><br/>&quot;To date, we have not been able to generate revenue from our advertising products delivered to mobile devices as effectively as we have for our advertising products served on traditional computers.&quot;<br/><br/>-- From the &quot;Risk Factors&quot; section of the Pandora Media (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/p' title='Pandora Media'>P</a>) 10-K, filed March 19th<br/><br/>CEO Joe Kennedy noted on the Q1 conference call last week that mobile listening was now closer to roughly 70 percent.&quot;<br/><br/>Pandora generated 55% of its advertising revenue from mobile, yet saw 70% of its listening hours in the segment. As such, desktop users are nearly twice as valuable on a revenue basis as mobile users.<br/><br/>Pandora should see significant pressure as mobile-aided user growth is offset by lower, mobile-induced revenue per user. You should know Pandora has to pay mobile listening. When mobile listening hours is growing faster, however revenue from mobile per user is much worse than desktop users, which will make Pandora lose more money since content cost from usage is growing faster!!!!<br/><br/>perhaps the best summation of the company's problems came from CFO John Cakebread on the conference call. Giving guidance for fiscal year 2013, Cakebread noted [emphasis mine]:<br/><br/>For fiscal 2013 [we] expect negative cash flow from operations, resulting primarily from increased listener hours and resulting content spend.<br/><br/>So while analysts and commentators were celebrating the massive increase in listener hours, the company was pointing out that very same increase as the key driver for the reversal from (modestly) positive OCF in FY12 to negative OCF in fiscal 2013. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 02:18:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Rocco:<br/><br/>Here is how growing mobile listening killing Pandora:<br/><br/>&quot;To date, we have not been able to generate revenue from our advertising products delivered to mobile devices as effectively as we have for our advertising products served on traditional computers.&quot;<br/><br/>-- From the &quot;Risk Factors&quot; section of the Pandora Media (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/p' title='Pandora Media'>P</a>) 10-K, filed March 19th<br/><br/>CEO Joe Kennedy noted on the Q1 conference call last week that mobile listening was now closer to roughly 70 percent.&quot;<br/><br/>Pandora generated 55% of its advertising revenue from mobile, yet saw 70% of its listening hours in the segment. As such, desktop users are nearly twice as valuable on a revenue basis as mobile users.<br/><br/>Pandora should see significant pressure as mobile-aided user growth is offset by lower, mobile-induced revenue per user. You should know Pandora has to pay mobile listening. When mobile listening hours is growing faster, however revenue from mobile per user is much worse than desktop users, which will make Pandora lose more money since content cost from usage is growing faster!!!!<br/><br/>perhaps the best summation of the company's problems came from CFO John Cakebread on the conference call. Giving guidance for fiscal year 2013, Cakebread noted [emphasis mine]:<br/><br/>For fiscal 2013 [we] expect negative cash flow from operations, resulting primarily from increased listener hours and resulting content spend.<br/><br/>So while analysts and commentators were celebrating the massive increase in listener hours, the company was pointing out that very same increase as the key driver for the reversal from (modestly) positive OCF in FY12 to negative OCF in fiscal 2013. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
