Too Big to Fail, Or Too Dumb to Survive? [View article]
All we have to do is to compare the situation of the world's financial system before and after the bankruptcy of Lehman. And we will get an idea of the risks that these mammoth financial institutions pose to the economy. Are we ready to take the gamble and let them fail ? There is no going back once it's done.
Mark-to-Market Triggered This Recession; It Will Also Trigger the Recovery [View article]
I don't think we should discard mark-to-market altogether. But changing it so that it does not depend on the wild fluctuations of assets would be a good thing. One suggestion I saw on this site was the use of a 3 to 5 year moving average for the valuation of assets.
Too Late to Complain About Mark-to-Market [View article]
It's only in hindsight that we know for sure the full effect of a rule or regulation. With time any rule or regulation can be improved upon. This is not some kind of religious dogma that is permanent.
It is true that the movement of Citigroup should not affect the market. But we are dealing with mass psychology and not rational thinking based on mathematics.
The Wonders of Mark-to-Market: Simultaneously Well-Capitalized and Insolvent [View article]
When mark-to-market was making the balance sheet go up, everybody was fat and happy and giving one another big bonuses. But when it starts going in the other direction, then they ask for a change in the rules. That's the dilemma we are facing.
"I have no problem with subsidizing private capital formation, even with ceding much of the upside to entrepreneurial investors while taxpayers absorb much of the downside when things go wrong."
This kind of thinking is what created the whole mess in the first place. Have you ever heard of moral hazard ?
Financial Stocks: Playing the Mark-to-Market Suspension [View article]
The mark-to-market provision is turning the toxic assets into some kind of black hole where any new money will be absorbed. So, to really fix the banking crisis, the requirement has to be modified.
America's Banks: Are They Really Insolvent? [View article]
So, does that mean all we need to do is redefine insolvency and the banking crisis is over ? Just remove the mark-to-market requirement and the problem is gone.
Right now in the finance industry, I doubt there are many top managers who would sneer at a 500K salary. But in a few years, when the economy is running full speed, the salary cap will be blown away. At this point, I hope a new compensation structure that will favor more longterm objectives will be put in place.
Nothing can make the banking sector's losses go away. We can move them around, but we can't make them go away. If that's what the experts are looking for, well, the banking crisis is going to be with us for some time.
Too Big to Fail, Or Too Dumb to Survive? [View article]
Mark-to-Market Triggered This Recession; It Will Also Trigger the Recovery [View article]
Waiting for the Government to Act on Banks [View article]
Too Late to Complain About Mark-to-Market [View article]
Citigroup Questions [View article]
The Wonders of Mark-to-Market: Simultaneously Well-Capitalized and Insolvent [View article]
Rethinking Subsidized Finance [View article]
This kind of thinking is what created the whole mess in the first place. Have you ever heard of moral hazard ?
Death of the Big Bank Model [View article]
Bailouts Support Survival of the Weakest [View article]
Financial Stocks: Playing the Mark-to-Market Suspension [View article]
America's Banks: Are They Really Insolvent? [View article]
Preview from Europe: Inactive Obama Leads Indices Lower [View article]
Why Capping Pay Is Likely to Work [View article]
2008: Year of the Global Recession [View article]
Nationalizing Bank Losses [View article]