Will We Have a Good 2009? Not If History Is Any Guide [View article]
I agree. It's nice that the media (and government) woke up to the fact that we were in a recession--if a year late. What continues to be very troubling is the naive acceptance of the misappropriation of funds in TARP. We have acknowledged some of the crises, but still fail to provide more than a bandage solution to any of them.
Just yesterday, I heard another pundit prattling (I believe on Fox News) about how "nine times out of ten the market rises after a bad year" and that the "worst thing you could do is try to time the market and miss it". What they failed to mention was that the one time it was not up was during the Great Depression, and that going long after the first year, you would have lost something like 43% of your remaining money.
Another interesting point that everyone seems to be missing is that the Great Depression didn't happen overnight. While they label this just another measly recession and not a depression, the markets are down more in the first year of this "recession" (38%) than they were in the first year of the great depression (30%).
Yes, maybe down years following immediately after down years are a 1 in 10 rarity, but so far we are positioned more strongly that way than even we were during the beginning of the great depression!
It would be fantastic if what I'm saying turns out to be a false alarm. I just find it very reckless to ignore the danger.
I'm afraid that until there is more caution and some real solutions--hard choices made, that there is still room for the markets to fall.
-
I agree. It's nice that the media (and government) woke up to the fact that we were in a recession--if a year late. What continues to be very troubling is the naive acceptance of the misappropriation of funds in TARP. We have acknowledged some of the crises, but still fail to provide more than a bandage solution to any of them.
Jan 04 09:54 am
|Rating:
+4
0
All Comments by Against Aphobus »Will We Have a Good 2009? Not If History Is Any Guide [View article]
Just yesterday, I heard another pundit prattling (I believe on Fox News) about how "nine times out of ten the market rises after a bad year" and that the "worst thing you could do is try to time the market and miss it". What they failed to mention was that the one time it was not up was during the Great Depression, and that going long after the first year, you would have lost something like 43% of your remaining money.
Another interesting point that everyone seems to be missing is that the Great Depression didn't happen overnight. While they label this just another measly recession and not a depression, the markets are down more in the first year of this "recession" (38%) than they were in the first year of the great depression (30%).
Yes, maybe down years following immediately after down years are a 1 in 10 rarity, but so far we are positioned more strongly that way than even we were during the beginning of the great depression!
It would be fantastic if what I'm saying turns out to be a false alarm. I just find it very reckless to ignore the danger.
I'm afraid that until there is more caution and some real solutions--hard choices made, that there is still room for the markets to fall.