How Much Downside Could Still Exist? [View article]
I don't believe in raising the taxes on the top 10% of successful invertors-wage earners, to pay for the greed and corruption of the mortgage lenders, wall street brokers, and failing banks. If these people can't manage their buisnesses then they need to be allowed to fail. I've lost as much as the rest of you. I would like to salvage whats left to take advantage of the oppurtunity's that will present themselves in the future, not be taxed into oblivion! Not expand the welfare programs! The harder you work, the more risk you take, the more jobs you create, the more you should be rewarded. Not punished by taxation!
Honest alias? I don't insult people on here, I would appreciate the same respect in return! Thank you.
On Mar 03 10:12 AM Anandakos wrote:
> > @know nothing > > "What one person receives without working for, another person must > work for without receiving". > > Like for instance the income during retirement from the non-recipient's > Individual Retirement Account eviscerated by the mendacious actions > of the receiver? Was that what you were meaning? Because if not, > you're probably one of the thieves. > > P.S. You have an honest alias! Congratulations. > > On Mar 03 09:55 AM know nothing wrote:
-
I don't believe in raising the taxes on the top 10% of successful invertors-wage earners, to pay for the greed and corruption of the mortgage lenders, wall street brokers, and failing banks. If these people can't manage their buisnesses then they need to be allowed to fail. I've lost as much as the rest of you. I would like to salvage whats left to take advantage of the oppurtunity's that will present themselves in the future, not be taxed into oblivion! Not expand the welfare programs! The harder you work, the more risk you take, the more jobs you create, the more you should be rewarded. Not punished by taxation!
Mar 03 10:47 am
|Rating:
+7
-6
All Comments by know nothing »How Much Downside Could Still Exist? [View article]
Honest alias? I don't insult people on here, I would appreciate the same respect in return! Thank you.
On Mar 03 10:12 AM Anandakos wrote:
>
> @know nothing
>
> "What one person receives without working for, another person must
> work for without receiving".
>
> Like for instance the income during retirement from the non-recipient's
> Individual Retirement Account eviscerated by the mendacious actions
> of the receiver? Was that what you were meaning? Because if not,
> you're probably one of the thieves.
>
> P.S. You have an honest alias! Congratulations.
>
> On Mar 03 09:55 AM know nothing wrote: