Airlines: Some Costs They Can't - And Shouldn't - Cut [View article]
auto pilots are going to become the "right stuff" because only insane people are willing to do such a demanding job for so little; $25 grand for FO! USAF is moving to more UAVs so they have less $1million training bills ( 174th FW). disclosure: fly for fun, stay away from professional aviation.
Currently fashionable erroneous economic assumptions, Part IV: China [View instapost]
great article, i have heard that communism is only a label the west put on china. china's policies are based on being the most efficient: artificially low currency. keep unemployment down, etc. With labor laws in the US and none in china, and a low wage, do you still think china is a bad investment? I am a goldbug, but have been eyeing Macquarie and Rogers™ China Agriculture Index. what do you think of commodities in china?
The Great Awakening: Boomers, Your Crisis Has Arrived (Part 3 of 3) [View article]
regardless of boomers, war has always been a response to economic crisis's. obama has decided to escalate the troop level in Afghanistan. i agree the middle east is a power keg. to be practical...What do you (anyone) think of defense stocks? GE, boeing, raytheon, etc.?
Wary Americans Slowed Spending Long Before Economic Crisis [View article]
The federal government is sending each of us a $600 rebate. If we spend that money at Wal-Mart, the money goes to China. If we spend it on gasoline it goes to the Arabs. If we buy a computer/Software it will go to India. If we purchase fruit and vegetables it will go to Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala. If we purchase a good car it will go to Germany. If we purchase useless crap it will go to Taiwan and none of it will help the American economy. The only way to keep that money here at home is to spend it on prostitutes and beer, since these are the only products still produced in US. I've been doing my part .
Coming Soon: The $600 Trillion Derivatives Emergency Meeting [View article]
edgar filings shows JPM at 86 trillion and citi at 37 trillion as of last quarter. these are only two of many. read footnotes of Q and it is broken out by industry sector.
On Oct 23 03:35 PM novice12 wrote:
> Two questions: (1) Can someone make it absolutely plain why this > matters? I see the figures and acknowledge their size. However, > I have yet to see someone explain play by play for us newbie’s why > notional size matter in the case of derivatives. (2) How is it that > the notional amount can be so large? Is their overlap in what these > derivatives cover? Maybe these are basic questions but I am sure > some of you have had to answer this for yourselves at some point. > If the explanation is long please direct me to some literature on > the topic. Thx.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedAirlines: Some Costs They Can't - And Shouldn't - Cut [View article]
Currently fashionable erroneous economic assumptions, Part IV: China [View instapost]
Fed's Balance Sheet: Week of August 19, 2009 [View article]
where is your 9/27 article on gold manipulation?
Citi Unloads Phibro [View article]
Why Dollar Devaluation Won't Save Us [View article]
Why This Rally Will Continue [View article]
National Health Insurance, 'Cap and Trade': Two Steps in the Wrong Direction [View article]
The Great Bond Affair. [View instapost]
Natural Gas: The Next Big Thing [View article]
G-20 Summit: A New World Order? [View article]
www.globalresearch.ca/...
G20 Must Address the 'White Blue Eyed Bankers' Issue [View article]
www.globalresearch.ca/...
U.S. Economy: Spending and Phantom Financing Will Only Lead to Ruin [View article]
The Great Awakening: Boomers, Your Crisis Has Arrived (Part 3 of 3) [View article]
Wary Americans Slowed Spending Long Before Economic Crisis [View article]
Coming Soon: The $600 Trillion Derivatives Emergency Meeting [View article]
On Oct 23 03:35 PM novice12 wrote:
> Two questions: (1) Can someone make it absolutely plain why this
> matters? I see the figures and acknowledge their size. However,
> I have yet to see someone explain play by play for us newbie’s why
> notional size matter in the case of derivatives. (2) How is it that
> the notional amount can be so large? Is their overlap in what these
> derivatives cover? Maybe these are basic questions but I am sure
> some of you have had to answer this for yourselves at some point.
> If the explanation is long please direct me to some literature on
> the topic. Thx.