Seeking Alpha

Futurist's  Instablog

Send Message
I am a daily activist in the market. I hold a few great stocks for a long time and trade non great stocks daily. I believe one should only act in the market on information that they Know. Not what one Hopes will happen or what they Think will happen. This simple philosophy has saved me from... More
View Futurist's Instablogs on:
  • Risks Of Owning Axion- A Discussion

    An Outline of the Risk of Stock Ownership in Axion Power, International (OTCQB:AXPW)




    This article is written simply as a discussion tool for the owners of Axion stock. There has been an attack on Axion shareholders by a few disgruntled persons on the message board of

    It is fairly obvious that these disgruntled persons are indeed one or more of the original Mega C corporation that ended up owning a company that could not afford to pay the scientist for their knowledge or patents. Axion shareholders converse on the Axion Concentrator instablog of A few of these negative shareholders have tried to join in the conversation. Always being drummed out due to their negativity has drawn criticism that the Concentrator contributors never look at real world risk. I disagree with that theory. I believe most Axionistas ( as we call ourselves) are level headed investors that understand markets and risk. But, in order to formally discuss risk, as an Axion Shareholder I offer the following article for your perusal or comment. I do not expect that its submission will allow the previously banned negative posters to contribute as they are only prone to personal attack.

    1. Micro cap risk

      AXPW.ob is a publicly held stock that trades on the Over the Counter market. In 2003 the company was a privately held company that purchased the patent and full rights to a technology developed by a few Russian scientist. Their discovery was that if you replaced the negative lead electrode in a standard lead acid battery, with a negative electrode made of carbon, then the battery would act as a capacitor and a battery. It should give one the power of a lead acid battery and the quickness of accepting and releasing a charge normally reserved to a capacitor. Thus was born the PbC, " a multi-celled asymmetrically supercapacitive lead-acid-carbon hybrid battery.

    The team of entrepreneurs decided to try and commercially develop a way to make the negative electrode and sell them to current battery manufacturers. Thus manufacturers all around the world could order the electrodes and compete in selling the PbC battery. PbC is the trade name now used for the asymmetrical capacitor. Pb is the symbol for lead. C is the symbol for Carbon.

    In 2003 a group of original investors realized that it would take about 30 Million dollars to secure the patents, go public, and develop the PbC to commercialization. To do this they contacted an attorney named John Petersen, who specialized in small firm start -ups. He happen to control an SEC clean publicly owned shell corporation called Tamboril Cigar Company. The shell was purchased and the name changed to Axion Power International. John Petersen later was named Chairman of the Board of Directors. The history of the company is found in this article entitled Axion: Against all odds posted on the Axion Website

    ( I mention this for two reasons. First so everyone understands that Axion Power is a legitimate publicly traded stock company that has no relation to a Cigar company except that they took over a functioning shell corporation. Second that John Petersen was a respected attorney that earned the position of Chairman of the board and has no status or connection to the company now. Except as a significant shareholder. Much negative criticism has been received by Mr. Petersen due to his writing and support of Axion Power since his departure 4 years ago.

    As a matter of risk, small micro cap stocks are very risky. Axion initially had 30 Million to buy the needed patents ,set up a team of engineers and scientist, and develop their commercialized product. To date they have been woefully slow in achieving their goal. As of the end of the 2011 fiscal year Axion has spent $76 Million to develop the PbC. More than double what they planned. This is not unusual for microcap stocks. Often well laid plans take twice as long as necessary and cost more than twice as much as expected. Axion is still not breaking even on a cash flow basis. They are not expected to until the last quarter of 2013. The risk of not being able to meet funding needs is the largest risk of Axion. They have enough money today to continue their existence until the first quarter of 2013.

    1. Product acceptance:

    Axion's second largest risk is that of not developing a product the world wants. Making a better mousetrap does not guarantee success. A better mousetrap needs to compete effectively with the old mousetrap. If you go to a hardware store and go to the mousetrap isle you will find many types of traps.

    The old fashion wood base trap with a single hinged spring cost about $.50 and are very effective.

    Its a little messy for picking up and disposal. Cheapskates that want to reuse the trap have to ward off touching the dead mouse in the disposal process. As an aside ,one reason for the success of this product is the fact that people simply throw the mouse and all in the trash. After all its only $.50. A simple google search will show mousetraps of every other variety on sale from $3 each to $85 each.

    From the looks of it many companies have tried to build a better mousetrap. I'm sure some are better. But there is risk in simply not being able to beat the competitors price.


    Axion is competing with a standard lead acid battery that sells for around $65. An AGM battery sells for $125. It has been estimated that a PbC will sell for around $250. Now a PbC lasts five times longer than an LAB. It has never died, as far as published material can show, when discharging at a rate above full depth of discharge. It has several qualities that mimic the benefits of lithium batteries that would cost 3-5 times the cost of a PBC.

    So there is risk is that the product will not be accepted. This risk is now tempered because Norfolk Southern has accepted the product to install for testing in its hybrid locomotive program. The Navy has accepted the product for testing in its zero energy use building. BMW has been testing and not dismissing this product for its Start/stop systems for three years. Viridity energy and PJM have joined with Axion to be the first "behind the meter" battery storage product that actually can be used to sell electricity back to the utility. This provides cash flow to the owner and allows the utility to spend less money in capital expenditures.

    Each investor must establish whether the product is at risk of failure or non acceptance. This is simply a fact that has to be addressed. Some don't believe the product is a better mousetrap that will be accepted and some believe it is the best value mousetrap on the planet.

    4) Commercialization

    Axion"s initial plans were to build the negative electrode on a very fast robotic assembly line starting in 2009-2010. Excitement was everywhere because the ability to manufacture in quantity was soon to be here. But something went terribly wrong. The process of making a negative electrode out of carbon instead of lead proved difficult. So difficult that the first Gen 1 electrode assembly line was scrapped. A Gen 2 line was ordered and installed. This new line has been tweaked all through 2011. The CEO reports that it could now be duplicated and large numbers of products could be made. That's a nice thought but until you try to manufacture one million of anything, with low fault error, you simply don't know if it can be done, until you complete the task. Risk exists. According to the latest Conference Calls the risk is low. Yet, the risks exist.

    5) World wide political and economic risks.

    As with any company a world wide recession can have detrimental effects on Axion. Axion presently produces a majority of it's revenues from making old fashion lead acid batteries for another battery company. A meltdown could cost Axion 75% of its revenues. Likewise a European meltdown could stop BMW from progressing to implement an Axion solution. Governments could ease pollution restraints in response to an economic collapse. A better battery would not be needed because the economics could change. A driving force for the adoption of the PbC is its ability to save fuel for automotive, rail, housing, and renewable energy storage. All which are fueled by environmental concerns. Politics and economics are strange bedfellows. For now the world seems to believe in saving the environment and money by burning less oil. The PbC might help. But if political forces change, so could the fortunes Axion Power, Int.


    Each and every shareholder of a microcap company must identify the risks of the investment. When one looks at the disruptive technology that Axion has developed and compare that with the rest of the industry a conclusion can be drawn that the risks are in the shareholders favor.

    Disclosure: I am long OTCQB:AXPW.

    May 17 6:50 AM | Link | 65 Comments
  • Test Driving An Automatic Start/Stop Automobile- The Wave Of The Future

    I am not a car buff. In fact I don't even like to drive. It is very unusual for me to care about anything automotive. However, I have owned stock in Axion Power International(OTCQB:AXPW) since January, 2009. Axion makes a device called the PbC battery. Technically its not a battery but everyone refers to it as such. It is actually a battery/capacitor combination. Anyone interested can read about it at It appears that the PbC will be the best battery for start/stop systems. Therefore, my interest in something automotive.


    The point is that the learning about Axion Power and the PbC has taught me about the automatic start/stop systems being placed on automobiles today. It is estimated that 17 million of these systems will be sold each year in America by 2017. 30 million will be sold each year in Europe and America by that time. Since these systems require a different battery than the old 12 volt lead acid battery it is a very interesting investment thesis.

    Today I was invited to my local Kia dealership for a test drive of a Kia brand automobile with the new system. It was the 2013 Kia Rio. The first subcompact car under any nameplate to have a start/stop system. The system works like this:

    The start/stop system is completely automatic. When the key is turned and the engine starts the system is automatically on. The car is then put in motion. When the brake is applied and the car is completely stopped the engine turns off. No gasoline is wasted at idle. Nothing else changes. The air conditioner works. The radio works. the car simply does not use any gas when off. As soon as you release the brake pedal the engine starts. In every case the engine was started before I could get my foot over to the gas pedal. That is how a start/system works. It is called a micro hybrid by some writers but there is nothing hybrid about it. It is simply saving gas by not burning fuel at idle.


    One of the Salesmen at our local dealership, here in Florida, knows of my interest in the new Kia Rio w/ start/stop. Kia calls their system idle stop and go ( ISG). The first 2013 Kia Rio came in yesterday and we scheduled a drive for today. I was the first person to drive the vehicle except for the mechanic that prepped the car upon arrival. We jumped in and drove it over to the gas station since it had little fuel. On the way over we read the three pages of the manual devoted to the system. After fueling I left the gas pump and drove to the end of the driveway. The car stopped running when I stopped. When traffic cleared I released the brake and the engine quietly and immediately engaged allowing me to move into traffic. No shakes, shudders, or involuntary movements. Nothing dramatic. It operated as a normal car. The engine again stopped at the next stoplight. It was flat terrain ( all of Florida) so I took my foot off the brake for just a second. The engine started and we sat with the car at idle until the light turned green. I felt like I just wasted precious gas. All because I released the brake. We then drove the car several miles stopping often if possible.

    The system does not allow the car to shut off, if the battery is at a low state of charge. It will simply idle, just like your car. This happened several times during my drive and would happen often in congested city driving I'm sure. The funny thing is that after a few minutes of assuring yourself that the car will restart, you want it to stop using gas when your stopped.

    The one problem we experienced was the air conditioning. It is summer here already. It was 82 degrees by 10:00AM. We simply leave our car air conditioners to MAX AIR all year long. In that way the sealed up auto can cool down the quickest. We then turn the air down after the car cools off. With the air conditioner at MAX AIR the start/stop system quit working. With the fan speed set on #4 (highest) the system will not work. I set the air at the highest setting that was not MAX and put the fan at #3. The system worked fine.


    Kia adds the Economy Package ( idle stop and go) on the Rio for $400.

    One study has shown that most Americans will pay up to $300 for every mpg they can save when purchasing an automobile. Even with the stingy test the EPA uses to measure gas mileage this car is rated at saving 1 mpg. That is 3% savings in town and 2% savings on the highway. Which is funny because when I drive on the highway I rarely stop.


    The Kia Rio uses a single 12 volt 70Ah (20HR) AGM ( absorbed glass mat) battery. I read somewhere that the manufacturer is a South Korean battery company. The use of a single AGM battery in Europe the last couple of years has had problems. After the first several months of use, the batteries dynamic charge acceptance capabilities are severely diminished. This means that the start/stop systems quit shutting the car off. The car companies don't want to admit this and simply charge up the customers batteries in order to make their Start/stop systems work again. But that is not a fix. The batteries will never have the charge acceptance they need, ever again. The real solution is a better battery. Several solutions are trying to win favor with the auto companies right now.

    This link will take you to a white paper on Charge Acceptance Issues published by Axion Power after joint research with BMW was released in 2010.


    Neither I or anyone at the dealership had ever driven a start/stop automobile. Everyone wanted to know my impressions when I returned. My biggest impression was that the system was indeed seamless. No driving habits had to change. But I really did feel like I was saving gas. Saving gas money for me. Saving on imported oil and reducing emissions. But I didn't have to do anything to do it. Just drive normally. I was very impressed with the car and the start/stop system.

    They were not as happy with my knowledge of the battery issues customers in Europe have experienced with start/stop. But I assured them that this is the wave of the future and that Kia should be very proud of putting out such a fine subcompact with this feature. Since I just purchased a Kia Soul a month ago I was not in the market to buy a Rio. Now I find out that the 2013 Soul will also have this feature available. Rats.

    Disclosure: I am long OTCQB:AXPW.

    Tags: AXPW
    May 07 3:14 PM | Link | 35 Comments
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments

Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.