On Apr 21 12:47 PM CloroxCowboy wrote: >If you think you know any more about the future performance of the first stock than the second, you are mistaken.
You don't know that's why selling half is a false notion of being conservative. It only makes some sense after a long bull market move as a strategy for incrementally moving into cash on all your positions on your way to being in "all-cash" at the end. Or, conversely, as a tactic for moving from "all-cash" into fully invested at the beginning of a market move.
Perhaps stating the strategy in the inverse - scaling up by adding to a successfully working position - makes more sense.
I've tried this and always found I wind up with too many "half positions". Starting at the beginning of a bull market or market consolidation phase, and then scaling out of positions (and reinvesting those proceeds into other stocks) always leaves me with too many positions to track and herd.
Money (stock positions) are fungible. If I make 25% in a stock, I don't much care that I make the next 25% in the same stock or in 2 (after having sold half and reinvested).
As a matter of fact, selling half forces me to have to find a second stock that performs as well as the first. You know how what you have has (and may in the future) performed but don't really know how what you're getting into will perform.
Is the Bear Market Exhausting Itself? [View article]
What you described has long been known as On Balance Volume. Check out what I wrote back in November at around the October low in "Resurrecting OBV" at tinyurl.com/stockchart....
There's been much written about the value and "accuracy" of the 200-day moving average as a market timing tool in my blog (stockchartist.blogspot... - search the blog on the term) and elsewhere.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedThe Wisdom of Half Positions [View article]
On Apr 21 12:47 PM CloroxCowboy wrote:
>If you think you know any more about the future performance of the first stock than the second, you are mistaken.
You don't know that's why selling half is a false notion of being conservative. It only makes some sense after a long bull market move as a strategy for incrementally moving into cash on all your positions on your way to being in "all-cash" at the end. Or, conversely, as a tactic for moving from "all-cash" into fully invested at the beginning of a market move.
Perhaps stating the strategy in the inverse - scaling up by adding to a successfully working position - makes more sense.
The Wisdom of Half Positions [View article]
Money (stock positions) are fungible. If I make 25% in a stock, I don't much care that I make the next 25% in the same stock or in 2 (after having sold half and reinvested).
As a matter of fact, selling half forces me to have to find a second stock that performs as well as the first. You know how what you have has (and may in the future) performed but don't really know how what you're getting into will perform.
Emerging Markets Are Coming Back to Life [View article]
Is the Bear Market Exhausting Itself? [View article]
A Simple Method for Market Timing [View article]
80 Winning Stocks That Have Nothing to Do with Gold [View article]
URX
EYE
IWOV
IDEV
CYCL
Continuing My Technical Analysis Experiment of Stocks [View article]
Continuing My Technical Analysis Experiment of Stocks [View article]