SteadyOptions's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.com/user/354402/comments http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-18870661 18870661 http://bit.ly/wvVVoZ

The last article was on Jan.28. Do you need more confirmation?]]> Wed, 15 May 2013 17:58:14 -0400 http://bit.ly/wvVVoZ

The last article was on Jan.28. Do you need more confirmation?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18723171 18723171
With one long correction per year, you can expect to lose 50-60% on the VXX position. But rest of the time, you should be able to make 10-15% per month on average. Even with only 10% per month, you are WAY ahead. Even with 2 50% percent losses on the year, you still break even with 10% average gain per month. But with VXX on constant decline, you should be able to make more than 10% per month.]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 22:22:03 -0400
With one long correction per year, you can expect to lose 50-60% on the VXX position. But rest of the time, you should be able to make 10-15% per month on average. Even with only 10% per month, you are WAY ahead. Even with 2 50% percent losses on the year, you still break even with 10% average gain per month. But with VXX on constant decline, you should be able to make more than 10% per month.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18709491 18709491
One alternative would be to go long deep ITM put 2-3 month further and short the front month put with strike slightly lower than the current price.]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 10:48:35 -0400
One alternative would be to go long deep ITM put 2-3 month further and short the front month put with strike slightly lower than the current price.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18709361 18709361 Sat, 11 May 2013 10:43:50 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18702151 18702151
1. Short VXX with ITM put options, not the stock. In case of really large IV spike, the loss is limited.
2. Limit the position size of the VXX trade to no more than 10%.
3. Hedge the risk with few vega positive trades.]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 01:13:17 -0400
1. Short VXX with ITM put options, not the stock. In case of really large IV spike, the loss is limited.
2. Limit the position size of the VXX trade to no more than 10%.
3. Hedge the risk with few vega positive trades.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-18699991 18699991
Not sure if you are aware of the SA decision to discontinue the options category. This is the reason why we stopped writing articles. If you want to learn more about options, you are welcome to join the subscriptions services both I and Kevin have. Of course you should base your decision on your risk tolerance, the transparency of the service, the track record etc.

Do you really think that making 6k every week on 25k capital is realistic? That's 1,200% per year. If you think it is, then you have a LOT to learn, and you will be very disappointed when you really start trading.]]> Fri, 10 May 2013 23:24:44 -0400
Not sure if you are aware of the SA decision to discontinue the options category. This is the reason why we stopped writing articles. If you want to learn more about options, you are welcome to join the subscriptions services both I and Kevin have. Of course you should base your decision on your risk tolerance, the transparency of the service, the track record etc.

Do you really think that making 6k every week on 25k capital is realistic? That's 1,200% per year. If you think it is, then you have a LOT to learn, and you will be very disappointed when you really start trading.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/437451/comments?source=feed#comment-18655261 18655261 Thu, 09 May 2013 21:05:49 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/304428/comments?source=feed#comment-18299891 18299891 Wed, 01 May 2013 00:38:54 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/310703/comments?source=feed#comment-18218861 18218861
Look at my performance page - http://bit.ly/16Ur5qM.

Most of my losers were caused by holding for too long. Examples include TIF, WFM, RL, JPM etc.

My 5-7 timeframe is based on over 400 trades sample. If you can provide some examples where 14 days was a better timeframe, please do it.

btw, Augen himself agrees that the introduction of weeklies changed the game and the timeframes are now much shorter.]]> Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:03:55 -0400
Look at my performance page - http://bit.ly/16Ur5qM.

Most of my losers were caused by holding for too long. Examples include TIF, WFM, RL, JPM etc.

My 5-7 timeframe is based on over 400 trades sample. If you can provide some examples where 14 days was a better timeframe, please do it.

btw, Augen himself agrees that the introduction of weeklies changed the game and the timeframes are now much shorter.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/354402-steadyoptions/1776161-trading-earnings-a-tale-of-two-strategies?source=feed#comment-17939571 17939571
I especially would welcome any kind of statistics on your held through earnings trades. Like I mentioned, they can work great if the stock cooperates, the question is how you deal with occasional catastrophic losses and adjust your position sizing.]]> Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:42:33 -0400
I especially would welcome any kind of statistics on your held through earnings trades. Like I mentioned, they can work great if the stock cooperates, the question is how you deal with occasional catastrophic losses and adjust your position sizing.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1153001/comments?source=feed#comment-17868821 17868821 Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:16:15 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-17861101 17861101
So let me repeat what I replied to you Kevin:

I commented on all your claims, but did not see any response from you. Once again, I NEVER said that your daily strategy doesn't work. Please show me one place when I said it does not work. I NEVER said that I know the strategy - the opposite is true, I said on several occasions that I have no idea about it. What I did say and continue saying is that no person and no strategy can make 24% per week week after week as you claim.

You mentioned that you "made a ton this week on CMG, INTC, JNJ, SNDK." I have no idea how much did you made on the trades you mentioned - unlike me, your website doesn't have a track record documenting all your trades. I do know that you lost 90% on IBM - that alone requires three 30% winners just to break even. Would you mind posting full results of your trades this past week?

On a separate note, you claimed that I'm going after quantity not quality of trades. I find it highly ironic coming from a guy who already placed over 10 trades since inception of his website just over a week ago while I have 20 trades per month on average. I also find it ironic that you mentioned several times that my trades are commissions consuming, while in some of yours (like INTC) commissions are 15% of the trade value.

Once again, I challenge you to post your trading results from the past week in order to prove that you can do much better than 5% per trade. Those should include the entry/exit dates and prices.

Lets for a change have a civilized and well argumented discussion and not personal attacks.]]> Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:11:48 -0400
So let me repeat what I replied to you Kevin:

I commented on all your claims, but did not see any response from you. Once again, I NEVER said that your daily strategy doesn't work. Please show me one place when I said it does not work. I NEVER said that I know the strategy - the opposite is true, I said on several occasions that I have no idea about it. What I did say and continue saying is that no person and no strategy can make 24% per week week after week as you claim.

You mentioned that you "made a ton this week on CMG, INTC, JNJ, SNDK." I have no idea how much did you made on the trades you mentioned - unlike me, your website doesn't have a track record documenting all your trades. I do know that you lost 90% on IBM - that alone requires three 30% winners just to break even. Would you mind posting full results of your trades this past week?

On a separate note, you claimed that I'm going after quantity not quality of trades. I find it highly ironic coming from a guy who already placed over 10 trades since inception of his website just over a week ago while I have 20 trades per month on average. I also find it ironic that you mentioned several times that my trades are commissions consuming, while in some of yours (like INTC) commissions are 15% of the trade value.

Once again, I challenge you to post your trading results from the past week in order to prove that you can do much better than 5% per trade. Those should include the entry/exit dates and prices.

Lets for a change have a civilized and well argumented discussion and not personal attacks.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17851371 17851371 Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:47:30 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17830651 17830651
By the way, as expected, his trades are hit or miss - few very nice winners but also some catastrophic losers.]]> Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:11:24 -0400
By the way, as expected, his trades are hit or miss - few very nice winners but also some catastrophic losers.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/382671/comments?source=feed#comment-17761441 17761441
Using AAPL as an example, you can do the June 350/360/440/450 IC (10% OTM) for 4.50 credit, which is 81% potential gain. Going 20% OTM (310/320/480/490) will give you 1.55 credit which is still almost 19% potential gain.

btw, for IBM I see a credit of 1.16 for July IC using your strikes (185/190/230/235) which is 30% gain.]]> Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:49:22 -0400
Using AAPL as an example, you can do the June 350/360/440/450 IC (10% OTM) for 4.50 credit, which is 81% potential gain. Going 20% OTM (310/320/480/490) will give you 1.55 credit which is still almost 19% potential gain.

btw, for IBM I see a credit of 1.16 for July IC using your strikes (185/190/230/235) which is 30% gain.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17733301 17733301
You see, even his famous GOOG trade was not a bad trade. It would make money in 80% of the cycles. The problem is that when it loses money, it can lose badly, and this disclaimer was exactly what was missing.

I didn't see anywhere on his site a track record - did you?]]> Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:07:33 -0400
You see, even his famous GOOG trade was not a bad trade. It would make money in 80% of the cycles. The problem is that when it loses money, it can lose badly, and this disclaimer was exactly what was missing.

I didn't see anywhere on his site a track record - did you?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17714771 17714771 Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:35:57 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-17714411 17714411 Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:19:45 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-17622441 17622441
When Kevin wrote back in September " I will write an article on Kim Klaiman's/Steady Options trading approach and why it doesn't work as advertised.", I hoped for some kind of real discussion poking holes in my strategy. Unlike Kevin who wrote "I know everything that anyone can possibly know about options", I'm still learning. I will be learning as long as I breathe. So I really wanted to learn something new - maybe after all, my returns are just a fluke? Instead, I got a bunch of personal attacks which have nothing to do with my trading approach.

No system will work all the time. Nobody is able to produce profits week after week month after month. This is why Kevin's claims are so ridiculous. He keeps repeating that I misquote him, but it was him claiming a while ago that he hasn't had a losing trade in almost a year. Does he really expect anyone to believe that?

I hope to find some time and write a blog about my approach and how it compares to Kevin's. I'm not holding my breath to get any serious response from Kevin, but maybe he will surprise us.]]> Sun, 14 Apr 2013 23:55:57 -0400
When Kevin wrote back in September " I will write an article on Kim Klaiman's/Steady Options trading approach and why it doesn't work as advertised.", I hoped for some kind of real discussion poking holes in my strategy. Unlike Kevin who wrote "I know everything that anyone can possibly know about options", I'm still learning. I will be learning as long as I breathe. So I really wanted to learn something new - maybe after all, my returns are just a fluke? Instead, I got a bunch of personal attacks which have nothing to do with my trading approach.

No system will work all the time. Nobody is able to produce profits week after week month after month. This is why Kevin's claims are so ridiculous. He keeps repeating that I misquote him, but it was him claiming a while ago that he hasn't had a losing trade in almost a year. Does he really expect anyone to believe that?

I hope to find some time and write a blog about my approach and how it compares to Kevin's. I'm not holding my breath to get any serious response from Kevin, but maybe he will surprise us.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/317818/comments?source=feed#comment-17621921 17621921 Sun, 14 Apr 2013 23:46:25 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-17582141 17582141
"You are a very, very sick man. The medicine is not working."
"If I didn't know who this little guy was from the start, I would have mistaken him for Eddie Munster. Uncanny resemblance."
"This is what I like to call "class"... Klaiman, u chump. You asked for it."
"You must be kidding, you are a joke. I assume you know when I entered and when I exited or plan to exit? Also, can you tell me what will happen in 2015? What a goof."
"Seriously, you have some problems.. genius."

I'm sure I can find many more, but you get the idea..

And here are some of the emails I got from Kevin:
"So you want to play ball with me? Ok. No problem. Know who you are talking to first, which you obviously haven't done."
"You have some serious balls. You are a fraud. I know it"]]> Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:57:45 -0400
"You are a very, very sick man. The medicine is not working."
"If I didn't know who this little guy was from the start, I would have mistaken him for Eddie Munster. Uncanny resemblance."
"This is what I like to call "class"... Klaiman, u chump. You asked for it."
"You must be kidding, you are a joke. I assume you know when I entered and when I exited or plan to exit? Also, can you tell me what will happen in 2015? What a goof."
"Seriously, you have some problems.. genius."

I'm sure I can find many more, but you get the idea..

And here are some of the emails I got from Kevin:
"So you want to play ball with me? Ok. No problem. Know who you are talking to first, which you obviously haven't done."
"You have some serious balls. You are a fraud. I know it"]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-17581601 17581601
1. I was asked stop commenting on Kevin's articles by Kevin, not by SA editor - and I respected his request till he started mentioning me in his comments.

2. " CWelsh is not just another user who commented."
It is funny you are even mentioning CWelsh - he has exactly 6 comments on single article of yours back in April 2012.

3. " As I mentioned, Klaiman had a motive."
Most of our correspondence happened in November 2011. This was even before I had my website, so not sure what motive you are talking about.

4. "The Google (GOOG) trade you mentioned, I had around a 20% loss on that one. That's quite good in comparison to some of your trades, like a strangle on Decker's (http://bit.ly/HmiFjk)."
I guess we will never know how much did you lose on this trade since you never posted any updates how to manage it. However, if you read some of the comments on this article http://bit.ly/SrNfez you will see that most of your readers have lost over 80%. I have emails from some of your readers who have lost TENS of thousands of dollars on this trade. And by the way, my DECK trade has lost 7% .

5. "Klaiman would continually swipe my articles."
Do you have any examples? I actually have some opposite examples:
http://bit.ly/156fuqe
http://bit.ly/114DncP
Both are about FDX, same trade, mine published on Dec. 7, 2011, yours on Dec. 8, 2011.

6. "A 5% ROI? Really. And that's supposed to be good?"
Actually, SteadyOptions ROI was 152% in 2012 and 34% YTD 2013 - http://bit.ly/16Ur5qM. Full track record based on real trades, with every single trade fully documented. Where is yours Kevin? Please show us one single trade that you did in real time Kevin. Or is it all "HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED"?]]> Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:34:55 -0400
1. I was asked stop commenting on Kevin's articles by Kevin, not by SA editor - and I respected his request till he started mentioning me in his comments.

2. " CWelsh is not just another user who commented."
It is funny you are even mentioning CWelsh - he has exactly 6 comments on single article of yours back in April 2012.

3. " As I mentioned, Klaiman had a motive."
Most of our correspondence happened in November 2011. This was even before I had my website, so not sure what motive you are talking about.

4. "The Google (GOOG) trade you mentioned, I had around a 20% loss on that one. That's quite good in comparison to some of your trades, like a strangle on Decker's (http://bit.ly/HmiFjk)."
I guess we will never know how much did you lose on this trade since you never posted any updates how to manage it. However, if you read some of the comments on this article http://bit.ly/SrNfez you will see that most of your readers have lost over 80%. I have emails from some of your readers who have lost TENS of thousands of dollars on this trade. And by the way, my DECK trade has lost 7% .

5. "Klaiman would continually swipe my articles."
Do you have any examples? I actually have some opposite examples:
http://bit.ly/156fuqe
http://bit.ly/114DncP
Both are about FDX, same trade, mine published on Dec. 7, 2011, yours on Dec. 8, 2011.

6. "A 5% ROI? Really. And that's supposed to be good?"
Actually, SteadyOptions ROI was 152% in 2012 and 34% YTD 2013 - http://bit.ly/16Ur5qM. Full track record based on real trades, with every single trade fully documented. Where is yours Kevin? Please show us one single trade that you did in real time Kevin. Or is it all "HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED"?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1750181-a-story-worth-mentioning?source=feed#comment-17581521 17581521
So lets start with some background.

Both me and Kevin are implementing a strategy of buying a straddle/strangle or reverse iron condor few days before earnings. The main difference is that I sell before earnings and Kevin holds through earnings. Let me be very clear: both strategies can work. The main difference is the risk/reward and the predictability. With my strategy (which is based on Jeff Augen books) you get smaller gains and smaller losses, and the returns are very predictable. When you hold through earnings, the results are unpredictable. You can hit some big winners, but if the stock doesn't move enough, the losses can be very substantial. This is something that Kevin "forgets" to mention in his articles.

Jeff Augen, a successful options trader and author of six books, agrees:
“There are many examples of extraordinary large earnings-related price spikes that are not reflected in pre-announcement prices. Unfortunately, there is no reliable method for predicting such an event. The opposite case is much more common – pre-earnings option prices tend to exaggerate the risk by anticipating the largest possible spike.”

It is just natural that when I first read Kevin's articles, I started comparing the results and ask questions. Some of Kevin's trades worked, most did not. For the trades that did not work, his standard answer was "you don't know when I bought and when I sold".

Unlike my trades - all documented - Kevin did not list one single trade in real time (including dates and prices) since he is on SA. Have you ever wondered why?

This is a disclaimer from Kevin's brand new website:
" HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT."

Do you even trade Kevin? Or it's all " HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED, WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT"? Maybe this is the reason why you haven't posted a single live real time trade?

More later..]]> Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:29:23 -0400
So lets start with some background.

Both me and Kevin are implementing a strategy of buying a straddle/strangle or reverse iron condor few days before earnings. The main difference is that I sell before earnings and Kevin holds through earnings. Let me be very clear: both strategies can work. The main difference is the risk/reward and the predictability. With my strategy (which is based on Jeff Augen books) you get smaller gains and smaller losses, and the returns are very predictable. When you hold through earnings, the results are unpredictable. You can hit some big winners, but if the stock doesn't move enough, the losses can be very substantial. This is something that Kevin "forgets" to mention in his articles.

Jeff Augen, a successful options trader and author of six books, agrees:
“There are many examples of extraordinary large earnings-related price spikes that are not reflected in pre-announcement prices. Unfortunately, there is no reliable method for predicting such an event. The opposite case is much more common – pre-earnings option prices tend to exaggerate the risk by anticipating the largest possible spike.”

It is just natural that when I first read Kevin's articles, I started comparing the results and ask questions. Some of Kevin's trades worked, most did not. For the trades that did not work, his standard answer was "you don't know when I bought and when I sold".

Unlike my trades - all documented - Kevin did not list one single trade in real time (including dates and prices) since he is on SA. Have you ever wondered why?

This is a disclaimer from Kevin's brand new website:
" HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT."

Do you even trade Kevin? Or it's all " HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED, WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT"? Maybe this is the reason why you haven't posted a single live real time trade?

More later..]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17566051 17566051 Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:23:22 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17477791 17477791 Kim Klaiman is my real name.
SteadyOptions is the name of my subscription service.

It is really not complicated, just try to concentrate.

Looking forward for the article. You didn't mention which Saturday and which year.

P.S. posting trades next day proves NOTHING. The only way is posting entry and exit in real time. I can always find dozens of trades which would work perfectly in hindsight. ]]> Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:42:18 -0400 Kim Klaiman is my real name.
SteadyOptions is the name of my subscription service.

It is really not complicated, just try to concentrate.

Looking forward for the article. You didn't mention which Saturday and which year.

P.S. posting trades next day proves NOTHING. The only way is posting entry and exit in real time. I can always find dozens of trades which would work perfectly in hindsight. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17473271 17473271 http://seekingalpha.co.... However, this was a year ago and this was the only time he posted anything on Kevin's articles, but apparently Kevin still remembers him.. good memory I must say. I'm pretty sure Welsh doesn't even remember who is Kevin.. But Welsh is an attorney and I'm sure he will know how to handle this issue.]]> Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:58:08 -0400 http://seekingalpha.co.... However, this was a year ago and this was the only time he posted anything on Kevin's articles, but apparently Kevin still remembers him.. good memory I must say. I'm pretty sure Welsh doesn't even remember who is Kevin.. But Welsh is an attorney and I'm sure he will know how to handle this issue.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1741061-website-is-officially-up-and-running-www-kevinmobrien-com?source=feed#comment-17472571 17472571
"You, my friend, have been treading on some very serious territory lately. While I know you are a complete sham, I have for the most part kept that to myself. Now it is personal. I know you have your "pals" posting all the time. Here's the kicker: it comes back to your IP address? I am filing a lawsuit against you, Welsh, and everyone who has orchestrated it. Try me. You must think I'm find this funny? Do you think I'm kidding? No, it is beyond that."

What a miserable joke.. Welsh I think didn't visit SA for months.. "orchestrated it"? I think that this is really paranoid.

On a separate note, I would be very careful to pay $159 per month to someone with absolutely no track record, but that's just me..]]> Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:30:07 -0400
"You, my friend, have been treading on some very serious territory lately. While I know you are a complete sham, I have for the most part kept that to myself. Now it is personal. I know you have your "pals" posting all the time. Here's the kicker: it comes back to your IP address? I am filing a lawsuit against you, Welsh, and everyone who has orchestrated it. Try me. You must think I'm find this funny? Do you think I'm kidding? No, it is beyond that."

What a miserable joke.. Welsh I think didn't visit SA for months.. "orchestrated it"? I think that this is really paranoid.

On a separate note, I would be very careful to pay $159 per month to someone with absolutely no track record, but that's just me..]]> http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1682191-new-book-published-on-amazon-com?source=feed#comment-17421851 17421851 http://amzn.to/11Qdz6j]]> Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:01:11 -0400 http://amzn.to/11Qdz6j]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1325451/comments?source=feed#comment-17341161 17341161 Mon, 08 Apr 2013 03:22:06 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/974046-kevin-m-o-brien/1648141-3-stocks-worth-buying-puts-on-in-an-overbought-market?source=feed#comment-17314421 17314421
Every single quote that I gave was taken from your article or comment.

And there are still questions waiting for your response. And there will be much more in my review of your book on Amazon. But I highly doubt we will get real answers. ]]> Sun, 07 Apr 2013 03:02:50 -0400
Every single quote that I gave was taken from your article or comment.

And there are still questions waiting for your response. And there will be much more in my review of your book on Amazon. But I highly doubt we will get real answers. ]]>