Full index of posts »
Latest Comments
-
robert.b.ferguson on Hindenburg Omen - November 13, 2012 Nothing like a disjointed withdrawal from a tac...
-
doubleguns on Hindenburg Omen - November 13, 2012 learn to can and build a garden and/or greenhouse.
-
Albertarocks on Hindenburg Omen - November 13, 2012 Literally. And food. People should definitely b...
-
H. T. Love on Hindenburg Omen - November 13, 2012 AR: There's concerns down here too about "...
-
doubleguns on Hindenburg Omen - November 13, 2012 Time to invest in lanterns, rope and pitchforks.
Most Commented
- Hindenburg Omen - October 8, 2012 (168 Comments)
- Hindenburg Omen Blog - December, 2011 - The HO Is Repaired (164 Comments)
- Hindenburg Omen Blog - Heading Into The New Year (139 Comments)
- Hindenburg Omen Blog - April 24, 2012 (127 Comments)
- April Hindenburg Omen Blog (119 Comments)
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
















View Albertarocks' Instablogs on:
Hindenburg Omen - November 13, 2012
This is the continuation of a discussion on the Hindenburg Omen which was originated by our friend John Lounsbury over 3 years ago. The preceding chapter in this series can be read here. For further reference or to read about actual Hindenburg events we have covered including the near misses which occurred in the "week before" and the "day of" the flash crash, the entire series began with John's original post found here.
In the chart below we see the latest picture of what the NYSE is doing as well as a very easy-to-follow method of monitoring whether or not the Hindenburg Omen is obeying one of its most important rules, that being whether or not its 50 day moving average is rising. As you can see, as of the close on November 13, 2013 that moving average is on the verge of heading south. In fact, unless the NYSE puts on a spectacular rally over the next 10 days the HO is about to go off line. And of course if that happens the HO as an indicator can no longer issue a signal. But we will continue to monitor the new highs and new lows anyway since they still provide a great view into the market internals and can help identify when the market is highly polarized with an unusually high number of new lows being achieved at the same time as an unusually low number of new highs.
As a brief summary of recent activity, we can just state that the HO has really been humming for the past couple of weeks, particularly the past 5 days or so. We've had what should probably be considered as a series of "near misses", the closest one having occurred on Monday, Nov. 12th. On that day had the NYSE been able to register just 9 more new 52 week highs the HO would have issued its first signal since it last went off in August of 2010. As I told the readers back then, even though the Hindenburg Omen hadn't officially gone off, the message was still abundantly clear... the market is at a degree of polarity not seen very often (meaning that while the steady heavy horses were still trying to pull the stock wagon up the hill, nearly as many were on the other end trying to pull it downhill). And as one could easily imagine, those that are trying to pull a wagon 'downhill' are likely to be the winners. And when one of those heavy horses named APPLE (pictured below) is pulling 'downhill', guess which way the market is going to go.
.........
Nevertheless, all this scary activity doesn't mean that a rip-snorting rally can't still occur. It certainly can and don't be surprised if it does. In fact, I personally expect some upside action at any time now... at least a bounce. But that's all we should be expecting... A BOUNCE. That's the message from the HO... to be long at this stage in time is a very dangerous proposition.
So we continue to monitor the situation. As always, comments are welcome.
Hindenburg Omen - October 8, 2012
This is the continuation of a discussion on the Hindenburg Omen which was originated by our friend John Lounsbury 3 years ago. Again, we offer a great big "thank you" to John for having maintained this series of instas for over a year and a half... until I finally learned how to create an insta by myself and take this endeavor off his hands. I'm beginning to wonder if this might be the longest running series of instas on Seeking Alpha. Not that that matters of course but I don't think John nor I realized what a monster he'd started a full 3 years ago. Imagine that!
In any case, the preceding blog can be read here. For further reference, or to read about actual Hindenburg events we have covered including the near misses which occurred in the "week before" and the "day of" the flash crash, the entire series began with John's original post found here.
At this point I'd like to acknowledge that I'm aware of reports by a few very prominent writers that the HO had issued a signal or two back in July. It did not! One of those highly skilled technical analysts is Mr. Arthur Hill who also writes for StockCharts. At that time he had published on StochCharts an article in which he issued a statement that the Hindenburg Omen had triggered. And of course with the stellar reputation Mr Hill has earned [not tomention the stellar reputation of Stochcharts], few questioned him. Except myself of course... because I was aware that he was using rules that had been changed at least two years previous.
He had also reported back in December of 2010 that the HO had
triggered and he was mistaken at that time as well. I'm pleased to report that Mr. Hill has finally become aware of the rule changes that were put into effect by the creator of the Omen, Mr. Jim Meikka. As a result, the article he'd written for StockCharts in July has been amended and/or replaced with this article which is now correct. Note the new word in its title... "ALMOST". Please understand that in no way am I disparaging the fine work of Mr. Hill. His solid reputation and broad skills at technical analysis speak for themselves. It's just one of those things where the changes instituted by Mr. Meikka were not broadcast to the world. I myself was unaware of these changes for a brief period of time.
========Click here for a live and updating blimp image.=========
.
In the chart below we see the latest picture of what the NYSE is doing as well as a very easy-to-follow method of monitoring whether or not the Hindenburg Omen is obeying one of its most important rules, that being whether or not its 50 day moving average is rising. As you can see, that moving average turned higher in late July and has been pointing solidly higher every since. As long as the price of the NYSE is above the horizontal orange line thown on the chart below the HO is on-line:
(click to enlarge)
Click here for a live and updating version which I try to keep updated each day.
Obviously it's been very quiet in here in recent weeks, a reflection of the fact that there has been very little to report about on the HO front. The numbers of new 52 week highs has been rising normally throughout the rally that began in June. But as we enter the final quarter of the year the number of new highs once again begins to fail badly and enters the realm where the HO begins to take notice. In the chart below, we smooth out the statistics a little bit by focusing on the white 7 day moving average of new highs. We only do that for a better 'visual' of what's happening with the new highs but that white moving average line has nothing to do with the inner workings of the Hindenburg Omen itself:
(click to enlarge)
[Click here for a version which updates each day shortly after the market closes.]
.
Really, there nothing overly ominous with the chart above other than the fact that the numbers of new highs has begun to deteriorate markedly since the mid September high and now resides right in the HO's danger zone.
The question staring all of us in the face today is whether or not the
correction has run its course and we head higher from here. With the presidential election only 4 weeks away one would have to think that a market collapse from here would be highly unlikely. The chart above, as well as many other charts pertaining to market internals could indeed support the notion of higher prices but since that's not the purpose of the Hindenburg Omen indicator, we won't try to answer that question in this particular room. Besides, ever since Goldman Sachs purchased the rights to "logic" and has banned it's use, nobody knows where the markets are headed. Nobody but god that is and he's not telling... he's too busy at the helm of the FED, carefully guiding the good ship Earth into the iceberg that lies dead ahead. And of course, as was the case for the Titanic, I fear that the "rudder hard-a-port" command is going to arrive way too late.
Hindenburg Omen Blog - April 24, 2012
This is the continuation of a discussion on the Hindenburg Omen which was originated by our friend John Lounsbury over 2 and a half years ago. Again, we offer a great big "thank you" to John for having maintained this series of instas for over a year and a half, until I finally learned how to create one by myself and take this endeavor off his hands.
The preceding blog can be read here. For further reference, or to read about actual Hindenburg events we have covered including the near misses which occurred in the "week before" and the "day of" the flash crash, the entire series began with John's original post which can be found here.
First of all, I offer my sincere apologies to readers for having accidentally reverted the last insta on the HO topic back to 'draft' form. I didn't realize I had done that. However, I 'do' remember having come into the editing room to update the chart. SA had made a few changes to the editor, changes which I'm not particularly enamoured with, and since I no longer write articles nor instas on SA, when I ventured in here I wasn't quite as familiar with the surroundings as I had been originally. Bottom line... I didn't notice the final "publish" button way, way down at the bottom of the page. I didn't click it. Needless to say I'd prefer not to think I'm an idiot, but when the evidence for that conclusion builds it's time to sit yourself down and give it some thought.
(click to enlarge)
[My friends were saying the link to the last insta quit working. I need to think a few things over.]
.
In any case, thanks to the notification from FPA and the persistence and patience of our friend K202 we were able to get the previous insta back on line. Special thanks to those two fellas... Mark for his "staying on the case" and FPA for having gone to the trouble to contact SA to find out what the problem was. Thanks guys :-)
==============
Here's the latest 'picture' of what the NYSE is doing and showing where the HO stands from the perspective of whether or not it's obeying the rule that its 50 day moving average must be rising. As you can see, that moving average turned lower last week and the NYSE is struggling mightily to get back above its price of 50 days ago (orange line):
.
Obviously it's been very quiet in here in recent weeks, a reflection of the fact that there has been very little to report about on the HO front. The numbers of new 52 week highs had been rising normally throughout the early stages of the rise off the November low. But as we got into the first week of February the average number of new highs began to decline markedly. In the chart below, we smooth out the statistics a little bit by focusing on the white 7 day moving average of new highs:
.
Really, there nothing overly ominous with the chart above other than the fact that the numbers of new highs had begun to deteriorate markedly in early February even as the markets chugged ever higher. Obviously that divergence had to lead to 'something', either an improvement in the market internals where more stocks suddenly started to turn higher - OR - a correction in equities. Normally it would be the latter and that's indeed what occurred this time as well.
.
The question staring all of us in the face today is whether or not the
correction has run its course and we head higher from here. The chart above, as well as many other charts pertaining to market internals could indeed support the notion of higher prices from here. But since that's not the purpose of the Hindenburg Omen indicator, we won't try to answer that question in this particular room. Besides, ever since Goldman Sachs purchased the rights to "logic" and has banned it's use, nobody knows where the markets are headed. Nobody but god that is and he's not telling... he's too busy at the helm of the FED, carefully guiding the good ship Earth into the iceberg that lies dead ahead. And of course, as was the case for the Titanic, I fear that the "rudder hard-a-port" command is going to arrive way too late.