<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>The GeoTeam's Comments</title>
    <description>The GeoTeam's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/360252/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Cloud Star Technicals Breaking Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1384321/comments?source=feed#comment-18291181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18291181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ivwingfan, as long you are aware of the game you can make money on both sides of a PD. Two more stocks we track just pumped above $1, WSGP and TALK]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:19:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ivwingfan, as long you are aware of the game you can make money on both sides of a PD. Two more stocks we track just pumped above $1, WSGP and TALK]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Site Visit To Cleantech Solutions Reveals A Busy And Robustly Growing Operation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1069121/comments?source=feed#comment-18128561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18128561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Please see our update/commentary. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ZpgJO4'>http://bit.ly/ZpgJO4</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:10:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Please see our update/commentary. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ZpgJO4'>http://bit.ly/ZpgJO4</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ExactTarget And E2open: 2 Intriguing SaaS Plays</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1113301/comments?source=feed#comment-17733721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17733721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Although we sold our E2 Open (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eopn' title='E2open'>EOPN</a>) position on 4/3/2013, the stock slightly missed on its fourth quarter numbers for fiscal 2013.  The company has offered first quarter fiscal 2014 guidance that is significantly less than analyst estimates. It has attributed this to operational changes which the company expects to benefit from in the second half of fiscal 2014.  Our Premium Members may recall that we sold EOPN due to the risk that we saw from being long SaaS companies in the current volatile market.  We will revisit in the future.  The stock is down sharply in early trading.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:14:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Although we sold our E2 Open (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eopn' title='E2open'>EOPN</a>) position on 4/3/2013, the stock slightly missed on its fourth quarter numbers for fiscal 2013.  The company has offered first quarter fiscal 2014 guidance that is significantly less than analyst estimates. It has attributed this to operational changes which the company expects to benefit from in the second half of fiscal 2014.  Our Premium Members may recall that we sold EOPN due to the risk that we saw from being long SaaS companies in the current volatile market.  We will revisit in the future.  The stock is down sharply in early trading.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Site Visit To Cleantech Solutions Reveals A Busy And Robustly Growing Operation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1069121/comments?source=feed#comment-17536491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17536491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[strong today after Q4/full yr earnings. $CLNT]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:39:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[strong today after Q4/full yr earnings. $CLNT]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: No Longer A One Project Story</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314041/comments?source=feed#comment-17248641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17248641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[MG. GV's revenues are typically a multiple of year end backlog. Last two years (6.2 and 4.3X). If they replicate these multiples the company can report revenues of $100 million plus, when combined with remaining CREZ revenues. Regarding employees, we failed to mention that GV has significantly increased its headcount as margins have improved. This is a good sign. Regarding replacing CREZ, management did not say  &quot;sufficient&quot;. They said more than sufficient.  Backfilling CREZ probably becomes a factor going into the fourth quarter, giving GV plenty of time to ink some significant contracts. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:28:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[MG. GV's revenues are typically a multiple of year end backlog. Last two years (6.2 and 4.3X). If they replicate these multiples the company can report revenues of $100 million plus, when combined with remaining CREZ revenues. Regarding employees, we failed to mention that GV has significantly increased its headcount as margins have improved. This is a good sign. Regarding replacing CREZ, management did not say  &quot;sufficient&quot;. They said more than sufficient.  Backfilling CREZ probably becomes a factor going into the fourth quarter, giving GV plenty of time to ink some significant contracts. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: No Longer A One Project Story</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314041/comments?source=feed#comment-17248541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17248541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[XD. The long term options look interesting. September calls, strike $5 at $0.50 are appealing vs. the May calls at $0.40. That provides some time for the company to report a couple good quarters and some more contract news. I will look at historical prices on these options tomorrow. I am also looking at the September $2.50 calls. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:19:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[XD. The long term options look interesting. September calls, strike $5 at $0.50 are appealing vs. the May calls at $0.40. That provides some time for the company to report a couple good quarters and some more contract news. I will look at historical prices on these options tomorrow. I am also looking at the September $2.50 calls. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: No Longer A One Project Story</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314041/comments?source=feed#comment-17110101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17110101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[All we can do is wait now and let the company preform. Hopefully the recent developments will convince management that it's time to step up its IR efforts.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:22:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[All we can do is wait now and let the company preform. Hopefully the recent developments will convince management that it's time to step up its IR efforts.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield Corp: Unsustainable Margins And Declining Backlog</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1302171/comments?source=feed#comment-16877151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16877151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sarah, PWR and WG are multi billion dollar enterprises. The comparison is off the mark. Furthermore, PWR and WG are in many different sectors than GV's target markets. PIKE recently attained pre tax margins of near 15%. CREZ is not the GV story anymore. It is much broader. GV grew core revenues by 20% in 2012. Sure margins may come down somewhat in the long-run but not at this time. GV has entered a new growth stage.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:31:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sarah, PWR and WG are multi billion dollar enterprises. The comparison is off the mark. Furthermore, PWR and WG are in many different sectors than GV's target markets. PIKE recently attained pre tax margins of near 15%. CREZ is not the GV story anymore. It is much broader. GV grew core revenues by 20% in 2012. Sure margins may come down somewhat in the long-run but not at this time. GV has entered a new growth stage.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield Corp: Unsustainable Margins And Declining Backlog</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1302171/comments?source=feed#comment-16858291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16858291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sorry, I meant to say : I have to give it to you Sarah not Matt.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:01:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sorry, I meant to say : I have to give it to you Sarah not Matt.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield Corp: Unsustainable Margins And Declining Backlog</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1302171/comments?source=feed#comment-16852081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16852081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[R59, you summed it up. This article is flawed in so many ways I do not know where to begin. I may write a quick rebuttal this evening. <br/><br/>I have to give it to you Matt. Your article was well constructed if was intended to ilicit a response from investors by insinuation, but poorly written as it fails to explain the dynamics of what is going on at GV and other firms benefiting from a favorable industry trend.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:29:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[R59, you summed it up. This article is flawed in so many ways I do not know where to begin. I may write a quick rebuttal this evening. <br/><br/>I have to give it to you Matt. Your article was well constructed if was intended to ilicit a response from investors by insinuation, but poorly written as it fails to explain the dynamics of what is going on at GV and other firms benefiting from a favorable industry trend.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ExactTarget Needs A Decade Of Exceptional Growth To Hit Its Targets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1295891/comments?source=feed#comment-16832091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16832091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I was being sarcastic since I did not think a valuation analysis of a SaaS company is complete without discussing additional topics such as EV/S and a thorough look at the acquisition activity in the space. I think ET is tier one player in its space that possibly deserves a premium EV/sales multiple closer to ELOQ's take out multiples. <br/> <br/>That being said, other SaaS stocks exist that offer considerable upside if their business plans stick. SLTC being one of them.<br/> <br/>Good Luck]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:01:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I was being sarcastic since I did not think a valuation analysis of a SaaS company is complete without discussing additional topics such as EV/S and a thorough look at the acquisition activity in the space. I think ET is tier one player in its space that possibly deserves a premium EV/sales multiple closer to ELOQ's take out multiples. <br/> <br/>That being said, other SaaS stocks exist that offer considerable upside if their business plans stick. SLTC being one of them.<br/> <br/>Good Luck]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ExactTarget Needs A Decade Of Exceptional Growth To Hit Its Targets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1295891/comments?source=feed#comment-16820261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16820261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[How have you valued ET? Shares are selling well below the take out multiple that ORCL paid for ELOQ.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:36:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How have you valued ET? Shares are selling well below the take out multiple that ORCL paid for ELOQ.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Ceco's Dividend Increase Translates Into A Higher Price Target</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/435861/comments?source=feed#comment-16802811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16802811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Porch411. It not preposterous if the company is also in growth mode. The proof is in the pudding. You can also reference our SA article on TIS. Dividend yields also include a risk premium assumption. Why should a growing company that is perceived less risky today maintain a higher dividend yield tomorrow? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:05:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Porch411. It not preposterous if the company is also in growth mode. The proof is in the pudding. You can also reference our SA article on TIS. Dividend yields also include a risk premium assumption. Why should a growing company that is perceived less risky today maintain a higher dividend yield tomorrow? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: A 'Four-Bagger' In The Making</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/644681/comments?source=feed#comment-16781431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16781431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;On 5/11/2012, we coded GV as a GeoBargain @ $1.51.&quot;<br/><br/>the stock must reach about $6/shr to attain &quot;4-bagger&quot; status from our first mention.  Right around the corner....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:22:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;On 5/11/2012, we coded GV as a GeoBargain @ $1.51.&quot;<br/><br/>the stock must reach about $6/shr to attain &quot;4-bagger&quot; status from our first mention.  Right around the corner....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: A 'Four-Bagger' In The Making</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/644681/comments?source=feed#comment-16765711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16765711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[$0.50 to go!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:53:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[$0.50 to go!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SMTC Corporation Revitalization Initiatives To Drive Sales And Profits</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/339101/comments?source=feed#comment-16322311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16322311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On 2/11/2013 we alerted members that while we think SMTX’s long term future is bright, we are moving SMTX to the GeoBargain on the radar list.   We believe this is a prudent move due to the cautious commentary from Key Tronic (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ktcc' title='Key Tronic Corporation'>KTCC</a>) and Iec Electronics (NYSE AMEX:IEC), two companies operating in similar industries as SMTX.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:37:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[On 2/11/2013 we alerted members that while we think SMTX’s long term future is bright, we are moving SMTX to the GeoBargain on the radar list.   We believe this is a prudent move due to the cautious commentary from Key Tronic (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ktcc' title='Key Tronic Corporation'>KTCC</a>) and Iec Electronics (NYSE AMEX:IEC), two companies operating in similar industries as SMTX.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: A 'Four-Bagger' In The Making</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/644681/comments?source=feed#comment-16232611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16232611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wyo, I think the market is placing its bets that GV may have a chance of winning a bid on an additional CREZ project.<br/><br/>Here is a note to GeoInvesting premium members on March 1, 2013<br/><br/>&quot;We believe that Goldfield’s subsidiary Southeast Power Corporation is one of 5 companies who have bid on the Bakersfield to Odessa leg of the CREZ project.<br/><br/>The other four seem to be Barnard Construction, Irby, Mastec, Inc. (NYSE:<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Yb17JT'>http://bit.ly/Yb17JT</a>) and Michels. Mastec held its year end conference call this morning. In this call, we noticed the company did mention an electrical project win, but did not talk about the project GV is bidding on. In its prior third quarter 2012 conference call MTZ specifically mentioned the project win they were awarded - the 118-mile 345 kV transmission line in West Texas as part of the CREZ project.<br/><br/>Thus, we are assuming that MTZ did not win the Bakersfield to Odessa project. We also noticed that Barnard’s web-site provides a list of projects it is working on. This list does not mention the Bakersfield project. Thus, we also believe Barnard was not awarded the Bakersfield project. We are still performing due diligence on the other two companies, but the odds that GV has won this project have increased if our assumptions are correct.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:51:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wyo, I think the market is placing its bets that GV may have a chance of winning a bid on an additional CREZ project.<br/><br/>Here is a note to GeoInvesting premium members on March 1, 2013<br/><br/>&quot;We believe that Goldfield’s subsidiary Southeast Power Corporation is one of 5 companies who have bid on the Bakersfield to Odessa leg of the CREZ project.<br/><br/>The other four seem to be Barnard Construction, Irby, Mastec, Inc. (NYSE:<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Yb17JT'>http://bit.ly/Yb17JT</a>) and Michels. Mastec held its year end conference call this morning. In this call, we noticed the company did mention an electrical project win, but did not talk about the project GV is bidding on. In its prior third quarter 2012 conference call MTZ specifically mentioned the project win they were awarded - the 118-mile 345 kV transmission line in West Texas as part of the CREZ project.<br/><br/>Thus, we are assuming that MTZ did not win the Bakersfield to Odessa project. We also noticed that Barnard’s web-site provides a list of projects it is working on. This list does not mention the Bakersfield project. Thus, we also believe Barnard was not awarded the Bakersfield project. We are still performing due diligence on the other two companies, but the odds that GV has won this project have increased if our assumptions are correct.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: A 'Four-Bagger' In The Making</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/644681/comments?source=feed#comment-16229691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16229691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[User 712, We are constantly working on new ideas. While we publish some them on Seeking Alpha, we provide much more intel to geoinvesting.com members. We have several new potential multi-baggers in the pipeline. You can also continue to follow us on SA. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:01:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[User 712, We are constantly working on new ideas. While we publish some them on Seeking Alpha, we provide much more intel to geoinvesting.com members. We have several new potential multi-baggers in the pipeline. You can also continue to follow us on SA. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Green Innovations Derailed</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1207451/comments?source=feed#comment-15386081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15386081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[133tdrago.  it was great that you were able to identify this pump and dump. keep up the good work.  it seems that your intuition and research was spot on.  We did not see your work, and always cite/link our references.  Hopefully in the future you can get more exposure for your efforts.  Regards.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:56:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[133tdrago.  it was great that you were able to identify this pump and dump. keep up the good work.  it seems that your intuition and research was spot on.  We did not see your work, and always cite/link our references.  Hopefully in the future you can get more exposure for your efforts.  Regards.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is A Perfect Storm Coming To The U.S. Grain Market?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1210831/comments?source=feed#comment-15312301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15312301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great job Renn.  You should post occasional OBOSS columns when conditions get extreme.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:56:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great job Renn.  You should post occasional OBOSS columns when conditions get extreme.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Green Innovations Stock Is Likely To Fall By 70% Or More</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1208061/comments?source=feed#comment-15291821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15291821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Aqua, Keep up the good work. Don' t simply base your article timing on price. They can't all be perfectly timed scenarios. This type of work will build your reputation for the next one. Our members were shorting ECAU and GNIN in the $3 area, but by the time we were able to get full blown articles out to SA the stocks had fallen. Still, there was opportunity to make money. Remember these stocks are going close to zero. <br/><br/>The good news is that you were able to short this stock over $2.00. Heck, anything over $1 is looking good too. <br/><br/>Let me know if you ever want to share any P&amp;D ideas. We also line them up on our blog with quick briefings. We found several more candidates we will be talking about in the morning. <br/><br/>FYI. $0.20 is still too pricey for GNIN.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:33:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Aqua, Keep up the good work. Don' t simply base your article timing on price. They can't all be perfectly timed scenarios. This type of work will build your reputation for the next one. Our members were shorting ECAU and GNIN in the $3 area, but by the time we were able to get full blown articles out to SA the stocks had fallen. Still, there was opportunity to make money. Remember these stocks are going close to zero. <br/><br/>The good news is that you were able to short this stock over $2.00. Heck, anything over $1 is looking good too. <br/><br/>Let me know if you ever want to share any P&amp;D ideas. We also line them up on our blog with quick briefings. We found several more candidates we will be talking about in the morning. <br/><br/>FYI. $0.20 is still too pricey for GNIN.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Green Innovations Is A Train Wreck Waiting To Happen</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1203351/comments?source=feed#comment-15216221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15216221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Exactly @blackswans.  We pared this installment down by 80% just to get it out in the timeliest manner possible.  So yes, that means part 2 is on its way.<br/><br/>And @briandwright, just because the stock dumped does not mean you can't glean very useful information from this or any other article we put out on pump and dumps.  Understanding the dynamics of these plays is important so you can identify the next opportunity.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:25:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Exactly @blackswans.  We pared this installment down by 80% just to get it out in the timeliest manner possible.  So yes, that means part 2 is on its way.<br/><br/>And @briandwright, just because the stock dumped does not mean you can't glean very useful information from this or any other article we put out on pump and dumps.  Understanding the dynamics of these plays is important so you can identify the next opportunity.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Green Innovations Is A Train Wreck Waiting To Happen</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1203351/comments?source=feed#comment-15213611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15213611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[that's ok, we sent this article to our premium members (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VFHhuP'>http://bit.ly/VFHhuP</a>) when the stock was trading above $3.00.  We can not speak to the speed at which they are published here once they are submitted to SA editors.  thanks for the observation though ;)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:33:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[that's ok, we sent this article to our premium members (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VFHhuP'>http://bit.ly/VFHhuP</a>) when the stock was trading above $3.00.  We can not speak to the speed at which they are published here once they are submitted to SA editors.  thanks for the observation though ;)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Echo Automotive: The $155 Million Company Driven By Promotional Steam</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1163721/comments?source=feed#comment-14946361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14946361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Follow up:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/p957'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:38:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Follow up:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/p957'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldfield: A 'Four-Bagger' In The Making</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/644681/comments?source=feed#comment-14932631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14932631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Are you keeping track?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:42:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Are you keeping track?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Echo Automotive: The $155 Million Company Driven By Promotional Steam</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1163721/comments?source=feed#comment-14882691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14882691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mark:<br/>you stated:<br/><br/>&quot;I read all the comments. this 'smells' a little different than a 'normal' pump and dump.<br/>Too much money spent on marketing and the Indy tie in seems ok...<br/>I am not ready to call it a p/d yet.&quot;<br/><br/>Indy tie is legit? Are to serious? You should listen to Mayor's press conference and read summary excerpts:<br/><br/>Quote 1: <br/><br/>“requiring the city to replace its nearly 500 non-police sedans with electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles. New vehicles would be purchased as older ones are retired, and the city hopes to completely swap out its current 3100-vehicle fleet by 2025.” <br/><br/>Quote 2:<br/><br/>…”the city is currently working with multiple automakers in order to meet the city’s goals to replace its fleet of police cars.”<br/><br/>The promotional email conveniently failed to mention that the Mayor is already in discussion with major automakers. Furthermore, ECUA’s “business plan” appears to be geared towards converting existing vehicles whereas it seems that the Mayor would like to purchase new vehicles from established automakers. Considering such statements, we conclude that the odds that ECAU will play a meaningful part in the city’s transformation process seem to be grossly over-exaggerated.<br/><br/>And the video ride with the mayor is far from an endorsement .. more like a joy ride. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:08:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mark:<br/>you stated:<br/><br/>&quot;I read all the comments. this 'smells' a little different than a 'normal' pump and dump.<br/>Too much money spent on marketing and the Indy tie in seems ok...<br/>I am not ready to call it a p/d yet.&quot;<br/><br/>Indy tie is legit? Are to serious? You should listen to Mayor's press conference and read summary excerpts:<br/><br/>Quote 1: <br/><br/>“requiring the city to replace its nearly 500 non-police sedans with electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles. New vehicles would be purchased as older ones are retired, and the city hopes to completely swap out its current 3100-vehicle fleet by 2025.” <br/><br/>Quote 2:<br/><br/>…”the city is currently working with multiple automakers in order to meet the city’s goals to replace its fleet of police cars.”<br/><br/>The promotional email conveniently failed to mention that the Mayor is already in discussion with major automakers. Furthermore, ECUA’s “business plan” appears to be geared towards converting existing vehicles whereas it seems that the Mayor would like to purchase new vehicles from established automakers. Considering such statements, we conclude that the odds that ECAU will play a meaningful part in the city’s transformation process seem to be grossly over-exaggerated.<br/><br/>And the video ride with the mayor is far from an endorsement .. more like a joy ride. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Echo Automotive: The $155 Million Company Driven By Promotional Steam</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1163721/comments?source=feed#comment-14882351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14882351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[right, but (referencing the audio on the site) it looks like one of these technologies was a vehicle conversion one. Obviously, they could not raise the money (credits) to accomplish goals.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:59:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[right, but (referencing the audio on the site) it looks like one of these technologies was a vehicle conversion one. Obviously, they could not raise the money (credits) to accomplish goals.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Organovo's New Partnership Offers Large Upside With Limited Risk</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1143421/comments?source=feed#comment-14860651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14860651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You left out one minor detail. How are you valuing this company?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:32:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You left out one minor detail. How are you valuing this company?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Echo Automotive: The $155 Million Company Driven By Promotional Steam</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1163721/comments?source=feed#comment-14790841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14790841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We certainly need to look at this finding more closely. GoENV is/was run by Jason Plotke and Dan Kennedy. Why have two sites that do the same thing with two different trade names: ENV vs Echodrive. When I go to the twitter page for GoEnv the site link actually takes me to the Echo site. Yet the number on the GoEnv works and still uses the name Control Carbon, even though the name change should have occurred in August 2012. <br/><br/>Is the company rebranding the business, perhaps because it failed under previous name? The GeEnv twitte page ends in 2011. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:37:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We certainly need to look at this finding more closely. GoENV is/was run by Jason Plotke and Dan Kennedy. Why have two sites that do the same thing with two different trade names: ENV vs Echodrive. When I go to the twitter page for GoEnv the site link actually takes me to the Echo site. Yet the number on the GoEnv works and still uses the name Control Carbon, even though the name change should have occurred in August 2012. <br/><br/>Is the company rebranding the business, perhaps because it failed under previous name? The GeEnv twitte page ends in 2011. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Echo Automotive: The $155 Million Company Driven By Promotional Steam</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1163721/comments?source=feed#comment-14691711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14691711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[good stuff. Glad to see you are on board.. Here is what we had to say:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/ol33'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:15:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[good stuff. Glad to see you are on board.. Here is what we had to say:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/ol33'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
