Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident

LookingConfident
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View LookingConfident's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Australians Really Need To Start Paying Attention. [View instapost]
    .
    Update:

    [At law] In Canada, the Governor General is a corporation sole.

    Google: http://tinyurl.com/pqr...

    [At law] In Australia, the Governor General swears his oath to a corporation sole, it would appear. ("Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second". Being a Juristic entity.)

    < .... Some lawyers consider The Crown in right of each Commonwealth realm to be a corporation sole, which may possess property as the monarch distinct from property he or she possesses personally, and may do acts as monarch distinguished from her or his personal acts.
    Elizabeth II has several corporations sole: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia are all distinct corporations sole.

    Because Australia and Canada have federal systems of [corporate] government, Elizabeth also has a distinct corporation sole for each of the Australian states and Canadian provinces. For example, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Queensland. >

    http://bit.ly/1KZ4IUN

    < Internationally, for the purposes of protocol, the United Nations list of heads of state has for Australia "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II", in brackets, above the name and title of the governor-general; > (Wikipedia)

    Because Elizabeth (a living woman) is a distinct corporation sole for Australia "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II" and for each of the Australian states and the Canadian provinces - she answers to/is directly under the law of, the Pontiff.

    The GG of Australia himself and all state governors (who are all, also 'tied to' this corporation sole - an entity having the rights and duties of a living man and or, woman), would all answer to/be under "the Law", accordingly.

    Yes. The Queen (it's so often stated) is only symbolic in today's world.

    LC
    May 12, 2015. 04:14 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Queensland ... Beautiful One Day ... (Nothing Changes?) [View instapost]
    .
    BREAKING!!!!

    On top of the recent Tasmanian 30 years oath fiasco and further to the Queensland "circus" surrounding the "wrong" or, even no oath - it now gets even more sadder. :(

    Tassie: http://tinyurl.com/nqn...

    It would now seem that the current Queensland Governor Paul de Jersey who was officially sworn into office in mid July, 2014 had made a "Claytons'" Oath - the oath that wasn't the oath (p 11/15), until today's announcement? (And thus incorporating that Juristic entity, "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second.")

    Certainly, according to this (Report No. 71) September 2009.

    < Oath or affirmation of allegiance and of office—Governor and Acting Governor I, ..(name).., do sincerely promise and swear (or, for an affirmation—do sincerely promise and affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her (or His) Majesty..(name of Sovereign).. as lawful Sovereign of Australia and to Her (or His) heirs and successors, according to law; and I will well and truly serve Her (or His) Majesty..(name of Sovereign).. in the office of Governor of Queensland (or, for an Acting Governor —in the office of Acting Governor of Queensland) in the Commonwealth of Australia, and will duly perform the functions and exercise the powers of the office according to the best of my ability, skill and knowledge; and I will, in all things associated with the office, duly and impartially administer justice in Queensland.

    So help me God! (or omitted for an affirmation). >

    HMmm...? ----> "administer justice in Queensland"

    His Oath: "I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second as lawful sovereign of Australia and to her heirs and successors according to law ... and I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second,"

    Circus details: http://bit.ly/1Jt5clg

    LC

    ps; Two very important and significant points ...the old ....."administer justice in Queensland" and, ...... with the inclusion of the Juristic entity, "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second." (As for Magistrates, too.)

    http://ab.co/1Jt5ecJ

    The Rule of Law does not apply to Magistrates in Queensland?
    The MAGISTRATES COURT BILL 2003 for WA, should be the same as Queensland's own 2003 BILL, one can only imagine?
    ("The states of Queensland, Victoria, South Australia and New South Wales also have legislation setting up unified summary courts.")
    Listed on page 5/18 ....Clause 15 ... "Contempts of the Court" is the following:

    *Refusing to take an oath or affirmation

    http://bit.ly/1Jt5cBw

    Queensland Consolidated Regulations

    MAGISTRATES REGULATION 2013 - SECT 2

    2 Form of oath or affirmation for magistrates—Act, s 9

    (1) For section 9(1) of the Act, the oath is as follows—

    'I, ..(name).., do sincerely promise and swear that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second ...... as lawful Sovereign of Australia and to Her heirs and successors, according to law; and

    In the office of magistrate, I will at all times and in all things do equal justice to all persons and discharge the duties and responsibilities of the office according to law to the best of my knowledge and ability without fear favour or affection. So help me God!'.

    (2) For section 9(1) of the Act, the affirmation is as follows—

    'I, ..(name).., do sincerely promise and affirm that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second as lawful Sovereign of Australia and to Her heirs and successors, according to law; and

    In the office of magistrate, I will at all times and in all things do equal justice to all persons and discharge the duties and responsibilities of the office according to law to the best of my knowledge and ability without fear favour or affection.'

    http://bit.ly/1Jt5cBy

    It's "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second", again...

    They are now (also) making "their" oath to.... a juristic entity.

    LC
    May 7, 2015. 06:43 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Australia - About "The Crown" [View instapost]
    .
    Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth The Second Is A Corporate Person - Only A Juristic Entity

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    LC
    Apr 20, 2015. 02:15 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Bank Loan Validity.doc - The Banker And The Attorney (Promissory Notes) [View instapost]
    .
    Now "lost" from my full Index of Posts...(Published Apr 8, 2015 5:43 PM )

    How interersting.

    If It's Not Lawful It Isn't Legal - Rule Of Law

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    LC
    Apr 10, 2015. 09:57 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Bank Loan Validity.doc - The Banker And The Attorney (Promissory Notes) [View instapost]
    .
    Lost from my index.

    If It's Not Lawful It Isn't Legal - Rule Of Law

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    LC
    Apr 10, 2015. 09:43 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • If It's Not Lawful It Isn't Legal - Rule Of Law [View instapost]
    .
    Common law

    The only true law that's "common" to us all, is that which comes from Rome.

    The blog post above talks of "jurisdic/juristic" entities being 'registered' with and under the law of the Pope. (Holy See.)

    The Myth about "common law".

    In regards to the Commonwealth Constitution (1900/1901), the crown and common law, historian Professor Pitt Cobbett (in 1903) describes it all as involving a "defective conception" - which was ........ "the outcome of an attempt on the part of English law to dispense with the recognition of the State as a juristic person, and to make the Crown do service in its stead".

    Link - http://tinyurl.com/nk3...

    In his Ucadia blog (linked below), Frank O'Collins has this to say about Common Law.

    < "There is nothing grand about the Common Law.

    There is nothing noble about the laws of England or Great Britain or the United Kingdom. There is nothing enlightened or just or lawful about it.

    So the sooner people get over the delusion and actually read the statutes as I have, then the quicker we can have people working on how we get out of the mess of a corporate pirate world out of control." >

    The courts have ruled that Papal law is still valid today

    Yes, the point is, the highest court in America and our court here in Australia just cannot "rule" (at law), that the Pope's "law" only applies to the indigenous of our lands, and...that it [the law] does not apply to all other people, living on those same lands.

    "The Doctrine of Discovery" - http://bit.ly/1wB9Zx7

    Frank O'Collins: http://bit.ly/1anxRwb

    LC
    Apr 8, 2015. 09:46 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constitution, Not Bible, Is Supreme Law Of The Land - Is It? [View instapost]
    .
    "I pledge myself and the government to the rule of law, in which none shall be so above the law that they are not subject to its dictates, and none shall be so below it that they are not availed of its protection." ~ Muhammadu Buhari

    Rule of Law

    There are some very good things happening. This High court decision is one of them. Over in the UK, the HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ruled that the UK's Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (himself), has a duty recognised by statute to uphold the rule of law. Amazing stuff!!

    http://bit.ly/1IVEBwZ

    LC
    Apr 2, 2015. 03:57 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Jimmy Wululu - Australia (Aboriginal), Artist  [View instapost]
    .
    From Facebook...

    http://on.fb.me/1BEh8yW

    LC
    Mar 14, 2015. 09:17 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Law Of The 193 Corporate States Of The UNITED NATIONS' Corporation. [View instapost]
    .
    So often I make mention of those current 193 states of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation. - They are all corporate states of the UNITED STATES' corporation.

    http://bit.ly/1Mq6C06

    Hey. ........... Does it get any clearer, Folks?

    < "Building on the Geneva Conventions on the laws of war and similar binding agreements, global rules were first institutionalized with the establishment of the United Nations.

    But above all, the international framework for managing global affairs was the creation of the United States." >

    (The words are from Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and a former EU commissioner for external affairs, and chancellor of the University of Oxford.)

    http://bit.ly/1Mq6Cgk

    LC
    Mar 10, 2015. 09:51 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Was Obama Answering To The Rule Of Law? ("Do No Harm") [View instapost]
    .
    How about it being the supreme law over the 193 corporate states of, the UNITED STATES' corporation of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation?

    That law? http://tinyurl.com/kzl...

    Thanks for your comment.

    LC
    Mar 9, 2015. 11:51 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • CROWN Land - This Land Is Your Land/My Land [View instapost]
    .
    If a dead corporate fiction NAME or, (corporate) "person" (the state) is a juristic person and is "registered" with and UNDER, and so - is controlled by the law of the Holy SEE - and if all who are 'living on the land' are also under that same law....

    ....... then how can any so called "man made" Law (be it Statutes, Acts, Legislation, By-laws, Road rules), ever get to "out-power" the law that we are all, already under?

    http://bit.ly/1BK0a2J

    LC
    Mar 5, 2015. 01:12 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Australia - About "The Crown" [View instapost]
    .
    As 'juridical persons', all of the policy enforcers are now acting, unlawfully.

    As men/women, they are "acting" against the law of the Living Beneficiaries or, against the law of the land. (Do no Harm.)

    See my post scrip, to the OP, above.

    LC
    Mar 2, 2015. 08:22 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Australia - About "The Crown" [View instapost]
    .
    And the corporate Australian Government's Attorney General George Brandis (and the ALRC) need to soon start to realise that we, as a U.N. corporate state are NOT "sovereign" - and that if the very "originals" (that's all the "Aboriginals" in both Australia and the America's/Canada) must all answer to papal law (yes, the bulls - or, the crown), then that law equally applies, to us all.

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    LC
    Feb 28, 2015. 10:55 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Challenge To The Editor - Queensland's Courier Mail [View instapost]
    .
    A "People's Commission"?

    Total transparency is what is or, must be required. Nothing less.

    (Thinking out loud here, Folks.)

    Does it need to be a Q&A style "People's Commission" or, enquiry and along similar lines to what is commonly known as and that should/would have the full "powers" of, a "Royal commission"?

    With selected questions and cross examination/s coming from and put directly to or, through the Chief Justice (and to all special witnesses who are bound by the "commission" to appear - and for them to be totally transparent /honest and accountable, at law), being put by concerned men and women, in an open gallery/court?

    ("Royal Commissions are called to look into matters of great importance and usually controversy. These can be matters such as government structure, the treatment of minorities, events of considerable public concern or economic questions." - Wikipedia.)

    Whereby in the case of this Q&A or, ("People's") Commission itself, it is or, can/will be created, by the crown.

    (...Yes, the Sovereign, or his representative in the form of a Governor-General or, the state Governor?

    Or, is this question in itself still very much to be a central part of the 'body' of the very Q&A, itself? And, it certainly can be and should be so?)

    And couldn't/shouldn't it be one such Q&A or, ("People's") Commission where, in practice, and unlike lesser forms of inquiry- once a ("People's") Commission has started, the corporate government cannot stop it.

    Where only "the people" can bring it to a conclusion? Via some form of a consensus?

    http://bit.ly/1ET9pMw

    LC
    Feb 26, 2015. 06:11 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Mark McMurtrie:Gunham Badi Jakamarra - And, Blind As A Possum? [View instapost]
    .
    From the OP ...

    "British parliament and the 'crown' will cease to exist when The Lisbon Treaty comes in to full effect on 1st November 2014, power will no longer reside in Westminster, but in Brussels."

    An update on the Lisbon Treaty:

    http://bit.ly/1FYhjIp

    LC
    Feb 26, 2015. 02:47 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
912 Comments
7 Likes