Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident

LookingConfident
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View LookingConfident's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • The Law Of The 193 Corporate States Of The UNITED NATIONS' Corporation. [View instapost]
    .
    All readers/followers are welcomed to join our group.

    http://on.fb.me/1vqCbC0

    LC
    Dec 14, 2014. 07:11 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • What Is The Law? (The 'Color Of Law'?) [View instapost]
    .
    ..... Max Kowalski asks: "My legal person is illegal which makes me unlawful and therefore l do not exist and therefore l can't break the law if l don't exist. If any peoples out there understand this..can they explain it to me please."

    <Your legal person is illegal which makes you unlawful and therefore you do not exist and therefore you can't break the law if you don't exist.>

    What is LEGAL?

    1. Conforming to the law; according to law; required or permitted by law; not forbidden or discountenanced by law; good and effectual in law.

    2. Proper or sufficient to be recognized by the law ; cognizable in the courts; competent or adequate to fulfill the requirements of the law.

    3. Cognizable in courts of law, as distinguished from courts of equity; construed or governed by the rules and principles of law, in contradistinction to rules of equity. 4.

    Posited by the courts as the inference or imputation of the law, as a matter of construction, rather than established by actual proof;

    Law Dictionary: What is LEGAL? definition of LEGAL (Black's Law Dictionary)
    **************

    Does a "Legal person" (any dead corporate fiction entity or, construct) NAME, comform with the Law?

    For it to do so (to conform/comply) it must have the backing of law, to begin with. If it doesn't, it becomes unlawful.

    No living man or, woman can make a Law for any other living men and or, women within the 193 corporate states of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation.

    The means that the UNITED NATIONS' corporation and all those 193 corporate states cannot make Law.

    To do so, would be slavery. (Slavery is highly unlawful.)

    Any/all Statutes, Acts Legislation, Road Rules and council By-laws, and all FINES, NOTICES, etc are not Lawful, as they are man-made (by living men and or, women) within all of the 193 corporate states of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation.

    If they were Lawful (and were binding in a court of proper law), this would be slavery. (Slavery is highly unlawful.)

    Government corporations

    Legal NAMES (those "Legal persons" or, dead corporate fiction entities or, constructs) are used by living men and or, women within all our so called government corporations to enforce their "corporate" (man made) Statutes, Acts Legislation, Road Rules and council By-laws, along with all FINES, NOTICES, etc on you (and other living men and or, women), as they have constructed a "Legal person" (Legal NAME) for us all, to enable them to so so.

    This (all the above) had been necessary because corporations can only legally deal with, another corporation.

    This is referred to as being the 'fiction of law' or, only the 'colour of law' and at all times it deals with dead corporate entities.

    Proper binding Law (itself), is only about living men and or, women.

    [ What is the Law? (The 'Color of Law'?) - http://tinyurl.com/pfq... ]

    This "fiction of law" is now dead. It is unlawful as it now lacks any "crown" support (at Law), to "power" it.

    What does this mean?

    All "Legal persons" (and at Law) are "registered" with the law making body (of the 193 corporate states of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation), that is called the Holy SEE that operates within the Vatican City State, in Rome.

    Most all living flesh and blood men/women here in Australia and from off our 'actual' live birth bond (and at this Supreme law), are born into the law of the Holy SEE - and this has been the lawful means of our becoming part of the Global Estate Trust. (Both under and protected by the Law of the Trustee.)

    The Pope (Francis) is the Trustee.

    This Law is for Living flesh and blood men/women. (It is administered by the Judges and or, Justices who all answer to, this 'Law of the living'.)

    As stated, this live birth bond (at law), places us under the jurisdiction of and protects us with the Law of the Holy SEE. - It is a law that dates back to (at least), the Unam Sanctam, when on 18 November 1302, Pope Boniface VIII issued the Papal bull.- tinyurl.com/pco256w

    UNAM SANCTAM - http://bit.ly/1zbOcgq

    The Pope (Francis) is the "boss", the CEO or, the Lawmaker.

    The Roman Cult

    For centuries (certainly since the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666), a procession of corrupt Popes headed up a mafia style mob called the 'Roman cult' (made up of many Cardinals, Bishops all from within the Vatican church, from the 'Roman curia', from the Holy SEE and from within the Vatican's Bank) had actually "powered" the fiction or, had virtually allowed this form of slavery to be enacted. (At what was very corrupt Law, to say the least.) And as part of (a share of the) the "spoils", these corrupt Popes as the lawmakers - were providing the "power source" that enabled it.

    When Pope Francis became the new Pontiff (and sovereign Lawmaker or, what is the "crown" in Law), following the standing down of a corrupt Pope (in Benedict), he immediately closed down this corrupt Roman cult.

    He (Pope Francis) 'sacked' all those who were involved and is still hunting them down. No longer was there any "power" being given by the lawmaker (at law) so as to 'drive' the "fiction of law" or, the "Legal person" NAME game as we know it or, as has been described above.

    His September 1st, 2013 Decree (delivered "Motu Proprio" or, 'in his own words') makes no bones about the personal LIABILITY at law, that there now is for all those living men and or, women who are coercively enforcing "slavery", as has been described.

    All courts outside of proper courts of Law (courts with competent Justices answering to the Law) are not Lawful courts. They are what are described as being "Administrative Tribunals" that deal only in the unlawful fiction (the Legal person), and all those living men and or, women involved who are all answering, not to law, but to the corrupt corporate state/s - must ultimately face the full force of, the Law.

    They will.
    Dec 14, 2014. 05:25 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The STORY Of The CENTURY (So Far.) [View instapost]
    .
    < Most ALL living men and women working within these 193 states of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation (and from off their Live Birth date or, the given Name/s - eg; Ross James, for me), are then uniquely numbered and as such are 'bonded' at Law. (Held in Rome.) >.

    Here's what is an example, I feel...

    http://on.fb.me/1sm0faj

    LC
    Dec 13, 2014. 05:41 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • All The Living Flesh & Blood Men And Women 'Enforcing', Are Breaking Law. [View instapost]
    .
    ... So few people have realised the point that we are making over in our Facebook group. And that is, that without a "source" of power (the crown - that was once given, via corrupt Popes), there is no lawful (or, binding) CONtract.

    The writer here, like-wise. Although he does hilight or, exposes the "problem" nicely though.

    < .... "Government is an expression of power relationships, in which some people seek to dominate others by force.

    These dominators gather ‘insiders’ together so that they can take money, power and status away from other people, the ‘outsiders.’ That is not how contracts work." >

    < "The “social contract,” is a fraud. You can’t have a contract unless you have two willing and able parties. They must come together in a meeting of the minds — a real agreement about what they are going to do together." >

    "Government: A 'Social Contract' You Never Signed"

    http://bit.ly/1Aw8gst

    Our Facebook group? (Join the conversation, now?)

    Link: http://on.fb.me/1vqCbC0

    LC
    Dec 7, 2014. 06:50 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constable Benjamin Arndt/Natalie Barber - An Application For A Judicial Review [View instapost]
    .
    So few people have realised the point that I am making here in this, my application. And that is, that without a "source" of power (the crown - that was once given, via corrupt Popes), there is no lawful CONtract.

    The writer here, like-wise. He hilights or, exposes the "problem" nicely though.

    < "Government is an expression of power relationships, in which some people seek to dominate others by force.

    These dominators gather ‘insiders’ together so that they can take money, power and status away from other people, the ‘outsiders.’ That is not how contracts work." >

    < "The “social contract,” is a fraud. You can’t have a contract unless you have two willing and able parties. They must come together in a meeting of the minds — a real agreement about what they are going to do together." >

    http://bit.ly/1Aw8gst

    LC
    Dec 5, 2014. 03:29 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • "All The World's A Stage, And All The Men And Women Merely Players ~ WS [View instapost]
    (If there is no LAWful solution - there is no solution.)

    LC
    Dec 4, 2014. 07:34 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constable Benjamin Arndt/Natalie Barber - An Application For A Judicial Review [View instapost]
    .
    What is JURIDICAL PERSON?

    "Entity, as a firm, that is not a single natural person, as a human being, authorized by law with duties and rights, recognized as a legal authority having a distinct identity, a legal personality. ...... Also known as artificial person, juridical entity, juristic person, or legal person. Also refer to body corporate."

    Law Dictionary: What is JURIDICAL PERSON? definition of JURIDICAL PERSON (Black's Law Dictionary)

    We then need to accept that JURIDICAL PERSONS are entities directly dependent on the Holy See and listed in the registry of canonical juridical persons kept by the Governorate of Vatican City State"

    And finally get to realise that the VATICAN (a church) and the Holy SEE (a Law making body) are different organisations.

    This should help: http://tinyurl.com/k2t...

    **********

    canonical

    kəˈnɒnɪk(ə)l/adjective

    adjective: canonical

    1. according to or ordered by canon law.

    It is my strong opinion that (now - and since Pope Francis came to be the Pontiff), that the "fiction of Law" ..... and this includes all to do with these JURIDICAL PERSONS (as was fully supported by corrupt Popes), is now dead. Finished.

    That it is no longer supported by, the "crown". (Pope Francis.)

    Always, only an opinion.

    LC
    Dec 3, 2014. 03:56 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constable Benjamin Arndt/Natalie Barber - An Application For A Judicial Review [View instapost]
    .
    The Rule of Law stems from, the "crown" that's providing the "juridical framework which limits the rule of force and enables the rule of law to prevail over the power of tyranny".

    Rule of Law ='s no one is above the Law.

    LC
    Dec 1, 2014. 06:50 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constable Benjamin Arndt/Natalie Barber - An Application For A Judicial Review [View instapost]
    .
    < "the time has come to work together in building a Europe which revolves not around the economy, but around the sacredness of the human person, around inalienable values" > - Francis

    LC
    Dec 1, 2014. 06:19 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constable Benjamin Arndt/Natalie Barber - An Application For A Judicial Review [View instapost]
    .
    Where is there 'remedy'... and in quoting the Pope..... <"without a clear juridical framework which limits the rule of force and enables the rule of law to prevail over the power of tyranny"? >

    LC
    Dec 1, 2014. 06:09 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constable Benjamin Arndt/Natalie Barber - An Application For A Judicial Review [View instapost]
    .
    Rule of Law

    (Pope's address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg 25/11/2014.)

    < I feel bound to stress the close bond between these two words: “dignity” and “transcendent”. >

    < "What dignity can there be without a clear juridical framework which limits the rule of force and enables the rule of law to prevail over the power of tyranny?">

    < "Promoting the dignity of the person means recognizing that he or she possesses inalienable rights which no one may take away arbitrarily, much less for the sake of economic interests." >

    Address commences circa 8 minute mark of video.

    Full Text: http://tinyurl.com/jvz...

    Video: http://bit.ly/1twEwXS

    LC
    Dec 1, 2014. 05:48 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Toll Roads/FEES? (Is It Voluntary To Pay These TOLLS/FINES/FEES?) [View instapost]
    .
    Michael Knight: "The law states traveling upon + transporting one's property privately upon public roads is an inalienable Right, in contrast, using roads for commercial reasons is a privilege. Presumably Iza, you were not acting in the capacity of a legally defined "driver" employed at that time conducting commercial business, hence no acts/statutes/rules apply to you, especially any obligation to show a "driver's license".

    Ref: http://bit.ly/1rI4o2f
    Nov 29, 2014. 05:37 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • TOLLS ON EVERY ROAD? - Free To Travel [View instapost]
    .
    Michael Knight: "The law states travelling upon + transporting one's property privately upon public roads is an inalienable Right, in contrast, using roads for commercial reasons is a privilege. Presumably Iza, you were not acting in the capacity of a legally defined "driver" employed at that time conducting commercial business, hence no acts/statutes/rules apply to you, especially any obligation to show a "driver's license".

    Ref: http://bit.ly/1rI4o2f
    Nov 29, 2014. 05:36 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • "Truth...the Pill That Everyone Wants And No One Can Swallow". ~ John Symons [View instapost]
    .
    The STORY, of the DAY!!

    Where? http://on.fb.me/1vqCbC0

    We here are maintaining that all matters to do with "the Legal fiction/name" are unlawful and that if they are appealed to the Supreme court (be it even initially, through a Judicial review), will likely be overturned .... with the big question being:

    Are the Police "acting" Lawfully?

    < He took the issue to the B.C. Supreme Court, which dismissed the roadside prohibition, saying there was no evidence indicating Wilson's ability to drive was affected by alcohol.

    But the B.C. Court of Appeal later overturned the lower court's ruling.>

    That a living flesh and blood man/women "policy enforcer" could then well become personally and commercially fully liable for his/her actions against you, is my strong feeling.

    Story: http://bit.ly/1vqC8Gh

    All living flesh and blood men/women "Policy enforcers" (who are clearly all "acting" as dead corporate fiction ZOMBIE entities or, "persons"), are ALL now doing so, unlawfully.

    WHY?

    Because they have no "head of power" now (that vatican "crown") that had once given them this "colour of law" (albeit dodgy) "lawful" right, for them to do so.

    Police need to realise this. That ... the 'fiction of Law' is dead, Folks.

    (Yes. Pope Francis has "killed it off". - Full stop.)

    This includes ALL living flesh and blood men and women "acting" as dead corporate "fiction' ZOMBIE persons. Full stop.

    No living flesh and blood man and women in this world has any 'special' (or, lawful) "power" to deem another living flesh & blood man and or, women as being a "dead" corporate "legal person" - especially when they are clearly not.

    Yes..."I'm alive" ;)

    http://bit.ly/1vqC8Gi

    LC
    Nov 27, 2014. 08:14 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Shouldn't We Best START Using "The LAW", Folks? [View instapost]
    .
    None of it is Lawful....learn the Law?

    And...they (all of these corporate Trusts) are now NOT lawful in any way.

    They were (for a couple of centuries, and stemming from the CQV Act in 1666) semi-lawful or, they had the 'power of law' with our consent to being that dead corporate fiction, person. (Or, Legal NAME.)

    This (so called) "law" was or, had been "powered" by corrupt Cardinals/Popes within the vatican, Roman curia and the Holy SEE and was referred to as being the Roman cult.

    When Francis became Pope, he "killed off" the Roman cult and hence, the source of power that 'enabled' the law surrounding these inferior Trusts (all being Legal), that are "registered' with the Holy SEE.

    This renders them all, unlawful. The Popes decree (September 1st, 2013) clearly warns all living flesh and blood men/women who are acting unlawfully in coercively enforcing the now unlawfulness, that they all become personally and fully, commercially liable, at law.

    Both these blog-posts will help you: http://tinyurl.com/pco...

    The "colour of law" http://tinyurl.com/pfq...

    When a very prominent activist made this statement, it begged a question.

    "This is a good site, put on to me by a VATICAN Supporter of all people!"

    A VATICAN Supporter? May I ask the following?

    ...What in the world has the "church" (the VATICAN) to do with anything that concerns the Law (that comes from the Holy SEE) especially after this Pope Francis (and as a 1st thing that he did, upon being appointed to the top CEO /Papacy "role" and as head of the Holy SEE), "Killed off" the once powerful Roman Cult, that had it's "roots" firmly within, the VATICAN?

    And I guess that his "sacking" of the VATICAN Bankers, was all part of this?

    http://tinyurl.com/qbs...

    Say a final "bye-bye" to the very "fiction of Law" (the colour of law), as it no longer exists!! Full stop!!

    That corrupt Roman Cult...

    < Net income at the Vatican Bank, known as the Institute for Religious Works, or IOR, plummeted 97 percent in 2013 to 2.9 million euros ($3.9 million) from 86.6 million euros in 2012. >

    Yep!! http://tinyurl.com/l93...

    LC
    Nov 15, 2014. 08:19 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
889 Comments
7 Likes