Seeking Alpha


Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View LookingConfident's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Australia - About "The Crown" [View instapost]
    Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth The Second Is A Corporate Person - Only A Juristic Entity

    Apr 20, 2015. 02:15 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Bank Loan Validity.doc - The Banker And The Attorney (Promissory Notes) [View instapost]
    Now "lost" from my full Index of Posts...(Published Apr 8, 2015 5:43 PM )

    How interersting.

    If It's Not Lawful It Isn't Legal - Rule Of Law

    Apr 10, 2015. 09:57 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Bank Loan Validity.doc - The Banker And The Attorney (Promissory Notes) [View instapost]
    Lost from my index.

    If It's Not Lawful It Isn't Legal - Rule Of Law

    Apr 10, 2015. 09:43 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • If It's Not Lawful It Isn't Legal - Rule Of Law [View instapost]
    Common law

    The only true law that's "common" to us all, is that which comes from Rome.

    The blog post above talks of "jurisdic/juristic" entities being 'registered' with and under the law of the Pope. (Holy See.)

    The Myth about "common law".

    In regards to the Commonwealth Constitution (1900/1901), the crown and common law, historian Professor Pitt Cobbett (in 1903) describes it all as involving a "defective conception" - which was ........ "the outcome of an attempt on the part of English law to dispense with the recognition of the State as a juristic person, and to make the Crown do service in its stead".

    Link -

    In his Ucadia blog (linked below), Frank O'Collins has this to say about Common Law.

    < "There is nothing grand about the Common Law.

    There is nothing noble about the laws of England or Great Britain or the United Kingdom. There is nothing enlightened or just or lawful about it.

    So the sooner people get over the delusion and actually read the statutes as I have, then the quicker we can have people working on how we get out of the mess of a corporate pirate world out of control." >

    The courts have ruled that Papal law is still valid today

    Yes, the point is, the highest court in America and our court here in Australia just cannot "rule" (at law), that the Pope's "law" only applies to the indigenous of our lands, and...that it [the law] does not apply to all other people, living on those same lands.

    "The Doctrine of Discovery" -

    Frank O'Collins:

    Apr 8, 2015. 09:46 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Constitution, Not Bible, Is Supreme Law Of The Land - Is It? [View instapost]
    "I pledge myself and the government to the rule of law, in which none shall be so above the law that they are not subject to its dictates, and none shall be so below it that they are not availed of its protection." ~ Muhammadu Buhari

    Rule of Law

    There are some very good things happening. This High court decision is one of them. Over in the UK, the HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ruled that the UK's Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (himself), has a duty recognised by statute to uphold the rule of law. Amazing stuff!!

    Apr 2, 2015. 03:57 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Jimmy Wululu - Australia (Aboriginal), Artist  [View instapost]
    From Facebook...

    Mar 14, 2015. 09:17 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Law Of The 193 Corporate States Of The UNITED NATIONS' Corporation. [View instapost]
    So often I make mention of those current 193 states of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation. - They are all corporate states of the UNITED STATES' corporation.

    Hey. ........... Does it get any clearer, Folks?

    < "Building on the Geneva Conventions on the laws of war and similar binding agreements, global rules were first institutionalized with the establishment of the United Nations.

    But above all, the international framework for managing global affairs was the creation of the United States." >

    (The words are from Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and a former EU commissioner for external affairs, and chancellor of the University of Oxford.)

    Mar 10, 2015. 09:51 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Was Obama Answering To The Rule Of Law? ("Do No Harm") [View instapost]
    How about it being the supreme law over the 193 corporate states of, the UNITED STATES' corporation of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation?

    That law?

    Thanks for your comment.

    Mar 9, 2015. 11:51 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • CROWN Land - This Land Is Your Land/My Land [View instapost]
    If a dead corporate fiction NAME or, (corporate) "person" (the state) is a juristic person and is "registered" with and UNDER, and so - is controlled by the law of the Holy SEE - and if all who are 'living on the land' are also under that same law....

    ....... then how can any so called "man made" Law (be it Statutes, Acts, Legislation, By-laws, Road rules), ever get to "out-power" the law that we are all, already under?

    Mar 5, 2015. 01:12 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Australia - About "The Crown" [View instapost]
    As 'juridical persons', all of the policy enforcers are now acting, unlawfully.

    As men/women, they are "acting" against the law of the Living Beneficiaries or, against the law of the land. (Do no Harm.)

    See my post scrip, to the OP, above.

    Mar 2, 2015. 08:22 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Australia - About "The Crown" [View instapost]
    And the corporate Australian Government's Attorney General George Brandis (and the ALRC) need to soon start to realise that we, as a U.N. corporate state are NOT "sovereign" - and that if the very "originals" (that's all the "Aboriginals" in both Australia and the America's/Canada) must all answer to papal law (yes, the bulls - or, the crown), then that law equally applies, to us all.

    Feb 28, 2015. 10:55 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Challenge To The Editor - Queensland's Courier Mail [View instapost]
    A "People's Commission"?

    Total transparency is what is or, must be required. Nothing less.

    (Thinking out loud here, Folks.)

    Does it need to be a Q&A style "People's Commission" or, enquiry and along similar lines to what is commonly known as and that should/would have the full "powers" of, a "Royal commission"?

    With selected questions and cross examination/s coming from and put directly to or, through the Chief Justice (and to all special witnesses who are bound by the "commission" to appear - and for them to be totally transparent /honest and accountable, at law), being put by concerned men and women, in an open gallery/court?

    ("Royal Commissions are called to look into matters of great importance and usually controversy. These can be matters such as government structure, the treatment of minorities, events of considerable public concern or economic questions." - Wikipedia.)

    Whereby in the case of this Q&A or, ("People's") Commission itself, it is or, can/will be created, by the crown.

    (...Yes, the Sovereign, or his representative in the form of a Governor-General or, the state Governor?

    Or, is this question in itself still very much to be a central part of the 'body' of the very Q&A, itself? And, it certainly can be and should be so?)

    And couldn't/shouldn't it be one such Q&A or, ("People's") Commission where, in practice, and unlike lesser forms of inquiry- once a ("People's") Commission has started, the corporate government cannot stop it.

    Where only "the people" can bring it to a conclusion? Via some form of a consensus?

    Feb 26, 2015. 06:11 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Mark McMurtrie:Gunham Badi Jakamarra - And, Blind As A Possum? [View instapost]
    From the OP ...

    "British parliament and the 'crown' will cease to exist when The Lisbon Treaty comes in to full effect on 1st November 2014, power will no longer reside in Westminster, but in Brussels."

    An update on the Lisbon Treaty:

    Feb 26, 2015. 02:47 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Under The Jurisdiction Of The Roman Curia? I Don't Think So. [View instapost]
    Page 14/73 -

    Feb 10, 2015. 01:57 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • What Is A "Juridic Person"? - Rule Of Law [View instapost]
    Things appear to be happening yet is it just .... that we are not being told, that things are happening?

    Is this the Pope's Decree (issued Motu Proprio), in "action"?

    Bulgaria is a member state of the UNITED NATIONS' corporation.


    STORY: "Bulgarian CorpBank remains with revoked licence"

    < Bulgaria’s Supreme Administrative Court has refused to consider the complaints of the major Corporate Commercial Bank (CorpBank) shareholders, the Bulgarian National Television (BNT) reported.

    The court sitting was due on February 9 but the magistrates earlier ruled the complaints were inadmissible. The motives say the juridical person affected by the revoked licence is CorpBank AD. The shareholders do not have legal grounds to appeal against the decision of the Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) as it does not affect them directly but indirectly. The court ruling was signed by Judge Sonya Yankulova, who expressed a dissenting opinion, and can be appealed against before a 5-member court panel. >

    Yes .... (what was that?) "The motives say the juridical person affected by the revoked licence is CorpBank AD."

    We know all corporations are "registered" under the law of the Holy SEE:

    What is a "juridic person"?

    From the Pope's Decree (issued Motu Proprio) we find that his Law applies to the following:

    c) those persons who serve as representatives, managers or directors, as well as persons who even de facto manage or exercise control over the entities directly dependent on the Holy See and listed in the registry of canonical juridical persons kept by the Governorate of Vatican City State;

    That above confirmation:

    This is a BIG story, is what I feel:

    Bulgarian CorpBank remains with revoked licence
    13 January 2015 | 21:26 | FOCUS News Agency

    Jan 29, 2015. 10:19 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment