Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident

LookingConfident
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View LookingConfident's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • The Parliament Of The State Of Queensland Has Sealed The Statute Of Westminster 1931.  [View instapost]
    Unlawful Acts made by any Government CANNOT be Lawful. (Unlawful Acts made by Unlawful Government, is even more Unlawful. Especially when it can be proven to be, TREASON.)
    Aug 21, 2013. 04:04 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Reply To The AEC - Australia Must Cancel The Election [View instapost]
    .
    For Jacki (my reply E mail to her follows below), IF you have gotten this far:

    [Jacki]....Search for, find and Understand....the Truth...

    http://bit.ly/14st6YH

    FWIW, here's a copy of my E mail sent to SPER, here in Queensland.

    There's nothing like "getting the message out there", right? ;)

    Monday, 19th of August, 2013

    Attention: Jacki
    Senior Processing Officer
    Tolling Offence Unit | Central Operations and Support
    Customer Services Branch | Department of Transport and Main Roads

    Hi Jacki, [Good morning to you.]

    "In Religion and Politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand,& without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the question at issue, but have taken them at second hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing." ~ Mark Twain

    THIS (the above) also applies to LAW

    Please be advised that I do NOT consent to any of the following:

    < "If you were in charge of the vehicle at the time of the trip, in order for this matter to be considered, you are required to provide a Statutory Declaration nominating yourself as the driver of the vehicle including the:

    · Infringement Notice Number
    · The date/s in which you were responsible for the vehicle
    · You name, address and drivers licence number.

    The Statutory Declaration must be signed and declared before a Justice of the Peace/Commissioner for Declarations or a person authorised in your State or Territory." >

    In acting on behalf of both myself and my son, you were asked and [you] have failed to provide me with details of the following:

    "My question to Queensland Motorways Pty Limited, in regards to where do they LEGALLY and under what particular Law can they involve my son with their statement they made to me ("It may end up that your son will have to fill out a statutory declaration assigning the notice to you...........I would suggest that your son contacts us regarding this vehicle."), remains unanswered. Perhaps you will be prepared to and can provide me with this information in detail?"

    Bearing in mind that ...the deferred toll amount as [you advise, is] required by a Demand Notice from Queensland Motorways Limited (QML), is simply as is stated......meaning, that it's a Demand Notice. No?

    Now Jacki, you might well say...."It's my job, Ross" ....or, ..."I'm just doing my job"...to harrass and coerce me? Is that really your job? After all, I have offered to pay "double" the Toll Fee that is in question.

    With the election in a couple of weeks I approached the AEC (the Australian Electoral Commission) a Corporation much like your own.

    They (the AEC) are conducting the election on behalf of this unlawful Australian Government under the (perceived) authority of the Governor General.

    In a reply from the AEC as to where (?) this Government gets it's 'power' from, they advised-that it came from the GG through the Queen of Australia.

    In asking the AEC to provide me with a link to any "sealed" document that gives her (our Governor General-Quentin Alice Louise Bryce) this 'perceived power' (one showing that her appointment has been assented to by Her Majesty QE11), rather than answer me, all my posts were deleted and I was blocked from any further comment or, questions to them. My reply:

    http://tiny.cc/sa1u1w

    You see Jacki ... (and in reading the Mark Twain quote once again) LAWS are NOT laws simply because you have been told that they are LAWS.

    At this point of time, a 'reminder' to you Jacki of the following (that is) "LAW", perhaps?

    Trades Practices Act 1974 - 60 Harassment and coercion - Coercion at place of residence.

    A corporation shall not use physical force or undue harassment or coercion in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services to a consumer or the payment for goods or services by a consumer

    http://bit.ly/14st7eW

    The following is a post I've copied from Facebook, that I found interesting.

    "There are no such things as public servants any more. There are people hiding under the Public Sector Management act (illegal) but who employs them because the corp cannot. It does not matter which way you look at it the staff have stopped existing hence there are no public servants -= they do not have to obey what you say. They do not have to protect you. They do not have to offer fairness and balance. Equality or any human right..And that is what we are witnessing and basically all around the world. Dictatorships as they wrote it without us looking."

    I look forward to your reply that includes a copy of the "Law" that clearly states (and with a reference to the actual date of enactment of this Law), that [and in spite of my generous offer], as I was in charge of the vehicle at the time of the trip - I am required to provide a Statutory Declaration nominating myself as the driver of the vehicle.

    Thank you in anticipation.

    Sincerely,

    Ross James Bradley.
    Aug 18, 2013. 08:54 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Reply To The AEC - Australia Must Cancel The Election [View instapost]
    .
    .
    I guess it was my FOLLOWING reply to Gene Nevin that saw all my comments "deleted" and my being banned from posting to the AEC Site...

    "I work in and for the government of the day" [Gene Nevin]

    I guess that you Gene (in having a/your contract or, workplace agreement with this U.S. registered private corporation called the AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT) would then understand that you have 'signed' this agreement in accordance with "their" rules?

    [And, as such] You are a virtual shareholder.

    As "we" (the people of Australia) do not have any agreement and are NOT 'contracted' like you are Gene, we are not and won't be responsible for any debt that your "boss" is running up, on behalf of it's shareholders. (Like you.)

    Ordinary Australian people have an indissoluble "contract" with the 'monarch of the day', under the Commonwealth Constitution of 1900/1901. Whereas YOU (Gene) have your very own "lawful" contract that binds you to the 1986 'set of constitutional rules', that you have agreed to become a member of and as I've posted, you are 'lawfully' bound to.

    That includes you having a share of the debt and repayments related to any & all the unlawful "acts" that your employer ("the corporation"), may or, will have to pay back.

    ............The Nuremburg defense ("I was only doing my job") will apply in that it will NOT get to save your 'skin in this game', that you are Lawfully contracted, within.

    Unlawful Governments CANNOT make laws, that are Lawful.
    Aug 14, 2013. 11:20 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Reply To The AEC - Australia Must Cancel The Election [View instapost]
    .
    Government employee Gene Nevin posts: "Dude I work in and for the government of the day , I understand the constitution and legislation better then most. My point was not personal I mean lets all have our say, be thankful we have a proper vote and a say in a democratic process.

    I do care about the vote but I do not care why people question the process!!!"

    (Click on AEC hyperlink.) http://on.fb.me/14zNBSk
    Aug 14, 2013. 09:50 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Reply To The AEC - Australia Must Cancel The Election [View instapost]
    .
    The AEC's reply: [Is not good enough] :(

    Note that the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Act) has some 6 pages of "changes" made to it, since 1918!!

    http://bit.ly/14Mx9F2

    AEC

    "Last night we received a lot of interest regarding under what law the AEC conducts the federal election, the role of the Governor General, how we define elector versus voter, and some questions regarding the constitutional qualifications of candidates

    The AEC administers the conduct of federal elections under the provisions of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Act).

    The Governor-General is the Queen’s representative in Australia. The position has ongoing responsibilities within the political system and its powers are often debated.

    The Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 at Section 4(1) provides the following interpretation: ‘Elector means any person whose name appears on a Roll as an elector.’ The AEC uses the words elector and voter interchangeably.

    Following on from the definition there were comments regarding compulsory voting. The AEC itself does not have an official view on whether enrolment and voting should or should not be compulsory. this is a matter for the parliament to decide. the AEC conducts all elections according to the law in force at the time. The AEC has put together information on compulsory voting in practice which is available on our website at:

    http://bit.ly/14Mx6ZS

    The AEC has also put together information regarding constitutional disqualifications for intending candidates which is also available on our website at:

    http://bit.ly/14Mx9F4
    Like · Reply · 9 minutes ago via mobile
    Aug 14, 2013. 08:06 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Reply To The AEC - Australia Must Cancel The Election [View instapost]
    .
    Sue Jess:

    "AEC supposedly has a piece of paper somewhere which they have been told is a law; enforceable onto human citizens of this land. This is a lie as it would require the correct authority under very 'specific' guidelines to make a created idea a law.

    When Whitlam and Hawke criminally, unconstitutionally and unlawfully changed our Constitution to suit their own and 'foreign' agenda's, it was not done within the 'specific' guidelines of our Constitution by way of Referendum (Section 128).

    The Royals Styles and Titles Act 1973 removed the crown and replaced it with a statutory instrument; the Queen of Australia. Our Great Seal was changed, which was our law making seal. It was replaced with a corporate stamp.

    The Commonwealth (we the people and the crown) was removed (unlawfully) from all titles under which the Government are meant to function. A Referendum was held in 1999 to turn Australia into a republic but on the 24th of November 1999, Australia said 'No'. This made no difference as our Constitution had already been unlawfully suspended weeks earlier and registered as a Corporation belonging to D.C.

    ALL OF THESE ACTIONS ARE HIGH TREASON.

    This means the current 'Government' is a fraudulent corporate entity that has NO AUTHORITY over any Australian citizen, law, act and/or act amendment, tax, court ruling, commissioned office or officer, judge, police officer, lawyer or anything that requires the ultimate Royal Assent, (more often via the Governor General) and is NULL AND VOID!

    This is nothing less than a DICTATORSHIP with the masquerading government just 'appearing' to act under the Constitution, oblivious to the average Australian, who is losing common law rights daily, excessively and unlawfully.

    Any church leader, employee or officer of a supposed Government department who is aware of an act of treason being committed is required to follow through with an investigation; informing or exposing the crime or they will risk being found guilty of 'Misprision of Treason' (concealing treason) which is punishable by 2 years in prison. With great power comes great responsibility."
    Aug 14, 2013. 03:07 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Looksmart Is Worth More Than Its Cash [View article]
    .
    "Dr. Jean-Yves Dexmier is not fit to lace your boots never mind mine."

    Hi Swanson1. Thanks for your clarification re; Dexmier.

    Incidentally, I don't have shoe-laces, Mate!!

    http://bit.ly/XC5bYM

    LC
    .
    Apr 9, 2013. 10:07 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Looksmart Is Worth More Than Its Cash [View article]
    .
    "Looking at your posts you don't understand TAC or the balance sheet or anything at all."

    "To re-iterate - there is no TAC costs on "publisher solutions" - which means you don't understand Looksmart business model at all."

    "As a tier 2 - TAC should be 85% at least due to the lower bids - which attracts the quality publishers."

    "You clearly don't understand that this is "traffic acquisition costs" - and that it is not applicable to publisher solutions as there is no cost associated.

    I feel I need to explain what "TAC" is and why it will never be 20%.

    TAC is the percentage that Looksmart pays to partners for each click - to put it in perspective Google pays 68% and Yahoo/Bing pay 75%.

    So if Looksmart pay 20% then you really will attract the scammers that can't get a massive revenue from better sources."
    **************

    Forget about "Tier 2".- That's YOUR diminishing 'play-ground', ok?

    In the Q4 Report the Co talks of an increase in revenues from "the Company's Advertiser Networks" but it's not as you once knew it to be. Does a $2.3 million in impairment of property and equipment & internally developed software, mean anything to you?

    And you clearly don't understand what "comprehensive income" or, "revenue" is or, means? It would appear?

    You are living in an "old world" of times gone by, I feel.There is a better way. (And it's one that eliminates the very scammers you're familiar with & you talk of.) And it all becomes, totally transparent.

    Where you'll likely find that advertisers will be directly settling with publishers or, their representation and only pay Looksmart a set percentage of each winning bid. That this then becomes what is termed as "comprehensive revenue" on the Co's balance sheet.

    From this Looksmart will pay a TAC onto both an intermediary on whose network or, exchange an 'in market' user is found and to the 'search' provider of that 'real time' and 1st party (query) data - - for instigating those chargeable 'match-ups' within Looksmart's exclusive global marketplace. (One that we have been told, is now capable of 'handling' up to 100 billion 'events' per day.)

    Finally, and in regards to the revenue from the Company's Publisher Solutions (being $0.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2012), is what I feel will increase as early as this (just gone) Q1 period, 2013.

    With the addition of 'select' publishers who will pay a fee to 'white-label' Looksmart's solution & then join the intent based marketplace. (This revenue is net of any TAC, of course. - Is what I had written)

    All "New world" stuff, eh? Someone is being left behind, it seems?

    And you'd be embarrassed to have me involved in your business? You should offer Dr. Jean-Yves Dexmier a job then?
    Apr 5, 2013. 01:34 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Looksmart Is Worth More Than Its Cash [View article]
    .
    You are 100% correct again, swanson1. It's yet another "massive essay" and it does get to mention YOU, once again!

    http://seekingalpha.co...

    LC
    .
    Apr 4, 2013. 10:59 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Looksmart Is Worth More Than Its Cash [View article]
    .
    Looksmart's Q4 2012 Financial Results have been posted.

    http://yhoo.it/10jKGO7

    Michael Onghai - Looksmart's Chief Executive Officer says, in today's Report:

    ..."It is our intention to reinvigorate our team, work closer with existing and new partners, [and] expand our revenue mix - and position our company for profitable revenue growth in the future."

    ........With operating expenses now down to about $2 million per quarter post 2012 (this estimate does include all cost related to the operating of the Company’s data center) and a TAC going forward (this is my estimate only, of course) of just 20% of all comprehensive revenues, then Michael Onghai's 'intention of seeing profitable revenue growth in the future', may well come sooner than many could ever imagine.

    http://bit.ly/YrQGp6

    [.............Total operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2012 were $5.1 million and included $2.3 million in impairment of property and equipment and internally developed software and $0.1 million of non-cash, share-based compensation.]

    ...I'm very confident that the revenue from the Company's Publisher Solutions (of $0.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2012), will increase and as early as this (just gone) Q1 period, of 2013. (This revenue is net of any TAC, of course.)

    .........This along with an increase in revenues from "the Company's Advertiser Networks" will come from (I expect), the company now .......'working closer with existing and new partners'.

    Always, only an opinion.

    LC
    .
    Apr 1, 2013. 09:59 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • "We Will Be Forced To Sacrifice Democracy By Laws Protecting Us From Further Pollution." [View instapost]
    .
    On Facebook, moments ago...

    Ross Bradley
    Occupy Australia have deleted my posts? OMG!!

    Posts that relate to Australia's Strategic Policy?

    Here's proof!!

    Ross Bradley posted to Occupy Australia
    4 minutes ago
    Are posts being deleted, here?
    Like · · Promote

    Ross Bradley .
    Ross Bradley shared a link. (I can't find this post?)
    a few seconds ago

    "Heavy Weather: Climate and the Australian Defence Force"

    Are YOU one of the urban educated population?

    ......"It’s possible that dissatisfaction with government actions to mitigate climate change, while so far limited to the urban educated population, could contribute to domestic and regional instability."

    From today's Report: "Heavy Weather: Climate and the Australian Defence Force"

    A major concern for me (page 16) that I feel may have a direct relationship to the planned 'roll-out' of Agenda21 (with "Climate Change" being used for that means to an end - - in having the ADF directly involved in 'people moving'), is - as can be found under the following heading:

    <"Implications for the Australian Defence Force"

    Stabilisation

    Climate-induced population displacement, resource wars and the further weakening of fragile states are some of the potential consequences of a changing climate.

    It’s possible that dissatisfaction with government actions to mitigate climate change, while so far limited to the urban educated population, could contribute to domestic and regional instability.

    All this could see an increase in the ADF’s involvement in regional stabilisation missions.

    Defence will also need to plan more for its role in domestic disaster response missions. (Below).>

    Link to PDF of Report: http://bit.ly/103X1oP
    Australian Strategic Policy Institute
    http://www.aspi.org.au
    Like · · Share · Promote · 5 minutes ago ·

    Ross Bradley .
    This, was deleted!! Goes to show what I've said that "Occupy", was all about!!

    http://seekingalpha.co...
    Mar 25, 2013. 10:48 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • An RTB Global OPEN Marketplace 'Handling' Up To 100 Billion 'Events' Per Day! [View instapost]
    .
    ......"We believe the Mozilla news brings greater attention to the need for an ecosystem-wide solution, which preserves the bond between consumers and the content they rely on and trust, and, furthermore, ensures the best value for advertisers."

    Story: http://bit.ly/YzjqvF

    Upstream Sites

    Which sites did users visit immediately preceding looksmart.com?

    % of Unique Visits Upstream Site
    10.89% google.com
    3.92% yahoo.com
    1.96% 7search.com
    1.27% local.com
    1.20% facebook.com
    1.14% findbest-games.net
    1.01% ihavenet.com
    0.82% statmyweb.com
    0.76% bing.com
    0.76% miva.com

    Downstream Sites

    Where do visitors go after leaving looksmart.com?

    % of Unique Visits Downstream Site
    11.81% google.com
    3.55% yahoo.com
    1.81% 7search.com
    1.74% monstermarketplace.com
    1.74% nixxie.com
    1.68% facebook.com
    1.35% leaseweb.com
    1.29% siteadvisor.com
    1.03% bing.com
    0.97% infolinks.com

    Interesting.

    LC
    .
    Mar 25, 2013. 05:55 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • "We Will Be Forced To Sacrifice Democracy By Laws Protecting Us From Further Pollution." [View instapost]
    ..
    "The next clue was the city square eviction. How was that a clue?

    Well Adam Bandt and the greens held the balance of power in both the senate and the house of representatives at the time. Had they decided to make and issue of Occupy Melbourne’s rights to make a political point and demonstrate, they certainly had the power to bring down the government over the issue.

    Remember this was a government that was a minority government that needed alliances with 3 independents and Adam Bandt from The Greens to have the numbers to govern. Just one dissenter in their ranks was enough to make things very complex for them."

    http://bit.ly/14cAlru

    LC
    .
    Mar 22, 2013. 04:22 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Infolinks Has A Breakthrough Platform That Analyzes Content In Real-Time (?) [View instapost]
    .
    "infolinks.com" noted in Downstream sites...

    Upstream Sites

    Which sites did users visit immediately preceding looksmart.com?
    % of Unique Visits Upstream Site
    10.90% google.com
    4.14% yahoo.com
    2.07% 7search.com
    1.63% local.com
    1.25% findbest-games.net
    1.19% facebook.com
    1.07% ihavenet.com
    0.88% statmyweb.com
    0.75% bing.com
    0.69% dmoz.org

    Downstream Sites

    Where do visitors go after leaving looksmart.com?
    % of Unique Visits Downstream Site
    12.52% google.com
    3.43% yahoo.com
    1.84% monstermarketplace.com
    1.72% facebook.com
    1.65% 7search.com
    1.53% nixxie.com
    1.27% siteadvisor.com
    1.08% infolinks.com
    1.02% bing.com
    0.83% alexa.com
    Mar 19, 2013. 02:35 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Microsoft's DNT - When Search Meets Display (The Creator Economy) [View instapost]
    .
    "More people are spending more time in digital media environments than ever before. Marketers need to find ways to communicate with prospective consumers. What’s more, there are numerous first-party and contextual methods that allow for ultra-targeting with data and inference that are exponentially better than what the IAB is trying so hard to protect.." - Jim Spanfeller, CEO, Spanfeller Media Group

    Absolutely!!

    http://bit.ly/WzL0bp

    Thought from my Sept. 2012 post, above:

    <The login is the key, I feel - as it's the first party "cookie" with user's giving an automatic opt-in approval.

    Just as (I can only imagine?) users give this same (1st party 'cookie' and access to their data) approval, when using the search engines!

    Microsoft (with Bing) Google+ (the Google & the other search engines), Facebook, Yahoo (via Bing) will all have this exclusive FIRST PARTY DATA to enable their own advertisers to target users in real time - at that point of a search query either 'local' or, all over the web and right across a one publisher base or, publishers within a one open marketplace..>

    Now check the Upstream/Downstream Traffic in and out of Looksmart's intent based marketplace, as shown in my recent post:, here:

    http://bit.ly/Yn6upe

    LC
    .
    Mar 18, 2013. 06:43 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
912 Comments
7 Likes