Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (and a 69 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
View LookingConfident's Instablogs on:
  • My Right To Travel Free

    My Right to Travel

    It is important to note that I will be a traveler in my auto, moving along public streets and or, Highways where 'free passage' on such - will be my inalienable right to do so.

    If I do harm to anyone or, anyone's property or, I am to be reasonably suspected of the likelihood of doing any harm to anyone or, anyone's property, I am then (and like all men/women), under the Law. And not before. No one is above the Law.

    INALIENABLE. This word is applied to those things, the property of which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person to another.

    Public highways and rivers are of this kind; there are also many rights which are inalienable, as the rights of liberty, or of speech.

    "The Sunshine State is Great"! (New slogan.)

    With both corporations "registered" within the control of the UNITED STATES' corporation and with the SEC - in Washington D.C. and it is through or, via the QUEENSLAND-TREASURY-CORP that "reports" are made on behalf of the STATE-OF-QUEENSLAND-AUSTRALIA Corporation.

    See Form 18-K/A -

    Washington, D.C.,_D.C.

    < Although admiralty shares much in common with the civil law, it is separate from it. Common law does not act as binding precedent on admiralty courts, but it and other law may be used when no law on point is available.

    Parties subject to admiralty may not contract out of admiralty jurisdiction, and states [Note the small "s" once more] may not infringe on admiralty jurisdiction either judicially or legislatively. >

    ---> United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

    (See more at:

    "Citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access." Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009

    More than being just a citizen, I am a living flesh and blood man.

    [Anyone's] Right to Travel?

    (click to enlarge)
    Facebook Thread. (For the above.):

    "You have to have a Licence to be charged - It's a charging instrument"

    Yes, it's a fact. So I simply no longer want to be a part of the FRAUD, that exists. And the very 'fiction of law' (FICTIO), that is solely based (only), on assumptions and presumptions.

    Always, only an opinion.


    Sep 13 3:22 PM | Link | 1 Comment
  • The State Of QUEENSLAND Is In Good Hands? (After 31/12/2014?)

    The state of QUEENSLAND (a corporation under the UNITED STATES' corporation calling itself the STATE-OF-QUEENSLAND-AUSTRALIA), is in good hands.

    Or, is it?

    The E Mail sent today was addressed as follows:

    Mark Gray

    The "home" of, the 'Smart State'.

    The website and E Mail address is such an "important combo" for the Trustee, who does "report" on behalf of the sunshine state to the SEC of the UNITED STATES' CORPORATION in Washington D.C.

    It came as a surprise to receive the following E Mail, in reply:

    AUTO: David Vogler is not available: please contact Jo Nelson instead (returning 31/12/2014)

    9/11/14 at 2:02 PM More Information


    I am out of the office until 31/12/2014.

    David Vogler has recently left QTC, and this email inbox is no longer in use.

    Please forward your email to Jo Nelson ( for assistance or call her on 07 3842 4714.

    Note: This is an automated response to your message "Attention; Mark Gray" sent on 11/09/2014 02:02:33 PM.

    This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

    This email and any attachments (collectively, 'this message') is intended only for the addressee and may be confidential and privileged. None of its contents may be disclosed to, or relied upon by, any other party without our written consent. If you are not the addressee, you must not copy or use this message for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to anyone. Please delete it and notify QTC immediately by telephoning +61 7 3842 4600 or emailing the sender | Any opinion or advice provided in this message is subject to any assumptions noted within it and the assumption that the current economic, political and/or commercial environment does not materially alter. QTC does not warrant or guarantee any outcome or forecast in this message. Any opinion or advice in this message is provided by QTC in good faith on the basis of information supplied to QTC, which may not have been independently verified by QTC. Accordingly, QTC does not represent that the opinion or advice is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Unless stated otherwise, the views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, not those of QTC | To the extent permitted by law, neither QTC nor any of its employees, contractors, servants or agents accept any responsibility and liability whatsoever for any expense, damage, claim, cause of action, loss or costs, incurred by any person in connection with that person or any other person placing any reliance on, or acting or refraining to act on the basis of, the contents of this message | QTC does not warrant that any attachments to this email are free from viruses or other corruption, and recommends that you scan them for viruses before opening. QTC accepts no liability for any loss caused if this message contains a virus or is otherwise corrupted | QTC respects your privacy, and our privacy plan is available on our website | If you are a QTC public sector customer, please visit our website for information about registering to access our secure customer sub-site.

    It would appear to me (according to Linkedin), that a mysterious David Vogler may well have 'up and gone', sometime in August?

    Senior Advisor, Communication and Marketing Queensland Treasury Corporation

    Government Agency; 51-200 employees; Financial Services industry

    July 2011 - August 2014 (3 years 2 months)

    David's Facebook page is inactive:

    From a number of concerns that I have, I guess my main one would be - how does the all important E Mail 'addy' ( end up responding with an 'auto-generated' response and coming from someone who no longer works for the corporation?

    I then sent/forwarded my message on to Jo Nelson for assistance (and, as I was directed to do) and rang the number just to see she had received it ok?

    The phone rang for quite a period of time and when it was answered, it sounded very much to me like the 'tea lady" may have just 'popped in' to collect a cup and saucer. Without giving or, getting her or, my name, she then assured me that she would pass the message on to "Mark Gray" ... I thanked her.

    I guess any message this afternoon (today), may well have received
    a similar response? (Must be a glitch?)

    And my E Mail? Oh, it's nothing much of importance I guess.

    Here it is, in full;

    Mark Gray,

    Dear Mark,

    Tomorrow is the 12th of September, 2014

    Please be advised that in becoming aware of the fraud associated with the corporate entity known as a "Licence" and that knowingly, I can now no longer be a party to this unlawfulness. It must be clearly understood that as I am a living flesh and blood man I do not consent to being a dead corporate fiction, person.


    LICENCE NO 031 X76 X66

    Please also be advised that I have now removed both the plates (that will be returned to you, as the owner) along with the VIN number from off the Auto, that I travel in. I will install my own plates. (In a visible protest.)

    I will exercise my inalienable right to travel whenever and wherever I choose to travel (from A to B) at any given time.

    I am not involved in commerce and as such I do not "drive" a vehicle. (I am not a driver.)

    I do ensure the "auto" I travel in is always in top road-worthy condition and as a traveler of some (over) 50 years I always drive safely and with no intent to ever harm anyone or, harm anyone's property.

    As a younger man, I was awarded a 10 years of "Safe driving" Certificate (NSW Transport), when employed by the PMG/TELECOM/TELSTRA service and when "driving" a vehicle daily, as such.

    Note that (as a living flesh and blood man) I do not consent to Statutes/Acts/Legislation/Rules/By-laws, etc

    Both my views and basic understanding of what is Law, and that - as we are all under the Rule of Law and that as such - there is no one that is above, the Law - can be found on the following websites;

    1- Seeking Alpha -

    2- Facebook -

    I do anticipate harassment from policy enforcers (state POLICE) yet I will not consent to any coerciveness from anyone, as such. Those living flesh and blood men/women (and not as corporate persons), who enforce any such unlawfulness are now and will become fully liable for their any actions. Please advise them accordingly. Thank you.

    As the living beneficiary of both the state Trusts and as a living beneficiary of the Global Estate Trust I do feel strongly that I am both under the Supreme Law and that I am (as you are), fully protected by it.

    I will remind you and those (any living flesh and blood man/women) who do not want to obey the law that they/you are then, all breaking the law. And that to break a law is a crime and that you will be punished, as such.

    No longer can any/all Policy enforcers and or, those within administrative tribunals coerce or, dare to threaten any HARM to those any living men/women who do NOT consent to the dead fiction NAME that is not them.

    Because as living flesh and blood men/women we are (I am) the living beneficiary of the Public Trusts constructed around that fiction corporate NAME.

    A qualified interpretation of this Law (for all concerned) is as follows:

    "From September 1, 2013, all the judges, lawyers, police, government officials, and those posing as government officials, and all officers of all the corporate franchises and entities organized under the auspices of the UNITED STATES and all its state franchises become fully, personally and commercially liable for their any actions and omissions against the living beneficiaries of the public trusts"

    1 - AUSTRALIA and it's "states" (and all corrupt state governments) are now all corporations and as such are "registered" under the UNITED STATES' corporation of, the UNITED NATIONS' corporation.

    This is part of the planned One World Government that has been 'in the works' for maybe 100 years or, more.

    2 - ALL corporations in our world are "registered" with and are under the Law of the Holy SEE in Rome. The Pope [Francis] makes the Law.n All living men and women in the western world (and from off our Birth Certificate), are also "registered" with the Holy SEE.

    This makes both corporations (those men and women working within them) and all of us, all become - under and protected by that ONE Law. And if the "Rule of Law" is upheld, no living man or, women is, above the Law.

    "One of the cornerstones of the system introduced by this law is constituted by the so-called rule of law, as a result of which administrative sanctions may be imposed only in cases defined by law."

    Note also, and from within the September 1st, 2013 Pope's Motu Proprio:

    ........... "A separate section is dedicated to crimes against humanity, including genocide and other crimes defined by international common law, along the lines of the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court."

    That Motu Proprio -

    "Maritime Jurisdiction of Courts Exposed"

    Mark Gray. NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT. (The buck stops with you, Mark.)


    Ross James .... Family Name of Bradley
    [Christian or, given Names-certified copy Birth Certificate]

    When Mark Gray 1st got the job, I did a blog-post to him. I'm hoping that he will have moved in by now. Or, will he be next to go?

    Always only an opinion.


    Sep 11 8:03 AM | Link | 2 Comments
  • What Is The Law? (The 'Color Of Law'?)

    Simon Dicko commented the following in the form of a question over on Facebook:

    "I tire of the endless assertions made by people about what law is... to me we can go in one of two directions...

    1. quote what is written in black and white and clearly show why it's applicable and valid

    2. make a logical argument in order to show why a position is valid or invalid."

    My reply came as follows:

    In much of my own 'early research' on "the law" and where it comes from, I have relied mostly on this quote from a 'paper' put out by 'Sovereignty International' in what is an excellent piece of 'work', I feel. (Linked below.)

    "As far as the Vatican itself is concerned, it is clear that Private International Law, and Law Merchant, and Admiralty Maritime [Martial] Law, are different names for Canon Law, which comes from the Vatican."

    Indeed, I've posted the above many a time in comments. Although it can be misleading - and I expect that it has been out long before the Motu Proprio law was decreed a few days over, 1 year ago.

    In the past week and after reading the work of "Anna Maria" (pinned post thread), and, the excellent 'paper' from circa 2000/2001 ("Maritime Jurisdiction of Courts Exposed") and in then re-reading Ucadia's Frank O'Collins' view again (that the ROMAN CULT no longer exists, since Francis became Pope), it was clear to me that since the September 2013 Motu Proprio, this was the case.

    I mean, he (Francis) has decreed a law that will destroy the very "corrupt" and highly UNlawful "law' - that we now have in different shapes and forms. (Being the "colour of law", only.)

    ............ "The false LAWS and forgeries first formed by the ROMAN CULT from the 12th Century onwards that now constitute the highest laws of the CATHOLIC CHURCH and COMMON LAW.

    The name "Canon Law" literally translates as "the law of the Carpenter"-- --an obvious association to the false claim of Jesus being a carpenter as first created by the ROMAN CULT into CATHOLIC CHURCH liturgy from the 12th Century onwards.

    ......... As Christians claim Jesus to be the Son of God and highest SOVEREIGN BODY, by default Canon Law by its name alone claims superior STATUS above all other LAW."

    ....... "The age of the Roman Cult, as first formed in the 11th Century and that hijacked the Catholic Church first formed by the Carolingians in the 8th Century, then the Holly Christian Empire or Byzantine Church by the 13th Century and the world at large by the 16th Century ceased to exist around March 14th 2013 upon the election of Pope Francis."

    The following is also important.

    Just because they say the United Nations (in being a 'consensus' based organisation) has some 60 to 70 existing "state franchises" that all get to vote (formerly as countries or, as will be a "state" of -- just like Queensland), with a claimed 1.2 billion people that follow the Pope's Law- doesn't mean to anyone that the Pope has final say on what the law will be in, the UN's planned OWG??

    Just because the United Nations and it's ICC (, are under the Rome Statute (as are all those Treaty signatories including Australia and from the outset, 1st July 2002 -, doesn't necessarily mean to anyone that we should be paying attention to this fact?

    Is any of this making any sense to other members?

    Yes, and from within the September 1st, 2013 Pope's Motu Proprio:

    ........... "A separate section is dedicated to crimes against humanity, including genocide and other crimes defined by international common law, along the lines of the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court."

    That Motu Proprio -

    I will be most interested in what Simon Dicko´╗┐, Shane Rockliff, Barry Powell´╗┐and all others have to say, in reply.

    'Sovereignty International':

    The "colour of law"?

    If you are not sure what I am meaning or, don't even know what I am meaning, go no further than a listen to the 50 seconds onwards mark, in this video. (My thanks to a dear member.)

    The man being interviewed clearly says..."We don't operate under International Law...what we have is the 'colour of law', the 'law of the jungle' in which the 'rich and the powerful' basically determines what goes and what doesn't go."

    Yes... what we have is the 'colour of law' ....

    Always, only an opinion.


    ps; That thread:

    "Maritime Jurisdiction of Courts Exposed"

    Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia: Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow-Vorbeck

    Open Letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Lew - from Anna von Reitz

    Anna's letter to Francis Cardinal George, O.M.I. the Archbishop of Chicago.

    Sep 03 8:39 AM | Link | 3 Comments
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.