Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (and a 70 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
View LookingConfident's Instablogs on:
  • Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth The Second Is A Corporate Person - Only A Juristic Entity

    Back when the current Queensland Governor Paul de Jersey was officially sworn into office in mid July, 2014, he made the following oath:

    "I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second as lawful sovereign of Australia and to her heirs and successors according to law and I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second," he [as the 26th person to assume the position of Queensland Governor], said.

    Following his swearing in and by the very man who replaced him in his previous position he held, as Chief Justice of Queensland (Tim Carmody), the recently departed Premier Campbell Newman (who himself had made both the appointments), commented:

    ........."Queenslanders today are not only gaining not just a new governor but a quality family to be the Queen's representative in our great state of Queensland," is what the ex premier/state member, he said.

    On the Queensland Parliament website we are told that the Queensland Governor .... "is the personal representative of the Sovereign and that the Governor must always remain non-political".

    Even more ..... "One of the most important duties is the opening of the Parliament following a State election and the granting of Royal Assent to Bills passed in the Legislative Assembly. With the assent of the Governor given on behalf of the Sovereign, the Bill becomes an Act of Parliament and thus a law of the land." -

    **Cough** ("the Bill becomes an Act of Parliament and thus a law of the land.")


    Following the recent election, it became even more comical.

    February 09, 2015 -

    "Who Should the Queensland Governor Appoint as Premier?"

    It would very much appear to me that the Governor most certainly becomes a "Team Player", and with a clear understanding of his/her role.

    Queensland/AUSTRALIA - The Royals? ... Never ever had it, and never ever was "the crown" -

    The ongoing deception or, is it total ignorance of those within the corporate Queensland government, the governor and any/all lawful roles in relation to lawmaking or, "policy enforcing" and as to who they/we all answer to (at law), should need no further explaining.

    In recent times (Pope Benedict/Pope Francis) the Roman cult that under corrupt Popes and for centuries had controlled the slavery of the people, was 'killed off'.

    It no longer exists..... and the "crown" remains with the sovereign himself, Pope Francis.

    The Vatican is back to being a church and separate from the Holy SEE as the law making body, with the Pope being it's head or, the supreme power.


    Who controls the crown?

    < Note: Any plan or dealing affecting land standing in the name of the Sovereign (Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second etc) on behalf of a responsible Minister must be signed by a delegate of the Minister in the format:

    "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second (Minsiter for Police and Emergency Services)". >[sic]

    I believe ....

    That "crown land" is all part of the Global Estate Trust with we as living men and women the Living Beneficiaries of that Trust (and through or, off our Live Birth record), and that (at law), we are all under the law of the Pope.

    We have looked into what are corporate fictions or, juridic/juristic persons/entities previously, in another instablog, Australia - About "The Crown"

    UHMMm? Says it all... "is a juristic entity" (Oh yeah!!)

    As always, only an opinion.


    ps; My strong feeling is that the state Governors and including the Governor General - all (now), answer to the Pope.

    From Canada's corporate "rule book"...

    Mar 24 8:58 PM | Link | 2 Comments
  • [St] Robert Bellarmine - "Rule Of Law" - Evidence

    Just could be the answer as to why there is never much said about the sovereignty of the crown (the Pope) in his role as the lawmaker.


    The following is taken from the book (page 557) "Law, the State, and the International Community". (By James Brown Scott)

    The writer is documenting the work of a Robert Bellarmine (1542 - 1621), and a man who was a definite 'heavyweight' at the law, in his time. (A Jesuit.)

    St Robert Bellarmine, S.J. (Italian: Roberto Francesco Romolo Bellarmino; 4 October 1542 - 17 September 1621) was an Italian Jesuit and a Cardinal of the Catholic Church. He was one of the most important figures in the Counter-Reformation. He was canonized in 1930 and named a Doctor of the Church. Bellarmine is also widely remembered for his role in the Galileo affair.

    The following is taken from the book, Law, the State, and the International Community (By James Brown Scott)

    ["extraneous" - irrelevant or unrelated to the subject being dealt with.]

    Ross Bradley

    23 mins · Edited

    What we Admins of this group are saying and what I am saying to Dean Clifford in our discussion is - for us to forget about the Pope and religion and yet, we should ONLY use, the Pope's law.

    It's the law that we are all under. That no one is above. It's the law that the "Rule of Law" applies to.

    Pope Francis says that:

    .......... "One of the cornerstones of the system introduced by this law is constituted by the so-called rule of law, as a result of which administrative sanctions may be imposed only in cases defined by law."

    "This I decide and establish, anything to the contrary notwithstanding."

    It doesn't get much clearer.

    Deprivation Of Liberty And The Rule Of Law - LookingConfident | Seeking Alpha

    All states are corporations. As a corporation, they are "registered" (ultimately) with the Holy SEE in Rome. - This then means that they are all under the Law of, the registrar. (Pope Francis, being the "boss".)

    Always, only an opinion.


    ps; Besides the Lawyers not ever wanting to make their chosen career path to become yet another 'horse and cart', industry.

    (Yes Folks ...... They ain't ever gunna tell us.)

    Do no Harm?

    Mar 23 9:51 PM | Link | Comment!
  • This Land Is Your Land/My Land - Let "The Financiers" Know This, Too!

    In a recent post (This land is your Land/my Land), I made the claim that there's not one piece of "crown" land here in Australia that we (as Living Beneficiaries of the Global Estate Trust) cannot lawfully go and live on and to grow our crops, peacefully and to farm/work the land and freely access the, any available water, etc.

    Yes, it is a big claim. Understanding why it's lawful, simplifies it.

    In another post pre Xmas I passed on the Dr David Pascoe story of the sorry plight of 87 yr old Australian farmer, Charlie Phillott 'from on the ruggedly beautiful Carisbrooke Station at Winton. He has owned his station since 1960.' Charlie was being 'driven off the land by the greed of banking executives'.

    There are many Australian Farmers in a similar situation. Including this Facebook group - the men/women of the Mount Morris Station Charleville Queensland.

    From in her "Diary entry 14th of March 2015" the writer "Cate" makes an interesting point and asks the question:

    < "Why are people inspecting properties when the financiers are told, as allegedly in this reported case rippling across this great land, when they [the purchaser] can be taken to court instead of the financier who is foreclosing - why would anyone purchase if this was the case?"

    Cate goes on:

    < "A very important question must be asked .. WHY would any financier feel the "need" to have this in any contract of sale? Are they hiding or trying to cover something up?" >

    A Supreme Court Judicial Review should be called for. Asking if the original 'loans' taken out were ever and or are they still, lawful and do they have any crown backing at law, to be enforced?

    It will be news for some that at law, a dead corporate fiction NAME or, a corporate "XYZ Greedy Bank" is a juristic person - and at law is "registered" with and UNDER, and controlled by the law of the Holy SEE. (Located within the VATICAN CITY STATE in Rome, in Italy.)

    Now as living men and or, women (the Farmers) who are and from off their Live Birth Record the Living Beneficiaries of the Global Estate Trust and (as juridic entities, all 'living on the land') and as such - are all under and are all protected by, that same law.

    At law, the corporation "XYZ Greedy Bank", is a juristic person.

    At law, the financiers (or, CEO of the bank) as a living man/woman and in being head of that corporation "XYZ Greedy Bank", is a juridic person.

    A "juridic person" (canon law's version of a corporation) is also the head of the civil corporation. (The corporation also being, a juristic person.)

    That story;

    (Note again: All Farmers as living men/women are, Juridic entities who are all directly dependent on the Holy See-live birth record and are all under and protected by, the law.)

    What is a "juridic person"?

    From the Pope's Decree (as issued Motu Proprio and commencing on Sept. 1st, 2013) we find that his Law applies to the following:

    c) ......those persons who serve as representatives, managers or directors, as well as persons who even de facto manage or exercise control over the entities directly dependent on the Holy See and listed in the registry of canonical juridical persons kept by the Governorate of Vatican City State;

    Here's a Link to an interpretation -

    It's very important to now note that not one of those living men or, women "the financiers" (the Bank managers) loaned any Living man/women Farmer, any money whatsoever.

    As living men/women, they ("the financiers") can no longer coerce or, harm any other living man/woman. At law.

    At Law, a corporation can only do business with another corporation.

    Loans were only ever given from the corporation (being "XYZ Greedy Bank") that were always enacted by a dead corporate juridic person and onto a dead corporate 'fiction' NAME on a Legal 'construct' or, what is only a "registered" corporate NAME, of the Farmer/s.

    The Living Farmer was deceived (non disclosure upfront of this, fact) and had "signed" a contract on behalf of that NAME, unknowing.

    Can (in a proper court of law), any of those living men or, women "the financiers" say under oath before a competent justice in Law that they loaned the living man/woman (the farmer/s), any money?

    So since the corrupt "fiction of law" (that once had "powered" all those inferior Trust/contracts, at law), is now dead, all Bank loans now become void. -

    Yes, it is difficult to comprehend. No doubt.

    Always, only an opinion.



    Mar 15 5:24 AM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.