Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (and a 70 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
View LookingConfident's Instablogs on:
  • CROWN Land - This Land Is Your Land/My Land

    It's that "long paddock" or, what is "crown" land in the out-back of Australia or, crown land all over the land - that belongs to the Living men and women, as Living Beneficiaries of, the Global Estate.

    ......"We have nine parcels of public land we are currently working through with the Crown Lands department ....... to be freed up for industrial or residential development" said the mayor.

    Global Estate:


    And it's about all the land that mostly belongs in Trust to "we" the living men and women in the world, and by/through the "crown"- is so easily "stolen" from us and through our ignorance and it is stolen by the corporations, and only to then be monetised. ("nine parcels of public land")


    There's not one piece of "crown" land here in Australia that we (as Living Beneficiaries of the Global Estate Trust) cannot lawfully go and live on and to grow our crops, peacefully and to freely access the, any available water, etc ...

    (Shouldn't we be learning, just why this is so?)

    And it's why we (as travelers) can FREE-ly access the roads that we living men and women can "share", and at law we do NOT need any "Rego" or, a Licence for us to do so. We don't (none of us) need to be "governed" (CONtrolled) by other men and women. (As slaves to them.)

    We all share that one Law - Do no Harm.

    Rule of Law

    Under the "Rule of Law", all men and women are equals, at law.

    And you hear it so often ... "The law of the land is common law."

    What they are really saying is (I feel), that the law of the land is "common" to all. (That we were born into or, that we are living on the land. - that land called Australia, New Zealand, the Americas, Canada, etc.)

    This land is controlled (at law) as part of the Global Estate with the sovereign crown and "lawmaker" (himself), being the Trustee.

    < "The Papal Bulls that sanctioned the invasion and exploitation of Indigenous peoples lands all around the world are still valid." >

    < "However, the legacy of Terra Nullius remains with the Crown retaining the underlying sovereignty of all land in Australia." >

    The question is (does it really need any further explaining?), just who/what is the "crown"? And just who, controls the land? (With ALL the people- the living beneficiaries of the land, as part of that Global Estate Trust. The Pope being, The Trustee.) >

    That Law:

    We all share that one ('natural') Law - Do no Harm.

    The Pope doesn't give that to us.. as the "crown", he administers it... and he is the Trustee...and he is the lawmaker.

    In closing and in regards to that "Doctrine of Discovery". (And as is linked above.)

    They simply cannot "cherry pick" one LAW saying that it is "valid" (for the "originals of the land" to comply with) and then disregard all other Law or, that supreme "system of law" over us all - that comes from the Holy SEE, in Rome.

    "Do no Harm" Yes ... and Woody Guthrie was 100% correct!

    Always, only an opinion.


    Mar 04 10:56 PM | Link | 1 Comment
  • Australia - About "The Crown"

    About "The Crown"

    From within the document:

    The Crown

    84. The first use of the expression "the Crown" was to identify the body politic.

    ........ Writing in 1903, Professor Pitt Cobbett identified this as involving a "defective conception" which was "the outcome of an attempt on the part of English law to dispense with the recognition of the State as a juristic person, and to make the Crown do service in its stead".

    Yes .... "of an attempt on the part of English law to dispense with the recognition of the State as a juristic person"

    Q? A "juristic person" is registered with who/what and is under what law?

    Queen of Australia

    An extract from Volume 1 of the Constitutional Commission 1988 Report dealing with Queen Elizabeth in her capacity as the Queen of Australia and other documents confirming that role including the Royal Style and Titles Act 1953 and the 1999 High Court decision on the Sue v (Heather) Hill Case. -

    Professor Pitt Cobbett (1853-1919) -

    [Juridical personality- jurisdic person] What's a "Juridic Person"?

    Link to that story:

    Do we need further evidence? Click on this link?

    Truth About the Magna Carta (

    It's clear or, should be clear that all Jurisdic/juridical persons are "registered" with and are under to law of, The Holy SEE with the Pontiff himself (Pope Francis) being the sovereign "crown".

    Always, only an opinion.



    The poster within the link (mysterynomore, on 12/04/2012), refers to it, as being "Juristic law".

    Yet it's the very "Law" that's mentioned so often, here on this blog.

    (Forget about anything "archon-ish", as it's ---> The Supreme law.)

    And whilst this "law" no longer "powers" the state (either juristic-ly or, as [a] juridic person/s of the state) both are still, "registered" with and are UNDER (besides, as living men and women, being "protected" by), that law.

    We, in our remaining as a "juridic person" (registered with the Holy SEE from off our Live birth bond) do so as the Living (as men and women) Beneficiaries of, the Global Estate Trust. (The Pontiff/Pope being, the lawmaker and Trustee.)

    And as 'juridical persons', all of the policy enforcers are now acting, unlawfully.

    As men/women, they are "acting" against the law of the Living Beneficiaries or, against the law of the land. (Do no Harm.)

    Feb 28 8:47 PM | Link | 2 Comments
  • Challenge To The Editor - Queensland's Courier Mail


    Ross Bradley

    30 mins · Edited

    --------> The people V's the Corporate 'state' of QUEENSLAND?

    From a current thread. My question remains....

    We do have a "system" of law and a "Rule of Law" (as strange as it may seem), and within that same global "system", Justices of the Supreme court answer not to the corporate state (government/s), they answer to - the law.

    Would Queensland's CJ himself (Tim Carmody) care to 'chance his arm' on a matter of determining law (I wonder), in his own Supreme court, of law?

    Is that not the kind of "challenge" that we need to generate an interest in?

    Below pic - Queensland's Chief Justice, Tim Carmody.

    Like ·

    Always, only an opinion.


    Feb 25 10:32 PM | Link | 1 Comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.