Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (and a 70 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
View LookingConfident's Instablogs on:
  • AUSTRALIA's Governor General - Be The Man That You Are

    Dear General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC (Retd) - you well know that when the going get's tough, the tough get going.

    This job now calls for that 'tough man' that you are, Digger!

    As the Ambassador of the Holy See (the Pope's law-making body), and as Australia's Governor General you must start taking an "active" role in 'waving the whip', is what 'me thinks'.

    ["Afterwards, the Governor-General received from His Excellency Archbishop The Most Reverend Adolfo Tito Yllana, Letters of Credence accrediting him as the Ambassador of The Holy See." - ]

    You and they (all the state governors) simply cannot continue to hide behind the apron (or, the pork-pie that it is) of "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second", forever.

    You may only need to have a good 'chin wag' with them and to have them remind the Justices in the Supreme Courts that the living men and women acting in juridic positions (entities) in the corporate 'states' all must answer to THEM, at law - and that they the justices (separation of powers), don't ever answer to, any corporate entities.

    You can do this, Honourable General.

    It's so interesting to read and realise that International Law always "out-trumps" Domestic Law. (The lawmaker has said so.)

    Wikipedia tells us:

    "Pacta sunt servanda is related to good faith, while 'pacta sunt servanda' does not equate with good faith.

    This entitles [U.N. corporate] states to require that obligations be respected and to rely upon the obligations being respected.... This good faith basis of treaties implies ..... that a party to the treaty cannot invoke provisions of its municipal (domestic) law as justification for a failure to perform."


    This ("pacta sunt servanda") came up in a speech to the United Nations given by the Holy See's PAUL RICHARD GALLAGHER - SECRETARY FOR RELATIONS WITH STATES. [Page 4 IV.2 Responsibility to Observe the Existing International Law.

    That Speech:

    Supposedly (and as recently advised by a Supreme Court Justice - the Honourable Justice Jackson), Queensland's Supreme court doesn't entertain any jurisdiction other than it's own state civil law interpretations?

    Hello? ("Houston, we have a problem"?)

    Yet, some 12 months ago I wrote that the then Attorney General of the UNITED STATES' corporation Eric Holder, was arguing before the Supreme Court (the US' highest court) that the United Nations treaties even out-trump the United States Constitution.

    Don't take Your Guns to Town? -

    Yes ... and if the then Attorney General of the UNITED STATES' corporation had to go to the Supreme court (I never read of any 'result'?) to 'argue' a point - you can only imagine how tough it is for an "ordinary", uneducated pensioner (who lives in the 'burbs of Logan City out of Brisbane), to do similar?

    Always, only an opinion.


    Oct 04 10:41 PM | Link | Comment!
  • Change Doesn't Just Happen - Cause-And-Effect?

    When you know you are "winning".

    Below is a "screen-shot" from within my "Open Letter to Julie Steel Re; 9104/15 James V's Barber" InstaBlog-post.


    Note the link to the law firm's website?


    Note how they have now "changed" the 'text' of their story.

    That no longer, is there any reference to (to me, its been moved off the page), the corporate Queensland Government's use of the Papal Bull, "Doctrine of Discovery" or, "Doctrine of Conquests".

    How AMAZING!! Just shows us what we are up against.

    Never a dull moment.


    Oct 01 1:55 PM | Link | Comment!
  • Pope Francis - The U.N. And The Supreme Court Of Queensland

    The Supreme Court of Queensland

    Not only is the appointment system (for Justices) entirely in the hands of the executive government, so too is any matter before the court that Justices of this Queensland plenary jurisdiction get to 'hear', controlled by the Registry. (Being part of what is yet another, corporate body.)

    In this white paper, a mention is made of a speech made by Justice Bruce McPherson, 'Why have law at all?'

    From within it, the Honourable Justice says:

    [That]...."Justice apart from law may seem a noble ideal; but it remains at base ........ an unpredictable and therefore potentially dangerous conception that leads to tyranny."


    Not only should our Justices here in Queensland always be seen to remain neutral and to "know the law of the realm", they should ALWAYS be seen to be upholding the law, in all matters.

    Below: From page 10/10

    The Pope (Francis) talks of the Law and the Rule of Law to the 193 states of the United Nations yet, the Honourable Justice Jackson (and, in my own matter that is before the Supreme Court of Queensland) tells the court- and in no uncertain terms, that he,"makes his oath to..the Queen"?

    Hellooooo? Houston...we have a problem.

    And when the Pope talks of "Law" and the "Rule of law" to the United Nations (and with all it's corporate states), he is not exactly meaning (Catholic), "church law".

    They know what he is meaning. That ONE (universal), law.

    Pope Francis - to the United Nations

    "No human individual or group can consider itself absolute"

    "The work of the United Nations, according to the principles set forth in the Preamble and the first Articles of its founding Charter, can be seen as the development and promotion of the rule of law, based on the realization that justice is an essential condition for achieving the ideal of universal fraternity.

    In this context, it is helpful to recall that the limitation of power is an idea implicit in the concept of law itself... To give to each his own, to cite the classic definition of justice, means that no human individual or group can consider itself absolute, permitted to bypass the dignity and the rights of other individuals or their social groupings."

    As always, only an opinion. My Truth.


    Sep 27 8:57 PM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.