Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (and a 70 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
View LookingConfident's Instablogs on:
  • It's Hard Not To Agree With This 100%

    One day, people will learn (and, hopefully get to fully understand) that the Roman Curia (being the governorate of the Vatican City State - Rome) and through the Holy See - has created (and under-pins) all the law forms giving rise to.... legal fiction entities - to trusts, corporations, co-operatives, public utilities and foundations.

    And that all these corporate entities exist for good reasons - - with trusts enabling us to protect and to pass on property assets - that corporations encourage private investment in new technologies and other business ventures, while public utilities encourage investment in infrastructure - and so on and so on.

    And we need to learn and fully comprehend that these things were all created for good reasons and for good intentions, and yet these very same incorporated entities can also be misused and [that most all], get to be abused and so often, in, a truly criminal manner.

    Thanks to "Judge Anna"

    It's hard not to agree with this 100%.

    (click to enlarge)

    Always, only an opinion.


    Aug 07 10:07 PM | Link | Comment!
  • Canonical Principle - Home, Car Repossessed Unlawfully?

    Canonical Rights To Temporal Goods - Had a home/car, confiscated unlawfully?

    The word is described as follows:

    adjective: temporal

    relating to worldly as opposed to spiritual affairs; secular.

    This was found, in my 'hunting around' and is worth featuring in view of our getting to acquire a better understanding of the law.

    When we realise that not one "dead" corporate person (man or, woman acting as a Juridic entity - policy enforcers), can cause "harm" to a living man or, woman, we will then learn why they simply cannot do so (take our possessions), outside of a Law court - and a Justice in law, ordering any such confiscation.

    They may well 'take your vehicle' yet, are they then setting themselves up for an even bigger hiding, down the line?

    The case I found was against the 'so called' Vatican Bank (Istituto per le Opere di Religione or, "IOR" - Institute for religious works) that is in itself a public juristic person, brings forward some very important information in regards to the Law. (Begins page 71/92.)

    The plaintiff in the matter was claiming that the IOR (the Vatican Bank) was the personal property of the Pope. Which is proven as being incorrect.

    Since the corrupt Roman cult surrounding the fiction of law has been destroyed (it was "killed off" by the current two living Popes), and as living beneficiaries/global estate trust/juridic persons, any/all property lawfully acquired (house, car, etc) cannot be deprived of us (at law), by another living man or, woman acting as a juridic person for a juristic person. (eg; Bank, Council, SPER, Equities, etc.)

    Not even as living sovereign/crown - can the Pope himself, steal it from us.

    Best those 'heads of civil corporations' and other living men and women 'acting' in that Juridic role and only as 'policy enforcers' (police), better take note. As your day in a proper Law court is yet to come.

    There is no statute of limitations on unlawfulness. (Nuremberg.)

    Link to File:

    Click on, to enlarge


      • Ross Bradley .
        Yes...("No one can be deprived of a right - absent fault), and stands for the principle that no person - even the Pope - can lawfully deprive another of temporal goods legitimately acquired"
      • Ross Bradley .
        Bank home loans, new Car loans, etc .... you are on very, very "shaky grounds" with those that get to learn of the law and exactly how to apply it.
      • Ross Bradley .
        My heart bleeds for the many Farmers (property owners) having their life long "dream" being stolen from them (repossessed), by greedy Bankers. People need to learn.

      Ross Bradley What Law have Farmers broken?


      Perhaps Looksmart's CEO Michael Onghai would like to reply to my E Mail/s sent to him in relation to my shares in the soon to be taken "private" company, please?

      Always, only an opinion


    Jul 30 12:38 AM | Link | 1 Comment
  • An Open Letter To The Honourable Justice James S Douglas. Supreme Court Queensland

    Bradley v Barber- Application for a Judicial Review No BS4846/15

    It is with regret that I pen this open letter to you, for all to read.

    I was wanting to avoid this embarrassing situation yet some reasonable 10 E Mails containing 'appealing like' content in hope that common sense, and that the letter of the law would prevail - and that were send to the top law person in this glorious state of Queensland, have all remain unanswered.

    .........................The Honourable Justice James S Douglas


    I've even "Tweeted" a message to the Honourable Premier herself.

    No one is listening. Sadly.

    To them it may well all be, unintelligible. Or, told to them that this is so?

    The Honourable Annastacia Palaszczuk MP. 39th Premier of Queensland, and head of government in the state of Queensland, Australia, and sitting alongside her (nearest us) is the Queensland Attorney General, the Honourable Yvette D'Ath MP.

    Your Honour...

    The two objections that now need to go before the court, are that:

    We [I] feel that:

    (1) any Lawyer from Crown Law should not be playing any part in the matter, before the court. (It will be shown to be, unlawful.)


    That this also includes any Law firm that has or, has had any kind of contact working either for or, on behalf of either the Department of Justice and Attorney-General and or, has contracted juridically or, juristically .... for any/all other departments of, the Queensland Government.

    The other dispute that must also to go before you your Honour is:

    or, concerns the very minor 'kafuffle' surrounding the listing of the matter. That it was inadvertently listed as a civil matter- instead of being listed, of a criminal nature.

    Herod Atipas

    You now get to become the King Herod, in your own court. And I had reminded all parties concerned that a kind of repeat of history over 2000 years ago should not again be, the case. ... And that as a good independent Justice, at law, you can only serve one master.



    Let's hope we can avoid that situation? That sanity can prevail?


    Ross Bradley - Plaintiff

    Jul 15 11:09 PM | Link | 2 Comments
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.