Seeking Alpha

LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (and a 70 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
View LookingConfident's Instablogs on:
  • Attorney General Yvette D'Ath - To Use An Own 'Crown' Law Against The Crown?

    Queensland's Minister for Justice and Attorney General Yvette D'Ath, the Principal Lawyer at Crown Law Brisbane area (Lauren M Reibelt) and the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Queensland (here in Brisbane) all, surely.... must know better.

    [They should all] Know...

    That you cannot 'defend' a living woman contracted within or, under your own corporate umbrella by using the corporation's legal team, when you are up against 'the boss' (at law) the living sovereign.

    And who, and when as a corporation you (along with the defendant in the matter), all answer to. (Yes, at law.)

    Is there any higher form of law?

    ........................The Honourable Justice James S Douglas

    The matter before the court (in a Judicial Review application to the Supreme Court of Queensland) asks the court (The Honourable Justice James Douglas) if the defendant Natalie Barber, as a living women) is acting lawfully .. in her juridical role of handing out administrative sanctions (pecuniary punishment) against living men and women who (naturally), do not consent to her coercive and forceful manner in demanding payment of her determinations.

    The defendant cannot use any lawyer from Crown Law, in fact or, anyone from any law-firm that is in anyway connected with this government of Queensland or, from a law-firm that may have done any recent work for or, is 'on the books' as having done work for the government.

    A serious CRIME here in Queensland is alleged to have been committed (and is allegedly, continued to be committed), and the Attorney General's (Hon Yvette D'Ath's) OWN "Crown Law", will defend the accused?

    Its not on.

    Its called a serious "conflict of interest". And a huge one at that. (Is there any bigger example, that there can be?)

    For the Attorney General of Queensland to pit anyone against the law of, 'he who you are under and answer to, at law' (yes, the living sovereign) would be a grave mistake to make.

    My recent advice has been that our Attorney General has been in discussion with Crown Law (and I wonder what has been told or, not been told to the Attorney General, by the Crown Solicitor), and surely I'm not out of line in my asking in my own E Mail to Yvette D'Ath:

    [Can] "I assume that you will be advising me ultimately of what was discussed, in this regard?" (See E mail, below.)


    Don't know how this came to be listed as a Civil situation when my application clearly relates to criminal law allegations made.

    (The very highest form of criminal law, if I may add.)

    This matter should not (eve r) be one to be left in the hands of an independent Justice in Law (The Honourable James Douglas) to have to make - as I feel it would be an insult to his standing, in law.

    That's beside the trivial issue raised in relation to how the matter has been 'listed' in the court and as so, will be heard.

    Criminal allegations (and re; the highest form of law) should not need any explanation, to competent Registrars.



    All is not well in our highest level of the judiciary, here in the top state of Queensland. Today's news article and a comment below it, tell part of that story: Senior judge saved from reforms by Newman

    From Facebook, brave 'fighter' (a champion) Dr David Pascoe BVSc PhD OVH Repro who tells it (the above story), as he understands it.

    3 hrs ·



    "There is a story in the Sunday Mail today that has implications far more serious than even the editors and journalists behind it most likely realise.

    There is obviously an incomplete understanding of the separation of powers and what flows from it - and the penalties from breaching it.

    The implications of this story are far greater than anything really to do with Justice Margaret McMurdo and any beneficial window dressing reform it was to be sold as.

    .......These implications go right to the heart of what Campbell Newman- and Jeff Seeney - were really up to in setting up their very own Fascist State. These implications are very oppressive: it meant that no one could effectively appeal a legal decision under their plans, if Carmody - their minion - would not approve it.

    Furthermore, Carmody would effectively control all trial matters coming before the courts by having to first agree for those matters be heard. Carmody was their instrument and directly under their control and not independent. This is, by default, a breach of the separation of powers.

    The proof Carmody's lack of independence or non-partisan behaviour is seen in his actions and words subsequent to both appointments as Chief Magistrate and later as the Chief Justice.

    ....Carmody had run "show trials" in the Magistrates courts and tried to silence Magistrates if they spoke against the government's philosophy - if there ever was one. Therefore he was not impartial by evidence.

    Since Jarrod Bleijie - the former Attorney General - was set to implement these changes, he was in effect, Newman's proxy from the executive arm of Government.

    This would suggest that both Carmody and Newman now have a criminal case to answer. Even after the event of Newman's removal as Premier and the LNP losing the election, if this is supported by evidence, they must then be held accountable as this is a very serious offence.

    Certainly the LNP went ahead against all advice and placed Carmody as Chief Justice as they drafted and implemented some of these plans.

    Therefore this suggests that much more than a technical breach of the separation of powers was enabled.

    The evidence suggests that they should now both be charged.

    Charging these conspirators will prevent another political party attempting to do the same thing - and possibly getting away with it.

    (Our thanks to The Crocodile and a whole pond of Platypus)"

    A previous, with Dr David Pascoe BVSc PhD OVH Repro


    We sure do live in interesting times. Always, only an opinion.


    Jul 04 11:17 PM | Link | 4 Comments
  • Looksmart - Oracle? Goods And Services Exchanges?

    In any One World Government 'scenario' (and rest assured, that's a set in concrete 'plan' of all of the 193 franchised member states within the UNITED NATIONS' corporation), we already virtually have that ONE Law "system". It comes from the Holy See, the Pope.

    The many (and different) factions within the U.N. (like the AG21 mob), have virtually now been brought to their senses by the Pope Francis September 1st, 2013 Decree or, Law - and as such, they are now unable to get their own "dream" up and running, by using any further coerciveness.

    Proper Ecclesiastical 'Courts of law' will/are yet to deal with them.

    The (this) Law has now stopped any/all "slavery" nonsense, misusing the corporate "Legal" NAME.

    The Law now - is down to "Do no Harm" ... as a core footing or, foundation. We people, simply don't yet realise this.

    Learn why?

    I'd like to seriously think (valueinvestor007) that Looksmart does have a small, yet unique role to play in that coming, world ahead.

    Along with Oracle, et al .... To become part of that Global Exchange that is (or, will be) needed, inter-connecting people and along the lines of the existing global telecommunications infrastructure.

    There is an unstoppable global crisis looming that requires a global solution.

    With the "resources" of the world being returned to the rightful owners of those resources - the Global Estate (being the living people of the world - to pass on to the next generation, as such), those who are involved, will still get to "manage" those same resources and they will be rewarded.

    That's their "expertise", and an expertise that's central to all people's needs.

    People who grow food will "exchange" food/value for reward. (Digital credits?)

    All people can/should/will have free access to basic needs like hand held communications and all/many may/should get access to trade for (top shelve) "exotics" or, services, on a supply/demand basis.

    The raw resources of the world (to be then shared by all the people), will virtually pay for the FREE food/water/shelter for all, in our new world ahead. (On a cost plus, basis. Non profit.)

    And a solution needs to begin now. (Along with that need for unique digital passwords.)


    It's going to be a very long road if we don't start preparing for that inevitability that lies ahead. Many billions will starve to death if we don't consider this.

    What do people think the FEMA camps are about?

    If they are not to imprison the thieves and law-breakers? The many people who will become so desperate for food for them to feed their starving families. (Scenes like Baltimore will soon be seen, world wide.)

    We really need to start the "conversation" among "Tech" companies and with the Banks, our local councils etc, in these initial stages.

    We do have the land and councils have the needed (the people paid for) Human Resources (plus suitable gardening mech-aids), for them to start building/growing survival, 'local' food gardens, etc

    This is a global crisis that requires a global solution.

    Goods and Services exchanges?

    [Sweat] Equity "exchanges" can so easily be established by using existing Pi 'data' (on people), already contained within banks/local councils, and in most/many communities.

    Trading in a one fits all unit of or, via, digital credits/debits?

    People getting to access digital "Exchanges" (much like telephone communications- globally) can then get to "inter-act" between each other or, through these many exchanges, that can be accessed by all who have been "pre-qualified", and who wish to "trade".


    Always, only an opinion.


    Apr 29 10:41 PM | Link | Comment!
  • This Corporate "System", Is Broken. Can't Be Repaired.

    We are now arriving at the "business end" when talking of the new world ahead, that awaits us all.

    Much-like a broken piece of (shattered) glass - and so often when an object or, thing is 'broken', we will quickly come to realise that a replacement becomes an only solution.

    This corporate "system", is broken. It cannot be repaired.

    The total corruption and fraud associated with Banking (and the fiction of money), has been well and truly documented. Exposed. Unlawful.

    So too is the corporate "involvement" within the legal system. It's broken.

    Yet, Banking and the "Legal" system continue to so blindly 'carry on regardless', if only to be heading towards an almighty collapse - one that can do no one any good, at all. Including all the crook 'bankster' fraudsters, who continue to embrace it.

    Under the Law and the Rule of law that we have and with well intended un-selfish planning, things can be carefully rectified.

    The Global Estate can then be returned to it's rightful 'owners', being the living people in our world. For them to then pass on to the next generation. And where a new beginning can be just that, and begin. An end to the unlawfulness.

    Whilst I can agree with much of this author's finding, I don't agree with all of it. How much of it do you agree with? -

    CORPORATIONS (Corporate persons)

    Readers should always remember that all corporations can only "talk" (contract) with another corporation. (At law.)

    Also realise that all corporations are "registered" with and are under the Law of the Holy See - in the Vatican City State, Rome.

    (The Pope's law.)

    This means that any alleged legal 'contract' with any corporation has been (or, it must be) conducted through a dead corporate fiction entity or, through that established "Legal name".

    Up until the destruction of the corrupt Roman cult (by the two living Popes), this deceit was being supported, by the Law.

    A long time argument about the unlawfulness of the above is that there was clearly a lack any such "disclosure" of or, about these arrangements upfront and that this was then - - never clearly or, not understood by both the living parties involved in any such 'alleged' contract. - And therefore making any such contract null and void, 'ab initio'. (From the beginning.)

    < Once a FRAUD is revealed, ALL contracts, ALL document, ALL actions resulting from the initial FRAUD are all rendered NULL & VOID - from the beginning - Ab Initio, Nunc Pro Tunc.

    FACT: There is NO Statute of Limitations on the CRIME of FRAUD! >

    It's also important for us all to note that living men and women contracted within all corporations, must act as dead corporate fiction entities (Juridic entities/fiction, persons) for or, on behalf of that dead corporation (called, a Juristic entity), when wishing to conduct any such contract with other living men and women. (At law.)

    As a result, should any living man or, woman now choose NOT to accept being that "Legal" entity (to be that legal NAME), then no further business whatsoever - can then be, conducted.

    The corporate policy "enforcers" are now ALL breaking the law (the Pope's Decree/Law Motu Proprio, a law that commenced on 1st September, 2013), when either by deceit or, through coercion (by threat or, through force), any attempt to make this necessary 'connection' - becomes unlawful. (Or, being what is required at law or, that "corporation to corporation" connection, requirement.)

    There is a solution and one that is fair and just to all living men and women who will ultimately get to "share" the Global Estate, and as is intended, at law.

    More on that of course, in a post to follow.

    Always, only an opinion.


    Apr 25 8:38 PM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.