<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>David Merkel's Comments</title>
    <description>David Merkel's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/366439/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Insurance: Is Buffett Right About Asbestos Liability?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/283496/comments?source=feed#comment-1801807</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1801807</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi, Tom.  Thanks for the mention.  About 8-9 years ago BRK bought out most of White Mountains asbestos exposure as well.  Make there are other deals BRK has done that we don't know about... might require a stroll through the 10-Ks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:44:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi, Tom.  Thanks for the mention.  About 8-9 years ago BRK bought out most of White Mountains asbestos exposure as well.  Make there are other deals BRK has done that we don't know about... might require a stroll through the 10-Ks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Life Insurance Stocks Trading Below Book Value</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/277047/comments?source=feed#comment-1733520</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1733520</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Revenue&quot; is an irrelevant metric for insurers.  It comes down to a earnings and book conservatively stated.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:38:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Revenue&quot; is an irrelevant metric for insurers.  It comes down to a earnings and book conservatively stated.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 U.S. Insurers With Strong Free Cash Flow, Trading Below Book Value</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/275144/comments?source=feed#comment-1710721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1710721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[How did you calculate FCF for life insurers?  That's not easy to do, and the databases do it wrong -- did you do it yourself?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:25:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How did you calculate FCF for life insurers?  That's not easy to do, and the databases do it wrong -- did you do it yourself?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7 Potential Buys Based on Valuation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/258735/comments?source=feed#comment-1534377</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1534377</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Okay, then, here's a series of articles on analyzing insurance companies.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://alephblog.com/2010/06/06/a-summary-of-my-writings-on-analyzing-insurance-stocks'>alephblog.com/2010/06/...</a>/<br/><br/>I hope you benefit from it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:50:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Okay, then, here's a series of articles on analyzing insurance companies.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://alephblog.com/2010/06/06/a-summary-of-my-writings-on-analyzing-insurance-stocks'>alephblog.com/2010/06/...</a>/<br/><br/>I hope you benefit from it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7 Potential Buys Based on Valuation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/258735/comments?source=feed#comment-1533766</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1533766</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm not trying to be mean here, but the tools that work on industrials do not apply to financials.  If you are using price-to-sales on financial companies, I can tell you that will end up with nonsense.  Same for all price-to-whatever cashflow type figures on financials.  Only price to earnings and price to tangible book are valid, and even then, with reservations.<br/><br/>You need to study accounting for financials; the effect of accruals is there on steroids.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:50:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm not trying to be mean here, but the tools that work on industrials do not apply to financials.  If you are using price-to-sales on financial companies, I can tell you that will end up with nonsense.  Same for all price-to-whatever cashflow type figures on financials.  Only price to earnings and price to tangible book are valid, and even then, with reservations.<br/><br/>You need to study accounting for financials; the effect of accruals is there on steroids.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You're Retiring: Where Is Your Income Going to Come From?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/256958/comments?source=feed#comment-1517343</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1517343</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There is one significant problem with your argument.  Dividends are not guaranteed.  In the American context, dividend policies are firmer in the rest of the world, and so people rely on them more.<br/><br/>But dividend streams are never any better than the economics of the free cash flow streams underlying each company.  And almost every year, particularly in bear markets, some previously reliable dividend payer cuts or eliminates the dividend.<br/><br/>This is just another means of reaching for yield.  You are taking on stock market levels of risk using seemingly one equity strategy, and daring to call it safe.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:25:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There is one significant problem with your argument.  Dividends are not guaranteed.  In the American context, dividend policies are firmer in the rest of the world, and so people rely on them more.<br/><br/>But dividend streams are never any better than the economics of the free cash flow streams underlying each company.  And almost every year, particularly in bear markets, some previously reliable dividend payer cuts or eliminates the dividend.<br/><br/>This is just another means of reaching for yield.  You are taking on stock market levels of risk using seemingly one equity strategy, and daring to call it safe.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Four Cheap Reinsurers to Research: Historically Low Price to Book</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/248400/comments?source=feed#comment-1426618</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1426618</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[One more thing to note about PRE, they don't discount their reserves, so book is understated relative to their peers.  Very well-run place in my opinion.  As conservative as they get in Bermuda.<br/><br/>Full disclosure: long PRE for me and my clients.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:20:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[One more thing to note about PRE, they don't discount their reserves, so book is understated relative to their peers.  Very well-run place in my opinion.  As conservative as they get in Bermuda.<br/><br/>Full disclosure: long PRE for me and my clients.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My Visit to the U.S. Treasury</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172628/comments?source=feed#comment-754805</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">754805</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This was originally seven pieces, and made more sense as seven individual pieces, as I wrote them at my blog.<br/><br/>Yes, I write late at night.  I have many responsibilities, and it is my only time that I *can* write.  I do my best for readers, but I make no claims for perfection.<br/><br/>And, though I normally like the editing done to my pieces, this one really took out critical stuff that was in the originals.  I do not like what was done with my original work.  The seven pieces should have been published sequentially, unmodified.  You did a disservice to readers because it left out a lot of data on the interactions between me and the Treasury.<br/><br/>Next time I write something in parts, please, publish each part separately.  You have done readers no favor by publishing one integrated account, because the separate accounts included links and references to the other seven bloggers who I got to know and appreciate.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:34:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This was originally seven pieces, and made more sense as seven individual pieces, as I wrote them at my blog.<br/><br/>Yes, I write late at night.  I have many responsibilities, and it is my only time that I *can* write.  I do my best for readers, but I make no claims for perfection.<br/><br/>And, though I normally like the editing done to my pieces, this one really took out critical stuff that was in the originals.  I do not like what was done with my original work.  The seven pieces should have been published sequentially, unmodified.  You did a disservice to readers because it left out a lot of data on the interactions between me and the Treasury.<br/><br/>Next time I write something in parts, please, publish each part separately.  You have done readers no favor by publishing one integrated account, because the separate accounts included links and references to the other seven bloggers who I got to know and appreciate.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On Primus Credit Mitigations</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/153232/comments?source=feed#comment-613004</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">613004</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks, James.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:27:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks, James.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Memory of Greg Newton</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/129342/comments?source=feed#comment-455105</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">455105</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Greg and I corresponded a few times.  He had a wealth of knowledge and contacts, and the courage to use it.  We lost a leader here.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:25:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Greg and I corresponded a few times.  He had a wealth of knowledge and contacts, and the courage to use it.  We lost a leader here.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dorel: Stable, Profitable and Terrifically Priced</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/126833/comments?source=feed#comment-432678</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">432678</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I own it as well.  Cheap, and seemingly well-run.  The shares in Toronto are more liquid.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:10:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I own it as well.  Cheap, and seemingly well-run.  The shares in Toronto are more liquid.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
