<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>David Stallard's Comments</title>
    <description>David Stallard's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/381906/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Jeremy Grantham Believes In High Oil Prices: Thinks Oil Sands Producers Are Bad Investments</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1357671/comments?source=feed#comment-17938671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17938671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not to disparage the oil sands industry, but having experienced ups &amp; downs in the oil &amp; gas business for 38 years, and having extensively studied its long-term history of ups &amp; downs, there's certainly something to be said for sticking with efficient low-cost producers.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:21:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not to disparage the oil sands industry, but having experienced ups &amp; downs in the oil &amp; gas business for 38 years, and having extensively studied its long-term history of ups &amp; downs, there's certainly something to be said for sticking with efficient low-cost producers.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oilfield Water Management: The Oil And Gas Industry's Holy Grail</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309811/comments?source=feed#comment-17457401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17457401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Anybody have any insight on GasFrac?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:02:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Anybody have any insight on GasFrac?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Financial Repression Will Fail</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1010881/comments?source=feed#comment-11692011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11692011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree with granger ... one of the best articles I've ever read on SA.  Reinforces the little known or understood fact that the Fed was created, and continues to operate, to benefit the big banks &amp; spendthrift politicians at the expense of the populace, exactly the opposite of how it was originally sold to the public in the early 1900s.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:04:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree with granger ... one of the best articles I've ever read on SA.  Reinforces the little known or understood fact that the Fed was created, and continues to operate, to benefit the big banks &amp; spendthrift politicians at the expense of the populace, exactly the opposite of how it was originally sold to the public in the early 1900s.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chuy's - Another Overvalued Restaurant Company?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/910721/comments?source=feed#comment-10326221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10326221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wow ... great analysis.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:45:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wow ... great analysis.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold And The Miners: The Ultimate Hedge?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/872861/comments?source=feed#comment-9574001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9574001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Helpful analysis ... thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:41:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Helpful analysis ... thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Natural Gas: The Buy Of The Decade</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/662961/comments?source=feed#comment-6507301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6507301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[agree with author &amp; am long low-cost natgas producer UPL]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:32:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[agree with author &amp; am long low-cost natgas producer UPL]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sizing Up Chesapeake's Permian Basin Asset Sale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/661821/comments?source=feed#comment-6506391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6506391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[good article, but:<br/><br/>1.  oil &amp; gas activities originated in the Permian Basin with spudding of the Santa Rita #1 in 1921 -- not &quot;early 1930s&quot;<br/><br/>2.  Chevron is a VERY active operator in the Permian Basin, having acquired Texaco and Texaco earlier having acquired Gulf Oil -- both of whom were significant long-time players in the basin.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:05:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[good article, but:<br/><br/>1.  oil &amp; gas activities originated in the Permian Basin with spudding of the Santa Rita #1 in 1921 -- not &quot;early 1930s&quot;<br/><br/>2.  Chevron is a VERY active operator in the Permian Basin, having acquired Texaco and Texaco earlier having acquired Gulf Oil -- both of whom were significant long-time players in the basin.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buying Opportunity Or Full-Blown Bear Market?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/654941/comments?source=feed#comment-6383141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6383141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[good article, but those Spanish bond yields don't look problematic (questionable or uncertain) to me at all ... they look downright troublesome!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:10:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[good article, but those Spanish bond yields don't look problematic (questionable or uncertain) to me at all ... they look downright troublesome!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Play The Niobrara Silo Field</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/523591/comments?source=feed#comment-4823191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4823191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Anybody heard anything about Ultra's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/upl' title='Ultra Petroleum Corp.'>UPL</a>) Niobrara venture farther south (near Colo Spgs, El Paso Co., I believe)?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:49:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Anybody heard anything about Ultra's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/upl' title='Ultra Petroleum Corp.'>UPL</a>) Niobrara venture farther south (near Colo Spgs, El Paso Co., I believe)?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dallas Fed's Creative Denial Game</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/456921/comments?source=feed#comment-3831031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3831031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Perhaps you mean Congress &quot;couldn't&quot; care less -- instead of &quot;could.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:03:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Perhaps you mean Congress &quot;couldn't&quot; care less -- instead of &quot;could.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Energy, Rolling Stone Magazine, Shale Gas Scams And Bubbles</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/414431/comments?source=feed#comment-3257801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3257801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks to &quot;texastech0429&quot; for a good comparison of Full Cost &amp; Successful Efforts methods of E &amp; P accounting.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:03:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks to &quot;texastech0429&quot; for a good comparison of Full Cost &amp; Successful Efforts methods of E &amp; P accounting.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LTRO: Savior Or Distraction?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/400001/comments?source=feed#comment-3035821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3035821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good analysis, James ... appears LTRO addresses only liquidity, not solvency ... more central bank &quot;can kicking.&quot;  Just wonder how long central banks can continue enabling fiscal profligacy, not just in Europe but also in Japan &amp; U.S.?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:16:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good analysis, James ... appears LTRO addresses only liquidity, not solvency ... more central bank &quot;can kicking.&quot;  Just wonder how long central banks can continue enabling fiscal profligacy, not just in Europe but also in Japan &amp; U.S.?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Lucas Energy Copying Chesapeake And About To Make A Bold New Move?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/393491/comments?source=feed#comment-2967001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2967001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Might be a good spec for all the reasons cited by the author, but I wonder why the G&amp;A is so high for such a small company ... and the fact that their latest reserves report shows that PUD (proved undeveloped) acreage is 96% of total proved reserves gives me some pause, i.e., they don't appear to be an E&amp;P company finding producing reserves with the drill bit ... more of a lease flipper -- but apparently a pretty good one.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:41:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Might be a good spec for all the reasons cited by the author, but I wonder why the G&amp;A is so high for such a small company ... and the fact that their latest reserves report shows that PUD (proved undeveloped) acreage is 96% of total proved reserves gives me some pause, i.e., they don't appear to be an E&amp;P company finding producing reserves with the drill bit ... more of a lease flipper -- but apparently a pretty good one.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dry Gas Drilling Concerns Rise: Why You Should Avoid These 9 Energy Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/386431/comments?source=feed#comment-2948221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2948221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[All the points raised by PalmDesertRat are very valid ... my investment approach is similar.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:06:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[All the points raised by PalmDesertRat are very valid ... my investment approach is similar.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dry Gas Drilling Concerns Rise: Why You Should Avoid These 9 Energy Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/386431/comments?source=feed#comment-2936451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2936451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[DAG1996 &amp; PalmDesertRat:<br/>I look at the presentations (&quot;slide decks&quot;) from the companies, and they often disclose &quot;Finding &amp; Development&quot; cost.  UPL is on the low end ($1.60/mcf by my calculation).  See p. 12 of UPL's latest presentation for cost comparisons with peers.  Also look at reported margins, e.g., Yahoo Finance &quot;Key Statistics&quot; lists UPL Profit Margin (41.13%) &amp; Operating Margin (70.20%).  Also look at Enterprise Value (from Yahoo) compared to Proved Reserves (from 10-K or press release), which shows how much you're effectively paying for each mcf of natgas -- for UPL I estimate $1.11/mcf for proved reserves, based on industry standard energy equivalence of 6 mcf of gas for each bbl of oil.  If use 23:1, closer to financial equivalence, then effectively paying $1.00/mcf for proved reserves.  When reported, I also look at 2P reserves (proved+probable) -- $0.52/mcf for UPL, and 3P reserves (proved+probable+possi... -- $$0.37/mcf for UPL.  So if anybody in the U.S. is going to make $$$ from natgas sometime in the future, it's going to be UPL.  Also look at drill bit RRR (reserves replacement ratio), sometimes disclosed in presentations -- or (the way I calculate it) the annual increase in proved reserves (excluding assets sales or purchases) divided by the annual production -- want to see organic growth.  Hope this helps. <br/><br/>TLM looks pretty good, but more balanced with crude oil -- not really a natgas play.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:37:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[DAG1996 &amp; PalmDesertRat:<br/>I look at the presentations (&quot;slide decks&quot;) from the companies, and they often disclose &quot;Finding &amp; Development&quot; cost.  UPL is on the low end ($1.60/mcf by my calculation).  See p. 12 of UPL's latest presentation for cost comparisons with peers.  Also look at reported margins, e.g., Yahoo Finance &quot;Key Statistics&quot; lists UPL Profit Margin (41.13%) &amp; Operating Margin (70.20%).  Also look at Enterprise Value (from Yahoo) compared to Proved Reserves (from 10-K or press release), which shows how much you're effectively paying for each mcf of natgas -- for UPL I estimate $1.11/mcf for proved reserves, based on industry standard energy equivalence of 6 mcf of gas for each bbl of oil.  If use 23:1, closer to financial equivalence, then effectively paying $1.00/mcf for proved reserves.  When reported, I also look at 2P reserves (proved+probable) -- $0.52/mcf for UPL, and 3P reserves (proved+probable+possi... -- $$0.37/mcf for UPL.  So if anybody in the U.S. is going to make $$$ from natgas sometime in the future, it's going to be UPL.  Also look at drill bit RRR (reserves replacement ratio), sometimes disclosed in presentations -- or (the way I calculate it) the annual increase in proved reserves (excluding assets sales or purchases) divided by the annual production -- want to see organic growth.  Hope this helps. <br/><br/>TLM looks pretty good, but more balanced with crude oil -- not really a natgas play.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dry Gas Drilling Concerns Rise: Why You Should Avoid These 9 Energy Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/386431/comments?source=feed#comment-2904031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2904031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[UPL is my favorite natgas rebound play.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:53:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[UPL is my favorite natgas rebound play.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Natural Gas Prices Will Rebound</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/380121/comments?source=feed#comment-2846561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2846561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[For those who want to play a natgas rebound, I'd take a look at low cost producer UPL ... also EQT, which has E&amp;P, midstream and distribution units -- both should do really well if (when?) natgas rebounds.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:25:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[For those who want to play a natgas rebound, I'd take a look at low cost producer UPL ... also EQT, which has E&amp;P, midstream and distribution units -- both should do really well if (when?) natgas rebounds.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banks, Miners, Germany Pointing To Market Correction</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/370781/comments?source=feed#comment-2711451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2711451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Are you sure?  I thought Fisher was bumped up to a voting member last go around.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:21:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Are you sure?  I thought Fisher was bumped up to a voting member last go around.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exxon Mobil Needs To Stop Buying Back Shares And Buy Penn West Energy Instead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/360581/comments?source=feed#comment-2602421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2602421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Appreciate the heads-up on PWE, but where did you hear that the Permian Basin has 5 acre spacing?  I've been involved in E&amp;P in the Permian Basin for almost 40 years, and most recent development that I'm aware of has been either 80 ac or 160 ac spacing ... much of the older shallower production (&quot;low hanging fruit&quot;) is on 40 ac spacing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:02:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Appreciate the heads-up on PWE, but where did you hear that the Permian Basin has 5 acre spacing?  I've been involved in E&amp;P in the Permian Basin for almost 40 years, and most recent development that I'm aware of has been either 80 ac or 160 ac spacing ... much of the older shallower production (&quot;low hanging fruit&quot;) is on 40 ac spacing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sifting Through The Hype - What's The Play On Natural Gas?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/322616/comments?source=feed#comment-2211455</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2211455</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[wholeheartedly agree ... am long UPL]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:00:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[wholeheartedly agree ... am long UPL]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Natural Gas Spike? Don't Trust It</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/322095/comments?source=feed#comment-2205466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2205466</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It may be trite and simplistic but does have at least a kernel of truth ... low prices are the best cure for low prices.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It may be trite and simplistic but does have at least a kernel of truth ... low prices are the best cure for low prices.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Natural Gas Continues Its Epic Fall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/320780/comments?source=feed#comment-2189693</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2189693</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree re UPL -- just bought some below $25 to tuck away for the future.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:13:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree re UPL -- just bought some below $25 to tuck away for the future.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A 5 Step Strategy For Investing In Natural Gas</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/320562/comments?source=feed#comment-2189667</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2189667</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree completely with the author &amp; recently bought UPL, one of the lowest cost nat gas producers -- a steal under $25 (IMHO) for those with an intermediate to long time horizon.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:07:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree completely with the author &amp; recently bought UPL, one of the lowest cost nat gas producers -- a steal under $25 (IMHO) for those with an intermediate to long time horizon.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Freeport McMoRan Is On Sale Again</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/311725/comments?source=feed#comment-2084374</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2084374</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[pretty sure the big copper mine in Utah is owned by Rio Tinto -- see their ads on local TV a lot]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:14:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[pretty sure the big copper mine in Utah is owned by Rio Tinto -- see their ads on local TV a lot]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Texas Solution To Greek Woes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/305795/comments?source=feed#comment-2023957</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2023957</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As we learned in Texas, allowing the insolvent banks to fail is the right answer ...  just look at Japan's zombie banks to see what &quot;extend &amp; pretend&quot; will get you.  The sooner we let the insolvent banks fail &amp; be taken over by stronger hands (regardless of location), the sooner the economy will recover.  I agree with the author!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:13:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As we learned in Texas, allowing the insolvent banks to fail is the right answer ...  just look at Japan's zombie banks to see what &quot;extend &amp; pretend&quot; will get you.  The sooner we let the insolvent banks fail &amp; be taken over by stronger hands (regardless of location), the sooner the economy will recover.  I agree with the author!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fund Managers' Moves In 11 Gold Value Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/298135/comments?source=feed#comment-1959853</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1959853</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[valuable information ... thanks for providing it ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:41:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[valuable information ... thanks for providing it ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Logical Case For 49% Drop In Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/291780/comments?source=feed#comment-1892866</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1892866</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why now?  common denominator, as shown in author's charts, is crossover of long-term moving averages signaling bear market]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:28:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why now?  common denominator, as shown in author's charts, is crossover of long-term moving averages signaling bear market]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts on the Near-Term Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/211715/comments?source=feed#comment-1082723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1082723</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[With respect to small business job growth, I believe you meant to say that the government could NOT care less.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:45:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[With respect to small business job growth, I believe you meant to say that the government could NOT care less.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Was Thursday’s Stock Market Action the Start of a New Rally?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/209593/comments?source=feed#comment-1063040</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1063040</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think you meant low-end support held at about 1040, not 1140]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:41:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think you meant low-end support held at about 1040, not 1140]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should Glass-Steagall Return? I Prefer the Volcker Rule</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/184046/comments?source=feed#comment-865662</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">865662</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Finally, a bit of clarity on the issue. It's poor policy to privatize gain &amp; socialize loss, or -- put another way -- we need to separate the casino (proprietary trading) operations from the traditional banking (accepting deposits &amp; lending) operations. Taxpayers should not be bailing out the casino operators making bad bets! Also, Buffett has a good idea when he suggests that top management of financial institutions should be wiped out financially (i.e., personally liable) if they resort to taxpayer bailouts. That would certainly encourage more prudent risk calibration. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Finally, a bit of clarity on the issue. It's poor policy to privatize gain &amp; socialize loss, or -- put another way -- we need to separate the casino (proprietary trading) operations from the traditional banking (accepting deposits &amp; lending) operations. Taxpayers should not be bailing out the casino operators making bad bets! Also, Buffett has a good idea when he suggests that top management of financial institutions should be wiped out financially (i.e., personally liable) if they resort to taxpayer bailouts. That would certainly encourage more prudent risk calibration. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
