<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>2MuchDebt's Comments</title>
    <description>2MuchDebt's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/392972/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL -1.3%) roundup: 1) Bloomberg reports Jony Ive's team is "racing to finish iOS 7," expected to feature a major UI overhaul, in time for a preview at June's WWDC. This meshes with what John Gruber reported hearing a month ago. Bloomberg also reports Ive has "met with makers of gesture [recognition] technology" - is Leap Motion among them? 2) Top Apple shareholder Fidelity Contrafund cut its stake by 12% in Q1; fund manager Will Danoff is worried about competition and margin pressure (previous). 3) Apple's collaboration with automakers has reportedly extended to creating in-car consoles that support iPhone docking and access to Maps/Siri.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/987561?source=feed#comment-18328811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18328811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That's mainly because its largest holding was Apple! Contrafund was the second largest mutual fund holder of Apple as of Feb 2013. Contrafund has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by 3.24 percentage points per year over the past 15 years. Not a bad track record rocback!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:47:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That's mainly because its largest holding was Apple! Contrafund was the second largest mutual fund holder of Apple as of Feb 2013. Contrafund has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by 3.24 percentage points per year over the past 15 years. Not a bad track record rocback!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) roundup: 1) 9to5 Mac reports iOS 7's Jony Ive-designed UI has shed "all signs of gloss, shine, and skeumorphism." The WSJ reported something similar in March. 9to5 also reports iOS 7 sports new icons, toolbars, and tab bars.&amp;nbsp; 2) OS X 10.9 (Cabernet) will reportedly feature an improved Finder app and possibly iOS-like multitasking and app-pausing features. 3) ISI's Brian Marshall claims he "got cold feet" when going to buy a Galaxy S4, due to 6 years of relying on Apple's "flypaper-like" ecosystem. "In the tech industry, one of the most under-valued assets ... is the stickiness of an installed base." But he still considers a bigger iPhone a must.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/979771?source=feed#comment-18251401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18251401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[An updated / revamped operating system would be a big plus for Apple. The iPhone is great, but the user interface feels a little stale and somewhat inefficient. I'm looking forward to iOS 7 release. There is a lot of room for improvement and I hope Apple capitalizes on the opportunity.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:49:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[An updated / revamped operating system would be a big plus for Apple. The iPhone is great, but the user interface feels a little stale and somewhat inefficient. I'm looking forward to iOS 7 release. There is a lot of room for improvement and I hope Apple capitalizes on the opportunity.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL): FQ2 EPS of $10.09 beats by $0.02. Revenue of $43.6B (+11% Y/Y) beats by $1.1B. 37.4M iPhones, 19.5M iPads, just under 4M Macs. Expects FQ3 revenue of $33.5B-$35.5B, below $39.3B consensus. Buyback increased by $50B. Shares halted. CC at 5PM ET (webcast). (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/961171?source=feed#comment-18008921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18008921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Large increase in share buyback authorization and increase in dividend and stock price flat... I thought Apple bulls said these catalysts would boost the stock price significantly (say $100+)? What say you?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:57:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Large increase in share buyback authorization and increase in dividend and stock price flat... I thought Apple bulls said these catalysts would boost the stock price significantly (say $100+)? What say you?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A little more on Apple: Implied FQ2 iPhone ASP of $613, down from FQ1's $641 (was emerging markets discounting or a mix shift to older iPhones the culprit?). iPad ASP was $449, down from FQ1's $467 (shift to iPad Mini). Mac ASP of $1,378, up from FQ1's $1,359. iTunes/Software/Services revenue +30% Y/Y to $4.11B. Accessories +15% to $1.38B. R&amp;amp;D spend +33% Y/Y to $1.12B, SG&amp;amp;A +14% to $2.67B. Cash balance stood at $145B at quarter's end, up from prior $137B. AAPL resumes trading, shares are up 5.4% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/961361?source=feed#comment-18002281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18002281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Unfortunately after hours gain has dwindled to $1 (or 0.25%). Clearly not impressed.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:58:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Unfortunately after hours gain has dwindled to $1 (or 0.25%). Clearly not impressed.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlackBerry (BBRY +3.8%) is off its premarket highs, but still up following mixed FQ4 results. BB10 shipments were roughly in-line with consensus. Total BlackBerry shipments -13% Q/Q and -23% Y/Y (they fell 7% Q/Q and 51% Y/Y in FQ3), and the BlackBerry sub base fell by 3M Q/Q to 76M. However, gross margin rose 970 bps Q/Q and 660 bps Y/Y to 40.1%, fueling the EPS beat. Opex +3% Q/Q and -8% Y/Y (exc. last year's goodwill charge) vs. a 36% revenue drop. Cash balance unchanged Q/Q at $2.9B. A 50% Q/Q increase in marketing spend is forecast, but BlackBerry still expects FQ1 results to be near breakeven, above a -$0.12 EPS consensus.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/914941?source=feed#comment-16955221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16955221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If / when people start to realize the Z10 is a great smartphone (which it is), I think you'll see a lot of people move from the Android and iOS platforms to BB10. And to think the Z10 is Blackberry's first smartphone without a physical keyboard. Good things to come from Blackberry in the smartphone realm.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:28:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If / when people start to realize the Z10 is a great smartphone (which it is), I think you'll see a lot of people move from the Android and iOS platforms to BB10. And to think the Z10 is Blackberry's first smartphone without a physical keyboard. Good things to come from Blackberry in the smartphone realm.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlackBerry (BBRY +3.8%) is off its premarket highs, but still up following mixed FQ4 results. BB10 shipments were roughly in-line with consensus. Total BlackBerry shipments -13% Q/Q and -23% Y/Y (they fell 7% Q/Q and 51% Y/Y in FQ3), and the BlackBerry sub base fell by 3M Q/Q to 76M. However, gross margin rose 970 bps Q/Q and 660 bps Y/Y to 40.1%, fueling the EPS beat. Opex +3% Q/Q and -8% Y/Y (exc. last year's goodwill charge) vs. a 36% revenue drop. Cash balance unchanged Q/Q at $2.9B. A 50% Q/Q increase in marketing spend is forecast, but BlackBerry still expects FQ1 results to be near breakeven, above a -$0.12 EPS consensus.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/914941?source=feed#comment-16952541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16952541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@SoldHigh: I agree. I walked into a local Verizon store today; no signage for the Z10. I played around with the Z10 for about 10-15 minutes. The phone is awesome. Great user reviews as well from AT&amp;T and Verizon customers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:32:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@SoldHigh: I agree. I walked into a local Verizon store today; no signage for the Z10. I played around with the Z10 for about 10-15 minutes. The phone is awesome. Great user reviews as well from AT&amp;T and Verizon customers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samsung: A Whole New Galaxy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1289821/comments?source=feed#comment-16634541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16634541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What about if you're eating and your hands are dirty? I would like to have the no touch features for something like that. Contrary to your narrow minded beliefs, some people will find value in these new features. Adding NFC will be a useful feature, right? Samsung already has it. I agree that fingerprint technology would be a plus. While the iPhone is a great phone, Apple didn't add any great new features in the iPhone 5 (except for 4G, which was already behind the curve and ultimately expected) and some Apple users noticed. If Apple came out with the new features in the S4 you would probably find a way to spin it as a positive. We will all see whether or not the S4 will be a success. I believe it will be well received. I also believe if Apple came out with a bigger screen it would be a positive for unit sales.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:34:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What about if you're eating and your hands are dirty? I would like to have the no touch features for something like that. Contrary to your narrow minded beliefs, some people will find value in these new features. Adding NFC will be a useful feature, right? Samsung already has it. I agree that fingerprint technology would be a plus. While the iPhone is a great phone, Apple didn't add any great new features in the iPhone 5 (except for 4G, which was already behind the curve and ultimately expected) and some Apple users noticed. If Apple came out with the new features in the S4 you would probably find a way to spin it as a positive. We will all see whether or not the S4 will be a success. I believe it will be well received. I also believe if Apple came out with a bigger screen it would be a positive for unit sales.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the Galaxy S IV: Samsung continues doing everything it can to differentiate itself via software, even as the OS and many of its core apps for its hardware are provided by Google (GOOG). The S IV features a text/speech translator (9 languages), the ability to transfer data from any phone witha PC's help, a health-tracking app that can leverage the phone's pedometer and sync with blood pressure monitors, and the ability to control home electronics via infrared. There's also Samsung's eye-tracking and touch-free gesture tech (as rumored). No kitchen sink just yet. (live blog)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890401?source=feed#comment-16344331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16344331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree bgold. I expect the user would have that option (or hope they would at least!).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:31:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree bgold. I expect the user would have that option (or hope they would at least!).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live from New York, it's the Samsung (SSNLF.PK) Galaxy S IV. Mobile chief JK Shin has unveiled Samsung's new flagship device, which happens to look a lot like its predecessor. The S IV, said to support every 4G LTE band, will go on sale in late April (U.S. availability might take longer). The expected 5" 1080p display and 13MP camera are there, the next-gen 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard is supported (could be a positive for BRCM), and infrared, temperature, and humidity sensors are thrown in. A variety of camera tricks/gimmicks are provided, including the ability to simultaneously record video from both cameras. (live blog) (previous)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890391?source=feed#comment-16336141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16336141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The S4 isn't even on sale yet. Why would there be lines at phone stores for the S4 at this point?! S4 will sell very well (certainly better than S3), but won't be an iPhone killer. I think it has the potential to be on par with the iPhone.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The S4 isn't even on sale yet. Why would there be lines at phone stores for the S4 at this point?! S4 will sell very well (certainly better than S3), but won't be an iPhone killer. I think it has the potential to be on par with the iPhone.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the Galaxy S IV: Samsung continues doing everything it can to differentiate itself via software, even as the OS and many of its core apps for its hardware are provided by Google (GOOG). The S IV features a text/speech translator (9 languages), the ability to transfer data from any phone witha PC's help, a health-tracking app that can leverage the phone's pedometer and sync with blood pressure monitors, and the ability to control home electronics via infrared. There's also Samsung's eye-tracking and touch-free gesture tech (as rumored). No kitchen sink just yet. (live blog)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890401?source=feed#comment-16317581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16317581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@harsh: I appreciate the level head and objective comment. I think some of the new features will be adopted and liked by some people and not by others. I do hope the battery life improves. I didn't hear about a new battery in the phone. Was an improved battery part of the S4? Either way, I think the S4 will be a solid product. I think the Note product line has been successful too, but not to the extent of the Galaxy series (not as widely adopted by consumers). Note that Samsung has a different business strategy than Apple (reverse engineering). Thanks for the post!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:05:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@harsh: I appreciate the level head and objective comment. I think some of the new features will be adopted and liked by some people and not by others. I do hope the battery life improves. I didn't hear about a new battery in the phone. Was an improved battery part of the S4? Either way, I think the S4 will be a solid product. I think the Note product line has been successful too, but not to the extent of the Galaxy series (not as widely adopted by consumers). Note that Samsung has a different business strategy than Apple (reverse engineering). Thanks for the post!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the Galaxy S IV: Samsung continues doing everything it can to differentiate itself via software, even as the OS and many of its core apps for its hardware are provided by Google (GOOG). The S IV features a text/speech translator (9 languages), the ability to transfer data from any phone witha PC's help, a health-tracking app that can leverage the phone's pedometer and sync with blood pressure monitors, and the ability to control home electronics via infrared. There's also Samsung's eye-tracking and touch-free gesture tech (as rumored). No kitchen sink just yet. (live blog)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890401?source=feed#comment-16308441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16308441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@the_value: I hear you and good point. It is definitely not the death of the iPhone, but it is certainly not &quot;a lot of hype over nothing&quot;. I think the S4 will be a great phone with new, useful, interesting and improved features. It's good to see other phone manufacturers coming out with some competitive smartphones.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:08:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@the_value: I hear you and good point. It is definitely not the death of the iPhone, but it is certainly not &quot;a lot of hype over nothing&quot;. I think the S4 will be a great phone with new, useful, interesting and improved features. It's good to see other phone manufacturers coming out with some competitive smartphones.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live from New York, it's the Samsung (SSNLF.PK) Galaxy S IV. Mobile chief JK Shin has unveiled Samsung's new flagship device, which happens to look a lot like its predecessor. The S IV, said to support every 4G LTE band, will go on sale in late April (U.S. availability might take longer). The expected 5" 1080p display and 13MP camera are there, the next-gen 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard is supported (could be a positive for BRCM), and infrared, temperature, and humidity sensors are thrown in. A variety of camera tricks/gimmicks are provided, including the ability to simultaneously record video from both cameras. (live blog) (previous)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890391?source=feed#comment-16308341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16308341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good point Herr. Keep in mind though the screen size of the S4 is larger than the S3, but the phone size hasn't changed. The trend with Samsung is bigger though, but how much bigger can a phone get without making it too big. I don't find the S3 phone size to be too big and therefore the S4, but the Note is pushing it!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:04:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good point Herr. Keep in mind though the screen size of the S4 is larger than the S3, but the phone size hasn't changed. The trend with Samsung is bigger though, but how much bigger can a phone get without making it too big. I don't find the S3 phone size to be too big and therefore the S4, but the Note is pushing it!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the Galaxy S IV: Samsung continues doing everything it can to differentiate itself via software, even as the OS and many of its core apps for its hardware are provided by Google (GOOG). The S IV features a text/speech translator (9 languages), the ability to transfer data from any phone witha PC's help, a health-tracking app that can leverage the phone's pedometer and sync with blood pressure monitors, and the ability to control home electronics via infrared. There's also Samsung's eye-tracking and touch-free gesture tech (as rumored). No kitchen sink just yet. (live blog)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890401?source=feed#comment-16307641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16307641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Jack: You're delusional. Clearly you're an Apple fanboy invested in Apple stock and will dislike any non-Apple product no matter how great it may be because it's not Apple. Yes, it's that obvious. Unfortunately you're going to miss out; the S4 will be better than the iPhone 5 and likely the iPhone 5s. Competition in the smartphone market should be viewed as a positive for the consumer because ultimately it will yield improved products. What would be needed to wow Jack Baker? That's the real question. I don't dislike Apple products, but it's amazing how defensive some Apple fans can become when a competitor releases a product that potentially matches or is potentially better than a current Apple product. There are other smartphones on the market now that are just as good as the iPhone.<br/><br/>Why are you in denial of recognizing or potentially utilizing other great smartphone devices? Are you that stubborn?<br/><br/>The S4 release will certainly spell trouble for Apple in the near future.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:30:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Jack: You're delusional. Clearly you're an Apple fanboy invested in Apple stock and will dislike any non-Apple product no matter how great it may be because it's not Apple. Yes, it's that obvious. Unfortunately you're going to miss out; the S4 will be better than the iPhone 5 and likely the iPhone 5s. Competition in the smartphone market should be viewed as a positive for the consumer because ultimately it will yield improved products. What would be needed to wow Jack Baker? That's the real question. I don't dislike Apple products, but it's amazing how defensive some Apple fans can become when a competitor releases a product that potentially matches or is potentially better than a current Apple product. There are other smartphones on the market now that are just as good as the iPhone.<br/><br/>Why are you in denial of recognizing or potentially utilizing other great smartphone devices? Are you that stubborn?<br/><br/>The S4 release will certainly spell trouble for Apple in the near future.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samsung's (SSNLF.PK) Galaxy S IV will indeed use green OLED host emitter materials, SamMobile reports, while adding their use will make the S IV's display 25% more power-efficient. Universal Display (PANL +2%) is higher, though it looks as if the news was partly priced in following Cowen's Feb. 6 report. The S IV, due to be unveiled on Thursday, is also said to feature "floating touch" technology that allows a user's finger to act as a cursor when hovering above a screen. (previous)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/877831?source=feed#comment-16051521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16051521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As a smartphone user, I'm glad to see all the competition in the smartphone market. The result is a better end-product for the consumer. I think the S IV will be a big success. Look forward to the unveiling event next Thursday.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:29:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As a smartphone user, I'm glad to see all the competition in the smartphone market. The result is a better end-product for the consumer. I think the S IV will be a big success. Look forward to the unveiling event next Thursday.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The BlackBerry Z10 (BBRY +1.4%) will hit AT&amp;amp;T store shelves on March 22, says Bloomberg - N4BB previously reported of a March 15 launch. Separately, Jefferies' Peter Misek, who upgraded shares on Jan. 18, says his checks indicate no Z10 inventory buildup, and that any price cuts are normal for a new smartphone. Pac Crest had reported different findings.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/877231?source=feed#comment-16028221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16028221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm excited to try out the new Z10. Should be a good addition to the U.S. smartphone market.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:42:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm excited to try out the new Z10. Should be a good addition to the U.S. smartphone market.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pres. Obama confirms three new cabinet nominations: Sylvia Burwell, currently leading Wal-Mart's charitable organization, as director of the Office of Management and Budget; Ernest Moniz, an MIT physicist and former energy undersecretary, as head of the Energy Department; and Gina McCarthy, who runs the EPA's air quality office, to direct the EPA.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/865081?source=feed#comment-15807141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15807141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think it's funny that Obama nominated Wal-Mart's charitable organization leader to director of the Office of Management and Budget. That can't be a coincidence.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:50:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think it's funny that Obama nominated Wal-Mart's charitable organization leader to director of the Office of Management and Budget. That can't be a coincidence.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Is Not Worth $460</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1205471/comments?source=feed#comment-15263761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15263761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Ryche: You're missing the point, but this conversation will go on forever if we continue... EPS growth rate declined substantially and for the most recent quarter turned negative. This should be of some concern to investors... Obviously they're not going bankrupt per your sarcastic comment, but it is a concern. P/E doesn't look as good if negative EPS growth ensues; still relatively low, but not as strong. I figured some of you readers would understand this. FYI, I'm not an Apple bear and I enjoy / like the company's products.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:11:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Ryche: You're missing the point, but this conversation will go on forever if we continue... EPS growth rate declined substantially and for the most recent quarter turned negative. This should be of some concern to investors... Obviously they're not going bankrupt per your sarcastic comment, but it is a concern. P/E doesn't look as good if negative EPS growth ensues; still relatively low, but not as strong. I figured some of you readers would understand this. FYI, I'm not an Apple bear and I enjoy / like the company's products.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Is Not Worth $460</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1205471/comments?source=feed#comment-15262701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15262701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@red: One definition of &quot;contraction&quot; means shrinking. How is Apple's EPS  not shrinking when you compare Q1 of this year to Q1 of last year? Diluted EPS of $13.81/share for quarter ended 12/29/12 and diluted EPS of $13.87/share for the quarter ended 12/31/11. That's considered negative growth.<br/><br/>About visibility: I meant Apple investors have little visibility into the future. How do you have any idea what's going to drive Apple's earnings in 5 years, let alone 3 years?<br/><br/>Clearly you disagree with me and that's fine.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:53:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@red: One definition of &quot;contraction&quot; means shrinking. How is Apple's EPS  not shrinking when you compare Q1 of this year to Q1 of last year? Diluted EPS of $13.81/share for quarter ended 12/29/12 and diluted EPS of $13.87/share for the quarter ended 12/31/11. That's considered negative growth.<br/><br/>About visibility: I meant Apple investors have little visibility into the future. How do you have any idea what's going to drive Apple's earnings in 5 years, let alone 3 years?<br/><br/>Clearly you disagree with me and that's fine.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Is Not Worth $460</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1205471/comments?source=feed#comment-15251801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15251801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@red: You're right. There are no other great investments out there. In fact everyone should just put 100% of their portfolio in Apple because it's &quot;guaranteed&quot; to make money. In the meantime, you've been losing money on Apple and others have been making money either in an index fund, many other stock picks, preferreds, even currencies. The problem is Apple is a tech company with lots of competition and very little visibility into the future. You can do all the arithmetic you want but Apple is still going down... Don't be mad because you're losing money and you don't understand it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:53:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@red: You're right. There are no other great investments out there. In fact everyone should just put 100% of their portfolio in Apple because it's &quot;guaranteed&quot; to make money. In the meantime, you've been losing money on Apple and others have been making money either in an index fund, many other stock picks, preferreds, even currencies. The problem is Apple is a tech company with lots of competition and very little visibility into the future. You can do all the arithmetic you want but Apple is still going down... Don't be mad because you're losing money and you don't understand it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Is Not Worth $460</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1205471/comments?source=feed#comment-15251271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15251271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[EPS contraction in the most recent quarter compared to prior year comparable quarter. Say what you like but the market thinks that Apple's growth days are over. That's not too far fetched. If zero or negative growth ensues Apple's &quot;extremely&quot; low P/E ratio looks more reasonable. Competition and supply chain constraints are two serious issues here. Nothing I say will change your mind though bgold. Good luck with your investments.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:41:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[EPS contraction in the most recent quarter compared to prior year comparable quarter. Say what you like but the market thinks that Apple's growth days are over. That's not too far fetched. If zero or negative growth ensues Apple's &quot;extremely&quot; low P/E ratio looks more reasonable. Competition and supply chain constraints are two serious issues here. Nothing I say will change your mind though bgold. Good luck with your investments.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Is Not Worth $460</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1205471/comments?source=feed#comment-15246731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15246731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It doesn't matter what you think Apple is worth; it only matters at what price Apple trades. You can kick and scream all you want, but Apple is $457/share and the technicals are still negative. Growth will likely slow significantly and margins will likely contract from here unless Apple releases another new, high margin product no one else will offer. A great company isn't necessarily a great investment. Too many people have fallen in love with Apple stock. There are plenty of other great investments out there.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:27:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It doesn't matter what you think Apple is worth; it only matters at what price Apple trades. You can kick and scream all you want, but Apple is $457/share and the technicals are still negative. Growth will likely slow significantly and margins will likely contract from here unless Apple releases another new, high margin product no one else will offer. A great company isn't necessarily a great investment. Too many people have fallen in love with Apple stock. There are plenty of other great investments out there.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HTC's new One Android phone is its latest bid to stay relevant ... and it might just do the job. Sporting a unibody design that borrows a page or three from the iPhone 5, the One comes with a 4.7" 1080p display, front stereo speakers, a quad-core Qualcomm (QCOM) Snapdragon 600 processor, and a camera that boasts strong low-light performance (but only a 4MP sensor). Initial hands-on impressions are mostly positive. The device's launch comes a month ahead of an expected Samsung (SSNLF.PK) Galaxy S IV event.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/835701?source=feed#comment-15234911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15234911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Looks like a great phone with cool features. If HTC plays it right it looks like this phone could be a winner. S IV release may overshadow this phone's release though.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:26:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Looks like a great phone with cool features. If HTC plays it right it looks like this phone could be a winner. S IV release may overshadow this phone's release though.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has slashed prices for three 13" MacBook models. The price of the 13" retina MacBook Pro with 128GB SSD has been cut by $200 to $1,499, and the 256GB model by $300 to $1,699. Meanwhile, the 13" MacBook Air with 256GB SSD has been cut by $100 to $1,399. Apple's 15" retina MacBook Pro models remain priced at $2,199 and $2,799, but both have been given faster Intel Core i7 CPUs, and the costlier model now sports twice as much RAM. The moves follow a quarter where Mac shipments fell 22% Y/Y, and revenue 16%. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/824201?source=feed#comment-14944891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14944891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well said GaltMachine]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:04:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well said GaltMachine]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has slashed prices for three 13" MacBook models. The price of the 13" retina MacBook Pro with 128GB SSD has been cut by $200 to $1,499, and the 256GB model by $300 to $1,699. Meanwhile, the 13" MacBook Air with 256GB SSD has been cut by $100 to $1,399. Apple's 15" retina MacBook Pro models remain priced at $2,199 and $2,799, but both have been given faster Intel Core i7 CPUs, and the costlier model now sports twice as much RAM. The moves follow a quarter where Mac shipments fell 22% Y/Y, and revenue 16%. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/824201?source=feed#comment-14930081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14930081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mac unit sales fell 22% and revenue 16% from Q1 2012 to Q1 2013 and you think Apple is coming out with a new model for Mac? Doubtful...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:46:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mac unit sales fell 22% and revenue 16% from Q1 2012 to Q1 2013 and you think Apple is coming out with a new model for Mac? Doubtful...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has slashed prices for three 13" MacBook models. The price of the 13" retina MacBook Pro with 128GB SSD has been cut by $200 to $1,499, and the 256GB model by $300 to $1,699. Meanwhile, the 13" MacBook Air with 256GB SSD has been cut by $100 to $1,399. Apple's 15" retina MacBook Pro models remain priced at $2,199 and $2,799, but both have been given faster Intel Core i7 CPUs, and the costlier model now sports twice as much RAM. The moves follow a quarter where Mac shipments fell 22% Y/Y, and revenue 16%. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/824201?source=feed#comment-14929521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14929521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Margin compression for the investor and a few extra dollars in the pocket for the consumer.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:32:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Margin compression for the investor and a few extra dollars in the pocket for the consumer.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Apple Get Its Mojo Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1160531/comments?source=feed#comment-14661751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14661751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@JUDOKA: I'm not sure what you're getting at, but I'm referring to the concept that a fundamental analysis of Apple yields an undervalued stock. However, this has been the case for quite some time. Maybe &quot;manipulation&quot; was the incorrect word choice, but the point is that Apple is not being recognized by the market for the market leader it is and the significant cash flow generation Apple achieves. I exited out of Apple because it appears that fundamental analysis achieves little in determining expected return in AAPL.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:41:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@JUDOKA: I'm not sure what you're getting at, but I'm referring to the concept that a fundamental analysis of Apple yields an undervalued stock. However, this has been the case for quite some time. Maybe &quot;manipulation&quot; was the incorrect word choice, but the point is that Apple is not being recognized by the market for the market leader it is and the significant cash flow generation Apple achieves. I exited out of Apple because it appears that fundamental analysis achieves little in determining expected return in AAPL.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Apple Get Its Mojo Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1160531/comments?source=feed#comment-14656591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14656591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I was long Apple and have never shorted Apple... I am no longer long Apple (no positions in the stock). It seems like too much manipulation going on in the stock for me to handle. As for your other comment, I had never previously used a Galaxy S3 before. Upon reviewing the phone selections with my brother I was impressed with the S3. I'm not taking aware from the iPhone because it is very reliable and has good batter life in my experience, but I feel as though the S3 offers a better user experience (and I was surprised that I liked the bigger screen).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:49:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I was long Apple and have never shorted Apple... I am no longer long Apple (no positions in the stock). It seems like too much manipulation going on in the stock for me to handle. As for your other comment, I had never previously used a Galaxy S3 before. Upon reviewing the phone selections with my brother I was impressed with the S3. I'm not taking aware from the iPhone because it is very reliable and has good batter life in my experience, but I feel as though the S3 offers a better user experience (and I was surprised that I liked the bigger screen).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Apple Get Its Mojo Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1160531/comments?source=feed#comment-14654771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14654771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Interesting article and perspective. Thanks!<br/><br/>I'm in the camp that thinks the iPhone 5 is inferior to the Galaxy S3 and will likely be switching to a Samsung phone upon upgrade (currently an iPhone user). My brother recently upgraded to an S3 and it is incredible! More features, bigger/more colorful screen, and I like the customization factor.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:14:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Interesting article and perspective. Thanks!<br/><br/>I'm in the camp that thinks the iPhone 5 is inferior to the Galaxy S3 and will likely be switching to a Samsung phone upon upgrade (currently an iPhone user). My brother recently upgraded to an S3 and it is incredible! More features, bigger/more colorful screen, and I like the customization factor.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>January Nonfarm Payrolls: +157K vs. consensus +160K, 196K previous (revised from 155K). Unemployment rate&amp;nbsp;7.9%&amp;nbsp;vs. consensus 7.8%, 7.8% previous.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/798471?source=feed#comment-14443551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14443551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@IT: I understand where you're coming from. Also note though that the previous two months were revised significantly higher.<br/><br/>&quot;The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for November was revised from +161,000 to +247,000, and the change for December was revised from +155,000 to +196,000.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:39:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@IT: I understand where you're coming from. Also note though that the previous two months were revised significantly higher.<br/><br/>&quot;The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for November was revised from +161,000 to +247,000, and the change for December was revised from +155,000 to +196,000.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Apple: iPhone and Mac sales below expectations, iPads roughly in-line. FQ1 gross margin was 38.6%, down 510 bps Y/Y but above guidance of 36% and responsible for EPS beat. FQ2 gross margin guidance of 37.5%-38.5%. Exc. retail, Americas sales +15% Y/Y (was +43% in FQ4), Europe +11% (+8% prior), Japan +25% (+113% prior), Greater China +67%, rest of Asia-Pac +10%. Retail +5%. Cash/investment balance at $137B. AAPL -4.8% AH. CC at 5PM ET (webcast). (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/777531?source=feed#comment-14079871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14079871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[brudd: I hear you from a valuation perspective, but I just don't see that happening in the near future. I'm long AAPL.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:18:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[brudd: I hear you from a valuation perspective, but I just don't see that happening in the near future. I'm long AAPL.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
