yousaidwhat's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/39350/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/178411-the-most-feared-name-in-computing-goes-green?source=feed#comment-809401 809401 Surely you jest?? Otherwise you must have your head buried in the sand!

On Dec 16 08:18 PM Robert0713 wrote:

Except for nuclear weapons, there ain't much America makes that is technically superior to other countries'.]]> Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:12:40 -0500 Surely you jest?? Otherwise you must have your head buried in the sand!

On Dec 16 08:18 PM Robert0713 wrote:

Except for nuclear weapons, there ain't much America makes that is technically superior to other countries'.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/164436-swine-flu-stocks-where-are-they-now?source=feed#comment-702930 702930 Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:17:39 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/128006-michael-murphy/28185-buy-the-obesity-drug-basket-arna-orex-vvus?source=feed#comment-684370 684370 DNDN) if this was not a major concern. I know all of my friends including myself have voiced concerns on this subject in recent years and are avoiding drugs for this reason. During my last physical my soon to retire family doctor told me he personally avoids most drugs for this same reason.


On Sep 20 04:47 PM biomax2000 wrote:

> Interesting article.
>
> However, with all due respect, the author has a fundamental flaw
> in his argument.
> Although he accepts that ARNA drug is not effective (only 3% weigh
> loss), yet he choses ARNA drug by assuming that doctors will do ARNA
> a big faivor and prescribe inefficient ARNA's drug together with
> phentermine.
>
> However, as a doctor, I don't see why any doctor would put their
> neck on the line and take a risk by prescribing a combination of
> drugs with were not approved by FDA in combination. If that was the
> case, then neither VVUS, no Orex would not need to do any trials
> at all, as both their drugs are combination of known drugs.
>
> Well, well, just 3% weight loss after whole one year (!) of taking
> ARNA drug. This is a laughable. For goodness sake, my own weight
> fluctuates 3% per day from empty stomach to after 2-3 good meals.
>
>
> I would go for VVUS, as 9-14% weight loss on VVUS drug is very impressive
> and its reasonably save.]]> Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:15:44 -0400 DNDN) if this was not a major concern. I know all of my friends including myself have voiced concerns on this subject in recent years and are avoiding drugs for this reason. During my last physical my soon to retire family doctor told me he personally avoids most drugs for this same reason.


On Sep 20 04:47 PM biomax2000 wrote:

> Interesting article.
>
> However, with all due respect, the author has a fundamental flaw
> in his argument.
> Although he accepts that ARNA drug is not effective (only 3% weigh
> loss), yet he choses ARNA drug by assuming that doctors will do ARNA
> a big faivor and prescribe inefficient ARNA's drug together with
> phentermine.
>
> However, as a doctor, I don't see why any doctor would put their
> neck on the line and take a risk by prescribing a combination of
> drugs with were not approved by FDA in combination. If that was the
> case, then neither VVUS, no Orex would not need to do any trials
> at all, as both their drugs are combination of known drugs.
>
> Well, well, just 3% weight loss after whole one year (!) of taking
> ARNA drug. This is a laughable. For goodness sake, my own weight
> fluctuates 3% per day from empty stomach to after 2-3 good meals.
>
>
> I would go for VVUS, as 9-14% weight loss on VVUS drug is very impressive
> and its reasonably save.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/159115-preview-from-europe-stocks-get-the-china-syndrome?source=feed#comment-654211 654211 Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:04:39 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/147472-why-the-recession-is-over?source=feed#comment-581347 581347
On Jul 08 10:01 AM MartyT wrote:

> Mr. Murphy,
>
> Thanks for the post it takes a lot of courage to make a post like
> that during times like these.
>
> I have no idea if we've bottomed out or not, but I've noticed that
> the bottom occurs when pessimism is at its highest. I think the fact
> that your post was met with overwhelming negativity is a clear indicator
> that pessimism is at a high point.
>
> My guess is that we are either teetering on the edge a total collapse
> of several of our systems or that you are correct and we are at the
> bottom. Assuming that we are at the bottom we may have a long, slow,
> painful climb up.
>
> Thanks again...
>
> Marty]]> Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:15:58 -0400
On Jul 08 10:01 AM MartyT wrote:

> Mr. Murphy,
>
> Thanks for the post it takes a lot of courage to make a post like
> that during times like these.
>
> I have no idea if we've bottomed out or not, but I've noticed that
> the bottom occurs when pessimism is at its highest. I think the fact
> that your post was met with overwhelming negativity is a clear indicator
> that pessimism is at a high point.
>
> My guess is that we are either teetering on the edge a total collapse
> of several of our systems or that you are correct and we are at the
> bottom. Assuming that we are at the bottom we may have a long, slow,
> painful climb up.
>
> Thanks again...
>
> Marty]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/124294-rambus-s-litigation-based-business-can-t-last?source=feed#comment-421526 421526 Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:19:19 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/114202-street-2009-view-still-too-high-for-semiconductors?source=feed#comment-352830 352830 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:20:53 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/104937-is-jim-cramer-right-is-apple-really-a-market-barometer?source=feed#comment-301374 301374 Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:46:44 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/95146-6-things-apple-s-not-doing-right?source=feed#comment-252756 252756 Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:41:13 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/93225-why-apple-stock-is-poised-to-go-flat-at-best?source=feed#comment-242174 242174 Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:59:36 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/92507-apple-s-problems-bad-to-the-core?source=feed#comment-238727 238727 Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:16:30 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/91409-apple-great-company-with-lofty-valuation-due-for-pullback?source=feed#comment-233176 233176 Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:03:19 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/91013-the-long-and-winding-road-of-foreclosures?source=feed#comment-231264 231264 Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:15:02 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/87679-changes-in-market-cap-for-biggest-u-s-companies?source=feed#comment-218743 218743 Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:00:51 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/87106-wamu-and-more-uninsured-depositors-begging-for-trouble?source=feed#comment-215211 215211
atlanta.bizjournals.co...]]> Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:08:31 -0400
atlanta.bizjournals.co...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/87040-apple-investors-need-to-get-a-grip?source=feed#comment-215175 215175 Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:59:30 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/65084-apple-s-at-t-deal-is-costly?source=feed#comment-117067 117067 Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:23:50 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/64005-apple-on-an-innovation-treadmill?source=feed#comment-115653 115653 Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:28:28 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/49667-thursday-s-selloff-is-it-over-now?source=feed#comment-98528 98528 Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:36:46 -0400