<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Matthew Potter's Comments</title>
    <description>Matthew Potter's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/394338/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Defense Industrials Close Out Mixed In 2012 And Prepare For Upcoming Challenges</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1144431/comments?source=feed#comment-14411781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14411781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for your comments. Yes, these companies especially LMT and BA will be around even if there is severe contraction in defense spending.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:20:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for your comments. Yes, these companies especially LMT and BA will be around even if there is severe contraction in defense spending.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>With defense budgets being slashed around the world, the collapse of the BAE's $45B merger with EADS will put the focus on possible deals between tier-two firms such as Rockwell Collins (COL), L-3 Communications (LLL), SAIC (SAI) and Harris (HRS), industry execs and bankers tell Reuters. Much could depend on whether Congress averts the automatic defense cuts that are due from Jan 1.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/581391?source=feed#comment-11408931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11408931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nothing will happen with SAI until they complete their split into 2 companies.  ITT Exelis (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xls' title='Exelis'>XLS</a>) should be a tempting target as well.  It is the former ITT Defense and is $5-6 billion in size.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:21:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nothing will happen with SAI until they complete their split into 2 companies.  ITT Exelis (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xls' title='Exelis'>XLS</a>) should be a tempting target as well.  It is the former ITT Defense and is $5-6 billion in size.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Carl Icahn's Oshkosh Strategy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/920281/comments?source=feed#comment-11307971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11307971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Unless OSK wins the JLTV contract their defense business will wither as the U.S. scales back its commitment to Afghanistan.  There is now little demand for new MRAP vehicles and the core military truck contract will have lesser demand due to there being no more combat replacements required.<br/><br/>Of course if they win the JLTV contract they will have $10 billion or more in sales over the next 20 years.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Unless OSK wins the JLTV contract their defense business will wither as the U.S. scales back its commitment to Afghanistan.  There is now little demand for new MRAP vehicles and the core military truck contract will have lesser demand due to there being no more combat replacements required.<br/><br/>Of course if they win the JLTV contract they will have $10 billion or more in sales over the next 20 years.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smaller Defense Contractors Are Seeing Mixed Results</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/982101/comments?source=feed#comment-11283671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11283671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I found your article very interesting.  There is definately going to be some movement in this sector and those companies that are more diverse will be in better shape.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:56:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I found your article very interesting.  There is definately going to be some movement in this sector and those companies that are more diverse will be in better shape.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Honeywell: Strong Third Quarter On Cost Control, But Little Inspiring Outlook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/936801/comments?source=feed#comment-10754021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10754021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think you will start seeing this with most of the aerospace / defense industrial stocks.  They will continue their cost cutting moves and share buybacks that will help value but many will see declining revenue over the next several quarters.  Long term their can only be so much cost reductions as ultimately it will come out of their labor force.  Then they will all be forced to compete for a smaller amount of government contracts.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:41:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think you will start seeing this with most of the aerospace / defense industrial stocks.  They will continue their cost cutting moves and share buybacks that will help value but many will see declining revenue over the next several quarters.  Long term their can only be so much cost reductions as ultimately it will come out of their labor force.  Then they will all be forced to compete for a smaller amount of government contracts.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ITT Exelis Heralding Defense M&amp;A Activity?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/586941/comments?source=feed#comment-10653511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10653511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There have started to be some small movement as companies look at the changing defense market.  SAIC (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sai' title='SAIC, Inc.'>SAI</a>) splitting themselves for example and BAE Systems trying the EADS route and then selling off a part.  This might accelerate as sequestration gets closer.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:18:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There have started to be some small movement as companies look at the changing defense market.  SAIC (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sai' title='SAIC, Inc.'>SAI</a>) splitting themselves for example and BAE Systems trying the EADS route and then selling off a part.  This might accelerate as sequestration gets closer.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lockheed Martin And Oshkosh Stand To Gain As Pentagon Takes Next Step In Humvee Replacement</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/832401/comments?source=feed#comment-8904631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8904631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Original reports were 5 bids from AM General and GD temaed, BAE Systems and Ford teamed, Lockheed, Oshkosh and Navistar.  I will double check info form back in March.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:59:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Original reports were 5 bids from AM General and GD temaed, BAE Systems and Ford teamed, Lockheed, Oshkosh and Navistar.  I will double check info form back in March.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lockheed Martin And Oshkosh Stand To Gain As Pentagon Takes Next Step In Humvee Replacement</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/832401/comments?source=feed#comment-8852991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8852991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sorry.  It is a bug of the stock link.  I tried to fix it.  LSE = London Stock Exchange in this case as BAE Systems is traded there.  The stock ticker LSE is not part of the story.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:58:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sorry.  It is a bug of the stock link.  I tried to fix it.  LSE = London Stock Exchange in this case as BAE Systems is traded there.  The stock ticker LSE is not part of the story.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lockheed Martin And Oshkosh Stand To Gain As Pentagon Takes Next Step In Humvee Replacement</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/832401/comments?source=feed#comment-8850851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8850851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading. I don't foresee much fluctuation in the LMT price until the future budget plans are firmed up.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:17:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading. I don't foresee much fluctuation in the LMT price until the future budget plans are firmed up.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAIC Continues To Expand Its Healthcare IT Business</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/739321/comments?source=feed#comment-8199281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8199281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading.  Many government contractors have had programs where cost and schedule exceeded initial plans.  SAIC's biggest issue recently was their contract with New York City to build a timekeeping system. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading.  Many government contractors have had programs where cost and schedule exceeded initial plans.  SAIC's biggest issue recently was their contract with New York City to build a timekeeping system. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Contracts Pushed Oshkosh Over A Rough Patch</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/762461/comments?source=feed#comment-7955221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7955221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I appreciate the information.  I will update the article.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:30:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I appreciate the information.  I will update the article.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAIC Continues To Expand Its Healthcare IT Business</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/739321/comments?source=feed#comment-7666851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7666851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I will submit a correction request.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:45:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I will submit a correction request.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Congressional Budget Calls For Delay In Buying The Joint Strike Fighter; Sell Lockheed Martin</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/717171/comments?source=feed#comment-7310221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7310221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The F-22 is not a candidate.  The costs to restart production are too high.  The only advanced, new production fighter aircraft being built for U.S. are the F/A-18 and F-35.<br/><br/>GD is not part of LMT and still produces the F-16.  Martin Marietta merged with Lockheed in the 90's and McDonnell Douglas became part of Boeing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:41:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The F-22 is not a candidate.  The costs to restart production are too high.  The only advanced, new production fighter aircraft being built for U.S. are the F/A-18 and F-35.<br/><br/>GD is not part of LMT and still produces the F-16.  Martin Marietta merged with Lockheed in the 90's and McDonnell Douglas became part of Boeing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Congressional Budget Calls For Delay In Buying The Joint Strike Fighter; Sell Lockheed Martin</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/717171/comments?source=feed#comment-7308721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7308721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Based on recent history the F/A-18 would be the choice to replace the delayed F-35 orders for the Navy and Marine Corps.  There has also been discussion of buying the F/A-18 for the Air Force.  The F-15 and F-16 lines are still hot for FMS.<br/><br/>Lockheed may see the revenue if the final quantity of F-35 are purchased.  There has been no cut yet to the acquisition objective just pushing the quantities out past the current budget.  This means they will still have to be bought in the 2019-2026 timeframe.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:12:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Based on recent history the F/A-18 would be the choice to replace the delayed F-35 orders for the Navy and Marine Corps.  There has also been discussion of buying the F/A-18 for the Air Force.  The F-15 and F-16 lines are still hot for FMS.<br/><br/>Lockheed may see the revenue if the final quantity of F-35 are purchased.  There has been no cut yet to the acquisition objective just pushing the quantities out past the current budget.  This means they will still have to be bought in the 2019-2026 timeframe.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Airbus's Move To Alabama Help Spirit Aerosystems (SPR)?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/710781/comments?source=feed#comment-7229981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7229981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading.  Yes, there are a lot of advantages for European firms to locate in the U.S.  Turbomeca has invested in parts and repair facilities to support their engines for example.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading.  Yes, there are a lot of advantages for European firms to locate in the U.S.  Turbomeca has invested in parts and repair facilities to support their engines for example.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ITT Exelis Heralding Defense M&amp;A Activity?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/586941/comments?source=feed#comment-5648261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5648261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  Yes the only trend will be declining defense spending.  M&amp;A will be different due to the changes in the industrial base and the products the Pentagon is buying.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 09:46:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  Yes the only trend will be declining defense spending.  M&amp;A will be different due to the changes in the industrial base and the products the Pentagon is buying.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ITT Exelis Heralding Defense M&amp;A Activity?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/586941/comments?source=feed#comment-5429311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5429311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sir, thank you for reading and you comment.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:50:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sir, thank you for reading and you comment.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trends Expected To Continue With Defense Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/518901/comments?source=feed#comment-4716251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4716251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That's true.  The Sequestration is supposed to happen automatically.  There is a chance that the &quot;Lame Duck&quot; Congress will change this in December in a situation similar to the automatic ending of the &quot;Bush Tax Cuts&quot;.<br/><br/>I don't think &quot;war and fear mongering&quot; are the main lobbying tactics used by defense contractors.  They normally stress &quot;jobs and investment&quot;.<br/><br/>The U.S. does also face some threats and needs a military.  The question since the end of Vietnam War has always been what size and what cost.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:26:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That's true.  The Sequestration is supposed to happen automatically.  There is a chance that the &quot;Lame Duck&quot; Congress will change this in December in a situation similar to the automatic ending of the &quot;Bush Tax Cuts&quot;.<br/><br/>I don't think &quot;war and fear mongering&quot; are the main lobbying tactics used by defense contractors.  They normally stress &quot;jobs and investment&quot;.<br/><br/>The U.S. does also face some threats and needs a military.  The question since the end of Vietnam War has always been what size and what cost.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trends Expected To Continue With Defense Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/518901/comments?source=feed#comment-4701121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4701121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading. That is one of the wild cards that needs to be considered.  If there is a change in administration there may be major changes to planned defense spending.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:15:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading. That is one of the wild cards that needs to be considered.  If there is a change in administration there may be major changes to planned defense spending.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Northrop Grumman Break The Trend?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/482561/comments?source=feed#comment-4222371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4222371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading.  Not as much as I would like to.  I appreciate you taking the time to create a new anonymous user name and leave the comment.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:25:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for reading.  Not as much as I would like to.  I appreciate you taking the time to create a new anonymous user name and leave the comment.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Boeing's Military Programs Looking Up?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/475471/comments?source=feed#comment-4105531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4105531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Defense stocks have been fairly flat for the last several months.  The potential of large budget cuts in 2013 and out are weighing on them.  Right now there is concern that significant cuts would severly impact revenue &amp; earnings.<br/><br/>Boeing has its commercial business and had a good 1st quarter of sales.  That may bouy the stock price this year.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:11:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Defense stocks have been fairly flat for the last several months.  The potential of large budget cuts in 2013 and out are weighing on them.  Right now there is concern that significant cuts would severly impact revenue &amp; earnings.<br/><br/>Boeing has its commercial business and had a good 1st quarter of sales.  That may bouy the stock price this year.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Boeing Facing A Tough Time?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/428341/comments?source=feed#comment-3411081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3411081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you. I wrote this prior to the final decision.  Boeing did come out well in the ruling.  Certainly it will not be as bad as it could have been.  In reality the final affects of all this are years off as the WTO decisions are worked out.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:56:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you. I wrote this prior to the final decision.  Boeing did come out well in the ruling.  Certainly it will not be as bad as it could have been.  In reality the final affects of all this are years off as the WTO decisions are worked out.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is NASA Contractor Orbital Sciences Set To Take Off In 2012?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/395711/comments?source=feed#comment-3005531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3005531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They had a launch failure a year ago.  Unfortunately these things have happened with those types of systems.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:57:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They had a launch failure a year ago.  Unfortunately these things have happened with those types of systems.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is NASA Contractor Orbital Sciences Set To Take Off In 2012?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/395711/comments?source=feed#comment-2995711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2995711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  Yes they discussed the contact with the SEC in their quarterly results.  Failure to get back on schedule with the ISS contract will certainly weigh on the company over the next several months.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:29:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  Yes they discussed the contact with the SEC in their quarterly results.  Failure to get back on schedule with the ISS contract will certainly weigh on the company over the next several months.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defense Industrials Are Becoming Only Dividend Plays</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/378601/comments?source=feed#comment-2798241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2798241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I will make a correction.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:59:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  I will make a correction.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oshkosh Takes A Blow From Planned Defense Budget</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/367811/comments?source=feed#comment-2675161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2675161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  It was reported on Monday that for one the votes were still being tabulated.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:08:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  It was reported on Monday that for one the votes were still being tabulated.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlackRock's Best Performing Buys: 2 Potential Longs, 1 To Avoid</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/347231/comments?source=feed#comment-2454651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2454651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Defense spending for the current year is pretty much locked in.  If the current plans go through GD will see some issues with delays in ship and submarine construction.  There will be increased pressure to reduce costs and prices for military contracts but overall they and the other big industrial contractors will most likely see flat earnings.  Stock price could still goup this year but may be sticky after that.  GD is probably still a good short term deal.<br/><br/>Disclosure:  I am long MRO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:24:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Defense spending for the current year is pretty much locked in.  If the current plans go through GD will see some issues with delays in ship and submarine construction.  There will be increased pressure to reduce costs and prices for military contracts but overall they and the other big industrial contractors will most likely see flat earnings.  Stock price could still goup this year but may be sticky after that.  GD is probably still a good short term deal.<br/><br/>Disclosure:  I am long MRO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alliant Techsystems Making Changes For New World Of Defense Contracting</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/340901/comments?source=feed#comment-2414331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2414331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  There will still be requirements to replenish stocks and support training and the plants will be needed to support those activities.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:11:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you.  There will still be requirements to replenish stocks and support training and the plants will be needed to support those activities.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lockheed And Raytheon Post Mixed Results</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/322682/comments?source=feed#comment-2210004</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2210004</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[True.  Even adjusting for inflation the $275 billion would be worth about $341 billion in 2010 dollars just over half of the actual budget.  The costs of Iraq and Afghanistan substantially increased the amount spent along with having to pay more for personnel and benefits.  The proposed cuts are only 9% over five years but require substantial reductions in troops, operations and some investment programs.  I expect little fluctuation in the major defense contractors stock prices.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:54:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[True.  Even adjusting for inflation the $275 billion would be worth about $341 billion in 2010 dollars just over half of the actual budget.  The costs of Iraq and Afghanistan substantially increased the amount spent along with having to pay more for personnel and benefits.  The proposed cuts are only 9% over five years but require substantial reductions in troops, operations and some investment programs.  I expect little fluctuation in the major defense contractors stock prices.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Northrop Grumman Facing Cut To Large Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Program?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/394338-matthew-potter/257163-northrop-grumman-facing-cut-to-large-unmanned-aerial-vehicle-uav-program?source=feed#comment-2206347</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2206347</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Boeing is working on a ultra high endurance, high altitude UAV for strategic reconnaissance missions.  That certainly could replace the U-2 or Global Hawk.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:57:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Boeing is working on a ultra high endurance, high altitude UAV for strategic reconnaissance missions.  That certainly could replace the U-2 or Global Hawk.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
