<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Chemistfrog's Comments</title>
    <description>Chemistfrog's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/399559/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Enzo Biochem's Intellectual Property Protection To Attract Investor Attention In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429091/comments?source=feed#comment-18878781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18878781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not really.  Although after watching the O.J. Simpson debacle, I can certainly understand it happening for Enzo as well...  Any opinion on the company's chances? So far, so good with good patent protection thus far..]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:58:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not really.  Although after watching the O.J. Simpson debacle, I can certainly understand it happening for Enzo as well...  Any opinion on the company's chances? So far, so good with good patent protection thus far..]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Top Of The Class' Small Pharma Investments For 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110331/comments?source=feed#comment-18878651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18878651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice sir!  I wish ADMD would have worked out better for you! Moving forward, I think ACRX still has some upside left in it, although the risk/reward isn't as big as it was.  APRI is beasting after unfounded rumors of takeover just because they removed a &quot;poison pill&quot; from its shareholder rights agreement. I am a bit concerned with the delay in the Canadian launch and give the EU approval a 50/50 chance.  ADMD is stuck right around where it is until it provides some meaningful news/revenue, although I don't think there is much downside from here and is worth a hold IMO.  Good luck moving ahead and remember that there is nothing wrong with securing gains from a big winner, while you can afford to wait for the laggards to move up and increase your overall profits... :)  Best of luck sir and congrats on a good run so far!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:54:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice sir!  I wish ADMD would have worked out better for you! Moving forward, I think ACRX still has some upside left in it, although the risk/reward isn't as big as it was.  APRI is beasting after unfounded rumors of takeover just because they removed a &quot;poison pill&quot; from its shareholder rights agreement. I am a bit concerned with the delay in the Canadian launch and give the EU approval a 50/50 chance.  ADMD is stuck right around where it is until it provides some meaningful news/revenue, although I don't think there is much downside from here and is worth a hold IMO.  Good luck moving ahead and remember that there is nothing wrong with securing gains from a big winner, while you can afford to wait for the laggards to move up and increase your overall profits... :)  Best of luck sir and congrats on a good run so far!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enzo Biochem's Intellectual Property Protection To Attract Investor Attention In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429091/comments?source=feed#comment-18834961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18834961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Q2, 2013 Conference Call<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/r7rf'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>&quot;Paul Nouri - Noble Equity Funds<br/>Have you gotten court dates with any of the other cases yet?<br/>Barry W. Weiner - Co Founder, President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Director<br/>Yes, we have. We are looking to court dates in early November for the New York cases.&quot;<br/><br/>&quot;Paul Nouri - Noble Equity Funds<br/>Looking at the Life Technologies court decision, I guess the timing of it becoming finalized is the next 6 to 9 months at this point?&quot;<br/><br/>I think that's it?  May have to dig a little for the other (I wrote this a couple of weeks ago). Thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 23:34:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Q2, 2013 Conference Call<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/r7rf'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>&quot;Paul Nouri - Noble Equity Funds<br/>Have you gotten court dates with any of the other cases yet?<br/>Barry W. Weiner - Co Founder, President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Director<br/>Yes, we have. We are looking to court dates in early November for the New York cases.&quot;<br/><br/>&quot;Paul Nouri - Noble Equity Funds<br/>Looking at the Life Technologies court decision, I guess the timing of it becoming finalized is the next 6 to 9 months at this point?&quot;<br/><br/>I think that's it?  May have to dig a little for the other (I wrote this a couple of weeks ago). Thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Medical Device Companies With Revolutionary Platforms</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429661/comments?source=feed#comment-18790801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18790801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi Curtis, and I appreciate you stopping by.  I'm actually much better versed with the technologies and technical analysis and need to study up on the warrants, especially as pertaining to the warrants call PR. I'm betting on some fairly impressive data from the first 1-3 patients early in the trial which could give the company a little leverage when looking for financing.  I'll post if I can find anything particularly useful...  Take care sir!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:08:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi Curtis, and I appreciate you stopping by.  I'm actually much better versed with the technologies and technical analysis and need to study up on the warrants, especially as pertaining to the warrants call PR. I'm betting on some fairly impressive data from the first 1-3 patients early in the trial which could give the company a little leverage when looking for financing.  I'll post if I can find anything particularly useful...  Take care sir!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Imminent Catalysts For Small Pharmaceuticals</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1409241/comments?source=feed#comment-18606531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18606531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed.  Especially if an independent data monitoring committee is utilized to review data. With Inovio's phase 2 trials I believe it is up to the company's discretion until final data is compiled?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:48:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed.  Especially if an independent data monitoring committee is utilized to review data. With Inovio's phase 2 trials I believe it is up to the company's discretion until final data is compiled?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Imminent Catalysts For Small Pharmaceuticals</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1409241/comments?source=feed#comment-18604611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18604611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, I'm not certain.  I'm certain there are some SEC rules about matters of  &quot;material importance&quot;, particularly if the data were bad?  Just conjecture... Anybody else?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:00:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, I'm not certain.  I'm certain there are some SEC rules about matters of  &quot;material importance&quot;, particularly if the data were bad?  Just conjecture... Anybody else?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Detecting Investment Potential In Medical Diagnostics Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1410291/comments?source=feed#comment-18574301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18574301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks sir!  Best of luck to you in 2013!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:52:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks sir!  Best of luck to you in 2013!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tale Of Three Pharmaceuticals: Getting Exciting In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1381501/comments?source=feed#comment-18276481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18276481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for pointing out the short term investments of $24 million troublesacomin.  Actually, I think I will revise the article to incorporate that...<br/><br/>Thanks and best of luck this week!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:10:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for pointing out the short term investments of $24 million troublesacomin.  Actually, I think I will revise the article to incorporate that...<br/><br/>Thanks and best of luck this week!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tale Of Three Pharmaceuticals: Getting Exciting In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1381501/comments?source=feed#comment-18249041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18249041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed JSF.  As I commented above, I feel there are many watching from the sidelines that aren't quite convinced yet.  I will add half a position on any weakness, and then the remainder once/if data prove to be promising.  Thanks and good luck to you.<br/><br/>CF]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:33:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed JSF.  As I commented above, I feel there are many watching from the sidelines that aren't quite convinced yet.  I will add half a position on any weakness, and then the remainder once/if data prove to be promising.  Thanks and good luck to you.<br/><br/>CF]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tale Of Three Pharmaceuticals: Getting Exciting In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1381501/comments?source=feed#comment-18248941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18248941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed on all points and I appreciate the compliments.  I would love to visit Inovio or one of the clinical sites to watch the treatment in person. I believe that could be very revealing....  Please don't be a stranger!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:31:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed on all points and I appreciate the compliments.  I would love to visit Inovio or one of the clinical sites to watch the treatment in person. I believe that could be very revealing....  Please don't be a stranger!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tale Of Three Pharmaceuticals: Getting Exciting In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1381501/comments?source=feed#comment-18248861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18248861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Joe. I believe there are a great many people with INO on their watch lists due to its large targeted market group, but they're awaiting more solid proof of efficacy before jumping in...  Actually, I don't yet have a position either, but will likely open one this week as I'm a bargain shopper and usually don't buy on a gap up kind of day like today... Good luck ahead Joe!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:29:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Joe. I believe there are a great many people with INO on their watch lists due to its large targeted market group, but they're awaiting more solid proof of efficacy before jumping in...  Actually, I don't yet have a position either, but will likely open one this week as I'm a bargain shopper and usually don't buy on a gap up kind of day like today... Good luck ahead Joe!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tale Of Three Pharmaceuticals: Getting Exciting In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1381501/comments?source=feed#comment-18248771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18248771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Ted! Long time no hear sir, hoping April is treating you well and that May is even better...<br/><br/>CF]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:27:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Ted! Long time no hear sir, hoping April is treating you well and that May is even better...<br/><br/>CF]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apricus Biosciences: A Transformative Year Ahead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1312701/comments?source=feed#comment-18072041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18072041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I see nothing out there negative.  The stock ran nicely yesterday, so it appears to be on the rebound...  Watching carefully..<br/><br/>Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:54:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I see nothing out there negative.  The stock ran nicely yesterday, so it appears to be on the rebound...  Watching carefully..<br/><br/>Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biodel: Reemerging From Obscurity In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1333761/comments?source=feed#comment-17519531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17519531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My recollection is that Biodel abandoned the sublingual glucagon, but is still developing the heat stable (room temperature) solution version. I guess the &quot;stable&quot; sublingual formulation is the one that the Q1 2014 NDA was referencing?  Anyway, updates on the heat stable solution should be forthcoming as noted above &quot;We will provide you with updates on our progress and projected development timelines in subsequent calls&quot; in the February 12th CC.<br/><br/>Thanks for the clarification and please have a nice weekend ahead.<br/>CF]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:16:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My recollection is that Biodel abandoned the sublingual glucagon, but is still developing the heat stable (room temperature) solution version. I guess the &quot;stable&quot; sublingual formulation is the one that the Q1 2014 NDA was referencing?  Anyway, updates on the heat stable solution should be forthcoming as noted above &quot;We will provide you with updates on our progress and projected development timelines in subsequent calls&quot; in the February 12th CC.<br/><br/>Thanks for the clarification and please have a nice weekend ahead.<br/>CF]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small Pharma Watch List: Week Of April 8, 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1327141/comments?source=feed#comment-17427181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17427181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[OCLS upgraded to a &quot;buy&quot; today at Zacks:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/10RylPc'>http://bit.ly/10RylPc</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:23:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[OCLS upgraded to a &quot;buy&quot; today at Zacks:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/10RylPc'>http://bit.ly/10RylPc</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apricus Biosciences: A Transformative Year Ahead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1312701/comments?source=feed#comment-17373801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17373801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks.  Stock price seems to be responding accordingly...<br/><br/>Good luck this week,<br/>CF]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:16:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks.  Stock price seems to be responding accordingly...<br/><br/>Good luck this week,<br/>CF]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Week Ahead Could Be Pivotal For These Small-Cap Companies' Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314121/comments?source=feed#comment-17373731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17373731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not really. It depends on how many patients overall they will need to enroll.  I'll dig around some... Thanks for the kind words... <br/><br/>CF<br/><br/>&quot; With initial enrollment of 163 patients targeted, the company will then perform a sample size re-estimation to determine what number of patients ultimately enrolled would be necessary to have statistically significant results at the trial's conclusion, with a range of 326-652 patients expected. Updates on this final enrollment size will indicate how much longer the trial may take and give an indication about how much more money PLC would require for trial completion.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:15:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not really. It depends on how many patients overall they will need to enroll.  I'll dig around some... Thanks for the kind words... <br/><br/>CF<br/><br/>&quot; With initial enrollment of 163 patients targeted, the company will then perform a sample size re-estimation to determine what number of patients ultimately enrolled would be necessary to have statistically significant results at the trial's conclusion, with a range of 326-652 patients expected. Updates on this final enrollment size will indicate how much longer the trial may take and give an indication about how much more money PLC would require for trial completion.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small Pharma Watch List: Week Of April 8, 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1327141/comments?source=feed#comment-17373611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17373611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're correct on the cash value at $33 million.  The $298 million is actually &quot;Cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale<br/>securities&quot;<br/><br/>Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:13:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're correct on the cash value at $33 million.  The $298 million is actually &quot;Cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale<br/>securities&quot;<br/><br/>Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small Pharma Watch List: Week Of April 8, 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1327141/comments?source=feed#comment-17373501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17373501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The &quot;4 &amp; 4.25&quot; are resistance levels (split adjusted), not the values at the time of the split.  The 2 prices are the two resistance levels.... split adjusted...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:10:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The &quot;4 &amp; 4.25&quot; are resistance levels (split adjusted), not the values at the time of the split.  The 2 prices are the two resistance levels.... split adjusted...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apricus Biosciences: A Transformative Year Ahead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1312701/comments?source=feed#comment-17192991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17192991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the solid comments Eicoman.  I think there is a key point to remember.  Apricus had already paid for the Totect and NitroMist licenses and was ready to start generating revenue off them.  To totally abandon those and focus on its sexual dysfunction product line says much about their confidence in profits and regulatory pathways forward for Femprox and Vitaros.<br/><br/>Best of luck....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:49:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the solid comments Eicoman.  I think there is a key point to remember.  Apricus had already paid for the Totect and NitroMist licenses and was ready to start generating revenue off them.  To totally abandon those and focus on its sexual dysfunction product line says much about their confidence in profits and regulatory pathways forward for Femprox and Vitaros.<br/><br/>Best of luck....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Week Ahead Could Be Pivotal For These Small-Cap Companies' Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314121/comments?source=feed#comment-17140141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17140141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[These are all gambles.. Just as with poker, you don't always have to have the best hand to win... :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[These are all gambles.. Just as with poker, you don't always have to have the best hand to win... :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Week Ahead Could Be Pivotal For These Small-Cap Companies' Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314121/comments?source=feed#comment-17122061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17122061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sure thing sir.  Great to see you in DARA.  I feel like I'm in good company... ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:07:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sure thing sir.  Great to see you in DARA.  I feel like I'm in good company... ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trovagene's Novel Diagnostics Platform To Garner Attention In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1305901/comments?source=feed#comment-16963291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16963291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree that the technology is not as straightforward as it might seem on the outside.  However, if TROV has multiple patents covering certain aspects of the diagnostics, it stands to reason that could be part of the reason HDVY, NEO and Quest haven't successfully developed a urine test..... many of TROV's patents are limiting what others can do... nonetheless, they already have a launch to their credit this week for HPV, something the aforementioned companies haven't managed to do yet for urine samples.  If development-stage TROV can pull it off for one indication, it could likely do it for others.  We will soon see as validations and launches move forward in 2013.<br/><br/>Thanks and best of luck to you.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:37:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree that the technology is not as straightforward as it might seem on the outside.  However, if TROV has multiple patents covering certain aspects of the diagnostics, it stands to reason that could be part of the reason HDVY, NEO and Quest haven't successfully developed a urine test..... many of TROV's patents are limiting what others can do... nonetheless, they already have a launch to their credit this week for HPV, something the aforementioned companies haven't managed to do yet for urine samples.  If development-stage TROV can pull it off for one indication, it could likely do it for others.  We will soon see as validations and launches move forward in 2013.<br/><br/>Thanks and best of luck to you.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Imminent Catalysts Should Keep Investor Interest Alive For These Pharmaceuticals - Part II</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1153731/comments?source=feed#comment-16938051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16938051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm not sure.  I think it can be day-traded for quick flips today and perhaps Monday with current volatility.  I hate giving a company too many opportunities to get through CRL's, especially given the company's diluted share structure.  The company will be spending cash in the interim and competitor products will be moving closer to approval.  Perhaps double up and hope for a gradual trend up with a tight stop limit in the event it starts bleeding down?<br/><br/>Thoughts??]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:59:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm not sure.  I think it can be day-traded for quick flips today and perhaps Monday with current volatility.  I hate giving a company too many opportunities to get through CRL's, especially given the company's diluted share structure.  The company will be spending cash in the interim and competitor products will be moving closer to approval.  Perhaps double up and hope for a gradual trend up with a tight stop limit in the event it starts bleeding down?<br/><br/>Thoughts??]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pivotal Phase III Trial Data Ahead For 3 Development-Stage Small Pharma Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1301511/comments?source=feed#comment-16889011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16889011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi and great to see you here.  Welcome to Seeking Alpha!  Stay in touch and find us some great investment ideas!  :)<br/><br/>CF]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:12:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi and great to see you here.  Welcome to Seeking Alpha!  Stay in touch and find us some great investment ideas!  :)<br/><br/>CF]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Affymax Will Rise Again</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1288951/comments?source=feed#comment-16583921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16583921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice, informative article WalkTheTalk.  You've done a great deal of work on this piece.  There are so many positive ways for this to play out with solid upside potential ranging from labeling restrictions all the way up to no restrictions whatsoever if the fault is found to be with an adjuvant or manufacturing issue (bad raw material, etc).<br/><br/>Yes, the downside does exist and I will keep that in mind.  I have stop limits in place but do realize they wouldn't be of any help in a &quot;gap down&quot; type of scenario.<br/><br/>Thanks again for the work and I appreciate the insight.  As investors we all have to weigh the risks and ascertain what is truth, partial truth or fiction.  You add more information to our arsenal by which we can hopefully make our decisions.  Please keep up the good work!<br/>CF]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:56:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice, informative article WalkTheTalk.  You've done a great deal of work on this piece.  There are so many positive ways for this to play out with solid upside potential ranging from labeling restrictions all the way up to no restrictions whatsoever if the fault is found to be with an adjuvant or manufacturing issue (bad raw material, etc).<br/><br/>Yes, the downside does exist and I will keep that in mind.  I have stop limits in place but do realize they wouldn't be of any help in a &quot;gap down&quot; type of scenario.<br/><br/>Thanks again for the work and I appreciate the insight.  As investors we all have to weigh the risks and ascertain what is truth, partial truth or fiction.  You add more information to our arsenal by which we can hopefully make our decisions.  Please keep up the good work!<br/>CF]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small Pharmas With Imminent Catalysts For March 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1263891/comments?source=feed#comment-16210511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16210511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed Walk, that's exactly why I noted it as speculative.  I main mentioned it because that type of companion diagnostic could help salvage the drug over the mid to longer term if screening could free up a patient set.  Thanks and have a great week ahead.   CF<br/><br/>&quot;Although Arrayit could provide a possible means to evaluate the patients experiencing adverse events with regard to OMONTYS and a means to screen future patients, the company should only be considered as a speculative possibility unless more information can be presented by the company.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:04:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed Walk, that's exactly why I noted it as speculative.  I main mentioned it because that type of companion diagnostic could help salvage the drug over the mid to longer term if screening could free up a patient set.  Thanks and have a great week ahead.   CF<br/><br/>&quot;Although Arrayit could provide a possible means to evaluate the patients experiencing adverse events with regard to OMONTYS and a means to screen future patients, the company should only be considered as a speculative possibility unless more information can be presented by the company.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Athersys' MultiStem Platform Tempts Big Pharma And Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1242731/comments?source=feed#comment-15897561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15897561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Noted. Thanks.<br/><br/>It appears that ATHX support is holding very well, closing today at $1.57.  Now we need to see how it holds up on a red market day. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:49:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Noted. Thanks.<br/><br/>It appears that ATHX support is holding very well, closing today at $1.57.  Now we need to see how it holds up on a red market day. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Speculation On The Cause Of The OMONTYS Recall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1234751/comments?source=feed#comment-15897081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15897081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Interesting note on removal of excess PEG, at least in one application:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/YbNN6T'>http://1.usa.gov/YbNN6T</a><br/><br/>F(ab')2 pegylation<br/><br/>After preparation, the F(ab')2 were dialyzed against borate buffer 0.02 M pH 9 before conjugation to PEG using a 3-fold molar excess of PEG (15 nmoles) added to 500 µg (500 µl of a 1 mg/ml solution) of dialyzed F(ab')2 (5 nmoles). After 30 min at room temperature with gentle agitation, F(ab')2 were purified by cation exchange chromatography to remove unreacted PEG and to separate the different F(ab')2 species (nonpegylated, monopegylated and multipegylated F(ab')2). A MacroCap SP column (GE Healthcare) (10.5×1 cm) was used with an AKTÄ system (GE Healthcare) and equilibrated with buffer A (0.02 M acetate buffer pH 5) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The reaction mixture was filtered through a 0.2 µm filter and loaded onto the column. After washing the column with 17 ml of buffer A at 1 ml/min, the pegylated F(ab')2 was eluted using successive gradient steps of 12 ml each at 2, 3, 4, 5 and 25% of buffer B (0.02 M acetate buffer pH 5+1 M NaCl) at 1 ml/min. The column was regenerated with 17 ml of buffer B at 1 ml/min. During the chromatography, fractions of 1 ml were collected and the absorbance was monitored at 280 nm. Fractions corresponding to each peak were pooled and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.<br/><br/>Observations:  a 3-fold molar excess of PEG was utilized in that particular scenario, noting that it is possible the OMONTYS manufacturing may also incorporate excess levels of PEG (nothing alarming about that as long as it's removed before the final product goes out the door).  Cation-exchange chromatography was used in the above example (plausible on a larger scale with larger production-scale batches but with much much bigger cation-exchange columns).<br/><br/>Possibilities:<br/>Not enough PEG was utilized (for several batches/lots, it could be because lower purity PEG was utilized, but with the lower purity not compensated for by using more, the pegylation reaction would not have yielded 100% desired final product but would rather have some lower molecular weight peptidic ESA unreacted, which could trigger anaphylactic shock due to immunogenicity.<br/><br/>Too much PEG was utilized, which in itself can trigger hypersensitivity also.  If this is sufficiently removed, no problems. However, if the cation exchange or other means of excess PEG removal was inadequate due to processing issues or due to higher levels of PEG than the system can adequately clean up, the PEG could carry into the finished product in PEG form, or produce other undesirable products depending on what else is in the solution/mixture.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:36:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Interesting note on removal of excess PEG, at least in one application:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/YbNN6T'>http://1.usa.gov/YbNN6T</a><br/><br/>F(ab')2 pegylation<br/><br/>After preparation, the F(ab')2 were dialyzed against borate buffer 0.02 M pH 9 before conjugation to PEG using a 3-fold molar excess of PEG (15 nmoles) added to 500 µg (500 µl of a 1 mg/ml solution) of dialyzed F(ab')2 (5 nmoles). After 30 min at room temperature with gentle agitation, F(ab')2 were purified by cation exchange chromatography to remove unreacted PEG and to separate the different F(ab')2 species (nonpegylated, monopegylated and multipegylated F(ab')2). A MacroCap SP column (GE Healthcare) (10.5×1 cm) was used with an AKTÄ system (GE Healthcare) and equilibrated with buffer A (0.02 M acetate buffer pH 5) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The reaction mixture was filtered through a 0.2 µm filter and loaded onto the column. After washing the column with 17 ml of buffer A at 1 ml/min, the pegylated F(ab')2 was eluted using successive gradient steps of 12 ml each at 2, 3, 4, 5 and 25% of buffer B (0.02 M acetate buffer pH 5+1 M NaCl) at 1 ml/min. The column was regenerated with 17 ml of buffer B at 1 ml/min. During the chromatography, fractions of 1 ml were collected and the absorbance was monitored at 280 nm. Fractions corresponding to each peak were pooled and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.<br/><br/>Observations:  a 3-fold molar excess of PEG was utilized in that particular scenario, noting that it is possible the OMONTYS manufacturing may also incorporate excess levels of PEG (nothing alarming about that as long as it's removed before the final product goes out the door).  Cation-exchange chromatography was used in the above example (plausible on a larger scale with larger production-scale batches but with much much bigger cation-exchange columns).<br/><br/>Possibilities:<br/>Not enough PEG was utilized (for several batches/lots, it could be because lower purity PEG was utilized, but with the lower purity not compensated for by using more, the pegylation reaction would not have yielded 100% desired final product but would rather have some lower molecular weight peptidic ESA unreacted, which could trigger anaphylactic shock due to immunogenicity.<br/><br/>Too much PEG was utilized, which in itself can trigger hypersensitivity also.  If this is sufficiently removed, no problems. However, if the cation exchange or other means of excess PEG removal was inadequate due to processing issues or due to higher levels of PEG than the system can adequately clean up, the PEG could carry into the finished product in PEG form, or produce other undesirable products depending on what else is in the solution/mixture.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Speculation On The Cause Of The OMONTYS Recall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1234751/comments?source=feed#comment-15895831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15895831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Known as Hematide at the time of the clinicals, OMONTYS information at 2008 ASCO:<br/><br/>&quot;With the use of Nektar's advanced PEGylation technology, the properties of therapeutic agents, such as Hematide(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tm' title='Toyota Motor Corporation'>TM</a>), can be enhanced by increasing drug circulation time in the bloodstream, decreasing immunogenicity, and reducing dosing frequency. Nektar proprietary technology uses advanced conjugation chemistry and techniques to attach polyethylene glycol polymers to therapeutic agents.&quot;<br/><br/>So, if PEG was of lower purity than actually stated (for example 90% instead of 98%), than the pegylation reaction wouldn't be efficient and yield 100% peginesatide.  If that is the case, then let's say that about 5% of the peptidic ESA is still in the lower molecular weight form.  If that is the case, there may be some induced immunogenicity which could possibly trigger the anaphylactic shock and other adverse events?  See the following link about immunogenicity and anaphylactic shock: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YMv8i2'>http://bit.ly/YMv8i2</a><br/><br/>In other words, excess PEG could be the culprit as could a shortage...  Too much PEG left over in the final product could cause hypersensitivity while not enough could leave enough to leave lower molecular weight peptidic ESA unreacted which could induce immunogenicity and also trigger the AE's.<br/><br/>This is just conjecture and should not yet be construed as a &quot;smoking gun&quot;.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:00:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Known as Hematide at the time of the clinicals, OMONTYS information at 2008 ASCO:<br/><br/>&quot;With the use of Nektar's advanced PEGylation technology, the properties of therapeutic agents, such as Hematide(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tm' title='Toyota Motor Corporation'>TM</a>), can be enhanced by increasing drug circulation time in the bloodstream, decreasing immunogenicity, and reducing dosing frequency. Nektar proprietary technology uses advanced conjugation chemistry and techniques to attach polyethylene glycol polymers to therapeutic agents.&quot;<br/><br/>So, if PEG was of lower purity than actually stated (for example 90% instead of 98%), than the pegylation reaction wouldn't be efficient and yield 100% peginesatide.  If that is the case, then let's say that about 5% of the peptidic ESA is still in the lower molecular weight form.  If that is the case, there may be some induced immunogenicity which could possibly trigger the anaphylactic shock and other adverse events?  See the following link about immunogenicity and anaphylactic shock: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YMv8i2'>http://bit.ly/YMv8i2</a><br/><br/>In other words, excess PEG could be the culprit as could a shortage...  Too much PEG left over in the final product could cause hypersensitivity while not enough could leave enough to leave lower molecular weight peptidic ESA unreacted which could induce immunogenicity and also trigger the AE's.<br/><br/>This is just conjecture and should not yet be construed as a &quot;smoking gun&quot;.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
