You make the classic mistake of assuming that all debt is equal but it isn't. Debt on GM's balance sheet is completely different from that at a utility company (like Berkshire's Mid-American which holds 90% of Berkshire's debt. All utilities are funded with debt because of the royalty like stream of their revenues. This makes complete sense as debt funding is a heckuva lot cheaper than equity & the revenue streams are preductable way into the future. Contrast that with tech companies that have to re-invent themselves every 5 years or so or lose their revenue streams - they have to be very careful about using debt & need cash to invest in new ideas or acquire new ideas.
Also it is important to know interest coverage & leverage ratios - net debt in isolation is a pretty useless measurement
On Mar 13 02:35 PM mkreisel wrote:
> If we include debt, things look very differently: > > Ticker, debt, net cash > XOM, 9425, 22582 > CSCO, 6848, 22683 > AAPL, 0, 25647 > BRKA, 36882, -11343 > PFE, 17283, 7272 > TM, 118626, -95745 > MSFT, 0, 20298 > GOOG, 0, 15846 > RDSA, 23269, -8081 > WYE, 11739, 2806 > IBM, 99925, -21018 > JNJ, 11825, 957 > INTC, 1988, 9855 > HPQ, 20458, -9203 > ORCL, 10238, 408 > > Now things look quite different! > > In addition, many companies are burdened with massive pension obligations, > the stuff that did GM and Bethlehem Steel in. For example, IBM has > 19452 million on its balance sheet; XOM 20729 million. > > BRKA also has a maximum of 67 billion derivatives exposure, including > 37 billion in equity index puts, 19 billion in CDS, and 18 billion > in muni bond insurance. > > PFE has just squandered its cash horde on that panic deal with WYE. > When the deal closes for good, PFE will have a monstrous debt load > and very little cash left. > > So if you really like company with lots of cash, AAPL, CSCO, MSFT, > GOOG, INTC, and XOM are your best choices.
The 15 Most Cash Rich Companies [View article]
You make the classic mistake of assuming that all debt is equal but it isn't. Debt on GM's balance sheet is completely different from that at a utility company (like Berkshire's Mid-American which holds 90% of Berkshire's debt. All utilities are funded with debt because of the royalty like stream of their revenues. This makes complete sense as debt funding is a heckuva lot cheaper than equity & the revenue streams are preductable way into the future. Contrast that with tech companies that have to re-invent themselves every 5 years or so or lose their revenue streams - they have to be very careful about using debt & need cash to invest in new ideas or acquire new ideas.
Also it is important to know interest coverage & leverage ratios - net debt in isolation is a pretty useless measurement
On Mar 13 02:35 PM mkreisel wrote:
> If we include debt, things look very differently:
>
> Ticker, debt, net cash
> XOM, 9425, 22582
> CSCO, 6848, 22683
> AAPL, 0, 25647
> BRKA, 36882, -11343
> PFE, 17283, 7272
> TM, 118626, -95745
> MSFT, 0, 20298
> GOOG, 0, 15846
> RDSA, 23269, -8081
> WYE, 11739, 2806
> IBM, 99925, -21018
> JNJ, 11825, 957
> INTC, 1988, 9855
> HPQ, 20458, -9203
> ORCL, 10238, 408
>
> Now things look quite different!
>
> In addition, many companies are burdened with massive pension obligations,
> the stuff that did GM and Bethlehem Steel in. For example, IBM has
> 19452 million on its balance sheet; XOM 20729 million.
>
> BRKA also has a maximum of 67 billion derivatives exposure, including
> 37 billion in equity index puts, 19 billion in CDS, and 18 billion
> in muni bond insurance.
>
> PFE has just squandered its cash horde on that panic deal with WYE.
> When the deal closes for good, PFE will have a monstrous debt load
> and very little cash left.
>
> So if you really like company with lots of cash, AAPL, CSCO, MSFT,
> GOOG, INTC, and XOM are your best choices.