<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Serenity's Comments</title>
    <description>Serenity's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/4073601/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>10 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's NCAV Criteria In May</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432751/comments?source=feed#comment-18832091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18832091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you very much, alpha bet soup!<br/><br/>However, do note that the $1,526.34 Million, $784.84 Million and 141.94 Million for XIN on Serenity's data feed also correspond exactly to the balance sheet figures on Google finance. <br/><br/>Also FYI, the Book Value given here is the Tangible Book Value calculated by Serenity, not the reported Book Value which usually includes Goodwill and other Intangibles.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:54:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you very much, alpha bet soup!<br/><br/>However, do note that the $1,526.34 Million, $784.84 Million and 141.94 Million for XIN on Serenity's data feed also correspond exactly to the balance sheet figures on Google finance. <br/><br/>Also FYI, the Book Value given here is the Tangible Book Value calculated by Serenity, not the reported Book Value which usually includes Goodwill and other Intangibles.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Defensive Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298941/comments?source=feed#comment-18771771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18771771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Update: Weis Markets Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmk' title='Weis Markets Inc'>WMK</a>) now appears to be a fully defensive Graham stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:57:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Update: Weis Markets Inc (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmk' title='Weis Markets Inc'>WMK</a>) now appears to be a fully defensive Graham stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Verizon Communications Inc: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1393301/comments?source=feed#comment-18395301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18395301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for Verizon Communications Inc:<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$31.34<br/>NCAV Price: -$59.76<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria. <br/><br/>Verizon Communications Inc fails all criteria other than Sales and Dividend Record.<br/>Sales: 23,170.00%<br/>Liabilities: 39.39%<br/>Debt: 0.00%<br/>Earnings Stability: 40.00%<br/>Dividend Record: 100.00%<br/>Earnings Growth: 23.74%]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 08:10:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for Verizon Communications Inc:<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$31.34<br/>NCAV Price: -$59.76<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria. <br/><br/>Verizon Communications Inc fails all criteria other than Sales and Dividend Record.<br/>Sales: 23,170.00%<br/>Liabilities: 39.39%<br/>Debt: 0.00%<br/>Earnings Stability: 40.00%<br/>Dividend Record: 100.00%<br/>Earnings Growth: 23.74%]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hedge Funds Are Buying These 5 Stocks Undervalued By Earnings Growth And The Graham Number</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1375251/comments?source=feed#comment-18122461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18122461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Aflac Inc fails the criteria for Liabilities and Debt.<br/>Encore Capital Group Inc fails the criteria for Liabilities, Debt and Dividends.<br/>Cardinal Financial Corp fails all criteria other than Earnings Growth and Earnings Stability.<br/>Kronos Worldwide Inc fails all criteria other than Sales and Earnings Growth.<br/>CAI International Inc fails all criteria other than Earnings Growth.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:14:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Aflac Inc fails the criteria for Liabilities and Debt.<br/>Encore Capital Group Inc fails the criteria for Liabilities, Debt and Dividends.<br/>Cardinal Financial Corp fails all criteria other than Earnings Growth and Earnings Stability.<br/>Kronos Worldwide Inc fails all criteria other than Sales and Earnings Growth.<br/>CAI International Inc fails all criteria other than Earnings Growth.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is Mr. Market's Mood Today?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360601/comments?source=feed#comment-18101121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18101121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Dividend Sleuth!<br/><br/>But perhaps Warren Buffett explained it best when he simply said - &quot;the market is manic-depressive&quot;.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:14:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Dividend Sleuth!<br/><br/>But perhaps Warren Buffett explained it best when he simply said - &quot;the market is manic-depressive&quot;.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is Mr. Market's Mood Today?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360601/comments?source=feed#comment-17993081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17993081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for Eaton Corporation:<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$15.53<br/>NCAV Price: -$27.44<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria. <br/>In addition to having a Graham Number of Zero, Eaton Corporation also fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.<br/><br/>Serenity excludes Goodwill and Intangibles while calculating Book Values and for ETN, such a BVPS evaluates to -$12.94. <br/>Hence the non-existent (Zero) Graham Number for ETN.<br/><br/>GN = sqrt(22.5 x EPS x BVPS) = square root of a negative number for ETN.<br/><br/>Book Value, also known as Net Tangible Assets, is the theoretical liquidation value per share and is not traditionally supposed to include Goodwill and Intangibles. <br/><br/>But in practice, this is not always followed. <br/>So instead of using reported Book Values, Serenity calculates Book Values from balance sheets.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:27:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for Eaton Corporation:<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$15.53<br/>NCAV Price: -$27.44<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria. <br/>In addition to having a Graham Number of Zero, Eaton Corporation also fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.<br/><br/>Serenity excludes Goodwill and Intangibles while calculating Book Values and for ETN, such a BVPS evaluates to -$12.94. <br/>Hence the non-existent (Zero) Graham Number for ETN.<br/><br/>GN = sqrt(22.5 x EPS x BVPS) = square root of a negative number for ETN.<br/><br/>Book Value, also known as Net Tangible Assets, is the theoretical liquidation value per share and is not traditionally supposed to include Goodwill and Intangibles. <br/><br/>But in practice, this is not always followed. <br/>So instead of using reported Book Values, Serenity calculates Book Values from balance sheets.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raytheon Company Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1357471/comments?source=feed#comment-17939381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17939381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[(Response given to an email query about the above)<br/><br/>Serenity excludes Goodwill and Intangibles while calculating Book value and for RTN, such a BVPS evaluates to -$16.45. <br/><br/>Hence the non-existent (Zero) Graham Number for RTN.<br/>GN = sqrt(22.5 x EPS x BVPS) = square root of a negative number for RTN.<br/><br/>Book value, also known as Net Tangible Assets, is the theoretical liquidation value of a share and is not traditionally supposed to include Goodwill and Intangibles. <br/><br/>But in practice, this is not always followed. <br/>So Serenity does not use reported Book Values.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:36:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[(Response given to an email query about the above)<br/><br/>Serenity excludes Goodwill and Intangibles while calculating Book value and for RTN, such a BVPS evaluates to -$16.45. <br/><br/>Hence the non-existent (Zero) Graham Number for RTN.<br/>GN = sqrt(22.5 x EPS x BVPS) = square root of a negative number for RTN.<br/><br/>Book value, also known as Net Tangible Assets, is the theoretical liquidation value of a share and is not traditionally supposed to include Goodwill and Intangibles. <br/><br/>But in practice, this is not always followed. <br/>So Serenity does not use reported Book Values.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All Star Battle: Graham Vs. Piotroski</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1357421/comments?source=feed#comment-17925961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17925961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Graham recommended 3 different grades of stocks for investment - Defensive, Enterprising and NCAV - and 16 criteria for finding them.<br/><br/>He backtested these criteria for decades before recommending them. <br/><br/>But perhaps the best backtest of all is Buffett's famous speech &quot;The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville&quot; that meticulously explains why all of Graham's students have been extraordinarily successful.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:32:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Graham recommended 3 different grades of stocks for investment - Defensive, Enterprising and NCAV - and 16 criteria for finding them.<br/><br/>He backtested these criteria for decades before recommending them. <br/><br/>But perhaps the best backtest of all is Buffett's famous speech &quot;The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville&quot; that meticulously explains why all of Graham's students have been extraordinarily successful.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Raytheon Company Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1357471/comments?source=feed#comment-17925741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17925741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for Raytheon Co:<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$19.74<br/>NCAV Price: -$28.70<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>And to be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria. <br/><br/>Raytheon Co fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:22:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for Raytheon Co:<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$19.74<br/>NCAV Price: -$28.70<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>And to be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria. <br/><br/>Raytheon Co fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Graham Value Stock Portfolio Update</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1344261/comments?source=feed#comment-17731231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17731231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Your criteria sound very similar to Benjamin Graham's Stock Selection criteria for the Enterprising Investor.<br/><br/>Summarized from CHAPTER 15 of The Intelligent Investor - Stock Selection for the Enterprising Investor:<br/>[For issues selling at P/E multipliers under 10]<br/>&quot;1-A. Current assets at least 1-1⁄2 times current liabilities.<br/>1-B. Debt not more than 110% of net current assets.<br/>2. Earnings stability: No deficit in the last five years covered in the Stock Guide.<br/>3. Dividend record: Some current dividend.<br/>4. Earnings growth: Last year's earnings more than those of 1966.<br/>[Note: This corresponds approximately to the earnings of 2008 today]<br/>5. Price: Less than 120% net tangible assets.&quot;<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/rxzv'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> gives a list of 5 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Enterprising Criteria In 2013:]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:34:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Your criteria sound very similar to Benjamin Graham's Stock Selection criteria for the Enterprising Investor.<br/><br/>Summarized from CHAPTER 15 of The Intelligent Investor - Stock Selection for the Enterprising Investor:<br/>[For issues selling at P/E multipliers under 10]<br/>&quot;1-A. Current assets at least 1-1⁄2 times current liabilities.<br/>1-B. Debt not more than 110% of net current assets.<br/>2. Earnings stability: No deficit in the last five years covered in the Stock Guide.<br/>3. Dividend record: Some current dividend.<br/>4. Earnings growth: Last year's earnings more than those of 1966.<br/>[Note: This corresponds approximately to the earnings of 2008 today]<br/>5. Price: Less than 120% net tangible assets.&quot;<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/rxzv'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> gives a list of 5 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Enterprising Criteria In 2013:]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Stocks You Shouldn't Sell</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1342721/comments?source=feed#comment-17685351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17685351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for the above stocks:<br/><br/>Amazon.com Inc<br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$0.90<br/>NCAV Price: -$6.76<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>Intuitive Surgical Inc<br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $172.80<br/>Enterprising Price: $99.66<br/>NCAV Price: $35.17<br/>Graham Grade: OK / NCAV<br/>Graham Price: $35.17<br/>Current Price: $509.99<br/><br/>Nike Inc<br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $23.67<br/>Enterprising Price: $12.61<br/>NCAV Price: $7.02<br/>Graham Grade: Excellent / Defensive<br/>Graham Price: $23.67<br/>Current Price: $59.67]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:14:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Given below is the result of the full 16-step Benjamin Graham analysis for the above stocks:<br/><br/>Amazon.com Inc<br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$0.90<br/>NCAV Price: -$6.76<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded<br/><br/>Intuitive Surgical Inc<br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $172.80<br/>Enterprising Price: $99.66<br/>NCAV Price: $35.17<br/>Graham Grade: OK / NCAV<br/>Graham Price: $35.17<br/>Current Price: $509.99<br/><br/>Nike Inc<br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $23.67<br/>Enterprising Price: $12.61<br/>NCAV Price: $7.02<br/>Graham Grade: Excellent / Defensive<br/>Graham Price: $23.67<br/>Current Price: $59.67]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 S&amp;P 500 Dividend Stocks Undervalued By Free Cash Flow And The Graham Number</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1343451/comments?source=feed#comment-17685011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17685011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Aflac Inc fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.<br/>Humana Inc fails the criteria for liabilities and dividends.<br/>L-3 Communications Holdings Inc fails the criteria for liabilities, debt and dividends.<br/>Northrop Grumman Corp fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.<br/>Principal Financial Group Inc fails all the criteria other than Sales and Earnings stability.<br/>Torchmark Corp fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:04:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Aflac Inc fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.<br/>Humana Inc fails the criteria for liabilities and dividends.<br/>L-3 Communications Holdings Inc fails the criteria for liabilities, debt and dividends.<br/>Northrop Grumman Corp fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.<br/>Principal Financial Group Inc fails all the criteria other than Sales and Earnings stability.<br/>Torchmark Corp fails the criteria for liabilities and debt.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Build A Complete Benjamin Graham Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1036121/comments?source=feed#comment-17576711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17576711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Quoting from &quot;General Portfolio Policy: The Defensive Investor&quot; of The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;It has been an old and sound principle that those who cannot afford to take risks should be content with a relatively low return on their invested funds. From this there has developed the general notion that the rate of return which the investor should aim for is more or less proportionate to the degree of risk he is ready to run. Our view is different. The rate of return sought should be dependent, rather, on the amount of intelligent effort the investor is willing and able to bring to bear on his task. The minimum return goes to our passive investor, who wants both safety and freedom from concern. The maximum return would be realized by the alert and enterprising investor who exercises maximum intelligence and skill.&quot;<br/><br/>And from Warren Buffett's Preface to The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;Whether you achieve outstanding results will depend on the effort and intellect you apply to your investments, as well as on the amplitudes of stock-market folly that prevail during your investing career&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:09:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Quoting from &quot;General Portfolio Policy: The Defensive Investor&quot; of The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;It has been an old and sound principle that those who cannot afford to take risks should be content with a relatively low return on their invested funds. From this there has developed the general notion that the rate of return which the investor should aim for is more or less proportionate to the degree of risk he is ready to run. Our view is different. The rate of return sought should be dependent, rather, on the amount of intelligent effort the investor is willing and able to bring to bear on his task. The minimum return goes to our passive investor, who wants both safety and freedom from concern. The maximum return would be realized by the alert and enterprising investor who exercises maximum intelligence and skill.&quot;<br/><br/>And from Warren Buffett's Preface to The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;Whether you achieve outstanding results will depend on the effort and intellect you apply to your investments, as well as on the amplitudes of stock-market folly that prevail during your investing career&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Benjamin Graham Investors Can Ignore What 'Research' Says</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1336101/comments?source=feed#comment-17535441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17535441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Benjamin Graham actually taught that the returns an investor could expect were not proportional to the risk he was willing to assume, but rather, to the effort he was willing to put into his investments.<br/><br/>Quoted from &quot;General Portfolio Policy: The Defensive Investor&quot; of The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;It has been an old and sound principle that those who cannot afford to take risks should be content with a relatively low return on their invested funds. From this there has developed the general notion that the rate of return which the investor should aim for is more or less proportionate to the degree of risk he is ready to run. Our view is different. The rate of return sought should be dependent, rather, on the amount of intelligent effort the investor is willing and able to bring to bear on his task. The minimum return goes to our passive investor, who wants both safety and freedom from concern. The maximum return would be realized by the alert and enterprising investor who exercises maximum intelligence and skill.&quot;<br/><br/>And from Warren Buffett's Preface to The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;Whether you achieve outstanding results will depend on the effort and intellect you apply to your investments, as well as on the amplitudes of stock-market folly that prevail during your investing career&quot;<br/><br/>More details on Graham strategies on <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/m7h5'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:16:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Benjamin Graham actually taught that the returns an investor could expect were not proportional to the risk he was willing to assume, but rather, to the effort he was willing to put into his investments.<br/><br/>Quoted from &quot;General Portfolio Policy: The Defensive Investor&quot; of The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;It has been an old and sound principle that those who cannot afford to take risks should be content with a relatively low return on their invested funds. From this there has developed the general notion that the rate of return which the investor should aim for is more or less proportionate to the degree of risk he is ready to run. Our view is different. The rate of return sought should be dependent, rather, on the amount of intelligent effort the investor is willing and able to bring to bear on his task. The minimum return goes to our passive investor, who wants both safety and freedom from concern. The maximum return would be realized by the alert and enterprising investor who exercises maximum intelligence and skill.&quot;<br/><br/>And from Warren Buffett's Preface to The Intelligent Investor:<br/><br/>&quot;Whether you achieve outstanding results will depend on the effort and intellect you apply to your investments, as well as on the amplitudes of stock-market folly that prevail during your investing career&quot;<br/><br/>More details on Graham strategies on <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/m7h5'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 Outperforming Dividend Stocks Undervalued By The Graham Number</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1331721/comments?source=feed#comment-17448041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17448041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Allstate Corp fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Fulton Financial Corp also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Principal Financial Group Inc fails all the criteria other than Sales and Earnings stability.<br/>First Interstate Bancsystem Inc fails all six criteria.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:02:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Allstate Corp fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Fulton Financial Corp also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Principal Financial Group Inc fails all the criteria other than Sales and Earnings stability.<br/>First Interstate Bancsystem Inc fails all six criteria.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Business Machines Corporation: Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1326061/comments?source=feed#comment-17347121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17347121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A percentage-wise breakdown for IBM by each of Benjamin Graham's Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Sales:  20,902.00%<br/>Liabilities: 56.66%<br/>Debt: 24.11%<br/>Earnings Stability: 100.00%<br/>Dividend record: 100.00%<br/>Earnings growth: 228.37%<br/><br/>Final Graham Assessment.<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$15.23<br/>NCAV Price: -$45.57<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A percentage-wise breakdown for IBM by each of Benjamin Graham's Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Sales:  20,902.00%<br/>Liabilities: 56.66%<br/>Debt: 24.11%<br/>Earnings Stability: 100.00%<br/>Dividend record: 100.00%<br/>Earnings growth: 228.37%<br/><br/>Final Graham Assessment.<br/><br/>Defensive Price (Graham Number): $0.00<br/>Enterprising Price: -$15.23<br/>NCAV Price: -$45.57<br/>Graham Grade: Ungraded]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Defensive Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298941/comments?source=feed#comment-17154941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17154941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're welcome, tyouth.<br/>Please write back if you have any other questions.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:18:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're welcome, tyouth.<br/>Please write back if you have any other questions.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hedge Funds Are Buying These 3 Outperforming Financials Undervalued By The Graham Number</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1302351/comments?source=feed#comment-17143001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17143001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>First Citizens BancShares Inc fails the liabilities and debt criteria.<br/>Firstmerit Corp fails the earnings growth, liabilities and debt criteria<br/>Colony Financial Inc fails all the criteria.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:33:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>First Citizens BancShares Inc fails the liabilities and debt criteria.<br/>Firstmerit Corp fails the earnings growth, liabilities and debt criteria<br/>Colony Financial Inc fails all the criteria.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Outperforming Dividend Stocks Undervalued By The Graham Number</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314391/comments?source=feed#comment-17142861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17142861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Allstate Corp fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Associated Banc-Corp also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Fulton Financial Corp also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Huntington Bancshares Inc also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Flushing Financial Corp fails all the criteria other than Earnings stability.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:27:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To be checked against the Graham Number, Benjamin Graham required that a stock first have uninterrupted earnings for the previous 10 years, uninterrupted dividends for the previous 20 years, and meet 4 other Defensive criteria.<br/><br/>Allstate Corp fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Associated Banc-Corp also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Fulton Financial Corp also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Huntington Bancshares Inc also fails all the criteria other than Sales and Dividend record.<br/>Flushing Financial Corp fails all the criteria other than Earnings stability.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Enterprising Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1303771/comments?source=feed#comment-17114611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17114611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Update:<br/><br/>Hallador Energy Co (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hnrg' title='Hallador Energy Co'>HNRG</a>) now meets Graham's Enterprising stock criteria, and Validus Holdings Ltd (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vr' title='Validus Holdings, Ltd.'>VR</a>) no longer does.<br/><br/>The Graham evaluation of a stock changes everyday in accordance with price and financial data changes. Please refer to the Comprehensive Screener to see the latest list of stocks meeting Graham's criteria.<br/>Link: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QYCMaj'>http://bit.ly/QYCMaj</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:49:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Update:<br/><br/>Hallador Energy Co (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hnrg' title='Hallador Energy Co'>HNRG</a>) now meets Graham's Enterprising stock criteria, and Validus Holdings Ltd (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vr' title='Validus Holdings, Ltd.'>VR</a>) no longer does.<br/><br/>The Graham evaluation of a stock changes everyday in accordance with price and financial data changes. Please refer to the Comprehensive Screener to see the latest list of stocks meeting Graham's criteria.<br/>Link: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QYCMaj'>http://bit.ly/QYCMaj</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Defensive Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298941/comments?source=feed#comment-16969041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16969041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hello tyouth,<br/><br/>Serenity excludes Goodwill and Intangibles while calculating Book value and for INTC, that comes to $7.13. <br/>Hence the lower Graham Number:<br/>GN =  sqrt(22.5 x 2.13 EPS x 7.13 BVPS) = $18.49<br/><br/>Book value, also known as Net Tangible Assets, is the theoretical liquidation value of a share and is not traditionally supposed to include Goodwill and Intangibles. <br/><br/>But in practice, this is not always followed. <br/>So Serenity does not use reported Book Values.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:36:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hello tyouth,<br/><br/>Serenity excludes Goodwill and Intangibles while calculating Book value and for INTC, that comes to $7.13. <br/>Hence the lower Graham Number:<br/>GN =  sqrt(22.5 x 2.13 EPS x 7.13 BVPS) = $18.49<br/><br/>Book value, also known as Net Tangible Assets, is the theoretical liquidation value of a share and is not traditionally supposed to include Goodwill and Intangibles. <br/><br/>But in practice, this is not always followed. <br/>So Serenity does not use reported Book Values.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Enterprising Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1303771/comments?source=feed#comment-16920171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16920171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[However PSEC has been removed from the list because it is not, in fact, an Enterprising Graham stock. A data error was causing it to wrongly satisfy the Enterprising criteria for current assets. Once the error was fixed, it no longer met all the required criteria. The other 5 stocks were not affected by the error.<br/><br/>Thank you!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:37:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[However PSEC has been removed from the list because it is not, in fact, an Enterprising Graham stock. A data error was causing it to wrongly satisfy the Enterprising criteria for current assets. Once the error was fixed, it no longer met all the required criteria. The other 5 stocks were not affected by the error.<br/><br/>Thank you!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Enterprising Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1303771/comments?source=feed#comment-16916431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16916431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hello awg,<br/><br/>Thanks for that information.<br/><br/>If a company is giving better return on investment than average and paying out most of the earnings as dividends, there is nothing to stop investors from reinvesting the dividends themselves. This amounts to the same as the same company giving increased earnings.<br/><br/>Graham's criteria are only designed to find companies that offer superior ROI over time  - whether those returns are given as dividends or increased earnings.<br/><br/>In fact, in most ways, returns by way of dividends are better because they put the investor in control of his profits. He gets his ROI immediately and can invest it as he wishes, instead of being dependent on the market to increase its evaluation of the stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:22:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hello awg,<br/><br/>Thanks for that information.<br/><br/>If a company is giving better return on investment than average and paying out most of the earnings as dividends, there is nothing to stop investors from reinvesting the dividends themselves. This amounts to the same as the same company giving increased earnings.<br/><br/>Graham's criteria are only designed to find companies that offer superior ROI over time  - whether those returns are given as dividends or increased earnings.<br/><br/>In fact, in most ways, returns by way of dividends are better because they put the investor in control of his profits. He gets his ROI immediately and can invest it as he wishes, instead of being dependent on the market to increase its evaluation of the stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Enterprising Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1303771/comments?source=feed#comment-16885731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16885731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the information, Atkins!<br/><br/>Graham designed his Defensive, Enterprising and NCAV criteria based on nearly 50 years of research on hundreds of stocks. So you'l probably be proved right soon enough.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the information, Atkins!<br/><br/>Graham designed his Defensive, Enterprising and NCAV criteria based on nearly 50 years of research on hundreds of stocks. So you'l probably be proved right soon enough.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Benjamin Graham's 4 Commandments Of Defensive Dividend Investing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1296131/comments?source=feed#comment-16825431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16825431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[richjoy403,<br/><br/>If you're not interested in beating the market (which is actually a very sensible goal), you could simply invest in an index fund and keep up with the average market with nearly no effort.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:02:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[richjoy403,<br/><br/>If you're not interested in beating the market (which is actually a very sensible goal), you could simply invest in an index fund and keep up with the average market with nearly no effort.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7 Defensive Investor Quick Picks For March</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1243811/comments?source=feed#comment-16815881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16815881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Clinton!<br/><br/>Serenity just got a full database and code upgrade for 2013.<br/>The screeners now check 4700 stocks for Graham's 16 criteria.<br/><br/>The list of fully defensive Graham stocks for 2013 was just published yesterday.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/ru9p'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>Also, unlike the book values on other sources, the ones on Serenity are now calculated excluding Goodwill and other Intangibles.<br/>So Serenity's screeners are now even more selective than they were before.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:50:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Clinton!<br/><br/>Serenity just got a full database and code upgrade for 2013.<br/>The screeners now check 4700 stocks for Graham's 16 criteria.<br/><br/>The list of fully defensive Graham stocks for 2013 was just published yesterday.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/ru9p'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>Also, unlike the book values on other sources, the ones on Serenity are now calculated excluding Goodwill and other Intangibles.<br/>So Serenity's screeners are now even more selective than they were before.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Defensive Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298941/comments?source=feed#comment-16810841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16810841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good information, Willaby!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 03:04:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good information, Willaby!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Stocks Meeting Benjamin Graham's Defensive Criteria In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298941/comments?source=feed#comment-16808551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16808551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, vorgriff!<br/><br/>Serenity just got a full database and code upgrade for 2013.<br/>The screeners now analyze 4700 stocks - up from 4000 last year - hence the larger number of approved Graham stocks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:48:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, vorgriff!<br/><br/>Serenity just got a full database and code upgrade for 2013.<br/>The screeners now analyze 4700 stocks - up from 4000 last year - hence the larger number of approved Graham stocks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Build A Complete Benjamin Graham Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1036121/comments?source=feed#comment-16806591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16806591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Jeepbuddy97!<br/><br/>Graham's 16 criteria are designed to check all significant aspects of a stock, not just the price.<br/>So Graham's Margin of Safety of safety, in his own words, is designed to ensure:<br/><br/>&quot;(1) a minimum of quality in the past performance and current financial position of the com- pany, and also (2) a minimum of quantity in terms of earnings and assets per dollar of price&quot;<br/><br/>That was his description of the 8 criteria for finding defensive stocks.<br/>One of the biggest myths about Graham is that he only recommended cheap stocks. NCAV stocks were only the last grade of stocks he recommended.<br/><br/>What he actually taught (and practiced) was to find stocks selling for less than they were worth - both quantitatively and qualitatively.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:06:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you, Jeepbuddy97!<br/><br/>Graham's 16 criteria are designed to check all significant aspects of a stock, not just the price.<br/>So Graham's Margin of Safety of safety, in his own words, is designed to ensure:<br/><br/>&quot;(1) a minimum of quality in the past performance and current financial position of the com- pany, and also (2) a minimum of quantity in terms of earnings and assets per dollar of price&quot;<br/><br/>That was his description of the 8 criteria for finding defensive stocks.<br/>One of the biggest myths about Graham is that he only recommended cheap stocks. NCAV stocks were only the last grade of stocks he recommended.<br/><br/>What he actually taught (and practiced) was to find stocks selling for less than they were worth - both quantitatively and qualitatively.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Benjamin Graham's 4 Commandments Of Defensive Dividend Investing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1296131/comments?source=feed#comment-16804791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16804791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, if you see the &quot;Legacy of Benjamin Graham&quot; video, you can see Warren Buffett explaining how Graham went out of his way to avoid meeting CEOs and Managements.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/103PUg7'>http://bit.ly/103PUg7</a><br/><br/>He wanted to develop theories and techniques of investment that any regular person could use and get similar results.<br/><br/>Buffett also gave a speech (in 1984) about how people have been saying for decades that things have changed, but how Graham's principles will always remain valid.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/TwFlS8'>http://bit.ly/TwFlS8</a><br/><br/>First principles rarely change with time.<br/><br/>For every action, there will still be an equal and opposite reaction.<br/>And to make money, one still has to first learn how to not lose it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:01:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, if you see the &quot;Legacy of Benjamin Graham&quot; video, you can see Warren Buffett explaining how Graham went out of his way to avoid meeting CEOs and Managements.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/103PUg7'>http://bit.ly/103PUg7</a><br/><br/>He wanted to develop theories and techniques of investment that any regular person could use and get similar results.<br/><br/>Buffett also gave a speech (in 1984) about how people have been saying for decades that things have changed, but how Graham's principles will always remain valid.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/TwFlS8'>http://bit.ly/TwFlS8</a><br/><br/>First principles rarely change with time.<br/><br/>For every action, there will still be an equal and opposite reaction.<br/>And to make money, one still has to first learn how to not lose it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
