<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ivan Kitov's Comments</title>
    <description>Ivan Kitov's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/434499/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>The Headline And The Core Consumer Price Index</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1078911/comments?source=feed#comment-12936831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12936831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I've published a few papers on real GDP and inflation which also claim higher inflation in the USA. On the other hand, I should support the BEA and BLS in their measurements. They are doing an important job when collecting data according to clear rules and guidelines. This is the only source of sound information we have.  <br/>You may take a look at my papers: <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/WJJk0q'>http://bit.ly/WJJk0q</a><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VpvB8f'>http://bit.ly/VpvB8f</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:54:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I've published a few papers on real GDP and inflation which also claim higher inflation in the USA. On the other hand, I should support the BEA and BLS in their measurements. They are doing an important job when collecting data according to clear rules and guidelines. This is the only source of sound information we have.  <br/>You may take a look at my papers: <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/WJJk0q'>http://bit.ly/WJJk0q</a><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VpvB8f'>http://bit.ly/VpvB8f</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Successfully Sold The S&amp;P 500 Index</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1066161/comments?source=feed#comment-12646841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12646841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I will stop following the past trajectory when deviation is too large. My analysis shows that the S&amp;P 500 index follows the growth in real GDP - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/jrzf'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>. Real GDP is driven by a specific age population and the 2010 census indicates a possibility of  recession in 2013 - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/5w9f'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>. This suggests the index to go down in 2013 as the blue curve in Figure 1 shows. <br/>I do not find  standard market terminology useful: &quot;bear market&quot; means nothing for me. The market is not driven by random decisions. It is driven by the age pyramid. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 02:54:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I will stop following the past trajectory when deviation is too large. My analysis shows that the S&amp;P 500 index follows the growth in real GDP - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/jrzf'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>. Real GDP is driven by a specific age population and the 2010 census indicates a possibility of  recession in 2013 - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/5w9f'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>. This suggests the index to go down in 2013 as the blue curve in Figure 1 shows. <br/>I do not find  standard market terminology useful: &quot;bear market&quot; means nothing for me. The market is not driven by random decisions. It is driven by the age pyramid. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Successfully Sold The S&amp;P 500 Index</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1066161/comments?source=feed#comment-12630781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12630781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ It's just for fun.  No additional efforts when editors let it through. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:30:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ It's just for fun.  No additional efforts when editors let it through. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rate Of Unemployment May Fall Below 6% In A Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1053631/comments?source=feed#comment-12588841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12588841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[But you cannot ignore the fact that a much larger portion of population can afford college now compared to the time when MCD salary was enough to pay off. Or you want to deny their right to get education in order to pay $35 for rent? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:22:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[But you cannot ignore the fact that a much larger portion of population can afford college now compared to the time when MCD salary was enough to pay off. Or you want to deny their right to get education in order to pay $35 for rent? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rate Of Unemployment May Fall Below 6% In A Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1053631/comments?source=feed#comment-12557471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12557471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You were lucky that your father was able to give college education to children. Only 35% were enrolled in 1967. In 2011,  this figure is 50% and more farthers are lucky to give college education to their children. It's better time now. and it was poor time for more people in 1967. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:22:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You were lucky that your father was able to give college education to children. Only 35% were enrolled in 1967. In 2011,  this figure is 50% and more farthers are lucky to give college education to their children. It's better time now. and it was poor time for more people in 1967. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rate Of Unemployment May Fall Below 6% In A Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1053631/comments?source=feed#comment-12520951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12520951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/SR8ndi'>http://1.usa.gov/SR8ndi</a> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:57:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/SR8ndi'>http://1.usa.gov/SR8ndi</a> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rate Of Unemployment May Fall Below 6% In A Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1053631/comments?source=feed#comment-12475331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12475331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Please notice that the portion of employed people reached the current (2012) level only around 1980. Before, a lower share of working age people had jobs than now. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:21:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Please notice that the portion of employed people reached the current (2012) level only around 1980. Before, a lower share of working age people had jobs than now. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rate Of Unemployment May Fall Below 6% In A Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1053631/comments?source=feed#comment-12446701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12446701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We had predicted the fall to 64% in the rate of participation in labor force two years before it actually realized: <br/><br/>Kitov, I., Kitov, O., (2008). The Driving Force of Labor Force Participation in Developed Countries, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. III(3(5)_Fall), pp. 203-222. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/1238tTX'>http://bit.ly/1238tTX</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:58:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We had predicted the fall to 64% in the rate of participation in labor force two years before it actually realized: <br/><br/>Kitov, I., Kitov, O., (2008). The Driving Force of Labor Force Participation in Developed Countries, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. III(3(5)_Fall), pp. 203-222. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/1238tTX'>http://bit.ly/1238tTX</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trends And Fluctuations In The Price Of Crude Oil And Motor Fuel</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/958781/comments?source=feed#comment-12410911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12410911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Let's compare the outcome in 2016.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 03:08:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Let's compare the outcome in 2016.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P 500 In December 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1042341/comments?source=feed#comment-12264581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12264581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My first plan was to buy S&amp;P 500 at 1325 in May 2012 and to sell at 1550 in 2013. This plan would give me approximately 15%. If to follow ups and downs, one can use multiplication. In  May 100%, in September 110%, in December 110%*1.05=115%. In October 2013 115%*1.1= 126.5%. (I do not mention another two expected minima in 2013 which are potentially profitable.) If not to sell at 1430-1450 in Decemeber, one gets 110%*1.1=1.21% in 2013. The difference might be 6%.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 05:41:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My first plan was to buy S&amp;P 500 at 1325 in May 2012 and to sell at 1550 in 2013. This plan would give me approximately 15%. If to follow ups and downs, one can use multiplication. In  May 100%, in September 110%, in December 110%*1.05=115%. In October 2013 115%*1.1= 126.5%. (I do not mention another two expected minima in 2013 which are potentially profitable.) If not to sell at 1430-1450 in Decemeber, one gets 110%*1.1=1.21% in 2013. The difference might be 6%.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P 500 In December 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1042341/comments?source=feed#comment-12221301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12221301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This empirical approach is a brand new and it has missed the monorgaph by two years. I have no scientific reason to assume the current S&amp;P 500 trajectory to repeat that in the past. just an assumption. On the other hand, my scientific expirience/intuition cries that two curves should never repeat each other when not driven by similar forces. I would wait before the turn in 2013 for a more conclusive discussion.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:08:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This empirical approach is a brand new and it has missed the monorgaph by two years. I have no scientific reason to assume the current S&amp;P 500 trajectory to repeat that in the past. just an assumption. On the other hand, my scientific expirience/intuition cries that two curves should never repeat each other when not driven by similar forces. I would wait before the turn in 2013 for a more conclusive discussion.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P 500 In December 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1042341/comments?source=feed#comment-12221261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12221261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the question. In this thread,  i just imply that the S&amp;P 500 goes the same trajectory as in the past. This approach is not better or worse than any other based on the past statistics. All moves are documented weeks before I actually buy or sell. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 01:59:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the question. In this thread,  i just imply that the S&amp;P 500 goes the same trajectory as in the past. This approach is not better or worse than any other based on the past statistics. All moves are documented weeks before I actually buy or sell. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pitney Bowes' Share Price May Continue Its Long-Term Fall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1021141/comments?source=feed#comment-11873711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11873711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am a physicist. we all want to decompose something into pieces. This is a model, which does not contradict my understanding of physics, just describes. You may take it as worthless of meaningful.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:56:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am a physicist. we all want to decompose something into pieces. This is a model, which does not contradict my understanding of physics, just describes. You may take it as worthless of meaningful.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Updated Model Of Loews' Share Price: A Large Positive Correction Is Expected</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1007181/comments?source=feed#comment-11862541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11862541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the deep consideration. I do provide predictions at a several month horizon where available. Because the model uses the monthly closing prices and CPIs no daily estimates are possible. I have quite a few metrics to measure the performance of the model as published in my book <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://amzn.to/wmO6rS'>http://amzn.to/wmO6rS</a> <br/>but this is beyond the interest of the broader readership on SA and editors request not to give too many stat and math details. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:05:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the deep consideration. I do provide predictions at a several month horizon where available. Because the model uses the monthly closing prices and CPIs no daily estimates are possible. I have quite a few metrics to measure the performance of the model as published in my book <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://amzn.to/wmO6rS'>http://amzn.to/wmO6rS</a> <br/>but this is beyond the interest of the broader readership on SA and editors request not to give too many stat and math details. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pitney Bowes' Share Price May Continue Its Long-Term Fall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1021141/comments?source=feed#comment-11835671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11835671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What I've learned from the hard sciences is &quot;no correlation imply no causation&quot;. This is opposite in economics and finances, where so called scientists  invent economic and pricing models for remote stars. The to-big-to-fall had all excellent indicators one minute before collapse and this was the reason of the biggest investors' loss. Why don't you learn this lesson?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 02:07:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What I've learned from the hard sciences is &quot;no correlation imply no causation&quot;. This is opposite in economics and finances, where so called scientists  invent economic and pricing models for remote stars. The to-big-to-fall had all excellent indicators one minute before collapse and this was the reason of the biggest investors' loss. Why don't you learn this lesson?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JPMorgan Chase Is Slightly Overvalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1018491/comments?source=feed#comment-11822261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11822261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you. This is obvious from the graph - deviations oscillate around the observed curves. Since the deviations always return to the prediction and have some overshoot one can use them to forecast the future behavior and thus profit. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:03:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you. This is obvious from the graph - deviations oscillate around the observed curves. Since the deviations always return to the prediction and have some overshoot one can use them to forecast the future behavior and thus profit. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JPMorgan Chase Is Slightly Overvalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1018491/comments?source=feed#comment-11795021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11795021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Please let me know the result of the DW test:<br/><br/>3.870377<br/>3.166679<br/>0.641644<br/>-0.39661<br/>-0.607819<br/>-1.920338<br/>6.196041<br/>8.830315<br/>3.808186<br/>2.159657<br/>-2.755684<br/>-5.984444<br/>-3.056847<br/>-7.31407<br/>-0.546841<br/>1.812908<br/>0.143127<br/>1.433918<br/>0.996887<br/>1.566936<br/>3.059555<br/>1.44698<br/>-1.34565<br/>-5.925602<br/>-4.995777<br/>-3.191692<br/>-4.975498<br/>-0.764278<br/>-4.166195<br/>-0.707539<br/>0.331055<br/>2.234142<br/>0.470676<br/>-2.447483<br/>0.677227<br/>1.885338<br/>2.287201<br/>5.130318<br/>5.802433<br/>2.752346<br/>0.250519<br/>4.500126<br/>0.303522<br/>-5.09416<br/>-7.494883<br/>-6.110516<br/>-1.777319<br/>-2.693588<br/>3.739719<br/>7.415668<br/>-0.890961<br/>-0.84898<br/>-6.712128<br/>1.092751<br/>2.883404<br/>-1.459656<br/>-3.198467<br/>2.581608<br/>-1.613419<br/>-0.076557<br/>1.214943<br/>-0.151722<br/>-2.001404<br/>-2.20882<br/>1.372578<br/>3.102448<br/>1.170559<br/>-1.533558<br/>1.040188<br/>2.187466<br/>-0.340393<br/>-1.363091<br/>0.00087<br/>0.029018<br/>-0.539253<br/>1.567192<br/>-0.369396<br/>1.845798<br/>3.16449<br/>0.20406<br/>0.409012<br/>-0.897453<br/>-1.072052<br/>-1.209686<br/>-2.238756<br/>-3.344376<br/>-3.034288<br/>-3.1509<br/>-2.853682<br/>-1.248787<br/>-1.687588<br/>-2.08173<br/>0.328756<br/>-0.274115<br/>1.886095<br/>1.58358<br/>2.595238<br/>3.871035<br/>1.950575<br/>0.928917<br/>2.060591<br/>1.331121<br/>2.553934<br/>4.411682<br/>3.355795<br/>0.890322<br/>-0.748764<br/>-1.631191<br/>-0.234255<br/>-2.125572<br/>-1.875484<br/>-0.267595<br/>-0.978983]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:30:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Please let me know the result of the DW test:<br/><br/>3.870377<br/>3.166679<br/>0.641644<br/>-0.39661<br/>-0.607819<br/>-1.920338<br/>6.196041<br/>8.830315<br/>3.808186<br/>2.159657<br/>-2.755684<br/>-5.984444<br/>-3.056847<br/>-7.31407<br/>-0.546841<br/>1.812908<br/>0.143127<br/>1.433918<br/>0.996887<br/>1.566936<br/>3.059555<br/>1.44698<br/>-1.34565<br/>-5.925602<br/>-4.995777<br/>-3.191692<br/>-4.975498<br/>-0.764278<br/>-4.166195<br/>-0.707539<br/>0.331055<br/>2.234142<br/>0.470676<br/>-2.447483<br/>0.677227<br/>1.885338<br/>2.287201<br/>5.130318<br/>5.802433<br/>2.752346<br/>0.250519<br/>4.500126<br/>0.303522<br/>-5.09416<br/>-7.494883<br/>-6.110516<br/>-1.777319<br/>-2.693588<br/>3.739719<br/>7.415668<br/>-0.890961<br/>-0.84898<br/>-6.712128<br/>1.092751<br/>2.883404<br/>-1.459656<br/>-3.198467<br/>2.581608<br/>-1.613419<br/>-0.076557<br/>1.214943<br/>-0.151722<br/>-2.001404<br/>-2.20882<br/>1.372578<br/>3.102448<br/>1.170559<br/>-1.533558<br/>1.040188<br/>2.187466<br/>-0.340393<br/>-1.363091<br/>0.00087<br/>0.029018<br/>-0.539253<br/>1.567192<br/>-0.369396<br/>1.845798<br/>3.16449<br/>0.20406<br/>0.409012<br/>-0.897453<br/>-1.072052<br/>-1.209686<br/>-2.238756<br/>-3.344376<br/>-3.034288<br/>-3.1509<br/>-2.853682<br/>-1.248787<br/>-1.687588<br/>-2.08173<br/>0.328756<br/>-0.274115<br/>1.886095<br/>1.58358<br/>2.595238<br/>3.871035<br/>1.950575<br/>0.928917<br/>2.060591<br/>1.331121<br/>2.553934<br/>4.411682<br/>3.355795<br/>0.890322<br/>-0.748764<br/>-1.631191<br/>-0.234255<br/>-2.125572<br/>-1.875484<br/>-0.267595<br/>-0.978983]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JPMorgan Chase Is Slightly Overvalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1018491/comments?source=feed#comment-11779641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11779641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[R^2 = 0.72, but it is not biased when there exists cointegration between two I(1) processes (observed and predicted prices). We conduct unit root and cointegration tests as appropriate, but do not publish them because editors consider such stuff to complicated to SA readers. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:22:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[R^2 = 0.72, but it is not biased when there exists cointegration between two I(1) processes (observed and predicted prices). We conduct unit root and cointegration tests as appropriate, but do not publish them because editors consider such stuff to complicated to SA readers. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alcoa's Share Price May Fall To $5 In November-December Timeframe</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1001561/comments?source=feed#comment-11537891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11537891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A good suggestion to check the price of Al to model AA. I'll try in the future.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:31:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A good suggestion to check the price of Al to model AA. I'll try in the future.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time To Buy SPY</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/434499-ivan-kitov/653541-time-to-buy-spy?source=feed#comment-11280991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11280991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[this post is from May 2012. A similar post <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/kjvb'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> was a week ago and showed that we were righ with the S&amp;P 500. <br/>We predicted the turn in oil price in 2008, when it did not reach the peak yet. In May, we had the same long-term view and expected the price to fall. However, we always stress that oil price is highly volatile and may fluctuate around the long term trend that aloows for additional profit - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/kjst'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> <br/>Currently, it is definitely on a downward short-term trend. It is not the best time to buy stocks with a positive link to oil price.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:08:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[this post is from May 2012. A similar post <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/kjvb'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> was a week ago and showed that we were righ with the S&amp;P 500. <br/>We predicted the turn in oil price in 2008, when it did not reach the peak yet. In May, we had the same long-term view and expected the price to fall. However, we always stress that oil price is highly volatile and may fluctuate around the long term trend that aloows for additional profit - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/kjst'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> <br/>Currently, it is definitely on a downward short-term trend. It is not the best time to buy stocks with a positive link to oil price.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economists Ignore 33,000,000 Americans When Calculating Income Inequality</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/957521/comments?source=feed#comment-11218631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11218631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We have published a relatively long paper on the link between the rate of unemployment (and employment/population ratio) and the rate of real GDP growth - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Ua1JlY'>http://bit.ly/Ua1JlY</a><br/>Theoretically, when extrapolated to very high and very low rate of GDP  growth the rate of unemployment may reach zero or 100% (no work when no economy).  In reality, I would not expect so high or low rates. In Spain, unemployment may touch 1/3 of labor force in 2013, however.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:31:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We have published a relatively long paper on the link between the rate of unemployment (and employment/population ratio) and the rate of real GDP growth - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Ua1JlY'>http://bit.ly/Ua1JlY</a><br/>Theoretically, when extrapolated to very high and very low rate of GDP  growth the rate of unemployment may reach zero or 100% (no work when no economy).  In reality, I would not expect so high or low rates. In Spain, unemployment may touch 1/3 of labor force in 2013, however.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economists Ignore 33,000,000 Americans When Calculating Income Inequality</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/957521/comments?source=feed#comment-10998521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10998521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is a list of income sources as defined by the Census Bureau<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/Rgs0Zn'>http://1.usa.gov/Rgs0Zn</a> : <br/><br/>For each person in the sample 15 years old and over, the CPS asks questions on the amount of money income received in the preceding calendar year from each of the following sources: <br/><br/>1.Earnings <br/>2.Unemployment compensation <br/>3.Workers’ compensation <br/>4.Social security <br/>5.Supplemental security income <br/>6.Public assistance <br/>7.Veterans’ payments <br/>8.Survivor benefits <br/>9.Disability benefits <br/>10.Pension or retirement income <br/>11.Interest <br/>12.Dividends <br/>13.Rents, royalties, and estates and trusts <br/>14.Educational assistance <br/>15.Alimony <br/>16.Child support <br/>17.Financial assistance from outside of the household <br/>18.Other income <br/><br/>It should be noted that although the income statistics refer to receipts during the preceding calendar year, the demographic characteristics, such as age, labor force status, and family or household composition, are as of the survey date. The income of the family/household does not include amounts received by people who were members during all or part of the income year if these people no longer resided in the family/household at the time of interview. However, the CPS collects income data for people who are current residents but did not reside in the household during the income year. <br/><br/>Data on consumer income collected in the CPS by the Census Bureau cover money income received (exclusive of certain money receipts such as capital gains) before payments for personal income taxes, social security, union dues, medicare deductions, etc. Therefore, money income does not reflect the fact that some families receive part of their income in the form of noncash benefits, such as food stamps, health benefits, rent-free housing, and goods produced and consumed on the farm. In addition, money income does not reflect the fact that noncash benefits are also received by some nonfarm residents which often take the form of the use of business transportation and facilities, full or partial payments by business for retirement programs, medical and educational expenses, etc. Data users should consider these elements when comparing income levels. Moreover, readers should be aware that for many different reasons there is a tendency in household surveys for respondents to underreport their income. Based on an analysis of independently derived income estimates, the Census Bureau determined that respondents report income earned from wages or salaries much better than other sources of income and that the reported wage and salary income is nearly equal to independent estimates of aggregate income. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:11:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is a list of income sources as defined by the Census Bureau<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/Rgs0Zn'>http://1.usa.gov/Rgs0Zn</a> : <br/><br/>For each person in the sample 15 years old and over, the CPS asks questions on the amount of money income received in the preceding calendar year from each of the following sources: <br/><br/>1.Earnings <br/>2.Unemployment compensation <br/>3.Workers’ compensation <br/>4.Social security <br/>5.Supplemental security income <br/>6.Public assistance <br/>7.Veterans’ payments <br/>8.Survivor benefits <br/>9.Disability benefits <br/>10.Pension or retirement income <br/>11.Interest <br/>12.Dividends <br/>13.Rents, royalties, and estates and trusts <br/>14.Educational assistance <br/>15.Alimony <br/>16.Child support <br/>17.Financial assistance from outside of the household <br/>18.Other income <br/><br/>It should be noted that although the income statistics refer to receipts during the preceding calendar year, the demographic characteristics, such as age, labor force status, and family or household composition, are as of the survey date. The income of the family/household does not include amounts received by people who were members during all or part of the income year if these people no longer resided in the family/household at the time of interview. However, the CPS collects income data for people who are current residents but did not reside in the household during the income year. <br/><br/>Data on consumer income collected in the CPS by the Census Bureau cover money income received (exclusive of certain money receipts such as capital gains) before payments for personal income taxes, social security, union dues, medicare deductions, etc. Therefore, money income does not reflect the fact that some families receive part of their income in the form of noncash benefits, such as food stamps, health benefits, rent-free housing, and goods produced and consumed on the farm. In addition, money income does not reflect the fact that noncash benefits are also received by some nonfarm residents which often take the form of the use of business transportation and facilities, full or partial payments by business for retirement programs, medical and educational expenses, etc. Data users should consider these elements when comparing income levels. Moreover, readers should be aware that for many different reasons there is a tendency in household surveys for respondents to underreport their income. Based on an analysis of independently derived income estimates, the Census Bureau determined that respondents report income earned from wages or salaries much better than other sources of income and that the reported wage and salary income is nearly equal to independent estimates of aggregate income. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economists Ignore 33,000,000 Americans When Calculating Income Inequality</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/957521/comments?source=feed#comment-10982791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10982791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Census Bureau measures income distribution once a year, in March. This is a special survey in addition to the monthly Current Population Surveys reporting unemployment - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/VwPWcG'>http://1.usa.gov/VwPWcG</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:09:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Census Bureau measures income distribution once a year, in March. This is a special survey in addition to the monthly Current Population Surveys reporting unemployment - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/VwPWcG'>http://1.usa.gov/VwPWcG</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Income Inequality For Households: A Long Biased History Of Gini And Mean Income</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/903031/comments?source=feed#comment-10877731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10877731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have developed a quantitative theory of personal income distribution and its evolution over time ◦ Ivan O. Kitov, 2009. &quot;Mechanical model of personal income distribution,&quot; Working Papers 110, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/RlgihP'>http://bit.ly/RlgihP</a> .  It describes quantiatively how personal income evolve with age and time. The observed time series published by the Census Bureau are well matched together with Gini ratios. The model does not contain any human factors except the number of people in a given age group. I think the model works because it does not include those human factors.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:38:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have developed a quantitative theory of personal income distribution and its evolution over time ◦ Ivan O. Kitov, 2009. &quot;Mechanical model of personal income distribution,&quot; Working Papers 110, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/RlgihP'>http://bit.ly/RlgihP</a> .  It describes quantiatively how personal income evolve with age and time. The observed time series published by the Census Bureau are well matched together with Gini ratios. The model does not contain any human factors except the number of people in a given age group. I think the model works because it does not include those human factors.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment In Spain May Reach 33% In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/922541/comments?source=feed#comment-10531051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10531051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In 2012, the rate of unemployment is 25.1% (October) which implies a 3.3% fall from 2011 with 21.8%. According to (2), the fall of 3.1 per cent in the rate of unemployment gives a -1.6% GDP fall in 2012. So, one needs only 6.5% fall in 2013 in order to get 33% unemployment. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:17:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In 2012, the rate of unemployment is 25.1% (October) which implies a 3.3% fall from 2011 with 21.8%. According to (2), the fall of 3.1 per cent in the rate of unemployment gives a -1.6% GDP fall in 2012. So, one needs only 6.5% fall in 2013 in order to get 33% unemployment. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment In Spain May Reach 33% In 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/922541/comments?source=feed#comment-10531001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10531001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[William, I did not invent this equation. THis is a modified Okun's law known since 1962. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/GRKXCc'>http://bit.ly/GRKXCc</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:08:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[William, I did not invent this equation. THis is a modified Okun's law known since 1962. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/GRKXCc'>http://bit.ly/GRKXCc</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment In The U.S. Will Fall To 6.2% By 2014</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/909051/comments?source=feed#comment-10276561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10276561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As a matter of fact, using the same approach we predicted the rate of participation in labor force to fall to 64.5% in 2007, i.e. three years before the fall. And published an article in 2008 (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/RKTnO9'>http://bit.ly/RKTnO9</a>) . <br/>This is a link to our post in 2009  <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/SXiJ8T'>http://bit.ly/SXiJ8T</a> <br/>By the way, all our models works in  developed countries, not only for the US.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 04:52:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As a matter of fact, using the same approach we predicted the rate of participation in labor force to fall to 64.5% in 2007, i.e. three years before the fall. And published an article in 2008 (<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/RKTnO9'>http://bit.ly/RKTnO9</a>) . <br/>This is a link to our post in 2009  <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/SXiJ8T'>http://bit.ly/SXiJ8T</a> <br/>By the way, all our models works in  developed countries, not only for the US.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment In The U.S. Will Fall To 6.2% By 2014</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/909051/comments?source=feed#comment-10275511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10275511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have another model linking the S&amp;P 500 index to real GDP -<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/TaODOU'>http://bit.ly/TaODOU</a> . It also indicates real GDP growth above 4% in Q3 or Q4 (quarter split is artificial). I am going to present this prediction before the Q3 figures are out. <br/>On the other hand all my models represent a feasibility study and show structural breaks (likely related to change in measutrement units). Therefore, I would not insist that the model is perfect despite it has been working since 2005 when it was developed and publsihed first.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 02:12:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have another model linking the S&amp;P 500 index to real GDP -<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/TaODOU'>http://bit.ly/TaODOU</a> . It also indicates real GDP growth above 4% in Q3 or Q4 (quarter split is artificial). I am going to present this prediction before the Q3 figures are out. <br/>On the other hand all my models represent a feasibility study and show structural breaks (likely related to change in measutrement units). Therefore, I would not insist that the model is perfect despite it has been working since 2005 when it was developed and publsihed first.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment In The U.S. Will Fall To 6.2% By 2014</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/909051/comments?source=feed#comment-10266081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10266081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is a physical model based on an assumption that people are particles whose sizes (incomes) are distributed as earthquake sizes. I am a seismologist. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:18:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is a physical model based on an assumption that people are particles whose sizes (incomes) are distributed as earthquake sizes. I am a seismologist. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment In The U.S. Will Fall To 6.2% By 2014</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/909051/comments?source=feed#comment-10265971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10265971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If Okun's law is quantitatively correct ( <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QWwu7v'>http://bit.ly/QWwu7v</a> ) we will see the growth rate of real GDP above 4% in the fourth quarter of 2012 and through 2013. The problem is frequent revisions to GDP figures of a few percent. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:14:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If Okun's law is quantitatively correct ( <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QWwu7v'>http://bit.ly/QWwu7v</a> ) we will see the growth rate of real GDP above 4% in the fourth quarter of 2012 and through 2013. The problem is frequent revisions to GDP figures of a few percent. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
