Aquater

ETF Market Trends: GDP Upside Surprise Ironically Gives Worry to Sustainable Recovery

Excellent analysis and a wealth of data to digest for investment purposes. Data is systematically organized and presented in comparable way. Synoptic coverage is highly remarkable, to say the least. Nary an aspect of investment world is left untreated.
The next question: Can this data be available on historical basis so one can see how an investment instrument has moved, and from which position, to where it is currently?
Any way, the author needs to be commended and congratulated on achieving a thorough, comprehensive and highly useful analytical presentation of current investment data.

Market Outlook: Trendless Consolidation Will Give Way to Major Move

Good analysis that, however, depends a great deal just on the play between 50dEma and 200dEMA. The magic of this interplay was asserted frequently but not explained in any detail. It was assumed and applied indiscriminately across the board in all kinds of markets without a serious look at alternative indicators like slow stochastics, RSI, MACD and so on. The fundamental analysis was restricted to UK debt downgrade and no serious examination of the green shoots was presented. Analysis of the long position on gold was, however, more convincing but did not make a long-term case for GLD or GDX. The bullish bias on equities along with a neutral short-term stance is indeed an interesting position to argue and for that the article merits serious consideration and a challenging perspective to the bearish scenario.

Where Are Markets Now? Technical, Fundamental and Valuation Reference Points

A great article, with a wide coverage and in-depth analysis. I am adding you to my watch list. It seems the rally is getting exhausted and may turn albeit slowly.

Defining a Set of Core Asset Classes

Thanks for your response. I understand the rationale for three-year look-back, tentative though it is it is back-tested by you. But on what basis is the QPP projection for one year based? I have hard time finding this. All I find is the details of its being tested. I need to see some articulation about the basis and method as to how the projection is made. Thank you, again for sharing what you have.

Defining a Set of Core Asset Classes

This is a very useful article. It is thoughtful and provokes thinking. A great piece. I have following points, however, to further the dialog.
1. On the one hand you say timing cannot be done and so one must stay invested in multiple widely uncorrelated asset classes. On the other hand, you want to look forward and marginalize history as backward look. Trying to have it both ways?
2. Also, no clue is provided as to how exactly you look forward. What tools are used to look forward and how are they better than other timing tools? Just saying QPP is not enough. You may be holding QPP as a proprietary device, but you would gain credibility if you share at least some philosophy behind it.
3. Thinking about reader comments, the name-calling match between retail and elite was entertaining heat but did not provide much light. The guru stuff was highly speculative. Both timers and non-timers have to resort to past record to justify themselves. It is indeed hard to really discount history. Snap discrediting of it as nothing but looking backward is a bit dogmatic. Its usefulness may be limited but it surely is debatable how to assess it.
4. It is not consistent to talk about cash as wasting asset because of inflation. To be consistent all assets and not just cash should be systematically weighed against inflation. Any way, cash is better than losing your capital. Including it as one of so many others is not a sin at all. It is also important to take advantage of emerging opportunities. It would be simpler and easier to do it if you have cash.
5. You hint at percentage allotment to the asset classes. Would like to know more about the concepts behind this.
All in all, your article is highly beneficial, thoughtful and noteworthy.

Portfolio Theory Vindicated

Not clear what is QPP precisely based on. Unless that is specified, the impression will remain that speculation and hindsight are at work. Why can't the author come up with a brief description of QPP or say that it is proprietary and cannot be revealed?