<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Scrapette's Comments</title>
    <description>Scrapette's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/461903/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title> The cost structure at big oil companies has grown dramatically, Jim Chanos says, with the cost of finding a marginal barrel &quot;up and rising - a very, very negative trend.&quot; Singling out Exxon Mobil (XOM -0.8%), &quot;it&amp;rsquo;s still not generating enough cash to cover all its cash needs,&quot; he says. &quot;There&amp;rsquo;s a reason the stock has lagged despite its being the bluest of blue chips.&quot; </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/96135?source=feed#comment-1980867</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1980867</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ok, first, Chanos is a famous bear on on oil. He will pick on ANY little thing to prove his point, which he doesn't, but the point is, I'm chuckling at this. Here sits one of the FEW remaining fiscally sound remaining companies on our economic planet, and Chanos wants us to believe that because the costs of its product increase they will not be able to get a profitable price point on sales? This is only because he does not value that sales price point because he is bearish on oil! Let me be clear: if ANY...ANY company on the face of this planet can steward their solvency through rough waters, it is ExxonMobil. Period. If they cannot, then we as a planet of people are not long for this world. But these current waters are not even rough, except to Chanos' wishful thinking.<br/><br/>How low must he feel he has to go to send out cheap shots, HOPING to disrupt trust in a proven guardian of investment. It is as if nothing else troubling or traumatic ever happened to this company between now and the 1920's. The only way Chanos will be made happy is if XOM suddenly changed its BOD and filled it with the likes of the jerks who pilfered Wall Street. This company is very different and always has been. And that is what irks Chanos so much.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:59:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ok, first, Chanos is a famous bear on on oil. He will pick on ANY little thing to prove his point, which he doesn't, but the point is, I'm chuckling at this. Here sits one of the FEW remaining fiscally sound remaining companies on our economic planet, and Chanos wants us to believe that because the costs of its product increase they will not be able to get a profitable price point on sales? This is only because he does not value that sales price point because he is bearish on oil! Let me be clear: if ANY...ANY company on the face of this planet can steward their solvency through rough waters, it is ExxonMobil. Period. If they cannot, then we as a planet of people are not long for this world. But these current waters are not even rough, except to Chanos' wishful thinking.<br/><br/>How low must he feel he has to go to send out cheap shots, HOPING to disrupt trust in a proven guardian of investment. It is as if nothing else troubling or traumatic ever happened to this company between now and the 1920's. The only way Chanos will be made happy is if XOM suddenly changed its BOD and filled it with the likes of the jerks who pilfered Wall Street. This company is very different and always has been. And that is what irks Chanos so much.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Stocks For The Coming Civil War</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/298393/comments?source=feed#comment-1965587</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1965587</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wow, talk some more like that and it might be a great propoganda tool for electing Romney! <br/><br/>&quot;Start thinking like a Mormon and hunker down. Vote for Romney, who'll be thinking like you.&quot; <br/><br/>Or something similar...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:12:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wow, talk some more like that and it might be a great propoganda tool for electing Romney! <br/><br/>&quot;Start thinking like a Mormon and hunker down. Vote for Romney, who'll be thinking like you.&quot; <br/><br/>Or something similar...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Stocks For The Coming Civil War</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/298393/comments?source=feed#comment-1965578</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1965578</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sorry for that duplicate post about turning in gold. I do not think it would be Obama doing it, but after him. At least it would mean there would still be some kind of market for gold. You cannot burn it, eat it or barter it realistically. I just think gold is one of those old-thinking commodities that may not have the *Red Dawn* value it once did in an apocalyptic world.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:09:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sorry for that duplicate post about turning in gold. I do not think it would be Obama doing it, but after him. At least it would mean there would still be some kind of market for gold. You cannot burn it, eat it or barter it realistically. I just think gold is one of those old-thinking commodities that may not have the *Red Dawn* value it once did in an apocalyptic world.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Stocks For The Coming Civil War</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/298393/comments?source=feed#comment-1963531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1963531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great article, Larry. Just one question:<br/><br/>Concerning Gold, what if Obama (or his successor) pulls an FDR and demands that all Americans turn in their gold? It happened before and it can happen again...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:32:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great article, Larry. Just one question:<br/><br/>Concerning Gold, what if Obama (or his successor) pulls an FDR and demands that all Americans turn in their gold? It happened before and it can happen again...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Apple a Better Investment Than Exxon?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/286505/comments?source=feed#comment-1829415</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1829415</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Just a thought here. Aside from market cap, the only other thing these two have in common is Choice of Political Correctness (the elephant in the room). If you like feeling all warm and fuzzy about the planet, if you have to have the cool investment to save face with your family and friends, you are gonna run screaming from XOM and jump right into Apple's arms. What does XOM have to offer to those who think these things matter? It's like Apple is Obama and XOM is McCain and it's 2008 again. The COOL factor, whether there is anything behind the facade or not. For those who don't think these kinds of thoughts enter an investor's mind (not every investor by a long shot is a serious pragmatic one), then you probably voted for that Hope and Change...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:03:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Just a thought here. Aside from market cap, the only other thing these two have in common is Choice of Political Correctness (the elephant in the room). If you like feeling all warm and fuzzy about the planet, if you have to have the cool investment to save face with your family and friends, you are gonna run screaming from XOM and jump right into Apple's arms. What does XOM have to offer to those who think these things matter? It's like Apple is Obama and XOM is McCain and it's 2008 again. The COOL factor, whether there is anything behind the facade or not. For those who don't think these kinds of thoughts enter an investor's mind (not every investor by a long shot is a serious pragmatic one), then you probably voted for that Hope and Change...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Covanta's Modern Day Alchemy: Turning Trash Into Profits</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/247944/comments?source=feed#comment-1825097</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1825097</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Could this company be a takeover target by WM? Thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:42:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Could this company be a takeover target by WM? Thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Love/Hate the Oil Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/341510-mad-hedge-fund-trader/203160-why-i-love-hate-the-oil-companies?source=feed#comment-1821935</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1821935</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Awesome post. You, sir, &quot;get it&quot;. Thanks for writing this.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:12:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Awesome post. You, sir, &quot;get it&quot;. Thanks for writing this.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All Democrats.. There is a financial way out !</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/928496-golfitobob/203238-all-democrats-there-is-a-financial-way-out?source=feed#comment-1821825</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1821825</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are too funny, but in a big bite way. Kudos! :-))))]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:53:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are too funny, but in a big bite way. Kudos! :-))))]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Green thing and the modern truth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/928496-golfitobob/203714-the-green-thing-and-the-modern-truth?source=feed#comment-1821740</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1821740</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Love it!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:12:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Love it!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The True Cost of an Education</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/485428-michaelham/203660-the-true-cost-of-an-education?source=feed#comment-1821717</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1821717</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Right on, dude! That's what my husband and I and our darling daughter did for her college and we are all glad. She went her first year to the local junior college, groaning all the way. We had to really hard-sell the student loan risks, because all her friends kept telling her that was her way out to a big 4-year school. We let her go off the second year provided she work and contribute to her costs and no loans. She stayed her soph year in a dorm, then wanted an apt., got roomies, and worked more. Cut to chase: 4 years, on time, degree in hand and hat tossed skyward, one unpaid internshio and one paid internship where she WAS hired permanently, thus becoming one of the 2% of the 2010 grads who got jobs in their field. Best of all? She often thanks us from the bottom of her heart that she does not have one cent of loans to repay, and has said it might be the gift of her life, particularly when she listens to her many friends who are sucked underground by theirs.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:01:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Right on, dude! That's what my husband and I and our darling daughter did for her college and we are all glad. She went her first year to the local junior college, groaning all the way. We had to really hard-sell the student loan risks, because all her friends kept telling her that was her way out to a big 4-year school. We let her go off the second year provided she work and contribute to her costs and no loans. She stayed her soph year in a dorm, then wanted an apt., got roomies, and worked more. Cut to chase: 4 years, on time, degree in hand and hat tossed skyward, one unpaid internshio and one paid internship where she WAS hired permanently, thus becoming one of the 2% of the 2010 grads who got jobs in their field. Best of all? She often thanks us from the bottom of her heart that she does not have one cent of loans to repay, and has said it might be the gift of her life, particularly when she listens to her many friends who are sucked underground by theirs.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Despite Historically Low Interest Rates, Demand for Mortgages Is Waning</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/274220/comments?source=feed#comment-1821595</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1821595</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My husband and I tried to refinance. We are a dream client, but the lenders' stubborn insistance on forcing us to carry the insurance and taxes in the monthly payment when we had not done that for 10 years and owe only 50% of our home's deflated value, had us telling them no thank you.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:50:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My husband and I tried to refinance. We are a dream client, but the lenders' stubborn insistance on forcing us to carry the insurance and taxes in the monthly payment when we had not done that for 10 years and owe only 50% of our home's deflated value, had us telling them no thank you.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cramer's 'Buy' List to Ride Out the Storm</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/285663/comments?source=feed#comment-1818319</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1818319</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You know, I'm really sick and tired of Chevron being a parasite value of XOM. I cannot wait for Chevron to get out of the refining biz and go explore itself to oblivion. I'm equally tired of blowhards like Cramer always dissing XOM any way they can.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:46:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You know, I'm really sick and tired of Chevron being a parasite value of XOM. I cannot wait for Chevron to get out of the refining biz and go explore itself to oblivion. I'm equally tired of blowhards like Cramer always dissing XOM any way they can.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cramer's Stop Trading! The Exxon of Coal (1/31/11)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/249941/comments?source=feed#comment-1440704</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1440704</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Just watch and see Jeffrey &quot;U Just Thought I Was For Green Energy&quot; Immelt fight in his new Jobs job to get Keystone XL pipeline phase III approved to move Canadian crude down to XOM's Beaumont Tx port for export to Europe and beyond.....then watch to see if Cramer eats his words and quits dissing XOM over trivial b.s. Unfolding this spring as the world's crisis events cooperate beautifully...<br/><br/>Just hide and watch....<br/><br/>Coal who?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:09:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Just watch and see Jeffrey &quot;U Just Thought I Was For Green Energy&quot; Immelt fight in his new Jobs job to get Keystone XL pipeline phase III approved to move Canadian crude down to XOM's Beaumont Tx port for export to Europe and beyond.....then watch to see if Cramer eats his words and quits dissing XOM over trivial b.s. Unfolding this spring as the world's crisis events cooperate beautifully...<br/><br/>Just hide and watch....<br/><br/>Coal who?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End of America? Not Quite</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/248003/comments?source=feed#comment-1426029</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1426029</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tim, I get your point here and I hope to God you are correct. However, I do wish you had stayed away from the charts tracking the change in the so-called luxury items and here's why: Moore's Law as applied to non-essential consumer goods doesn't work with food and energy and shelter (the stuff we have to buy in order to live day to day). While I am well aware that some would say their iphone is every bit as necessary as bread and energy, I'm trusting you know what I mean. And I think you proved that overall, we'll still be able to buy the basics. If Glen Beck is wrong, that is, lol, and food doesn't sharply rise in price over the next 1-5 years (food storage, anyone?) Okay, just a little joke....Peace out. xoxo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:37:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tim, I get your point here and I hope to God you are correct. However, I do wish you had stayed away from the charts tracking the change in the so-called luxury items and here's why: Moore's Law as applied to non-essential consumer goods doesn't work with food and energy and shelter (the stuff we have to buy in order to live day to day). While I am well aware that some would say their iphone is every bit as necessary as bread and energy, I'm trusting you know what I mean. And I think you proved that overall, we'll still be able to buy the basics. If Glen Beck is wrong, that is, lol, and food doesn't sharply rise in price over the next 1-5 years (food storage, anyone?) Okay, just a little joke....Peace out. xoxo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Pair Trades for 2011: Hedging and Managing Risk in Dangerous Markets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/248069/comments?source=feed#comment-1425930</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1425930</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The helium comment isn't very funny (XOM should be getting kudos for diversifying) and by the way, there is no &quot;e&quot; on ExxonMobil.....cheers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:32:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The helium comment isn't very funny (XOM should be getting kudos for diversifying) and by the way, there is no &quot;e&quot; on ExxonMobil.....cheers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exxon and BP: Process vs. Firefighting</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/216346/comments?source=feed#comment-1131649</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1131649</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I cannot tell you how much I appreciate you shining a light on this, and I am glad to know that NPR did, too. I just wish Obama, Pelosi, etc., would make the distinction, too. As the spouse of a 20-year XOM refinery employee, I can personally attest to the exemplary processes and traditions of safety at XOM. Let me offer that in all these years, my spouse has come home complaining, but it has never been about feeling unsafe. It's always been about the few people he has worked with who have bad attitudes and try to cut corners. Because of the inplace processes, those few thankfully cause no danger but they do create their own trails for dismissal. That is another benefit to process. <br/><br/>Thanks again.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:27:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I cannot tell you how much I appreciate you shining a light on this, and I am glad to know that NPR did, too. I just wish Obama, Pelosi, etc., would make the distinction, too. As the spouse of a 20-year XOM refinery employee, I can personally attest to the exemplary processes and traditions of safety at XOM. Let me offer that in all these years, my spouse has come home complaining, but it has never been about feeling unsafe. It's always been about the few people he has worked with who have bad attitudes and try to cut corners. Because of the inplace processes, those few thankfully cause no danger but they do create their own trails for dismissal. That is another benefit to process. <br/><br/>Thanks again.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Berkshire Hathaway's Latest Portfolio Update</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/205577/comments?source=feed#comment-1028758</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1028758</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wonder when the next time George Soros has to declare his...is it only at 12/31 of every year?? If he has to any sooner, pleasepleaseplease do a similar blog post on his. I would love to see a comparison of holdings and movement of holdings of XOM in both Soros and Buffet's portfolios...  This was a good article, thanks! ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:03:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wonder when the next time George Soros has to declare his...is it only at 12/31 of every year?? If he has to any sooner, pleasepleaseplease do a similar blog post on his. I would love to see a comparison of holdings and movement of holdings of XOM in both Soros and Buffet's portfolios...  This was a good article, thanks! ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Dow Component Stocks Lost Ground over Past 10 Years than Posted Gains</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/164075/comments?source=feed#comment-698791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">698791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You write: &quot;Exxon and Chevron’s dominance should also serve as reminder that we remain too heavily dependent on a dwindling natural resource that makes us dependent on tyrannical foreign governments and is quickly destroying our environment.&quot;<br/><br/>And just why did that happen? We could be a nation right this minute whose domestic fuel production enables us to be independent, but the environmental crazies stopped that at every turn. Nobody talks about that. Instead of lambasting and shaming a stellar company like Exxon for making a measly 9% profit (it's the volume of business that makes the big bucks), how about reflecting that maybe the overzealousness of the enviro-naziis have a huge responsibility in our current situation, and continue to do the same thing with wind and solar start-ups right now by playing the NIMBY card whenever they can.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:29:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You write: &quot;Exxon and Chevron’s dominance should also serve as reminder that we remain too heavily dependent on a dwindling natural resource that makes us dependent on tyrannical foreign governments and is quickly destroying our environment.&quot;<br/><br/>And just why did that happen? We could be a nation right this minute whose domestic fuel production enables us to be independent, but the environmental crazies stopped that at every turn. Nobody talks about that. Instead of lambasting and shaming a stellar company like Exxon for making a measly 9% profit (it's the volume of business that makes the big bucks), how about reflecting that maybe the overzealousness of the enviro-naziis have a huge responsibility in our current situation, and continue to do the same thing with wind and solar start-ups right now by playing the NIMBY card whenever they can.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CRBQ: Not Your Father&#8217;s Commodity Fund</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/163036/comments?source=feed#comment-688758</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">688758</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Julian Roberts and other track-record experts are very worried about inflation. These companies in this index produce inflation-proof goods. Other indexes are similar. So, the obvious is staring you in the face, but you want to gaze at something else just as the attack readies? Take the hint! Other countries are affected by inflation, too.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:39:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Julian Roberts and other track-record experts are very worried about inflation. These companies in this index produce inflation-proof goods. Other indexes are similar. So, the obvious is staring you in the face, but you want to gaze at something else just as the attack readies? Take the hint! Other countries are affected by inflation, too.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Truth About Fossil Fuels and Renewable Energy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/154615/comments?source=feed#comment-619602</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">619602</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Mr. Shaefer, for laying this out. Even though it would seem that people could add 2 and 2, they can't. They seem to completely believe this transition to renewables will be like turning on a light switch! Just looking at everything the petrochemical industry packages, bottles, insulates, lubricates, decorates, and mixes into will boggle the mind when factoring in retooling for alternative ingredients or forms. People have no idea how much it will impact us and like you ask, is it worth it and will it really result in any material NET good? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:03:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Mr. Shaefer, for laying this out. Even though it would seem that people could add 2 and 2, they can't. They seem to completely believe this transition to renewables will be like turning on a light switch! Just looking at everything the petrochemical industry packages, bottles, insulates, lubricates, decorates, and mixes into will boggle the mind when factoring in retooling for alternative ingredients or forms. People have no idea how much it will impact us and like you ask, is it worth it and will it really result in any material NET good? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Forget the 1930s; We're Reliving 1975 (Part II)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/151547/comments?source=feed#comment-604467</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">604467</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hello. Interesting analysis, and the 1970's are quite important to reference, but not really to compare with now. More importantly, the 70's timeframe was the beginning of an economic era and we are now at a period that either marks the end of it or the culmination of reaping what the beginning sowed. I think you ignore 2 telling events that happened back then: 1. going off the gold standard, and 2. for the first time the U.S. was opened up to being bought by foreign capital. Also, a parallel to note is that was the beginning of the rise of the Japanese auto industry in America (and the beginning of American autos not being dominant in our marketplace). We should look at the TRENDING of this era between 1973 to now. I believe it would yield more useful info than just comparing two little period of years.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:39:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hello. Interesting analysis, and the 1970's are quite important to reference, but not really to compare with now. More importantly, the 70's timeframe was the beginning of an economic era and we are now at a period that either marks the end of it or the culmination of reaping what the beginning sowed. I think you ignore 2 telling events that happened back then: 1. going off the gold standard, and 2. for the first time the U.S. was opened up to being bought by foreign capital. Also, a parallel to note is that was the beginning of the rise of the Japanese auto industry in America (and the beginning of American autos not being dominant in our marketplace). We should look at the TRENDING of this era between 1973 to now. I believe it would yield more useful info than just comparing two little period of years.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
