Seeking Alpha

jorgerodr904

jorgerodr904
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View jorgerodr904's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Sell Elephant Talk On Current Law Enforcement Investigation With -75% Downside [View article]
    Not true. It’s a fraud.
    May 28 01:02 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • VirnetX's ASM: Updates And Insights [View article]
    Thank you for taking time away from your family in order to provide an overview of the company. Nice job!
    May 22 09:03 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • VirnetX Vs. Apple At The CAFC: Why VirnetX Will Be Just Fine [View article]
    Jeff,
    Great write up with facts that supports your assestment.

    THanks,
    Mar 12 09:25 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Dear Apple Shareholders And Customers: What Apple Should Be Disclosing To You [View article]
    Great article Tom...


    There are tons of complaints with facetime and/or Imessage not working.

    http://bit.ly/1cRab2K


    Prior to 2013, very few complaints... I wonder why?
    Aug 18 02:09 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Dear Apple Shareholders And Customers: What Apple Should Be Disclosing To You [View article]
    There are tons of complaints with facetime and/or Imessage not working. Take a look.

    http://bit.ly/1cRab2K

    Prior to 2013, very few complaints... I wonder why?
    Aug 18 01:44 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Dear Apple Shareholders And Customers: What Apple Should Be Disclosing To You [View article]
    Here is comments and notes for the hearing from JeffWaterworks

    I was sitting in the court room in Tyler, Texas on Aug. 15th when Apple's lawyer, Danny Williams, told The Honorable Judge Davis that due to losing a patent infringement lawsuit to VirnetX, Apple has switched from the more reliable, more secure method of connecting ,which infringed the patents ,to 100% utilization of relay servers. To be clear, FaceTime has gone from a direct connection through the internet 90%-95% of the time to a system where 100% of the calls are routed through relay servers, according to Mr. Williams.


    In the original trial Patrick Gates testified in Federal Court that switching to relay servers could actually increase FaceTime call quality. This doesn't appear to be the case. The fact that Apple could have utilized relay servers from the inception of FaceTime also belies this fact. As a matter of fact, VirnetX's counsel has access to the customer service call logs from Apple and told the judge since the date Apple claims to have made the 100% switch there have been over 500,000 complaints about FaceTime quality and connectivity.


    Also at issue and to date not disclosed by Apple, to my knowledge, is the fact that routing FaceTime calls through relay servers makes FaceTime calls less secure and more vulnerable to government intercept.


    Lastly, before the much over used and poorly defined phrase "patent troll" starts being bantered around in regards to VirnetX, several of the officers and major shareholders of VirnetX are the gentlemen directly responsible for this technology and named on the patents in suit. This company is people pursuing the American dream of making money off of their own inventions.


    The issue here is Apple's willingness to sacrifice customer's FaceTime call security and quality of service for the sake of their bottom line (there very similar issues for VPN on demand as well). I'm on my fourth iPhone and may wander over to Samsung to look for my next phone.
    Aug 18 01:39 PM | 4 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • VirnetX Comes Out With Guns Blazing Against Cisco [View article]
    Excellent article Tom!
    Apr 10 10:55 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • VirnetX (VHC -10.1%) is tumbling to fresh 52-week lows on strong volume, as the Street continues weighing the fallout of an adverse jury ruling in its patent suit against Cisco. Last week, the judge presiding over the suit issued a final judgment declaring 12 VirnetX patent claims are not invalid, and denying all pending motions. [View news story]
    Eric,

    Your correction is wrong again with "denying all pending motions". This was a trail not a hearing.
    Mar 25 01:44 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
8 Comments
15 Likes