<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mayukh Mukherjee's Comments</title>
    <description>Mayukh Mukherjee's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/4793671/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>IBM: Revenues Flat But Stock Should Still Climb</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1388761/comments?source=feed#comment-18362521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18362521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Pepo, I personally don't look at quarterly eps estimates - in fact an eps miss might be an opportunity to pick up stocks for good businesses. Cheers]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:48:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Pepo, I personally don't look at quarterly eps estimates - in fact an eps miss might be an opportunity to pick up stocks for good businesses. Cheers]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM: Revenues Flat But Stock Should Still Climb</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1388761/comments?source=feed#comment-18362441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18362441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for your comment. I agree buying back shares alone can't help. In fact focusing on earnings alone is also a mirage as companies like IBM can manage that as well (see how they've consistently improved net margins and hence earnings, despite a relatively flat top-line).<br/><br/>IBM is a solid long-term stock precisely because of their superb capital allocation process. They tend to get good revenue growth every 3-4 years, followed by flat or declining revenues. They have figured out how to ride out these lean years by managing margins and cashflows. When they do generate solid revenues, they can pay down debt and relax on the margin front. Its a cycle they have ridden before and seem to have perfected.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:47:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for your comment. I agree buying back shares alone can't help. In fact focusing on earnings alone is also a mirage as companies like IBM can manage that as well (see how they've consistently improved net margins and hence earnings, despite a relatively flat top-line).<br/><br/>IBM is a solid long-term stock precisely because of their superb capital allocation process. They tend to get good revenue growth every 3-4 years, followed by flat or declining revenues. They have figured out how to ride out these lean years by managing margins and cashflows. When they do generate solid revenues, they can pay down debt and relax on the margin front. Its a cycle they have ridden before and seem to have perfected.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM: Big Blue's Big Bruise Is Your Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369171/comments?source=feed#comment-18235041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18235041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@bahamas<br/>Its called scenario analysis, you should try it sometimes.<br/>Self promotion on SA, shocking!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:50:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@bahamas<br/>Its called scenario analysis, you should try it sometimes.<br/>Self promotion on SA, shocking!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM: Big Blue's Big Bruise Is Your Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369171/comments?source=feed#comment-18140581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18140581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes thats my model Josh. Check out the site in general, would love to get your feedback.<br/><br/>I've got an article coming out on IBM too, maybe next week.<br/><br/>Cheers ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:32:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes thats my model Josh. Check out the site in general, would love to get your feedback.<br/><br/>I've got an article coming out on IBM too, maybe next week.<br/><br/>Cheers ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lululemon: Quality Issues More Extensive Than Reported</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369831/comments?source=feed#comment-18127391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18127391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good use of data. Maybe lulu goes the way of crocks. Its so hard to keep riding the fashion wave. I ran a dcf for this stock and got a value of less than $40... ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:49:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good use of data. Maybe lulu goes the way of crocks. Its so hard to keep riding the fashion wave. I ran a dcf for this stock and got a value of less than $40... ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM: Big Blue's Big Bruise Is Your Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369171/comments?source=feed#comment-18123561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18123561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I should have mentioned, thats a site that I run (its fairly new so you wouldn't have heard of it). Here are a few assumptions why cashflows reduce as you get to steady state<br/><br/>Assumptions (the ones driving lowering of free cashflows):<br/>1. Taxes increase gradually from about 24% at current levels to 40% in year 10. More taxes means less after-tax income to generate free cashflows<br/><br/>2. Reinvestments at IBM are currently negative.. (net capex - change in working cap). This isn't sustainable and the model corrects for that in the long term. Theoretically the long-term reinvestment rate is tied to long-term growth rate and the return on capital. As the reinvestment rate goes up, free cashflows to the firm goes down.<br/><br/>Sounds like academic jargon, I know, but dcf's are a theoretical construct after all<br/><br/>I adjusted some of the numbers and I got upto $160/share as an intrinsic valuation. -- <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12sFfO5'>http://bit.ly/12sFfO5</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:35:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I should have mentioned, thats a site that I run (its fairly new so you wouldn't have heard of it). Here are a few assumptions why cashflows reduce as you get to steady state<br/><br/>Assumptions (the ones driving lowering of free cashflows):<br/>1. Taxes increase gradually from about 24% at current levels to 40% in year 10. More taxes means less after-tax income to generate free cashflows<br/><br/>2. Reinvestments at IBM are currently negative.. (net capex - change in working cap). This isn't sustainable and the model corrects for that in the long term. Theoretically the long-term reinvestment rate is tied to long-term growth rate and the return on capital. As the reinvestment rate goes up, free cashflows to the firm goes down.<br/><br/>Sounds like academic jargon, I know, but dcf's are a theoretical construct after all<br/><br/>I adjusted some of the numbers and I got upto $160/share as an intrinsic valuation. -- <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12sFfO5'>http://bit.ly/12sFfO5</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM: Big Blue's Big Bruise Is Your Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369171/comments?source=feed#comment-18102581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18102581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Josh, Im researching IBM too at the moment and my findings tell me that while there is an opportunity in IBM it has more to do with IBM's ability to manage and generate steady cashflows (borrowing if need be) and manage its eps numbers well.<br/><br/>From an intrinsic valuation perspective I get about $120 <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/10g5Ut4'>http://bit.ly/10g5Ut4</a>  -- but I feel that a dcf of free cashflows (in the traditional sense) misses out on how IBM is generating positive returns for an investor]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:42:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Josh, Im researching IBM too at the moment and my findings tell me that while there is an opportunity in IBM it has more to do with IBM's ability to manage and generate steady cashflows (borrowing if need be) and manage its eps numbers well.<br/><br/>From an intrinsic valuation perspective I get about $120 <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/10g5Ut4'>http://bit.ly/10g5Ut4</a>  -- but I feel that a dcf of free cashflows (in the traditional sense) misses out on how IBM is generating positive returns for an investor]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Value Plays In China: China Yuchai</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1349151/comments?source=feed#comment-17777681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17777681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The key as you said is many Chineses companies ...and not all. In fact the over-reaction has created an opportunity to buy and hold a few companies for the long term. Im not saying CYD is the one for sure, but there are opportunities in PRC that didn't exist a few years ago.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:01:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The key as you said is many Chineses companies ...and not all. In fact the over-reaction has created an opportunity to buy and hold a few companies for the long term. Im not saying CYD is the one for sure, but there are opportunities in PRC that didn't exist a few years ago.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Relative Valuation: Facebook Vs. LinkedIn By The Numbers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1340731/comments?source=feed#comment-17664371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17664371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Similar sentiment to Doyle above, I don't see how LNKD valuations are justified,-  I'm just choosing to stay away..<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/14qQUBp'>http://bit.ly/14qQUBp</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:32:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Similar sentiment to Doyle above, I don't see how LNKD valuations are justified,-  I'm just choosing to stay away..<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/14qQUBp'>http://bit.ly/14qQUBp</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft Offers Investors An Annualized Gross Return Of Up To 25% Over The Next 5 Years</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1331611/comments?source=feed#comment-17448731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17448731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[MSFT is undervalued in my opinion, but then its been so for a long time.. The question is what will be the catalyst that drives investors to take a look at its huge pile of cash, strong margins and tremendous growth opportunities in the enterprise space.   <br/><br/>I view MSFT purely as an enterprise play with the consumer segment (search,xbox etc) as an added bonus.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:14:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[MSFT is undervalued in my opinion, but then its been so for a long time.. The question is what will be the catalyst that drives investors to take a look at its huge pile of cash, strong margins and tremendous growth opportunities in the enterprise space.   <br/><br/>I view MSFT purely as an enterprise play with the consumer segment (search,xbox etc) as an added bonus.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3D Stocks A New Way To Grow Wealth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1324211/comments?source=feed#comment-17444961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17444961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree the 3D printing market holds a lot of potential. The opportunities are tremendous, however I can't see a clear winner in this space yet.<br/><br/>DDD seems to be leading right now, but I feel its too expensive even after dropping 30% in 3 months. Despite putting in optimistic revenue estimates of over 40% revenue growth for the next 5 years, I still find the stock being fairly priced at around $30.  <br/><br/>The other concern is what are the barriers to entry in this space ? If the market continues to grow astronomically, I'd expect stronger, well capitalized entrants into this space.<br/><br/>So yes, very excited about 3D printing, just don't see a clear long-term investing opportunity in it yet.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:55:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree the 3D printing market holds a lot of potential. The opportunities are tremendous, however I can't see a clear winner in this space yet.<br/><br/>DDD seems to be leading right now, but I feel its too expensive even after dropping 30% in 3 months. Despite putting in optimistic revenue estimates of over 40% revenue growth for the next 5 years, I still find the stock being fairly priced at around $30.  <br/><br/>The other concern is what are the barriers to entry in this space ? If the market continues to grow astronomically, I'd expect stronger, well capitalized entrants into this space.<br/><br/>So yes, very excited about 3D printing, just don't see a clear long-term investing opportunity in it yet.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Red Hat: Application Software Company Perfect Example Of Cloud Bubble</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1328011/comments?source=feed#comment-17422011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17422011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like Red Hat and looking at its performance management has done a great job in running it, but like the author find it's current valuation too high for my taste..<br/><br/>Valuation:<br/> 20% annual revenue growth (steady for 5 years then tapering), 16% operating margins and 10% cost of capital gives me around $26.. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/149Jv9x'>http://bit.ly/149Jv9x</a><br/><br/>Comparisons:<br/>Comparing RHT against Oracle,CRM and CA leads me to believe that while this definitely a strong competitor I don't see anything that stands out <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/149Jv9x'>http://bit.ly/149Jv9x</a><br/><br/>disclosure: getquisearch.com is a tool that I've been working on to help me do long-term valuations. still a work in progress]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:04:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like Red Hat and looking at its performance management has done a great job in running it, but like the author find it's current valuation too high for my taste..<br/><br/>Valuation:<br/> 20% annual revenue growth (steady for 5 years then tapering), 16% operating margins and 10% cost of capital gives me around $26.. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/149Jv9x'>http://bit.ly/149Jv9x</a><br/><br/>Comparisons:<br/>Comparing RHT against Oracle,CRM and CA leads me to believe that while this definitely a strong competitor I don't see anything that stands out <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/149Jv9x'>http://bit.ly/149Jv9x</a><br/><br/>disclosure: getquisearch.com is a tool that I've been working on to help me do long-term valuations. still a work in progress]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top 25 Above-Average Companies Currently Selling At Fair Prices</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146941/comments?source=feed#comment-14421521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14421521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I took a quick glance at SCSC. From a Net current asset value it definitely stands out (I get $17 compared to current price of $29) -- a higher ratio than a lot of other companies out there.<br/><br/>However the major concern for me is the -ve gap between operating cash versus earnings and the fact that op cash has been volatile.  Haven't done a deeper dive into why that is but maybe one of these days.<br/><br/>I've liked DELL for the last 3 months now!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:02:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I took a quick glance at SCSC. From a Net current asset value it definitely stands out (I get $17 compared to current price of $29) -- a higher ratio than a lot of other companies out there.<br/><br/>However the major concern for me is the -ve gap between operating cash versus earnings and the fact that op cash has been volatile.  Haven't done a deeper dive into why that is but maybe one of these days.<br/><br/>I've liked DELL for the last 3 months now!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VMware Earnings: Down But Not Out</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146611/comments?source=feed#comment-14421481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14421481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like VMW as a business, but at current levels ( ~ $77) despite a 20% drop I still consider it expensive. Trailing PE (44) , EV/EBITDA (25), PB &gt; 5 are a little too high for my liking. <br/><br/>Add that to the level of dilution in shares over the last 5 years makes me not trust how much further they will go that route.<br/><br/>Still like the business fundamentals though (strong revenues, earnings, operating cash, roe, margins) just not willing to buy at this price.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:01:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like VMW as a business, but at current levels ( ~ $77) despite a 20% drop I still consider it expensive. Trailing PE (44) , EV/EBITDA (25), PB &gt; 5 are a little too high for my liking. <br/><br/>Add that to the level of dilution in shares over the last 5 years makes me not trust how much further they will go that route.<br/><br/>Still like the business fundamentals though (strong revenues, earnings, operating cash, roe, margins) just not willing to buy at this price.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Electric: Expanding And Riding The Economic Improvement</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146451/comments?source=feed#comment-14420821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14420821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the writeup. Do you have any thoughts on the rather high receivables as a % of revenue for GE?  Its almost twice revenues in any given quarter and so much higher than any large ( &gt; $1bn in revenues)  companies.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:57:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the writeup. Do you have any thoughts on the rather high receivables as a % of revenue for GE?  Its almost twice revenues in any given quarter and so much higher than any large ( &gt; $1bn in revenues)  companies.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dumpster Diving Series - BBY Starts To Look Promising</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/4793671-mayukh-mukherjee/1259731-dumpster-diving-series-bby-starts-to-look-promising?source=feed#comment-11469771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11469771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for your comments. My take is that BBY has fallen so much out of favor that it looks really good right now. If you believe in the brand and that they will find the right mix of online/offline presence its a good time to buy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:27:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for your comments. My take is that BBY has fallen so much out of favor that it looks really good right now. If you believe in the brand and that they will find the right mix of online/offline presence its a good time to buy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dumpster Diving Series: Nokia Looks Enticing But Wait For Those Lumias To Sell First</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/4793671-mayukh-mukherjee/1259781-dumpster-diving-series-nokia-looks-enticing-but-wait-for-those-lumias-to-sell-first?source=feed#comment-11412751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11412751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comments. I did not call out specific segments of their business as I put my assumptions in the dcf analysis. We are in agreement that the stock has tremendous upside. <br/><br/>My only concern is that its an all or nothing strategy with Lumia and Windows 8. And I when I mentioned free-fall I specifically was talking about handset sales. They are down double digits in every quarter.<br/><br/>Cheers]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:03:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comments. I did not call out specific segments of their business as I put my assumptions in the dcf analysis. We are in agreement that the stock has tremendous upside. <br/><br/>My only concern is that its an all or nothing strategy with Lumia and Windows 8. And I when I mentioned free-fall I specifically was talking about handset sales. They are down double digits in every quarter.<br/><br/>Cheers]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
