<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>User 486211's Instablog</title>
    <description>C.T. Wu, PhD in EE&amp;CS.
Have been working in the Networking industry for more than 30 years.  Also, a 20-year veteran in the field of Business Model Optimization research.  A hybrid Buffett/Lynch style value investor.</description>
    <author>
      <name>User 486211</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>Towards a Unified Theory of Equity Investment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/486211-user-486211/222918-towards-a-unified-theory-of-equity-investment?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">222918</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><b><span><font>Towards a Unified Theory of Equity Investment<sup>*</sup> </font></span></b></p><p><b><span><font>--John Keynes&rsquo; Unique Contributions to the Field of Security Analysis </font></span></b></p><p><b><span><font><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></font></span></b><b><span><font><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></span></b></p><span>Keynes the Money Manager</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>Keynes&rsquo;s fame as an economist and his personal success in the markets led to his being offered and accepting positions managing money on behalf of King&rsquo;s College, Cambridge and the National Mutual and the Provincial Insurance companies. Keynes enjoyed great success managing these portfolios - particularly King&rsquo;s College&rsquo;s.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Keynes became first bursar of King&rsquo;s in 1924, taking on responsibility for the college&rsquo;s financial well being. He decided to concentrate all of the college&rsquo;s resources over which he had discretion into a fund called the Chest. He intended using his trading and investing skills to considerably increase the Chest Fund&rsquo;s value.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>His investing philosophy changed over time as Keynes began to doubt his initial belief that he could profit from his broad understanding of economic cycles. He grew to favor making large investments in individual businesses; Keynes was a logical man and individual businesses had balance sheets he could study and they sold products or services whose value he believed he could assess objectively.</font></font></span></p><p><font size="3">The investment strategy Keynes finally adopted is, in many respects, remarkably similar to Warren Buffett&rsquo;s. <span>Buffett has acknowledged Keynes&rsquo;s influence on his thinking</span>. In 1991 he said Keynes was a man, &ldquo;whose brilliance as a practicing investor matched his brilliance in thought.&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3"><font>Buffett went on to quote a letter from Keynes to a business associate, F. C. Scott, on August 15, 1934 showing how Keynes, in addition to favoring long term investments, had grown to favor <span>limiting these investments to a small number of enterprises:</span></font></font></p><p><font size="3"><font>&ldquo;As time goes on, I get more and more convinced that the right method in investment is to put fairly large sums into enterprises which one thinks one knows something about and in the management of which one thoroughly believes. It is a mistake to think that one limits one&rsquo;s risk by spreading too much between enterprises about which one knows little and has no reason for special confidence&hellip;<span> One&rsquo;s knowledge and experience are definitely limited and there are seldom more than two or three enterprises at any given time in which I personally feel myself entitled <b>to put full confidence.&rdquo;</b></span></font></font></p><p><font size="3">Like Buffett, Keynes was sometimes criticized for investing in stocks he believed would prosper in the longer term and then sticking doggedly with his selections despite shorter-term problems. Increasingly, Keynes grew to favor a contrarian style of investing, writing in 1937:</font></p><p><font size="3">&ldquo;It is the one sphere of life and activity where victory, security and success is always to the minority and never to the majority. When you find any one agreeing with you, change your mind. When I can persuade the Board of my Insurance Company to buy a share, that, I am learning from experience, is the right moment for selling it.&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3">Benjamin Graham later summarized the contrarian credo:</font></p><p><font size="3">Mr. Market comes along each day quoting you a variety of prices for assets. He will buy or sell at the quoted price. Often his quotes reflect fair value. Mr. Market is, however, a manic depressive. On some occasions he is depressed and he prices assets too cheaply. Other days he's unreasonably optimistic and his prices are too high. The contrarian's job is to go </font><a href="http://www.investingator.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font size="3">investing</font></a><font size="3"> when Mr. Market is depressed and to divest when he's unreasonably optimistic. </font></p><p><font size="3">Keynes&rsquo; view of investing versus speculation was: &ldquo;<span>Investing is an activity of forecasting the yield over the life of the asset; speculation is the activity of forecasting the psychology of the market.</span>&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3">Keynes came to view too much speculative activity as economically damaging, famously saying: &ldquo;Speculators may do no harm as bubbles on a steady stream of enterprise. But the position is serious when enterprise becomes the bubble on a whirlpool of speculation. When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done.&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3">&nbsp;</font></p><span>Keynes on Concentrated Investment Portfolios</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>John Maynard Keynes proposed that investors should hold concentrated investment portfolios.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>In 1938 he described the principles he believed should underpin this style of investing. These are:</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>A careful selection of a few investments (or a few types of investment) having regard to their cheapness in relation to their probable actual and potential <em><span>intrinsic</span></em> value over a period of years ahead and in relation to alternative investments at the time;</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>A steadfast holding of these in fairly large units through thick and thin, perhaps for several years, until either they have fulfilled their promise or it is evident that they were purchased on a mistake;</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>A <em><span>balanced</span></em> investment position, i.e., a variety of risks in spite of individual holdings being large, and if possible, opposed risks.</font></font></span></li></ul><span>The Implications of Concentrated Portfolios</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>Consider the two possible extremes in building a stock portfolio:</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>The most<em><span> dilute</span></em> portfolio possible is one that includes every stock listed on the stock market. This can be achieved by investing using index-tracking investment trusts and mutual funds. Provided their fees are low, these funds achieve returns closely matching the return of the whole market.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>The most <em><span>concentrated</span></em> portfolio consists of a single stock. If an investor chooses a single stock well, its return will greatly exceed that of the general market. A bad choice may result in total loss of the investor&rsquo;s funds.</font></font></span></li></ul><p><span><font size="3"><font>The smaller the portfolio, the greater the likelihood that its return will differ significantly from the market average.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Investors who have the <b>competence</b> to analyze a small number of businesses in detail and the ability to identify low-priced, outstanding businesses, will be able to outperform the market dramatically . (For example, John Maynard Keynes and Warren Buffett.)</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Investors who lack the skill to select suitable stocks and who build a concentrated portfolio will probably underperform the market dramatically. (For example, any number of hopeful small investors.)</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>Skilled investors can maximize their <em><span>long-term</span></em> return through deliberate selection of stocks.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>Unskilled investors can maximize their <em><span>long-term </span></em>return by adopting a deliberate policy of no selection. (They should invest in the whole market via a low cost index tracking fund.)</font></font></span></li></ul><span>The Balanced Portfolio</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>A concentrated portfolio consisting of several stocks is immune to the risk of total loss should the value of a single holding fall to zero. Investors, however, still run the risk of large losses if each of the stocks in their portfolio behaves in the same way - if the share prices tend to rise and fall in tandem with one another and they all fall when an unexpected, harmful event happens.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Keynes said that investors should hold investments with <em><span>opposed risks</span></em>. A simple example of businesses with opposed risks might be a lender and a debt collection agency. Both can prosper in a booming economy. If interest rates rise strongly, the lender&rsquo;s business will probably worsen but the debt collection agency&rsquo;s profits could improve.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Alternatively, a stock investor could lessen his or her exposure to risk by investing in commodities or currencies. For example, an investor decides to buy shares in a car battery manufacturer. The batteries are made using lead metal.</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices stay low the battery maker will enjoy remarkably high profits.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices rise significantly, battery-making profits will suffer badly.</font></font></span></li></ul><p><span><font size="3"><font>If our investor buys lead, either directly in the commodity markets, or through buying shares in a lead mining company - they will lower their risk of loss, because:</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices stay low, they will benefit from an outstanding return from the battery manufacturer.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices rise sharply, the lower return from the battery maker will be compensated for by a greater profit from the position in lead.</font></font></span></li></ul><span>Hedge Funds</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>Gathering together attractive but <em><span>uncorrelated or opposed</span></em> investments in a single portfolio is the basis of hedge funds. In his development of the Chest Fund, John Maynard Keynes was responsible for creating one of the world&rsquo;s earliest hedge funds.</font></font></span></p><p><span>&nbsp;</span></p><p><p><b><span></span></b></p><b><font size="3">(*: This article is primarily based on the materials provided by </font><a href="http://www.maynardkeynes.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font size="3">www.maynardkeynes.org</font></a><font size="3"><font> with interpretations and minor enhancements by </font></font></b><b><font size="3"><font>C.T. Wu, PhD)</font></font></b></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:33:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><b><span><font>Towards a Unified Theory of Equity Investment<sup>*</sup> </font></span></b></p><p><b><span><font>--John Keynes&rsquo; Unique Contributions to the Field of Security Analysis </font></span></b></p><p><b><span><font><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></font></span></b><b><span><font><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></span></b></p><span>Keynes the Money Manager</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>Keynes&rsquo;s fame as an economist and his personal success in the markets led to his being offered and accepting positions managing money on behalf of King&rsquo;s College, Cambridge and the National Mutual and the Provincial Insurance companies. Keynes enjoyed great success managing these portfolios - particularly King&rsquo;s College&rsquo;s.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Keynes became first bursar of King&rsquo;s in 1924, taking on responsibility for the college&rsquo;s financial well being. He decided to concentrate all of the college&rsquo;s resources over which he had discretion into a fund called the Chest. He intended using his trading and investing skills to considerably increase the Chest Fund&rsquo;s value.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>His investing philosophy changed over time as Keynes began to doubt his initial belief that he could profit from his broad understanding of economic cycles. He grew to favor making large investments in individual businesses; Keynes was a logical man and individual businesses had balance sheets he could study and they sold products or services whose value he believed he could assess objectively.</font></font></span></p><p><font size="3">The investment strategy Keynes finally adopted is, in many respects, remarkably similar to Warren Buffett&rsquo;s. <span>Buffett has acknowledged Keynes&rsquo;s influence on his thinking</span>. In 1991 he said Keynes was a man, &ldquo;whose brilliance as a practicing investor matched his brilliance in thought.&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3"><font>Buffett went on to quote a letter from Keynes to a business associate, F. C. Scott, on August 15, 1934 showing how Keynes, in addition to favoring long term investments, had grown to favor <span>limiting these investments to a small number of enterprises:</span></font></font></p><p><font size="3"><font>&ldquo;As time goes on, I get more and more convinced that the right method in investment is to put fairly large sums into enterprises which one thinks one knows something about and in the management of which one thoroughly believes. It is a mistake to think that one limits one&rsquo;s risk by spreading too much between enterprises about which one knows little and has no reason for special confidence&hellip;<span> One&rsquo;s knowledge and experience are definitely limited and there are seldom more than two or three enterprises at any given time in which I personally feel myself entitled <b>to put full confidence.&rdquo;</b></span></font></font></p><p><font size="3">Like Buffett, Keynes was sometimes criticized for investing in stocks he believed would prosper in the longer term and then sticking doggedly with his selections despite shorter-term problems. Increasingly, Keynes grew to favor a contrarian style of investing, writing in 1937:</font></p><p><font size="3">&ldquo;It is the one sphere of life and activity where victory, security and success is always to the minority and never to the majority. When you find any one agreeing with you, change your mind. When I can persuade the Board of my Insurance Company to buy a share, that, I am learning from experience, is the right moment for selling it.&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3">Benjamin Graham later summarized the contrarian credo:</font></p><p><font size="3">Mr. Market comes along each day quoting you a variety of prices for assets. He will buy or sell at the quoted price. Often his quotes reflect fair value. Mr. Market is, however, a manic depressive. On some occasions he is depressed and he prices assets too cheaply. Other days he's unreasonably optimistic and his prices are too high. The contrarian's job is to go </font><a href="http://www.investingator.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font size="3">investing</font></a><font size="3"> when Mr. Market is depressed and to divest when he's unreasonably optimistic. </font></p><p><font size="3">Keynes&rsquo; view of investing versus speculation was: &ldquo;<span>Investing is an activity of forecasting the yield over the life of the asset; speculation is the activity of forecasting the psychology of the market.</span>&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3">Keynes came to view too much speculative activity as economically damaging, famously saying: &ldquo;Speculators may do no harm as bubbles on a steady stream of enterprise. But the position is serious when enterprise becomes the bubble on a whirlpool of speculation. When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done.&rdquo;</font></p><p><font size="3">&nbsp;</font></p><span>Keynes on Concentrated Investment Portfolios</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>John Maynard Keynes proposed that investors should hold concentrated investment portfolios.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>In 1938 he described the principles he believed should underpin this style of investing. These are:</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>A careful selection of a few investments (or a few types of investment) having regard to their cheapness in relation to their probable actual and potential <em><span>intrinsic</span></em> value over a period of years ahead and in relation to alternative investments at the time;</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>A steadfast holding of these in fairly large units through thick and thin, perhaps for several years, until either they have fulfilled their promise or it is evident that they were purchased on a mistake;</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>A <em><span>balanced</span></em> investment position, i.e., a variety of risks in spite of individual holdings being large, and if possible, opposed risks.</font></font></span></li></ul><span>The Implications of Concentrated Portfolios</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>Consider the two possible extremes in building a stock portfolio:</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>The most<em><span> dilute</span></em> portfolio possible is one that includes every stock listed on the stock market. This can be achieved by investing using index-tracking investment trusts and mutual funds. Provided their fees are low, these funds achieve returns closely matching the return of the whole market.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>The most <em><span>concentrated</span></em> portfolio consists of a single stock. If an investor chooses a single stock well, its return will greatly exceed that of the general market. A bad choice may result in total loss of the investor&rsquo;s funds.</font></font></span></li></ul><p><span><font size="3"><font>The smaller the portfolio, the greater the likelihood that its return will differ significantly from the market average.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Investors who have the <b>competence</b> to analyze a small number of businesses in detail and the ability to identify low-priced, outstanding businesses, will be able to outperform the market dramatically . (For example, John Maynard Keynes and Warren Buffett.)</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Investors who lack the skill to select suitable stocks and who build a concentrated portfolio will probably underperform the market dramatically. (For example, any number of hopeful small investors.)</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>Skilled investors can maximize their <em><span>long-term</span></em> return through deliberate selection of stocks.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>Unskilled investors can maximize their <em><span>long-term </span></em>return by adopting a deliberate policy of no selection. (They should invest in the whole market via a low cost index tracking fund.)</font></font></span></li></ul><span>The Balanced Portfolio</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>A concentrated portfolio consisting of several stocks is immune to the risk of total loss should the value of a single holding fall to zero. Investors, however, still run the risk of large losses if each of the stocks in their portfolio behaves in the same way - if the share prices tend to rise and fall in tandem with one another and they all fall when an unexpected, harmful event happens.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Keynes said that investors should hold investments with <em><span>opposed risks</span></em>. A simple example of businesses with opposed risks might be a lender and a debt collection agency. Both can prosper in a booming economy. If interest rates rise strongly, the lender&rsquo;s business will probably worsen but the debt collection agency&rsquo;s profits could improve.</font></font></span></p><p><span><font size="3"><font>Alternatively, a stock investor could lessen his or her exposure to risk by investing in commodities or currencies. For example, an investor decides to buy shares in a car battery manufacturer. The batteries are made using lead metal.</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices stay low the battery maker will enjoy remarkably high profits.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices rise significantly, battery-making profits will suffer badly.</font></font></span></li></ul><p><span><font size="3"><font>If our investor buys lead, either directly in the commodity markets, or through buying shares in a lead mining company - they will lower their risk of loss, because:</font></font></span></p><ul type="disc"><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices stay low, they will benefit from an outstanding return from the battery manufacturer.</font></font></span></li><li><span><font size="3"><font>If lead prices rise sharply, the lower return from the battery maker will be compensated for by a greater profit from the position in lead.</font></font></span></li></ul><span>Hedge Funds</span><p><span><font size="3"><font>Gathering together attractive but <em><span>uncorrelated or opposed</span></em> investments in a single portfolio is the basis of hedge funds. In his development of the Chest Fund, John Maynard Keynes was responsible for creating one of the world&rsquo;s earliest hedge funds.</font></font></span></p><p><span>&nbsp;</span></p><p><p><b><span></span></b></p><b><font size="3">(*: This article is primarily based on the materials provided by </font><a href="http://www.maynardkeynes.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font size="3">www.maynardkeynes.org</font></a><font size="3"><font> with interpretations and minor enhancements by </font></font></b><b><font size="3"><font>C.T. Wu, PhD)</font></font></b></p>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HPQ= HPC + HPS: How HP Can Unleash Its Best Value for the Shareholders</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/486211-user-486211/210757-hpq-hpc-hps-how-hp-can-unleash-its-best-value-for-the-shareholders?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">210757</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&nbsp; It is a well known consensus now that the stock market has basically flunked HP's current CEO.&nbsp; The way he announced HP's thinking&nbsp;on possible options to&nbsp;divest its PC business couldn't be more improper during the conference call.&nbsp; It fully indicates that he is not only an incompetent CEO with&nbsp;no&nbsp;sound strategic judgement,&nbsp;but also proves that he doesn't even possess the right caliber to handle the conference calls for investors.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp; From a Business Model Optimization perspective, HP can still realize the best value for its investors by splitting off its PC Business and Printer Business together as &quot;HP Computer Inc.&quot; (HPC)&nbsp;and making it a separate public company entity.&nbsp; The fundamental dividing line is the customer segment, not product line category.&nbsp; HP's PC Business has the No. 1 market leader status, plus a well known image for solid product quality.&nbsp; HP's Printer Business is also No.1 worldwide, with much higher margins and a strong IP portfolio.&nbsp; They all serve primarily the consumer segment, and can share a lot of synergies together.&nbsp; The new HPC will have much higher margins than pure PC companies; and&nbsp;HPC will continue to enjoy HP's legacy quality image and&nbsp;the well established Economy-of-Scale and global distribution channels, with its current PC and Printer&nbsp;business combined.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp; In essence, HPQ can be split into HPC and HPS (HP Solutions Inc.), similar to what Motorola went through to split the company.&nbsp; This way, the new HPC can still command an attractive valuation, remain to be the No. 1 leader globally, continue to leverage its Economy-of-Scale, and reward HPQ's investors in the best outcome possible.<br><br>&nbsp; If HPQ's Board and Mr. Apotheker do not have a good sense about this natural split strategy, they really don't deserve their&nbsp;ranks today.<br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 02:02:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&nbsp; It is a well known consensus now that the stock market has basically flunked HP's current CEO.&nbsp; The way he announced HP's thinking&nbsp;on possible options to&nbsp;divest its PC business couldn't be more improper during the conference call.&nbsp; It fully indicates that he is not only an incompetent CEO with&nbsp;no&nbsp;sound strategic judgement,&nbsp;but also proves that he doesn't even possess the right caliber to handle the conference calls for investors.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp; From a Business Model Optimization perspective, HP can still realize the best value for its investors by splitting off its PC Business and Printer Business together as &quot;HP Computer Inc.&quot; (HPC)&nbsp;and making it a separate public company entity.&nbsp; The fundamental dividing line is the customer segment, not product line category.&nbsp; HP's PC Business has the No. 1 market leader status, plus a well known image for solid product quality.&nbsp; HP's Printer Business is also No.1 worldwide, with much higher margins and a strong IP portfolio.&nbsp; They all serve primarily the consumer segment, and can share a lot of synergies together.&nbsp; The new HPC will have much higher margins than pure PC companies; and&nbsp;HPC will continue to enjoy HP's legacy quality image and&nbsp;the well established Economy-of-Scale and global distribution channels, with its current PC and Printer&nbsp;business combined.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>&nbsp; In essence, HPQ can be split into HPC and HPS (HP Solutions Inc.), similar to what Motorola went through to split the company.&nbsp; This way, the new HPC can still command an attractive valuation, remain to be the No. 1 leader globally, continue to leverage its Economy-of-Scale, and reward HPQ's investors in the best outcome possible.<br><br>&nbsp; If HPQ's Board and Mr. Apotheker do not have a good sense about this natural split strategy, they really don't deserve their&nbsp;ranks today.<br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cheer Up on These Down Days!</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/486211-user-486211/208435-cheer-up-on-these-down-days?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">208435</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><span>&nbsp; Please find&nbsp;an interesting article (<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/15/irving-kahn-105-perhaps-world-s-oldest-investment-banker-says-economy-in-downturn-just-a-blip.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/15/irving-kahn-105-perhaps-world-s-oldest-investment-banker-says-economy-in-downturn-just-a-blip.html</font></a>) about a real veteran of Value Investing, Irving Khan, who is 105 years old now and still working everyday. &nbsp;Irving had been through with the 1930&rsquo;s Great Depression and had served as a teaching assistant to the legendary Father of Value Investing, Ben Graham, at Columbia University, also during the 1930&rsquo;s.</span></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><span>&nbsp; Again,&nbsp;from a historical perspective, the market is not overvalued, but it is true we will have 5-8 years of slow US GDP growth in the 1-2% range, due to the deleveraging effect from the previous two bubbles (Per Prof. Garry Schilling: $600B annual consumer debt payoff which is roughly a 2% drag on annual GDP). &nbsp;So companies with solid business fundamentals traded at attractive PE ratios will prevail in the longer term.&nbsp; Again, in the short term, stock market follows the sentiment, and in the long term it follows the EPS growth.</span></div><div><b><span>Investors who are overwhelmed and controlled by the short term market sentiment will lose out to those smart ones who focus on the long term fundamentals. &nbsp;The choice is all yours!</span></b></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:38:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div><span>&nbsp; Please find&nbsp;an interesting article (<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/15/irving-kahn-105-perhaps-world-s-oldest-investment-banker-says-economy-in-downturn-just-a-blip.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/15/irving-kahn-105-perhaps-world-s-oldest-investment-banker-says-economy-in-downturn-just-a-blip.html</font></a>) about a real veteran of Value Investing, Irving Khan, who is 105 years old now and still working everyday. &nbsp;Irving had been through with the 1930&rsquo;s Great Depression and had served as a teaching assistant to the legendary Father of Value Investing, Ben Graham, at Columbia University, also during the 1930&rsquo;s.</span></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><span>&nbsp; Again,&nbsp;from a historical perspective, the market is not overvalued, but it is true we will have 5-8 years of slow US GDP growth in the 1-2% range, due to the deleveraging effect from the previous two bubbles (Per Prof. Garry Schilling: $600B annual consumer debt payoff which is roughly a 2% drag on annual GDP). &nbsp;So companies with solid business fundamentals traded at attractive PE ratios will prevail in the longer term.&nbsp; Again, in the short term, stock market follows the sentiment, and in the long term it follows the EPS growth.</span></div><div><b><span>Investors who are overwhelmed and controlled by the short term market sentiment will lose out to those smart ones who focus on the long term fundamentals. &nbsp;The choice is all yours!</span></b></div>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Systems Perspective on Value Investing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/486211-user-486211/182301-a-systems-perspective-on-value-investing?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">182301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>Q:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What is Value Investing and why Warren Buffett has been following it for his life long stock investment?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>A:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Value Investing, a rational equity investment framework pioneered by Ben Graham in the 1930&rsquo;s and later on flourished primarily by Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch, is still the most respected and validated equity investment guidepost in the world, albeit few equity investors truly followed it.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>In a nutshell, Value Investing is based on the central theme to maximize the Expected Reward/Risk ratio of a stock investment decision.&nbsp;There have been ample evidences and research results demonstrating that over the longer term, stock prices tend to correlate closely with the EPS (Earning per Share) growth rates of a company.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>As only high quality companies with significant entry barriers (wide moats per Warren Buffett) are likely to sustain their earning powers, so Value Investors naturally look for high quality companies that are more assured of their sustained earning potentials.&nbsp;Also, if a high quality company is still in its early growth stage, then its earning growths will be phenomenal for the next 5-10 years.&nbsp;Peter Lynch has been famous for his great success in spotting early growth high quality companies before the mainstream market eventually caught on.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>By concentrating on high quality company stocks, figuring out their sustained earning powers and growth rates, then their fair market prices, or Intrinsic Values, as defined by Ben Graham, can be grossly determined.&nbsp;In order to further increase the desired Expected Reward/Risk ratio, a savvy Value Investor would only buy a high quality company stock at a significant discount (30-50% typical) from its Intrinsic Value, which is the essence of the &ldquo;Margin of Safety&rdquo; concept stipulated by Ben Graham.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>The bigger the Margin of Safety, the higher the Expected Reward/Risk Ratio, and this is the Holy Grail for Value Investing.&nbsp;However, the higher the Margin of Safety desired, the harder it is to find such opportunities afforded by the stock market.&nbsp;This is the reason why Buffett always reminds value investors to be patient to wait for the &ldquo;Fat Pitch&rdquo; to come like a baseball player.&nbsp;In general, great opportunities to invest in high quality Large/Mid-Cap companies only occur when the market is extremely pessimistic, thus Buffett&rsquo;s famous quote &ldquo;Be greedy when others are panic&rdquo; elegantly applies here.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Nevertheless, the market is always full of good opportunities for savvy value investors to spot tomorrow&rsquo;s Large/Mid-Cap companies today among those promising Small/Micro-Cap companies which have the strong potential to disrupt the industries or sectors they are in.&nbsp;Possessing a VC-like professional due diligence caliber is the key to success in this &ldquo;Buy growth, but don&rsquo;t pay for it&rdquo; (per Martin Whitman) hidden gems discovery scenario, as well demonstrated by Peter Lynch during his 17-year Magellan Fund tenure which recorded a phenomenal 29% annualized return rate.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>In recent years, academic researches have pointed out that the performance of Value Investing can be further enhanced by the &ldquo;Momentum Life Cycles&rdquo; framework developed by Professor Charles Lee of Stanford University and enhanced by Professor Ron Bird of University of Technology, Sydney.&nbsp;Also, recently retired Professor Robert Haugen of UC-Irvine had engaged in an extensive stock market regression analysis over a span of 35 years indicating that employing valid stock momentum indicators can further enhance the performance of a pure Value Investing strategy.&nbsp;A thorough understanding of the &ldquo;Momentum Life Cycles&rdquo; framework requires a reasonable caliber in both the Business Model Analysis and Technical Analysis domain, beyond the Accounting-flavored Fundamental Analysis skills possessed by most savvy Value Investors.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 12:20:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div>Q:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What is Value Investing and why Warren Buffett has been following it for his life long stock investment?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>A:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Value Investing, a rational equity investment framework pioneered by Ben Graham in the 1930&rsquo;s and later on flourished primarily by Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch, is still the most respected and validated equity investment guidepost in the world, albeit few equity investors truly followed it.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>In a nutshell, Value Investing is based on the central theme to maximize the Expected Reward/Risk ratio of a stock investment decision.&nbsp;There have been ample evidences and research results demonstrating that over the longer term, stock prices tend to correlate closely with the EPS (Earning per Share) growth rates of a company.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>As only high quality companies with significant entry barriers (wide moats per Warren Buffett) are likely to sustain their earning powers, so Value Investors naturally look for high quality companies that are more assured of their sustained earning potentials.&nbsp;Also, if a high quality company is still in its early growth stage, then its earning growths will be phenomenal for the next 5-10 years.&nbsp;Peter Lynch has been famous for his great success in spotting early growth high quality companies before the mainstream market eventually caught on.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>By concentrating on high quality company stocks, figuring out their sustained earning powers and growth rates, then their fair market prices, or Intrinsic Values, as defined by Ben Graham, can be grossly determined.&nbsp;In order to further increase the desired Expected Reward/Risk ratio, a savvy Value Investor would only buy a high quality company stock at a significant discount (30-50% typical) from its Intrinsic Value, which is the essence of the &ldquo;Margin of Safety&rdquo; concept stipulated by Ben Graham.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>The bigger the Margin of Safety, the higher the Expected Reward/Risk Ratio, and this is the Holy Grail for Value Investing.&nbsp;However, the higher the Margin of Safety desired, the harder it is to find such opportunities afforded by the stock market.&nbsp;This is the reason why Buffett always reminds value investors to be patient to wait for the &ldquo;Fat Pitch&rdquo; to come like a baseball player.&nbsp;In general, great opportunities to invest in high quality Large/Mid-Cap companies only occur when the market is extremely pessimistic, thus Buffett&rsquo;s famous quote &ldquo;Be greedy when others are panic&rdquo; elegantly applies here.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Nevertheless, the market is always full of good opportunities for savvy value investors to spot tomorrow&rsquo;s Large/Mid-Cap companies today among those promising Small/Micro-Cap companies which have the strong potential to disrupt the industries or sectors they are in.&nbsp;Possessing a VC-like professional due diligence caliber is the key to success in this &ldquo;Buy growth, but don&rsquo;t pay for it&rdquo; (per Martin Whitman) hidden gems discovery scenario, as well demonstrated by Peter Lynch during his 17-year Magellan Fund tenure which recorded a phenomenal 29% annualized return rate.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>In recent years, academic researches have pointed out that the performance of Value Investing can be further enhanced by the &ldquo;Momentum Life Cycles&rdquo; framework developed by Professor Charles Lee of Stanford University and enhanced by Professor Ron Bird of University of Technology, Sydney.&nbsp;Also, recently retired Professor Robert Haugen of UC-Irvine had engaged in an extensive stock market regression analysis over a span of 35 years indicating that employing valid stock momentum indicators can further enhance the performance of a pure Value Investing strategy.&nbsp;A thorough understanding of the &ldquo;Momentum Life Cycles&rdquo; framework requires a reasonable caliber in both the Business Model Analysis and Technical Analysis domain, beyond the Accounting-flavored Fundamental Analysis skills possessed by most savvy Value Investors.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Cisco can learn from IBM?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/486211-user-486211/154055-what-cisco-can-learn-from-ibm?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">154055</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[1. Divest its Linksys and Scientific Atlanta division just like what IBM did with its PC and Hard Disk unit.<br><br>2. Acquire a strong leader in the critical WAN Performance Solutions arena.<br><br>3. Set up a corporate top architecture team to help lead Cisco to enhance its&nbsp;products to better meet the emerging Cloud Computing centric corporate IT needs.<br><br>4. Never deviate from its CORE again!&nbsp; Cisco is known for mission-critical corporate networking solutions, not for $20 simple net gears that you can shop online or at Fry's.<br><br>5.&nbsp;Cisco is probably 10 years behind IBM in business model refinement and transformation caliber.&nbsp; So it is&nbsp;critical to hire some senior executives with IBM-equivalent qualification for this big void in the senior executive team.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>I am long <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">CSCO</a>.<br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:25:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[1. Divest its Linksys and Scientific Atlanta division just like what IBM did with its PC and Hard Disk unit.<br><br>2. Acquire a strong leader in the critical WAN Performance Solutions arena.<br><br>3. Set up a corporate top architecture team to help lead Cisco to enhance its&nbsp;products to better meet the emerging Cloud Computing centric corporate IT needs.<br><br>4. Never deviate from its CORE again!&nbsp; Cisco is known for mission-critical corporate networking solutions, not for $20 simple net gears that you can shop online or at Fry's.<br><br>5.&nbsp;Cisco is probably 10 years behind IBM in business model refinement and transformation caliber.&nbsp; So it is&nbsp;critical to hire some senior executives with IBM-equivalent qualification for this big void in the senior executive team.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>I am long <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">CSCO</a>.<br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
