<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Trainer's Comments</title>
    <description>Trainer's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/495308/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Does Cell Therapy Hold The Key To Treating Stroke?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429761/comments?source=feed#comment-18768261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18768261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very informative and well researched article. My main takeaway is that stroke treatment is a hazardous minefield for pharmaceutical companies. Perhaps this is why Pfizer chose to partner with Athersys on less risky potentialities other than stroke. <br/>As an investment, I clearly like the upside potential and multiple avenues of possible use with Multistem. At about $2 a share I see an investment in Athersys as a rather astute roll of the dice.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:36:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very informative and well researched article. My main takeaway is that stroke treatment is a hazardous minefield for pharmaceutical companies. Perhaps this is why Pfizer chose to partner with Athersys on less risky potentialities other than stroke. <br/>As an investment, I clearly like the upside potential and multiple avenues of possible use with Multistem. At about $2 a share I see an investment in Athersys as a rather astute roll of the dice.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp Laps Up Growth On Mobile Traction And International Expansion</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408971/comments?source=feed#comment-18628501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18628501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Skeptical E- I imagine our disagreement is rooted in our different interaction with Yelp. You are a visitor. As a small business owner, I am a potential customer. As a NON PAYING visitor Yelp is viewed as &quot;cool&quot;. I enjoy it too when I visit. However, as a businessman, it would be extremely foolish of me to spend my ad $ on Yelp when I reap the benefit for free. I used to advertise in the Yellow Pages because the ads were a way to differentiate my business from others. Advertising influenced who to call. With Yelp, the FREE REVIEWS are the ads. Nobody cares about ads on Yelp. When you use Yelp, is it the ads or the reviews that guide your buying decisions? So it doesn't really matter if Yelp hits a billion visitors. They can't make money until there is value for potential paying customers like me. Their lack of profitability is a symptom. Their business model is the problem. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://tinyurl.com/camkxhe'>http://tinyurl.com/cam...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:02:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Skeptical E- I imagine our disagreement is rooted in our different interaction with Yelp. You are a visitor. As a small business owner, I am a potential customer. As a NON PAYING visitor Yelp is viewed as &quot;cool&quot;. I enjoy it too when I visit. However, as a businessman, it would be extremely foolish of me to spend my ad $ on Yelp when I reap the benefit for free. I used to advertise in the Yellow Pages because the ads were a way to differentiate my business from others. Advertising influenced who to call. With Yelp, the FREE REVIEWS are the ads. Nobody cares about ads on Yelp. When you use Yelp, is it the ads or the reviews that guide your buying decisions? So it doesn't really matter if Yelp hits a billion visitors. They can't make money until there is value for potential paying customers like me. Their lack of profitability is a symptom. Their business model is the problem. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://tinyurl.com/camkxhe'>http://tinyurl.com/cam...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Clean Energy (CLNE): Q1 beats on a per shares basis as total sales increase by 13% Y/Y. Gallons delivered totaled 49.9M gallons, up 14% from 43.7M gallons delivered in the same period a year ago. Net earnings swung to a loss however, as bottom line margins were hit by an accounting charge related to how it values its Series I warrants. Shares +2.2% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1010771?source=feed#comment-18596301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18596301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Appears Boone Pickens is not senile and his baby CLNE has turned the corner to a bright future. I expect market forces and the proactive push from states like PA., CA. and OK. will propel this company into a very profitable future. 14% increase in gallons delivered is very impressive and has convinced me to finally get on board with CLNE. Maybe Cramer was right about this one.....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:57:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Appears Boone Pickens is not senile and his baby CLNE has turned the corner to a bright future. I expect market forces and the proactive push from states like PA., CA. and OK. will propel this company into a very profitable future. 14% increase in gallons delivered is very impressive and has convinced me to finally get on board with CLNE. Maybe Cramer was right about this one.....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp Laps Up Growth On Mobile Traction And International Expansion</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408971/comments?source=feed#comment-18588391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18588391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Think a lot of people got head faked by a huge short squeeze caused by irrational exuberance that artificially ran up prices. I'd imagine the author may want to reconsider getting back to or below their target price of $16.<br/>This remains an unprofitable company that has yet to turn a profit in a decade. Reality bites. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:18:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Think a lot of people got head faked by a huge short squeeze caused by irrational exuberance that artificially ran up prices. I'd imagine the author may want to reconsider getting back to or below their target price of $16.<br/>This remains an unprofitable company that has yet to turn a profit in a decade. Reality bites. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can Yelp Live Up To Its 12X Sales Multiple?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406981/comments?source=feed#comment-18514601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18514601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@ Ives Research,<br/><br/>Kudos. Nailed it.<br/><br/>My only disagreement is with your statement, &quot;the stock is basically guaranteed at least a 5% drop.&quot; I dunno. I suspect with Yelp we are seeing irrational exuberance on steroids defying gravity. The fact that a company with all the negatives you point out could still sell at 12.3X price to sales gives me pause. I recall some very smart people believed in Bernie Madoff until the bitter end. <br/><br/>Yelp will be fun to watch from a spectator's viewpoint until the inevitable crash and burn. However, think I'll take a pass on timing Yelp's fall with a short position. <br/><br/>Thank you for your well researched and excellent article. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 19:42:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@ Ives Research,<br/><br/>Kudos. Nailed it.<br/><br/>My only disagreement is with your statement, &quot;the stock is basically guaranteed at least a 5% drop.&quot; I dunno. I suspect with Yelp we are seeing irrational exuberance on steroids defying gravity. The fact that a company with all the negatives you point out could still sell at 12.3X price to sales gives me pause. I recall some very smart people believed in Bernie Madoff until the bitter end. <br/><br/>Yelp will be fun to watch from a spectator's viewpoint until the inevitable crash and burn. However, think I'll take a pass on timing Yelp's fall with a short position. <br/><br/>Thank you for your well researched and excellent article. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Athersys Has Some Promise, But Controversy And Doubt Remain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1395611/comments?source=feed#comment-18383071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18383071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Think it's a bit of a stretch to imply that there is some unresolved controversy involving the scientific basis for Multistem. As we all know, any fool can make baseless accusations without supporting evidence. This was the case in one of the articles you cite as proof of some unresolved &quot;controversy&quot;. I'd call this more of a red herring rather than evidence of any valid dispute. This bit of trickery on your part brings your whole analysis into question from my viewpoint. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 20:09:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Think it's a bit of a stretch to imply that there is some unresolved controversy involving the scientific basis for Multistem. As we all know, any fool can make baseless accusations without supporting evidence. This was the case in one of the articles you cite as proof of some unresolved &quot;controversy&quot;. I'd call this more of a red herring rather than evidence of any valid dispute. This bit of trickery on your part brings your whole analysis into question from my viewpoint. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp: Future King Of Content</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379891/comments?source=feed#comment-18336501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18336501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yep, the stock price is rising. Have you ever heard of irrational exuberance aka, a bubble? Guess we'll agree to disagree on this one. Time will tell.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 19:13:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yep, the stock price is rising. Have you ever heard of irrational exuberance aka, a bubble? Guess we'll agree to disagree on this one. Time will tell.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp: Future King Of Content</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379891/comments?source=feed#comment-18332401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18332401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Stone Fox<br/><br/>&quot;Virtually breakeven&quot; after ten years of unprofitability and still unprofitable? Guess that's certainly a milestone losing less investor money. Kinda like saying the patient is still going to die but we slowed the bleeding. I agree with a lot of your articles but think you're beating a dead horse with this Yelp thingy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:56:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Stone Fox<br/><br/>&quot;Virtually breakeven&quot; after ten years of unprofitability and still unprofitable? Guess that's certainly a milestone losing less investor money. Kinda like saying the patient is still going to die but we slowed the bleeding. I agree with a lot of your articles but think you're beating a dead horse with this Yelp thingy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp's Mobile Monetization And International Growth Are Keys To Earnings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1384771/comments?source=feed#comment-18285631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18285631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm confused. Your article uses glowing terms like &quot;solid&quot; and &quot;grew&quot; repeatedly in harmony with this unprofitable enterprise Yelp. Yet, your final paragraph contains the ominous forecast that one should expect a 35% swoon in the stock price (YIKES!). Normally analysts support their conclusions in the preceding paragraphs. Am I alone in sensing the sadly predictable pump and dump? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:24:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm confused. Your article uses glowing terms like &quot;solid&quot; and &quot;grew&quot; repeatedly in harmony with this unprofitable enterprise Yelp. Yet, your final paragraph contains the ominous forecast that one should expect a 35% swoon in the stock price (YIKES!). Normally analysts support their conclusions in the preceding paragraphs. Am I alone in sensing the sadly predictable pump and dump? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp: Future King Of Content</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379891/comments?source=feed#comment-18207541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18207541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I will assume you don't dispute the flaws in their business model since you chose not to rebut those points. Regarding your assertion that their seemingly improved fortunes are not the result of smoke and mirrors, I would suggest you comment on a previous article in Seeking Alpha elaborating a different viewpoint entitled &quot; As Web Traffic Declines Yelp Spends $2 to earn $.90 cents.&quot; <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/kyi9'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:03:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I will assume you don't dispute the flaws in their business model since you chose not to rebut those points. Regarding your assertion that their seemingly improved fortunes are not the result of smoke and mirrors, I would suggest you comment on a previous article in Seeking Alpha elaborating a different viewpoint entitled &quot; As Web Traffic Declines Yelp Spends $2 to earn $.90 cents.&quot; <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/kyi9'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp: Future King Of Content</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379891/comments?source=feed#comment-18203601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18203601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Why did people advertise in the Yellow Pages?&quot; Because the consumer had no way to make comparisons other than ads. Yelp's business model is based on comparison shopping via reviews. Hence to compare Yelp to Yellow Pages is a flawed analogy.<br/><br/>&quot;Why do people advertise on TV?&quot; Because they wish to reach a segment audience with their message. Yelp's business model puts the message in the user reviews which are free. Regardless of ad dollars spent, the Yelp advertiser will reach the same market segment. Why buy the cow when the milk is free?<br/><br/>&quot;Explain why local ad growth surged 87%&quot; It surged because marketing expenses surged. If you continuously open new markets and throw more marketing $ at obtaining business you will see a transient top line increase as Yelp has. However, it is obviously an illusionary gauge of true value. Unless you're in government (-:), simply throwing money at a problem doesn't work. Yelp has a real problem turning a profit and I respectfully suggest they never will unless they find a solution to their unprofitable business model.<br/><br/>&quot;The one with the ad is likely to be noticed the most.&quot; Again you make the false Yellow Page analogy. People go to Yelp and make buying decisions based on reviews. Unless you choose to ignore their entire rationale for existence it becomes problematic to believe that people  go to a review site to make buying decisions based on ads.  <br/><br/>I agree that advertising is probably not your area of expertise and would not make sense to you. However, to properly analyse the future of an advertising venture it may behoove you to get up to speed on why advertising works or does not. Otherwise, your analysis may miss the forest while speculating on the trees.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:49:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Why did people advertise in the Yellow Pages?&quot; Because the consumer had no way to make comparisons other than ads. Yelp's business model is based on comparison shopping via reviews. Hence to compare Yelp to Yellow Pages is a flawed analogy.<br/><br/>&quot;Why do people advertise on TV?&quot; Because they wish to reach a segment audience with their message. Yelp's business model puts the message in the user reviews which are free. Regardless of ad dollars spent, the Yelp advertiser will reach the same market segment. Why buy the cow when the milk is free?<br/><br/>&quot;Explain why local ad growth surged 87%&quot; It surged because marketing expenses surged. If you continuously open new markets and throw more marketing $ at obtaining business you will see a transient top line increase as Yelp has. However, it is obviously an illusionary gauge of true value. Unless you're in government (-:), simply throwing money at a problem doesn't work. Yelp has a real problem turning a profit and I respectfully suggest they never will unless they find a solution to their unprofitable business model.<br/><br/>&quot;The one with the ad is likely to be noticed the most.&quot; Again you make the false Yellow Page analogy. People go to Yelp and make buying decisions based on reviews. Unless you choose to ignore their entire rationale for existence it becomes problematic to believe that people  go to a review site to make buying decisions based on ads.  <br/><br/>I agree that advertising is probably not your area of expertise and would not make sense to you. However, to properly analyse the future of an advertising venture it may behoove you to get up to speed on why advertising works or does not. Otherwise, your analysis may miss the forest while speculating on the trees.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp: Future King Of Content</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379891/comments?source=feed#comment-18200631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18200631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yelp is almost a decade old and has yet to become a profitable business.Their site is fun but their business model is fatally flawed. In brief, as a small business owner I have been solicited on numerous occasions by Yelp marketing. Perhaps you could answer what they cannot. Why would a prudent businessperson spend ad dollars on a service they already obtain free of charge? Keep in mind that consumer buying decisions are made based on the reviews not on paid advertisements. If I have good reviews they will call me. If I have bad reviews they will call someone else. Either result is totally independent of how much one gives Yelp for ads. See the problem? This is not a unique insight I have stated. Ask your local business if they advertise on Yelp. 80% will say no for the reason I have stated. Another 10% will say no because they are almost universally despised in the small business community. Proof? Google &quot;Yelp is a scam&quot; and read what their customers have to say. Investing in Yelp is like buying a ticket on the Titantic. It may look pretty and shiny but it's going to the bottom.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:21:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yelp is almost a decade old and has yet to become a profitable business.Their site is fun but their business model is fatally flawed. In brief, as a small business owner I have been solicited on numerous occasions by Yelp marketing. Perhaps you could answer what they cannot. Why would a prudent businessperson spend ad dollars on a service they already obtain free of charge? Keep in mind that consumer buying decisions are made based on the reviews not on paid advertisements. If I have good reviews they will call me. If I have bad reviews they will call someone else. Either result is totally independent of how much one gives Yelp for ads. See the problem? This is not a unique insight I have stated. Ask your local business if they advertise on Yelp. 80% will say no for the reason I have stated. Another 10% will say no because they are almost universally despised in the small business community. Proof? Google &quot;Yelp is a scam&quot; and read what their customers have to say. Investing in Yelp is like buying a ticket on the Titantic. It may look pretty and shiny but it's going to the bottom.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trading Athersys: Risks And Rewards</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1354281/comments?source=feed#comment-17943801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17943801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Anything is possible. Perhaps the moon landing was fake too. Who knows? However as an investor, it's probably better to base decisions on probabilities rather than possibilities.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:19:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Anything is possible. Perhaps the moon landing was fake too. Who knows? However as an investor, it's probably better to base decisions on probabilities rather than possibilities.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trading Athersys: Risks And Rewards</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1354281/comments?source=feed#comment-17845621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17845621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am unconvinced by the author's assertions. Apparently many other investors share my skepticism. Accordingly, if the author offers valid opinion, it would appear reasonable for him to respond with supporting evidence regarding his position. Specifically, (1) Proof of any fraudulent action(s) by the principals of Athersys and or (2) Hard data supporting the claim of a 95% certainty of trial failure.<br/><br/>I would respectfully suggest the author either rebut these questions via reply or concede through his silence that this article was nothing more than a crude attempt at market manipulation.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:15:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am unconvinced by the author's assertions. Apparently many other investors share my skepticism. Accordingly, if the author offers valid opinion, it would appear reasonable for him to respond with supporting evidence regarding his position. Specifically, (1) Proof of any fraudulent action(s) by the principals of Athersys and or (2) Hard data supporting the claim of a 95% certainty of trial failure.<br/><br/>I would respectfully suggest the author either rebut these questions via reply or concede through his silence that this article was nothing more than a crude attempt at market manipulation.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Are Hedge Funds Buying Recently?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1318381/comments?source=feed#comment-17567371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17567371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are right to be skeptical about Yelp. Should you trust a hedge fund manager or Yelp insiders who are actively dumping shares in million block lots.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:08:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are right to be skeptical about Yelp. Should you trust a hedge fund manager or Yelp insiders who are actively dumping shares in million block lots.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smartphones Will Drive Growth At Yelp</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1264241/comments?source=feed#comment-16225221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16225221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Would respectfully suggest you're comparing apples to oranges. I'm a small business owner and advertiser so my viewpoint is from ground level. I am also an officer in our local chamber of commerce and I get feedback from many other small business owners. If the business can ship a product nationally or internationally, then Google makes sense because you can target your ad to run anywhere.Yelp can't do that. If you have a business that strictly serves your local market then it is foolish to spend ad dollars on either one because you are already listed free. So yes, Google makes money on business that can serve a non-local market. Yelp doesn't have this capacity and doesn't make money. Big difference. There is also Yelp's very tarnished reputation in the small business community. Based on our local chamber of commerce, they are probably the most hated large company in existence. Lot of other problems with Yelp that could be the subject of a MUCH longer reply. But as most seasoned investors know, companies can fly high on promise before reality sets in. Yelp is flying high now but when you examine the business model and crunch the numbers you'll probably conclude the emperor has no clothes. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:50:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Would respectfully suggest you're comparing apples to oranges. I'm a small business owner and advertiser so my viewpoint is from ground level. I am also an officer in our local chamber of commerce and I get feedback from many other small business owners. If the business can ship a product nationally or internationally, then Google makes sense because you can target your ad to run anywhere.Yelp can't do that. If you have a business that strictly serves your local market then it is foolish to spend ad dollars on either one because you are already listed free. So yes, Google makes money on business that can serve a non-local market. Yelp doesn't have this capacity and doesn't make money. Big difference. There is also Yelp's very tarnished reputation in the small business community. Based on our local chamber of commerce, they are probably the most hated large company in existence. Lot of other problems with Yelp that could be the subject of a MUCH longer reply. But as most seasoned investors know, companies can fly high on promise before reality sets in. Yelp is flying high now but when you examine the business model and crunch the numbers you'll probably conclude the emperor has no clothes. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coming Soon: More Losses At Clean Energy Fuels</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1199801/comments?source=feed#comment-15609871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15609871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[rejrnjim: Thank you sir. Stone Fox has (IMHO) succumbed to the major malady of investment pundits; namely ego. He has been bashing this stock from his very first article and continues his unrelenting nit-picking of an admittedly speculative play in the emerging NG market.  He has made clear that CLINE is not his cup of tea. I respect that. But would respectfully suggest that this is a stock for big boys and not widows &amp; orphans as appears to be more congruent with his target audience. I am diligently attempting not to venture into the realm of personal attacks but the author's obvious bias and unwillingness to  even consider alternate viewpoints leads me to believe his entire argument is nothing more than an ego trip whereas he will rehash the same shopworn arguments regardless of changing realities. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:22:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[rejrnjim: Thank you sir. Stone Fox has (IMHO) succumbed to the major malady of investment pundits; namely ego. He has been bashing this stock from his very first article and continues his unrelenting nit-picking of an admittedly speculative play in the emerging NG market.  He has made clear that CLINE is not his cup of tea. I respect that. But would respectfully suggest that this is a stock for big boys and not widows &amp; orphans as appears to be more congruent with his target audience. I am diligently attempting not to venture into the realm of personal attacks but the author's obvious bias and unwillingness to  even consider alternate viewpoints leads me to believe his entire argument is nothing more than an ego trip whereas he will rehash the same shopworn arguments regardless of changing realities. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coming Soon: More Losses At Clean Energy Fuels</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1199801/comments?source=feed#comment-15609201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15609201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[10 hours without a break? Congratulations, I believe you're what's called a mother-trucker.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:57:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[10 hours without a break? Congratulations, I believe you're what's called a mother-trucker.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Yelp: Average monthly visitors totaled 86M, +31% Y/Y but only +2% Q/Q (was +7% Q/Q in Q3) - 28M were mobile Web users. Active local business accounts +12% Q/Q and +68% Y/Y to 39.8K. Cumulative reviews +9% Q/Q and +45% Y/Y to 36M. Mobile apps used on 9.2M unique devices/month, up from 8M in Q3 and 7.2M in Q2. Sales/marketing expenses +59% Y/Y, less than revenue growth but still 62% of revenue. R&amp;amp;D +97% and 15% of revenue. YELP -4.6% AH. CC underway (webcast). (PR) (slides)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/809531?source=feed#comment-14721051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14721051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sales/marketing expenses +59% Y/Y, less than revenue growth but still 62% of revenue.<br/><br/>Think that says it all.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:49:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sales/marketing expenses +59% Y/Y, less than revenue growth but still 62% of revenue.<br/><br/>Think that says it all.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp Earnings Will Highlight Revenue Growth And Expansion Plans</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1155551/comments?source=feed#comment-14692671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14692671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree Maria. Yelp is &quot;irrational exuberance&quot; to the nth degree. I'll keep my money (either short or long)  far away from this one.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:29:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree Maria. Yelp is &quot;irrational exuberance&quot; to the nth degree. I'll keep my money (either short or long)  far away from this one.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp Earnings Will Highlight Revenue Growth And Expansion Plans</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1155551/comments?source=feed#comment-14564521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14564521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Interesting read. Such a complimentary, fluffy piece on a dismal, dying company is a nice change of pace. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:02:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Interesting read. Such a complimentary, fluffy piece on a dismal, dying company is a nice change of pace. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stem Cell Therapy Companies: Underappreciated Outperformers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1139911/comments?source=feed#comment-14298021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14298021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[WCoastGuyCA brings up a good point. I believe stem cell companies are an opportunity with unlimited upside potential, however one must be careful as to whom you are dealing with. ATHX has close ties to Cleveland Clinic and has been looked at closely by Pfitzer before they got into bed with them. That tells me the science and the principals are sound. My big bet is on ATHX to run away from the field.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:25:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[WCoastGuyCA brings up a good point. I believe stem cell companies are an opportunity with unlimited upside potential, however one must be careful as to whom you are dealing with. ATHX has close ties to Cleveland Clinic and has been looked at closely by Pfitzer before they got into bed with them. That tells me the science and the principals are sound. My big bet is on ATHX to run away from the field.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Athersys (ATHX +6.4%) gets a boost today, possibly from an upbeat Seeking Alpha piece that touts its strong pipeline. ATHX is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company with a number of potential catalysts in its portfolio. Its most advanced programs are in the area of regenerative medicine using its stem cell therapy called MultiStem for the treatment of ischemic stroke. StemCells (STEM -2.3%) slips, possibly on the same article, which says it's in pre-clinical trials for the same indication, but its product isn't as advanced as that of ATHX.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/774011?source=feed#comment-14019901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14019901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Suspect ATHX is a gem that has everything in place except the savvy PR required to inform the street of its potential. Perhaps a favorable article after months of silence woke a few investors up. Good to see.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:23:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Suspect ATHX is a gem that has everything in place except the savvy PR required to inform the street of its potential. Perhaps a favorable article after months of silence woke a few investors up. Good to see.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How The Decision To List Health Code Ratings Could Hurt Yelp</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1119521/comments?source=feed#comment-13877751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13877751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[econmicsmaster makes an excellent point. I am simply stunned when investors somehow think &quot;users&quot; equals profitability with Yelp. Back to basics, it is the customers not the users or user experience that pays the bills and makes a profit. Until they find a way to monetize a review site (which no one else has been able to accomplish) then Yelp and their investors have a dismal future.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:24:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[econmicsmaster makes an excellent point. I am simply stunned when investors somehow think &quot;users&quot; equals profitability with Yelp. Back to basics, it is the customers not the users or user experience that pays the bills and makes a profit. Until they find a way to monetize a review site (which no one else has been able to accomplish) then Yelp and their investors have a dismal future.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook Puts Yelp On The Road To Irrelevancy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1117591/comments?source=feed#comment-13852001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13852001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Q. And how much money did Yelp make when you &quot;drilled down&quot; to read the reviews? <br/>A. $0<br/><br/>Q. And did you peruse their paid ads or rely on the reviews to make a buying decision?<br/>A. The reviews.<br/><br/>Case closed as to why Yelp has a terminally ill business model.<br/><br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:10:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Q. And how much money did Yelp make when you &quot;drilled down&quot; to read the reviews? <br/>A. $0<br/><br/>Q. And did you peruse their paid ads or rely on the reviews to make a buying decision?<br/>A. The reviews.<br/><br/>Case closed as to why Yelp has a terminally ill business model.<br/><br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook Puts Yelp On The Road To Irrelevancy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1117591/comments?source=feed#comment-13844641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13844641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[OK...this needs to be said. YELP MAKES NO MONEY OFF OF USERS. YELP ONLY MAKES MONEY WHEN SOME NAIVE SMALL BUSINESS OWNER ADVERTISES. In other words, no matter how cool Yelp is, how big the market is, how many followers it has, yadda, yadda, yadda, Yelp does not and will not make money because it is the most hated, reviled and despised scam that has ever cursed the small business community. I am a business owner with a 5 star rating on Yelp. Why would I pay for something I get for free? I have many, many friends in the business community that have been threatened and extorted by Yelp. Do you think they'll advertise with them? Wake up people. I'm giving you the view from the real world where Yelp has floundered for 8 years of negative earnings. Take off the rose colored glasses and look at their P&amp;L statement.. It's called due diligence. Yes, Stoppelman is no dummy. That's why he and other insiders are quietly dumping their shares. If you're smart, you'll be getting out too.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:42:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[OK...this needs to be said. YELP MAKES NO MONEY OFF OF USERS. YELP ONLY MAKES MONEY WHEN SOME NAIVE SMALL BUSINESS OWNER ADVERTISES. In other words, no matter how cool Yelp is, how big the market is, how many followers it has, yadda, yadda, yadda, Yelp does not and will not make money because it is the most hated, reviled and despised scam that has ever cursed the small business community. I am a business owner with a 5 star rating on Yelp. Why would I pay for something I get for free? I have many, many friends in the business community that have been threatened and extorted by Yelp. Do you think they'll advertise with them? Wake up people. I'm giving you the view from the real world where Yelp has floundered for 8 years of negative earnings. Take off the rose colored glasses and look at their P&amp;L statement.. It's called due diligence. Yes, Stoppelman is no dummy. That's why he and other insiders are quietly dumping their shares. If you're smart, you'll be getting out too.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook Puts Yelp On The Road To Irrelevancy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1117591/comments?source=feed#comment-13843491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13843491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;I wouldn't underestimate Jeremy Stoppelman&quot; Agree strongly. Anybody that walks away from the Yelp fiasco with millions in his pocket and doesn't go to jail is one helluva clever fella. However, my opinion of those who get fleeced by this scam tends to differ greatly. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:15:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;I wouldn't underestimate Jeremy Stoppelman&quot; Agree strongly. Anybody that walks away from the Yelp fiasco with millions in his pocket and doesn't go to jail is one helluva clever fella. However, my opinion of those who get fleeced by this scam tends to differ greatly. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook Puts Yelp On The Road To Irrelevancy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1117591/comments?source=feed#comment-13830901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13830901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I suspect the concern about FB is a lot of hype and horsesh*t. By the time FB decides what direction to go in, they'll probably already be irrelevant. A bunch of kids playing at being executives, IMHO.. However, your first bullet point about Yelp's profitability (or lack thereof) is all that really matters. After 8 years with virtually no competition, it has remained a consistent loser. Mobile has proved to also be a flop for Yelp. Bottom line is that only the founders who are dumping their shares and shorts will make any money off this POS. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:22:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I suspect the concern about FB is a lot of hype and horsesh*t. By the time FB decides what direction to go in, they'll probably already be irrelevant. A bunch of kids playing at being executives, IMHO.. However, your first bullet point about Yelp's profitability (or lack thereof) is all that really matters. After 8 years with virtually no competition, it has remained a consistent loser. Mobile has proved to also be a flop for Yelp. Bottom line is that only the founders who are dumping their shares and shorts will make any money off this POS. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp (YELP -3.3%) adds to the losses it saw yesterday following's Facebook's Graph Search launch thanks to a downgrade to Underperform from Northland's Darren Aftahi. Aftahi declares Graph Search, which has been lauded by some reviewers, to be "highly competitive to Yelp, as the platform provides a unique alternative to local business search." Of course, people have made similar remarks about Foursquare, Google/Zagat, and a few other would-be rivals.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/765111?source=feed#comment-13802701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13802701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't think this FB thing will have a big effect either. In fact, I think all the panic is misplaced. The problem with Yelp is still about core fundamentals.  Unprofitable today and selling for -- I kid you not -- a 989.5 P/E ratio on forward earnings estimates, Yelp shares are dramatically expensive. So expensive that the term &quot;overpriced&quot; just can't quite describe the disconnect between this stock's price, and its (minimal) value.<br/>My advice: There's no use shouting for help if you own this one. With more than two-thirds of Yelp shares sold short already, no one's coming to rescue you. The only thing to do now is sell, and try to save yourself.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:07:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't think this FB thing will have a big effect either. In fact, I think all the panic is misplaced. The problem with Yelp is still about core fundamentals.  Unprofitable today and selling for -- I kid you not -- a 989.5 P/E ratio on forward earnings estimates, Yelp shares are dramatically expensive. So expensive that the term &quot;overpriced&quot; just can't quite describe the disconnect between this stock's price, and its (minimal) value.<br/>My advice: There's no use shouting for help if you own this one. With more than two-thirds of Yelp shares sold short already, no one's coming to rescue you. The only thing to do now is sell, and try to save yourself.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelp - On Track To Potentially Become The MySpace Of Online Review</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1112491/comments?source=feed#comment-13745161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13745161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mainly FB is making moves to swat Yelp like a pesky fly. Add Yelp's other problems to the mix and investors are running for the exits. Insiders have already started bailing out and as usual, only the terminally optimistic will be left holding an empty bag of dreams.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:52:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mainly FB is making moves to swat Yelp like a pesky fly. Add Yelp's other problems to the mix and investors are running for the exits. Insiders have already started bailing out and as usual, only the terminally optimistic will be left holding an empty bag of dreams.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
