Will Google Throw In The Towel In The Endgame Against Vringo Due To Legal Precedents? [View article]
I have a question for any of you out there. If G is able to drag this out for a couple of years and finally has no options left and has to pay up, can V ask for interest on that money owed based on all there BS to drag it out?
How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
Marpha enjoyed your remarks. You seemed to have thought this out with a lot of research. I do have a question for you or anyone else. It seems,(and I stress seems) like everyone keeps stating that G has to just delay till the paten runs out. My thinking is that even if the time runs out then G still has to pay up if everything goes V way and all the mud in the water finally settles. Is this not true?
Well, I don't know about the 23 extra days. But to me, it sounds like JJ has had enough of G's playing games. Maybe he has given them enough rope to hang themselves. Or at least twist there necks a little (and I am sure he feels that he has given G ever benefit within the law). I agree alan, five days is pretty fast. But I would feel at this point that G can not come up with anything V has not thought of. And that includes the new work around. So, I would feel that the five days for them to reply will be enough time to lay out anything G can come up with.
Has anyone heard anything on why JJ did not make any kind of ruling on the 22nd? I saw where someone stated that V did not except the proposed time table that G had requested. But, still does not say why we can not get a word out of JJ on anything....
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
Has anyone heard anything from JJ or the two companies on what was suppose to happen on the 22nd. Someone stated that V was against the motion that G had made after there incredible timing of the announcement of the workaround. I can not find anything.
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
ala, I agree all the way, and have even stated it. Just not as well as you did. But, two points I would like to ask you. You mention that the work around, if implemented, would cancel the infringement. I take it that only from the day they implement till sometime in 2016. V would still be able to go after the past damages as well as the two or three quarters they have in the bank at this time. Also, why would the workaround decrease on the future royalties. I believe JJ has enough experience to keep that part out of his mind and rule on those damages alone.
I agree with you about Judge Scola and Big Bad Google. But, I am sure again that JJ has enough on the ball to know Googles past performance with other judges. And even if he is to rule with that out of his mind, he is only human. So, at some point (if Google is playing games) I feel that JJ will have had enough. And could come down on them as hard as the law will allow. I do not remember what the deal was, but I believe it had something to do with not giving V a copy of a motion or evidence(wish I could remember), but I am sure that is still in the back of his mind.
A little of me wonders if JJ is giving G enough rope to hang themselves. For some reason I believe it might have crossed his mind. After all, he has not given G a lot in most of his rulings on motions after the trial or during it. He has gone with the law as much as I understand it or have read.
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
alvarovc.......the 9 months to a year is starting from the Nov date which the jury found googel guilty. As I asked, I am not a lawyer but is it possible that it could take that long. Did not see V response, so hopefully we get some meat here pretty soon......john
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
Alvarov, check out Patent Play's comment on 22Apr 09:48 and go to the link and read the Proposed Schedule. If I am reading it correctly that is what is being stated. Not for sure, but the way I read it, that is the requested schedule. Not sure.....john
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
Well I am no lawyer, but it seems to me that every time we are suppose to get word out of JJ, something at the last minute happens. What is to stop G from making a claim that they have the work around, and at some later date (months from now) come out that the work around does not work. They have bought time. If I understand the link that the author provided, we could be waiting something like 9 months to a year go get JJ's ruling? I do not know why JJ can not let his decision be made. So what if they have a work around now, they did have one for the past two quarters, since the trial started. Could one of you lawyers explain in plain simple language what is going on at this time.....thanks
Google Values Vringo At $200 Billion [View article]
Good article, but one thing I believe you should have factored in is the fact that when G is doing all this testing and retesting on the work around, they would be infringing on V paten. So since the trial started, G has infringed on three quarters of royalties. Is that not true?
Google Claims To Have Defeated Vringo Search Patents [View article]
PP, what do you think V is stating here in the statement that they would send a proposed schedule? They could sent the court the schedule today or tomorrow. Could it be the fact that V would be willing for G time to present the court an amount of time for G to show the court what it has. And I am sure that the law team would want to talk to V prior to giving the court an answer.
Google Claims To Have Defeated Vringo Search Patents [View article]
Patent Plays, why would JJ want to keep putting this off and allow G more time to play games. He should be smart enough to see this kind of move and should know how to deal with it. That may mean, needs to show the court (JJ) that it is not just a play to stall for more time. But again, if this is what G is doing, I would see JJ being very upset in G using his court in this manner. I just do not see him giving G a blank check of time without providing something to the court.
We are fast approaching six months since V won this case in which the jury found them guilty. And it seems like this is the second or third time that just before JJ gives his ruling, it is delayed,
Google Claims To Have Defeated Vringo Search Patents [View article]
I just keep thinking that if this is a play by G (telling that they have a work around), then the law team has to take there word for it and is just working on what G has told them. But, it would seem to me that if they do not have a work around and it comes out now or later, JJ can not be happy about it. Using his court in that manner. Especially if JJ makes a decision in G favor on past and future damages. Then at a later date, V takes G back to court on the fact that they are still infringing on the same patens. Would not be a pretty picture for G.
Will Google Throw In The Towel In The Endgame Against Vringo Due To Legal Precedents? [View article]
Just Wondering.....john
How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
enjoyed your remarks. You seemed to have thought this out with a lot of research. I do have a question for you or anyone else. It seems,(and I stress seems) like everyone keeps stating that G has to just delay till the paten runs out. My thinking is that even if the time runs out then G still has to pay up if everything goes V way and all the mud in the water finally settles. Is this not true?
Just my thoughts......john
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
Vringo: Not Going Anywhere Fast [View article]
Just my thoughts.....john
Vringo: Not Going Anywhere Fast [View article]
Vringo: Not Going Anywhere Fast [View article]
Would like to know......john
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
Thanks in advance for the information......john
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
I agree with you about Judge Scola and Big Bad Google. But, I am sure again that JJ has enough on the ball to know Googles past performance with other judges. And even if he is to rule with that out of his mind, he is only human. So, at some point (if Google is playing games) I feel that JJ will have had enough. And could come down on them as hard as the law will allow. I do not remember what the deal was, but I believe it had something to do with not giving V a copy of a motion or evidence(wish I could remember), but I am sure that is still in the back of his mind.
A little of me wonders if JJ is giving G enough rope to hang themselves. For some reason I believe it might have crossed his mind. After all, he has not given G a lot in most of his rulings on motions after the trial or during it. He has gone with the law as much as I understand it or have read.
Hopefully, we will know soon.
Just my thoughts.....john
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
Vringo Vs. Google: Showdown Or Workaround [View article]
If I understand the link that the author provided, we could be waiting something like 9 months to a year go get JJ's ruling? I do not know why JJ can not let his decision be made. So what if they have a work around now, they did have one for the past two quarters, since the trial started. Could one of you lawyers explain in plain simple language what is going on at this time.....thanks
Google Values Vringo At $200 Billion [View article]
Just my thoughts.....john
Google Claims To Have Defeated Vringo Search Patents [View article]
Just my thoughts......john
Google Claims To Have Defeated Vringo Search Patents [View article]
We are fast approaching six months since V won this case in which the jury found them guilty. And it seems like this is the second or third time that just before JJ gives his ruling, it is delayed,
Just my thoughts........john
Google Claims To Have Defeated Vringo Search Patents [View article]
But, it would seem to me that if they do not have a work around and it comes out now or later, JJ can not be happy about it. Using his court in that manner. Especially if JJ makes a decision in G favor on past and future damages.
Then at a later date, V takes G back to court on the fact that they are still infringing on the same patens. Would not be a pretty picture for G.
Just wondering.....john