Seeking Alpha

mollysbuddy

mollysbuddy
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View mollysbuddy's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    sorry folks, forgot to check what I typed or hit spell check.....my fingers don't work real good this early in the morning and did not have my glasses on...lolololol...john
    Mar 24 08:13 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    amaa

    G may have added to or changed some of the parts to the original patent, but if they are still using the core of the patent in the search word then, as I understand it, they are infringing on the patent. To put is simple, if you invent a tool or what ever, and I come along and paint it a different color or made with a different material, I am still infringing on your patent. And that is what G did.

    I don't know if you followed the court case as it was going on, G's own witness (who was the expert) stated that G was using some sort of system on the ad words that was later called "dumb ads". When they started using the V patent they were getting a lot more hits on the search (which is money in G pocket) and it was called "smart ads". That is as I remember it. Just because you changed the color and add bells to something, does not mean that you are not using the core of a patent. And that is what G did when they came up with the fact that they stated to the court that they had a work around.

    As for V keeping silent, do you know when V informed G that they were infringing on the patent and to stop? They did inform them, and it has not been that long when you look at how long it took from the day V notified the court of the case and to this date. A lot of the time has been taken up by G's games they are playing......john
    Mar 24 08:10 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    amaa

    How is G going to get it back into the original court for its review. What are they going to hang there hat on? You should know, if you have followed this case all the little games they have been playing. The biggest one is that they have come up with a work around, which was a joke from the minute it was told to the court. I just wish I could have been a fly on the wall when G told the law team that they had one. I bet every lawyer rolled there eyes and hated to stand in front of JJ and tell him that bit of news.

    I guess you believe that G law team has not been working hard. You can bet your last dollar that they have been doing everything they can for this case not to get to this point. Not going to say that they were whipped by a better team of lawyers, but I believe they had a harder time trying to prove there point than the law team for V..........just my thoughts.....john
    Mar 23 10:47 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    amaa

    Like you, I do not understand the deal with M. But, again like you, I do not have all the facts. I truly believe that G never felt that this law suite would still be going on and that V (as I see it) would have the upper hand. But, maybe G is looking at it as since it has gone this far it might as well keep going. Who knows, maybe they will get lucky somewhere down the line......john
    Mar 23 02:01 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    vito, I have heard a lot of players talk about warrants and thank for the information, but I have a question for you. Why get the warrants at 1.30 that expire June of 2015 when you can get the calls for about half of that. I guess what I am asking is what is the difference between the warrant and the call? I bought the call for $.82 and if, as you say warrants will act, the call will go up dollar for dollar. Thanks in advance.....john
    Mar 23 09:46 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    amaa I can agree a little with what you are stating...as for giving V a good run for there money, I believe they are eating dust at this point. After all they have not been winning a lot of the decisions by the jury or by JJ. Just because M settled with V does not mean G will take it seriously. They have a bigger piece of the pie to protect in there eyes. And how do you know that G didn't try to settle and they would not ante up anything near what they will win. Don't think it will take years to get to the end. All they have to do is win the first appeal and the other will be easier. I believe that every time V wins an appeal (if they do) the ante will go up on the possibility that G settles (that is always on the table). Just my thoughts.....john
    Mar 23 09:38 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    thanks vito, for the information...I would think that the odds are in favor of the first one being favored. Not a lawyer, but I would think that not that many cases are sent back down to the lower court, unless it was for one or two decisions that were made. I don't see JJ making any mistakes on any major decision with all the time he spent before giving his answers. As for Google winning, will not happen. They know they lost the case and have tried everything in the books to delay. I am sure V will bring a lot of things up that G tried doing in the case such as the colored up work around, which should show the appeals court something.
    Again, thanks for the answer........john
    Mar 22 04:32 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    Justin, once the oral arguments are over on May 6th, what happens then. Not sure how this works on the appeals. As I understand the news today, they will argue the award of supplement of damages and post verdict. What then, do they make the decision based on the oral and written appeals, and once the decision is made that is it on that part of the appeals....thanks in advance.....if anyone else out there knows, please jump in...........thanks john
    Mar 21 07:10 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Reports Fourth-Quarter And Full-Year Results: Was The Sell-Off Warranted? [View article]
    Justin, nice reading...I don't really understand why so may fools out there started selling when V reported last week. I mean, what did they think V was going to report other than what they stated which was not bad at all to people who keep up with the stock. I watch it every day, but not for the reason of selling. Just keep looking for when the news hits the wire. I do have a question. Was JJ going to make a correction on one of his decision? For the life of me I can not remember what it was for.
    Has anyone seen when the trial date on ZTE is? The appeals from G should be coming in, in about a month or two. Or I am hoping they will. Guess I need to get me a calendar for everything that is coming up, believe I will need one with all the court dates that they will be having this year....
    Thanks again Justin....keep em coming...........john
    Mar 19 06:00 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo announces 2013 results; shares -4.9% AH [View news story]
    The way V is acting after hours tells me that there are a lot of nuts out there that owned this stock that was expecting V to show a profit. They did state that they had enough cash on hand to last thru 2015, got to remember that folks........Just my thoughts......john
    Mar 10 07:15 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo's Shareholder Update And What Investors Need To Know About Patent Reform And This Patent Hero [View article]
    Anyone know when the next court dealing V has with G?.....john
    Mar 4 02:59 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: ZTE request for injunction stay denied [View news story]
    Didn't I read somewhere that ZTE was found in contempt of court? Interesting, that they would take that stance. I am sure there lawyers have been going over the G trial very hard to try and come up with a better defense.
    I have seen where the courts like Germany, do not put up with a lot of what G did and will punish a company for wasting court time. I really don't think ZTE will keep that up for very long. But will be interesting to see just how they go about there turn in court with V. Just my thoughts....john
    Mar 2 10:05 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo's Shareholder Update And What Investors Need To Know About Patent Reform And This Patent Hero [View article]
    Justin, enjoyed your article and answered a few questions that I have been wondering about......looks like 2014 could be a very interesting years, looking forward to it.......john
    Feb 25 12:34 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: ZTE request for injunction stay denied [View news story]
    2014 will be a very interesting year...john
    Feb 25 12:30 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • David Slays Goliath: Vringo Awarded Billion-Dollar Victory Over Google [View article]
    Thanks Justin, enjoyed the reading....john
    Feb 2 04:50 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
274 Comments
151 Likes