Seeking Alpha

Elliott Wave Te...'s  Instablog

Elliott Wave Technology
Send Message
Joe Russo, is presently the publisher and chief market analyst for Elliott Wave Technology, and has been studying Elliott Wave Theory, and the Technical Analysis of Financial Markets since 1991.
My company:
Elliott Wave Technology
My blog:
FREE Special Report: Charts for the Millennium
View Elliott Wave Technology's Instablogs on:
  • EWT’s Nasdaq-100 Forecast
    Near-Term Nasdaq-100

    By Joe Russo, Elliott Wave Technology | January 13, 2011

     

    Introduction to Elliott Wave Technology’s periodical briefs

    As a service to the financial, investment, and trading communities, and in holding our longer range forecasts to task, on a rotational basis, we shall provide periodical briefs for each of the seven broad markets covered within our premium publications.

    The near-term chart and forecast shared herein shall provide a brief summary as to where it resides within four of Elliott’s nine fractal degrees of trend:

     

    ·         Minor Degree [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, a, b, c, etc.]

    ·         Minute Degree [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, a, b, c, etc.]

    ·         Minuette Degree [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, a, b, c, etc.] and

    ·         Sub-Minuette Degree [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, a, b, c, etc.]

     

    This brief contains a highly condensed rendition of the more thorough coverage dispatched via multi-chart video presentations supplied with our Near Term Outlook publication. 

    This brief shall impart unbiased technical assessments along with equally viable alternate prospects relative to this markets near-term directional outlook.  Without further ado, we present to you, recent price action observed in the…

    ...NASDAQ-100 Daily Bar Chart
    Assessment and Forecast | Near-Term:

    Bullish Perspectives
    :

    From its 1700 print low in July of 2010, the Nasdaq-100 has traced out a clear five-wave upward advance.  In observing that low as wave ‘b’ at the Minor degree, the subsequent five-waves of advance currently nearing completion is then viewed as taking place at the smaller Minuette degree.  Once the current Minuette 5th wave is complete, it will mark terminal to Elliott’s next fractal one dimension larger, which would cite the noted -1- wave at the Minute dimension of trend.  Since October of 2010, our proprietary indicator located in the lower panel of the chart continues to display a firmly bullish trending posture for the NDX.

    Bearish Perspectives
    :

    An equally viable bearish prospect is observed when calibrating the July 2010 low as that of a 4th wave terminal at Minor degree.  Doing so raises the odds that the current five-wave advance is nearing a fifth-wave-end rather than a first-wave-start to its Minute degree wave sequence.  This rather bearishly implies that the current advance will end a completed five-wave Minor degree structure from the bear market lows registered in 2008-2009. Bearish momentum divergences persist against the recent succession of fresh print highs posted in the Nasdaq-100.


    Until next time,

    Trade Better/Invest Smarter

    Joe Russo

    Publisher and Chief Technical Analyst

    Elliott Wave Technology

     

    Jan 13 6:00 PM | Link | Comment!
  • Elliott Wave, the Next Generation
    Of IV Down

    By Joe Russo, Elliott Wave Technology | December 20, 2010

    Forward 2011
    In this critical year-end forecast we shall pinpoint the following:
    • The precise degree of trend in which the Dow currently trades
    • The size and scope of the current wave at Supercycle degree
    • Where the Dow stands within its current primary bull market advance
    • Where the Dow and general share prices may be heading in 2011 and beyond
    • The precise path broad market indices may take during the course of IV down
    • Exactly how traders and investors should engage the markets going forward

    Before we proceed, we’ll wrap up our introduction by taking a step back in time for a quick visual review of the dead-on accuracy that our forecasts have produced over the past year.

    10 Months Ago:
    The three historical reference charts below are observed regularly in our Near Term Outlook publication.  Much earlier this year, way back on March 11 of 2010, we provided a rather detailed graphic forecast as to the projected price path for the Dow Jones Industrial average. 

    In early 2010, take note that we had illustrated a prospective top to an intermediate (a) wave terminal that was slated to occur in April above the 11,000 level.  From there we also projected a plausible price path (purple) which illustrated that following a peak in April, the Dow was then expected to experience a sharp correction toward the 9500 level into July of 2010. 

    Thereafter, our price path projections had also anticipated an equally sharp rebound recovery, which suggested that the Dow would then launch higher through December, registering a higher high beyond that which was imminently forecasted to occur in April.  

    More the exception than the rule, the medium range forecast we had presented back in March of 2010 was absolutely perfect.  We called for a high in April, then a low in July, followed by a forecast for higher highs in December; and the Dow has followed our price path and general amplitude projections to a tee. 

    The three charts that follow illustrate two dead-on outcomes as price and time unfolded.  If the Dow registers another key pivot high this December, we can then boast three dead-on outcomes.  Until then, the jury remains out on a December 2010 key pivot high.


    Charting and forecasting the market

    The first chart below is the original that was presented to clients on March 11, 2010.  Note that an alternate count is shown in light blue.  Could we have made it any clearer as to what our expectations were over the near and medium term?

     

    DEAD-ON Outcome #1:  Key pivot high registers in April
    Below, in the second of three historical reference charts, take note of the precision in which the Dow followed our standing price projections for a near term top in April.  Secondly, take note of the sharp decline occurring in May and June, which brought the Dow down toward the 9500 level in July, exactly as we had projected.


    DEAD-ON Outcome #2:
     
    Key pivot low registers in July / Higher, highs in DecemberBelow, in the last of our three historical reference charts, take note of the precision in which the Dow followed our standing price projections for a sharp recovery rally off the July low, validating our long standing forecast for higher highs into the year ending 2010.

    With our predominantly visual introduction out the way, we shall now proceed in laying out the case for:

     

    • The precise degree of trend in which the Dow currently trades
    • The size and scope of the current wave at Supercycle degree
    • Where the Dow stands within its current primary bull market advance
    • Where the Dow may be heading in 2011 and beyond
    • The precise path the Dow may take during the course of IV down
    • Exactly how traders and investors should engage the markets going forward

     

    Fibonacci Turn Periods | Elliott Wave Terminals | Trading Systems
    The tools employed for the following market forecasts have spawned from the works of Leonardo Fibonacci, and Ralph Nelson Elliott.  Developed by the author, associated trading systems built upon the underlying tenets of these tools eliminates the "what-if" emotionally biased guesswork from the near impossible task of knowing which forecast (if any) will ultimately prove correct.


    Leonardo Pisano Bigollo (c. 1170 – c. 1250)[1] also known as Leonardo of PisaLeonardo PisanoLeonardo BonacciLeonardo Fibonacci, or, most commonly, simply Fibonacci, was an Italian mathematician, considered by some "the most talented western mathematician of the Middle Ages."

    [2]

    Fibonacci is best known to the modern world for [3] the spreading of the Hindu-Arabic numeral system in Europe, primarily through the publication in the early 13th century of his Book of Calculation, the Liber Abaci; and for a number sequence named after him known as the Fibonacci numbers, which he did not discover but used as an example in the Liber Abaci.[4]


    Ralph Nelson Elliott (28 July 1871–15 January 1948) was an American accountant and author, whose study of stock market data led him to develop the Wave Principle, a form of technical analysis that identifies trends in the financial markets. He proposed that market prices unfold in specific patterns, which practitioners today call Elliott waves.[1]


    ______________________________________________________

    What exactly can we hope to accomplish using the tools provided by Leonardo and Ralph?
    ______________________________________________________


    Frame, Structure, Vision
    As clearly demonstrated with our trio of introductory charts above, if applied properly and with diligence, the effective use of Elliott Wave in concert with elements of the Fibonacci series can produce astoundingly accurate forecasts.  Simply put, the combined tools of Elliott and Fibonacci can provide a framework, structure, and vision like no other form of applied technical analysis.

     

    _______________________________________________________________

    What should we NOT expect from these brilliant and exquisite forecasting tools?
    _______________________________________________________________


    A precise roadmap set in stone | An effective way to trade and profit
    When it comes to forecasts like those presented in this article, one should never come to expect the type of precision archived nor rely upon such in the future to trade/invest their hard-earned speculative capital.  Despite the incredible power behind the tools employed, real time price action can and will change forecast dynamics as time and price unfold.  More importantly, due their varied and subjective dynamics, neither of these exceptional analytical tools can be relied upon as a standalone means by which to trade or time investments.

     

    So, when is this rally off the 2009 bear market low going to end?  How high will the Dow climb before another bear market takes hold?  What wave and degree of trend are we in?  If we are indeed in a secular bear market, how long might it last?  If we are still in the middle of a longer-term decline, will there be more bull markets within the larger construct of the secular bear market?  What will this Supercycle-IV wave look like?

     

    To answer the above questions in short:

    • The current rally may end in December of 2010.  Whether or not terminal to the current rally marks the end of the entire primary bull market is quite another story.
    • The Dow is in a IV wave down at Supercycle Dimension
    • Contingent upon its path, the Supercycle IV wave can last until 2020 or 2030
    • Yes, there will be many more bull and bear markets within the current Supercycle 

     

    Okay then, let's narrow our forecasts down to just three of the many nonlinear outcomes that may manifest over the next two decades.  First, we must start by identifying at least three potential prospects for citing the most plausible Elliott wave terminals associated with the current bull market advance from the 2008-2009 bear market lows.

    Secondly and by default, each of the imminent Elliott wave terminals proposed shall then contain subsequent waves relative to their respective degrees of trend. 

    Lastly, for general timing purposes, we'll correlate high probability Fibonacci turn-years from those which have proven to be exceptionally accurate over the past 90-years.

    To get a good visual comparison, we’ll first show you what each of our three forecasts looks like, and then we’ll go back and discuss each of them individually.  Here they are.

    Forecast One: where we are currently in (a) of B of A of IV down

      

     Forecast Two: where we are currently in B of A of IV down

     

    Forecast Three: where we are currently in A of B of IV down

     

     

     

    Now that you have comparative snapshots of all three forecasts, let’s quickly review each of them one by one.  But first, let’s briefly discuss what each of the charts share in common.

    Fibonacci Turn-Years
    Common to each of the charts are fixed Fibonacci turn-year markers.  We have labeled past, present, and future locations of turn years using light blue colored lines.  For example, at the lower left hand corner of the chart we see the cycle degree IV wave terminal basing in 1974.  We have labeled 1974 as the start of a plausible Fibonacci turn sequence.  The horizontal line drawn from 1974 to 2008 represents a thirty-four period (low-low) Fibonacci turn year projection.  If we do the very same thing from the 1987 low, it’s correlating 34-year turn period arrives in 2021.  Whether 2021 marks a low-low or low-high turn is not discernable, only the general timeframe for a turn pivot may be extrapolated from this type of sequencing. 

    Just think if back in 1974 someone had told you that in the year 2008 there will be a significant turning point in the stock market.  You would have thought they were mad.  But low and behold, just three months following the end of 2008, a major turning point for the stock market was indeed established.  Not bad for a general forecast made some 34-years in advance.

    We have identified other Fibonacci time relationships in the same fashion from various price terminals that we consider to be viable starting points from which to initiate a turn sequence.  We have used the 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, and 34 intervals in varying instances.  Another example would be the 5-year turn period from the 2002 low, which ran up the Dow to its 2007 all-time-high.  Each of the time studies is fixed across all three forecasts presented.  Okay, now let’s take a closer look at our first forecast.


    2010, Terminal Proposition 1:
    Forecast One: where we are currently in (a) of B of A of IV

    Be careful not to confuse this prospective wave count with the one presented earlier in our introduction.  In this study, we have still yet to complete the intermediate (a) wave up, which we may be in the process of doing right here, in December 2010.

    Most interesting in this plausible wave count is that following a corrective decline to (b) in 2011, the projected price path going forward points to a retest or possible fresh historic high into the 2012 Fibonacci turn period.  Such a high would mark terminal to wave (c) of Primary B, and complete the entire bull market advance off of the 2009 print low.

    We find this count particularly interesting because it sits in direct contrast to the widespread anticipation of ensuing catastrophe surrounding the arrival of the Mayan Calendar phenomenon slated to take place on December 21, 2012.

    On December 21, 2012 the Sun will eclipse the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.  It is also the winter Solstice, which places the Earth between the Moon and the Sun.  This alignment only happens once every 26 thousand years or so.  That is why the Mayans point it out as the end of a cycle.  It is a very large, galactic cycle - one that will begin again on December 22, 2012 and last another 26 thousand years.

    Will markets run up to this widely known event, manifesting a peak in stock prices in the same way that the markets ramped up into the Y2K event in 1999-2000?  Next, we’ll look at proposition 2.


    2010, Terminal Proposition 2    
    Forecast Two: where we are currently in B of A of IV

    This is the wave count presented in the introduction.  Here we show the 2010 July low as having based the intermediate (b) wave, and the current rally into December 2010 as wave (c) of primary B.  Of all three plausible counts, this is by far the most imminently bearish.

    We also find this count interesting from the perspective of the pending Mayan phenomenon.  Here, anticipated fears would be satisfied as the Dow retests or breaches beneath its 2009 bear market lows.  The catch here is that as soon as everyone realizes that the world is not coming to an end; the larger A wave at cycle degree will bottom, setting the Dow free to embark upon a massive three year bull market run into the 2015 turn period.  

    Note that 2012 marks 3-yrs from the 2009 low, 5-yrs from the 2007 high, and 13-yrs from the Y2K high in 1999.  Moreover, note that 2015 shall mark 8-yrs from the 2007 high, and 13-yrs from the 2002 low. 

    Given our long standing conviction that the 1932 crash low marked the II wave at Supercycle degree, we can then conclude that contingent upon where we place its terminal (1999 or 2007),  Supercycle III has lasted anywhere from 67-75 years.  This strongly suggests that a corresponding IV wave of Supercycle dimension should last for at least 1/3rd the amount of time of its preceding bullish advance. 

    As such, we can expect IV down to last at least 20-22 years.  If counted from a Supercycle III wave crest in 2007, wave IV down can base anytime between 2027 and 2029.  If the largest III wave is counted from the 1999 crest, Supercycle IV can base anytime between 2019 and 2021.   Next, we’ll look at our last plausible forecast.


    2010, Terminal Proposition 3:
          
    Forecast Three: where we are currently in A of B of IV

    In the last of our immediate and longer-term forecasts we have positioned the top of Supercycle III at the earlier 1999 crest.  Doing so repositions the all-time-high in 2007 as an expanded B wave at primary degree. 

    Note the severe oversold condition in the lower momentum panel taking place at the recent bear market lows in 2009.  Readings of such magnitude have not occurred since the last cycle degree low way back in 1974.  Correlating the depth of these two conditions suits labeling the recent 2009 low as completing all of the Cycle degree A wave. 

    When we view the current rally from this perspective, we must then consider that the Dow may be only part of the way through a larger bull market at Cycle degree.  Following an imminent primary degree B wave bear market decline into the 2012 period, another primary bull market will commence marking primary C of the larger Cycle wave B. 

    Once this plausible Cycle degree B completes sometime around 2015, the answering Cycle degree C wave decline shall commence.  Lasting at least five years through 2020-21, once complete, it would then present us with the earliest opportunity to envision an end to the larger Supercycle IV wave down.

    As it has always been, when it comes to forecasting financial markets, the future is wide open.  It’s been more than 80-years since we’ve seen a turn pivot of Supercycle dimension.  One big difference about forecasting and trading the markets today is that we have just recently witnessed a rare turn pivot at this dimension in either 1999 or 2007.    That’s a really big deal.

    So what is the recipe for success going forward?  It’s quite simply a combination of skill, luck, and persistence.  These in our view, are the essential ingredients needed to keep one step ahead of the markets.  That said, if you’re attitude is anything like ours, you’re probably thinking…

     

    …Okay Einstein, so how in the hell do you propose I position my funds for what you suggest might unfold in the future?  It's all well and good that each of these outcomes is viable, but how in God's name am I supposed to know which one (if any) of these propositions will come about?  Do you have some kind of system or something that tells you when to get out of dodge and when to get back in on the long side?  What if you're wrong?  I've been around the block a few times and remember back in 1995 you Elliott Wave people were saying that we were at the crest of some bear market tidal wave.  You were all dead wrong.  Instead of a bear market, the Dow more than quadrupled by 1999.  How are you going to deal with another profound forecasting disaster of such magnitude?

     

    To answer the above questions in short:

    • We suggest positioning ones speculative/investment funds in tandem with an automated rules based trading/investment methodology that has proven to be profitable over varied market cycles.
    • No one knows which forecast (if any) will come to fruition.  Thus the need for a disciplined strategic methodology that will find the right forecast, and/or correct itself much faster than you can.
    • Yes, we employ an automated rules based trading methodology that systematically positions us on the right side of the markets, and gets us out or short before things start getting ugly.
    • When our methodology is wrong, it will simply correct itself far in advance of doing any major damage to our account balances and equity curves.
    • We are not the same Elliott wave people who forecast the onset of a great bear market in 1995.  We are the next generation of Elliott wave.  Embracing the discipline of flexibility in forward vision along with applied strategic automation is what sets us apart from most others.  As the markets change, so do our forecasts and positions.   In our book, price action rules. As such, it is impossible for us to endure a forecasting blunder to the magnitude described.

     

    Using various tenets of Elliott wave, and Fibonacci sequencing, along with proprietary algorithms, the author has developed a near fool proof method by which to trade/invest safely and profitably throughout the course of the current and future market cycles.  

    These unique automated trading systems have been coded through TradeStation to capture the lion’s share of Elliott waves at three degrees of trend.  Additional shorter-term trading systems have also been designed, developed, and tested to successfully engage the markets at much smaller degrees of trend.

    Beginning sometime in 2011, the exemplary guidance provided by these robust trading systems may be bundled with a new suite of charting and forecasting services.  For those who are neither inclined nor interested in following the detailed charting and forecasting analytics, we will also be making these guidance services available as a standalone options.  Click here for a summary of 3, 5, and 10-year performance stats on each of these systems.

    We have yet to solidify all of the particulars surrounding our new suite of service options for 2011.  So, if you are interested in helping shape the nature and composition of these new ground breaking offerings, or if you are an existing subscriber and wish to have a say in how our new lineup is going take shape, it is VITAL that you get an invite to take our NEW SUITE OF SERVICES survey.  If you have not already received one, email us and we'll send one right over.


    Wishing each of you a safe, healthy, prosperous, and joyous Holiday Season

     

    Until next time,

    Trade Better/Invest Smarter

     Joe Russo

    Publisher and Chief Technical Analyst

    Elliott Wave Technologythe next generation



    Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
    Tags: DOW, SPY, Elliott Wave
    Dec 20 8:23 PM | Link | Comment!
  • It's the money, STUPID
    Part-II extra innings

    By Joe Russo, Elliott Wave Technology | October 30, 2010 

    From Part-I (game over)

    Back in May of this year, we constructed a dual paneled chart graphic to observe the effectiveness of such interventions relative to the volatility expressed in the price behavior of equity indices.  That chart consisted of a monthly volatility index in the top panel, and the relative trajectory of the Dow Jones industrial average in the charts lower panel. 

    We presented the chart and our opinions as to its potential implications in an article entitled The Fix in the VIX.  We began the article with the following: 

    "To measure the ongoing success or failure of massive QE "working groups" interventions, all one needs to keep an eye on is the VIX.  Readings below 20 suggest, "The FIX is in", whereas readings above 20 diminish the mission control effort to reflate monopoly-saving bubbles." 

    A little more than a year after our money-masters-of-the-universe shrewdly averted an outright global insolvency, many investors remain utterly baffled as to how stocks can sustain a raging bull market amidst massive outflows in concert with such dismal long-term structural imbalances. 

    Those in the nonprofessional category may find some clarity in our placing a concurrent price chart of the "flexible" $USD into the updated price panel mix.  This simple graphic should go a long way in helping to explain the otherwise perplexing bull market, or QE hyper-reflation conundrum. 

    Extra innings
    The chart below provides an update to our last, and includes an additional third panel illustrating the value of the US fiat currency unit, or "MONEY" as it were. 

    After trading in its normal range from April through August, the bulls won a key battle for Dow 10k, and the VIX submerged into QE-3 territory (readings beneath 20) amid the roaring rally of September 2010. 

    The VIX has remained beneath the 20 level ever since, closing out the week ending October 22 with a complacent, overly optimistic reading of 18.53.


    The graph in the upper panel, which looks like an array of jumping lines produced from a lie detector test or an earthquake reading, is the monthly VXO. In this rendition, its fluctuations record the month-to-month gauge of volatility (fear vs. complacency) resident in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

    Update
    The VXO's yet established closing read for the month was 18.53 at the time of this chart capture on 22-October. Per the close on 27-October, the VXO jumped to 20.17 following the continued rally attempt of the $USD off its 76.14 print low. This minor move up in the $USD spooked the equity markets, which appear to be growing more and more dependent on its continued weakness in order to remain in perpetual levitation mode.

    About the VXO/VIX
    In short, the historic norm for such fluctuations rest between the horizontal lines drawn at readings of 20 and 40. Bouts of excessive complacency and optimism typically correct themselves upon readings toward or marginally beneath the 20 level, and episodes of excessive fear and pessimism are generally subdued upon readings toward or marginally above the 40 level. Cyclical fluctuations between these two extremes are normal, and viewed as the natural ebb and flow of a healthy and balanced marketplace. 

    The Dow Jones Industrial average is in the middle panel and the US dollar illustrated in the lower panel of our chart. We have drawn four lines vertically through all three of the benchmarks to draw specific attention to how each reacts relative to the other within specific timeframes. A strong, stable, and rising money value in concert with strong, stable, and rising stock prices are the desired optimal conditions. 
    The quick ten-year Blow-by-Blow
    Around 1999-2000, we cite the 11500 Dow in concert with a relatively strong $USD at 105.00 as an optimal peak of accomplishment for equities and the end of a rather exceptional multi-generational run. 
    At present, the Dow is near to revisiting this 11500 benchmark however the $USD is now worth nearly 30% less than it was more than ten years ago in 1999. 
    The resultant Blowback
    Looking at the Dow's value through the prism of that which measures it, US money/dollars, its 2010 October 22 close of 11132 equates to a Dow at 7792 in 1999 money/dollars. 
    Insofar as the alchemist is concerned, perception deception is everything. The last thing they wish to expose is any semblance of truth or reality. 
    What does this mean to the US investor holding equity funds or ETF's?
    1.    It means that America's structural and competitive advantage reached its zenith at the turn of the century. 
    2.    Though it may give the appearance of short-term success, QE-1 and QE-2 as standalone interventionist strategies fail to remove any of the fundamental constraints that impose severe long-term structural threat to the competitiveness of the US economy. 
    3.    Only by the falling standards of the US money/dollar shall US based equities continue to rise in perceived value, which may provide some level of protection from further $USD devaluation in the future. 
    4.    Monitoring the VIX, Equity, US Money/Dollar relationships may assist ETF and index investors in staying on the right side of the equity markets over the intermediate and longer term. 
    In 2003, it became all About the Money, STUPID!
    Take note that amidst the artificial Greenspan bubble recovery, which began hitting its stride in 2003, the upper panel VIX exhibited an inordinately sustained (4-yrs) and excessive level of complacency readings well beneath the generally corrected 20 level. Moreover, the $USD in the lower panel continued losing value rapidly, and was down almost 34% from its peak in 2001. 
    Given that we measure the Dow in points, and the 30 corporations that comprise it are valued in money/dollars per share, the Dow was not making nearly the amount of bullish progress that it appeared to be making. Such is the cunning seduction and effectiveness of false incentive traps as intentionally deployed from an alchemist's powerful toolkit.  
    In the period from mid 2007 to date, we have drawn two parallel vertical lines between the Dollar and the Dow. Note that upon the threatening reemergence of strength and buying power in the dollar from its 70.70 print low in March of 2008, the Dow continued crashing hard into the abyss.  
    The current bull market in stocks did not commence until the $USD quickly reversed lower and resumed its degrading death spiral. This occurred in March of 2009, the time at which the dollar peaked just north of 90 and Dow bottomed around the 6500 level. 
    After plummeting for most of 2009, in the first quarter of 2010, the US money/dollar began showing some signs of life and future value. The mere prospect of a strong currency and stable measure of value brought the contrived 70% bull market run in the Dow to a screeching halt by late April.

    The inability of industrial and transnational corporations to operate profitably with a sound, stable, and strong sovereign currency is a HUGE part of the foreseeable problem. For the balance of June, the mere threat of a stable and secure currency expressed itself in a relatively modest but rapid 15% downward adjustment in equity values into early July of 2010. 
    August was another pivotal month as the Dow failed a recovery attempt and appeared headed back down to retest or breach beneath its July low, conceivably to more adequately correct the massive 70% bailout rally that took place behind it. As the Dow approached its July lows in late August, bulls and bears drew a showdown line in the sand at Dow 10K. 
    Much to the bears chagrin, the $USD money/dollar began another hard move down. In the first three days of September, the equity bulls took advantage of this and unleashed the big artillery in exacting a concise victory in that key battle for Dow 10K.
     

    Since then the US money/dollar continued to lose value rapidly, enabling the Dow along with a host of other equity indices to rise in persistent vertical advances without the slightest correction of commensurate merit.

    The Dow companies then resumed their QE reflationary advance from their August retest of the July lows as their sovereign fiat currency unit and valuation metric began once again plummeting rapidly in value. 
    Apart from the international currency translations that boost a transnational corporation's level of profitability and competitiveness, a very simple way to understand this MONEY phenomenon is to understand the flawed metrics inherent within the fiat money system. 

    Think of it in this way:
     
    The Magic Yardstick
    If the stock of a given company possesses a real intrinsic value but the metric or yardstick that measures that value (money/dollars) is unstable and can rapidly degrade, it then becomes necessary for the stock price to adjust upward in relation to its new measuring rods weaker standards, which in this case is the US money/dollar. 
    The reverse is true (stock prices will adjust downward) if a corporations sovereign money standards suddenly rise in relation to where the lower standards had previously valued them. 
    How does an element of fluctuating unstable value (money/dollars) price and effectively measure another element of fluctuating value (a corporation's intrinsic value and future prospects of profitability) accurately?  
    It does not, and that is the very basis from which monetary alchemists are able to concoct the wide variety of tools they use to control economies and by default, the masses.
     
    Think about this. 

    Would you trust a team of engineers to design/maintain a bridge, car, or airplane that you and your family will use regularly if an imposing inescapable influence intentionally or inadvertently coerced them to accept the assignment using flawed measuring devices that radically changed from week-to-week?
     
    I.e. this week, 1" = 1", then next week, last week's one inch parity standard changes and is now reset at 2 ½" = 1". Then the following week, the original one-inch parity standard is re-benchmarked at ¾" = 1" and so on. 
    You get the idea. The secure reliability and fundamental soundness of your bridge, car, or airplane is sure to eventually fail with such erratic engineering metrics, and bring with it the inevitability of fatal disaster. More or less, this is exactly how the global system of Fiat money is structured. 
    Yet astonishingly, civilization at large continues to accept these fluctuating, intentionally flexible, easily manipulated concoctions of global fiat money as the best we can come up with to foster efficient, fair, and balanced trade productivity within national and global economies.

    Come on - give us a break. More likely, this type of arcane monetary system was purposely engineered this way to conceal all of the underhanded alchemy necessary to maintain authoritarian power, trade advantages, and various forms of monopoly controls.  
    Time is running out for our wizards of Washington and Wall Street. It will not be long before civilization reaches a point of critical mass and collectively rejects such a willfully ignorant, destructive, and fraudulent system of monetary and economic governance. 
    We hope that the wizards of Washington and Wall Street take this message from the growing masses seriously. The same message extends to the rest of the G-20 nations. 
    No, it is not the economy, jobs, unemployment, terrorism, trade deficits, border control, racism, progressives vs. tea partiers', democrats vs. republicans, or Mosques at ground zero.

    It's the money, STUPID!
       
    Until next time,
    Trade Better/Invest Smarter 
     Joe Russo
    Publisher and Chief Technical Analyst
    Elliott Wave Technology

     



    Disclosure: None
    Oct 30 11:46 AM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

  • Physical Gold is a staple insurance product to which everyone should allocate 10% - 20% of their net worth.http://on.fb.me/zgqLwC
    Mar 18, 2012
  • Perhaps the Gold dip should also grab the attention those underinvested or late to the game that have been waiting for better entry points.
    Mar 18, 2012
  • The consolidation in the Gold price has gotten my attention of late. http://on.fb.me/zVxMPz
    Mar 18, 2012
More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.