Thoughts On Vringo's Response In Support Of Its Motion For Ongoing Royalties [View article]
In the recent Apple v Samsung case a special master was assigned by the court to review Samsung's proposed non-infringing workaround. He found that Samsung was still infringing.
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
The article by Markman Advisors explains basically nothing once again.
A special master might be assigned to the case to determine if Google's workaround still infringes or not.
In the recent Apple v Samsung case a similar situation took place. A special master was assigned by the court to review Samsung's proposed non-infringing workaround. He found that Samsung was still infringing.
Imo 5% chance Google will be successful and 2 months timeframe
GOOG has very likely changed something that is VERY minor and the system still infringes
There must be major changes for a single master to decide to 'overrule' a jury verdict
Moreover these might become frivolous claims by Google and it might end pay much more than due.
Thoughts On Vringo's Response In Support Of Its Motion For Ongoing Royalties [View article]
Thoughts On Vringo's Response In Support Of Its Motion For Ongoing Royalties [View article]
how long have you been trading? 5 weeks ?
shorts are all bk long term
Thoughts On Vringo's Response In Support Of Its Motion For Ongoing Royalties [View article]
Thoughts On Vringo's Response In Support Of Its Motion For Ongoing Royalties [View article]
Thoughts On Vringo's Response In Support Of Its Motion For Ongoing Royalties [View article]
Will Google Throw In The Towel In The Endgame Against Vringo Due To Legal Precedents? [View article]
appeal ruling is due in Jan 2014 (CAFC statistics)
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
not really
if Google settled for example for 700-900M it wouldn't risk
1.3B (7%) + 30M + past damages possible fix + laches reversal
+ frivolous claims penalties
that's the reason of a settlement, it's good for BOTH
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
USPTO decision on 2nd patent Jan 2014 + 2 months to file appeal + 36 months PTAB final decision = March 2017
Pendency of decided appeals from Notice of Appeal (average number of months) 36 months
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
Special masters help judges resolve complex cases, in this case a complex software code
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
you are the only confused here talking about something you don't know anything about
nothing is halted, it's a different path for the workaround
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
zero chance the proceedings will be halted
USPTO PTAB will give final ruling on both patents somewhere in 2017
just check PTAB statistics
zero chance VRNG will have problems with USPTO
shorts are desperate
Can Judge Jackson Still Ignore Google's Work-Around? [View article]
A special master might be assigned to the case to determine if Google's workaround still infringes or not.
In the recent Apple v Samsung case a similar situation took place. A special master was assigned by the court to review Samsung's proposed non-infringing workaround.
He found that Samsung was still infringing.
Imo 5% chance Google will be successful and 2 months timeframe
GOOG has very likely changed something that is VERY minor
and the system still infringes
There must be major changes for a single master to decide to 'overrule' a jury verdict
Moreover these might become frivolous claims by Google and it might end pay much more than due.
How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
Can Judge Jackson Impose An Injunction Against Google's Unconfirmed Workaround? [View article]