How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
A workaround confirmed and certified by who ? by Google ? the same guys who said they never infringed ? you must be joking
and again the USPTO farce? USPTO cannot save Google
Federal Circuit Uspto decision on both patents is due in 2016-2017 while CAFC ruling Q1 2014
NO chance of a Uspto final ruling preceding and thus saving Google from the final judicial CAFC ruling, not even if they invalidated all claims on both patents
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
From another site nick Hogmark
Anyone have a developer account with GOOG? I do. Go on the GOOG Adwords developer site (API Website Forum) Its the place that customers (GOOG's) intereacts with GOOG developers. Its the place that GOOG communicates that there are changes to their code that needs to be incorporated into the customers usage bond (CUB) so 3rd party code doesn't break when GOOG changes something. They do this all the time so API's stay the coarse. They tweak things all the time, most doesn't effect CUB's. There is NOTHING on there about Adwords changing. In fact, you can converse with one of their still wet 'techy's' which I did and he didn't know what I was talking about. I know there is no work-around that works. None. If you have a developer account, try it too. that's it.
How Long Until Vringo's Verdict Against Google Pays Off? [View article]
From another site nick Hogmark
Anyone have a developer account with GOOG? I do. Go on the GOOG Adwords developer site (API Website Forum) Its the place that customers (GOOG's) intereacts with GOOG developers. Its the place that GOOG communicates that there are changes to their code that needs to be incorporated into the customers usage bond (CUB) so 3rd party code doesn't break when GOOG changes something. They do this all the time so API's stay the coarse. They tweak things all the time, most doesn't effect CUB's. There is NOTHING on there about Adwords changing. In fact, you can converse with one of their still wet 'techy's' which I did and he didn't know what I was talking about. I know there is no work-around that works. None. If you have a developer account, try it too. that's it
Vringo Litigation: FAQs Re Latest Reexamination News [View instapost]
USPTO cannot save Google
USPTO Patent '420 review took 14 months (March 2012-May 2013) plus another 2-3 years of appeals to reach the final decision
14 months for patent '664 means Jan 2014 + appeal = 2016-2017
So Fed Circ USPTO decision 2016-2017 while CAFC ruling Q1 2014
NO chance of a USPTO final ruling preceding the final judicial CAFC ruling
This means that even if USPTO invalidated all claims on both patents after exhausting all appeals channels (which is extremely remote), Vringo would still risk nothing.
How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
+80 Billions from Nov 06 Verdict
yet it doesn't want to pay 1billion or even less to Vringo
How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
you can buy this certified workaround for $9.99 at almost any store
How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
it's all fake
I don't know how SA can post these articles
How Will Judge Jackson Handle Google's Confirmed Workaround? [View article]
the same guys who said they never infringed ?
you must be joking
and again the USPTO farce?
USPTO cannot save Google
Federal Circuit Uspto decision on both patents is due in 2016-2017 while CAFC ruling Q1 2014
NO chance of a Uspto final ruling preceding and thus saving Google from the final judicial CAFC ruling, not even if they invalidated all claims on both patents
Most ridicolous article ever
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
Anyone have a developer account with GOOG?
I do.
Go on the GOOG Adwords developer site (API Website Forum)
Its the place that customers (GOOG's) intereacts with GOOG developers.
Its the place that GOOG communicates that there are changes to their code that needs to be incorporated into the customers usage bond (CUB) so 3rd party code doesn't break when GOOG changes something. They do this all the time so API's stay the coarse.
They tweak things all the time, most doesn't effect CUB's.
There is NOTHING on there about Adwords changing. In fact, you can converse with one of their still wet 'techy's' which I did and he didn't know what I was talking about.
I know there is no work-around that works. None.
If you have a developer account, try it too.
that's it.
How Long Until Vringo's Verdict Against Google Pays Off? [View article]
Anyone have a developer account with GOOG?
I do.
Go on the GOOG Adwords developer site (API Website Forum)
Its the place that customers (GOOG's) intereacts with GOOG developers.
Its the place that GOOG communicates that there are changes to their code that needs to be incorporated into the customers usage bond (CUB) so 3rd party code doesn't break when GOOG changes something. They do this all the time so API's stay the coarse.
They tweak things all the time, most doesn't effect CUB's.
There is NOTHING on there about Adwords changing. In fact, you can converse with one of their still wet 'techy's' which I did and he didn't know what I was talking about.
I know there is no work-around that works. None.
If you have a developer account, try it too.
that's it
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
they didn't even inform their shareholders they have a new system working
How Long Until Vringo's Verdict Against Google Pays Off? [View article]
google phantom workaround is really ridicolous
they didn't even inform their shareholders they have a new system working
How Long Until Vringo's Verdict Against Google Pays Off? [View article]
How Long Until Vringo's Verdict Against Google Pays Off? [View article]
that rejection was NOT final
USPTO cannot save Google
Federal Circuit USPTO decision on both patents is due in 2016-2017 while CAFC ruling Q1 2014
NO chance of a USPTO final ruling preceding and thus saving Google from the final judicial CAFC ruling
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
Vringo Litigation: FAQs Re Latest Reexamination News [View instapost]
USPTO Patent '420 review took 14 months (March 2012-May 2013) plus another 2-3 years of appeals to reach the final decision
14 months for patent '664 means Jan 2014 + appeal = 2016-2017
So Fed Circ USPTO decision 2016-2017 while CAFC ruling Q1 2014
NO chance of a USPTO final ruling preceding the final judicial CAFC ruling
This means that even if USPTO invalidated all claims on both patents after exhausting all appeals channels (which is extremely remote), Vringo would still risk nothing.
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
VRNG could buy/start a very small search engine anytime
NPE problem is nonexistent
Google Cannot Penetrate Vringo's 7th Amendment Armor [View article]
290B right now
yet they don't want to pay 1 to Lang