Seeking Alpha

Kevin Porter

Kevin Porter
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View Kevin Porter's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    yes there could be a reversal (final judgement or appeal).
    Feb 18, 2013. 08:40 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    read all the case documents and you will find out
    Feb 18, 2013. 08:38 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    nothing to discuss

    you cannot even quantify a settlement
    Feb 17, 2013. 06:05 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    @ coolerheadsprevail

    I am not going to write in any subforum.
    I was not referring to iHub but to the freeforum.

    I think you should have much more respect for people,
    especially since I am the only one posting realtime trades here.
    All the rest is mainly blah blah blah to me.

    now you are writing that my settlement call is absurd but at the same time you cannot quantify any settlement.
    really ridicolous.
    Feb 17, 2013. 05:46 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    your posts were not neutral at all

    hope you will be more correct in the future
    Feb 17, 2013. 02:25 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    People (the market) don't even know that the 3.5% royalties was based on a 2004 hypothetical negotiation between Lycos and Google while future royalties will be based on a completely different situation for several reasons
    Feb 17, 2013. 01:42 PM | 6 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    first of all my call is 800-1000M settlement, not 1B

    I couldn't care less if you and 99% of the people disagree

    I am actually happy about it, just like for the shorts adding and adding (right now 15M) and eventually losing more than 100%
    Feb 17, 2013. 01:24 PM | 5 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    I agree Alan

    I think the market is reading a 30M verdict while having no idea what's actually going on

    The minimum Vringo will win is about 900M and it could be up to 1200-1250M.
    Then I am giving a 25-33% chance of Laches coming back (final judgement or appeal). That would pop the award to 1600M.

    I think a reasonable settlement sum is in the 800-1000M area.

    If Google keeps losing time without facing the issue in a serious manner they could end up losing more than that reasonable settlement sum (as said up to 1.6B)

    the 15M shorts will be bk
    Feb 17, 2013. 12:54 PM | 5 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    exactly

    perfectly said
    Feb 17, 2013. 12:39 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    coolerheadsprevail

    I would like to congratulate you for insulting me every other day in subforums while at the same time having great respect for postyle (aka Ravicher) and his 75M settlement call
    Feb 17, 2013. 12:37 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    I agree with edva

    This is some serious issue
    Feb 17, 2013. 10:27 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    what I posted is basically the whole doc
    Feb 16, 2013. 03:10 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    fantastic Vringo reply

    docket 897

    DECLARATION OF KENNETH W. BROTHERS IN SUPPORT OF I/P ENGINE INC.’S REPLY REGARDING ITS MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL ON THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF PAST DAMAGES

    Defendants submitted a declaration from Mr. Nelson, which they rely on in their opposition brief, in which Mr. Nelson states, “As soon as Defendants’ counsel located [Odetics], we immediately presented it (by hand) to both the Court and Plaintiff’s counsel.” (D.I. 865, ¶ 4.) This statement is false. I am now aware that, during the recess following I/P Engine’s initial closing statement, Defendants’ counsel (Mr. Noona and Mr. Bilsker) provided a copy of the Odetics case to the Court. Neither Mr. Noona, Mr Bilsker, nor any other counsel for Defendants, disclosed that fact to me or any other attorney for I/P Engine. During that recess, the Court considered the case, and decided to change its laches ruling. After the Court announced its decision, I noted that I had not received a copy of the case (Trial Tr. at 2018:3-6) nor was I aware that Defendants had provided it to the Court. The Court inquired about why I was not provided a copy, and Mr. Nelson responded, “I didn’t have a copy of the case. I had a citation.” (Trial Tr. at 2018:7-10.) At that point Mr. Nelson’s co-counsel, Mr. Bilsker, stood up and handed me a copy of the Odetics case.
    I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

    goog lawyers tried to game on laches and won, violating civil procedure
    Feb 16, 2013. 08:51 AM | 7 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    and if I am not wrong
    Vringo used only 3 patents out of more than 500 bought from Nokia
    vs ZTE

    many more suits to come
    Feb 15, 2013. 09:20 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo: Get Ready To Rumble [View article]
    @ coolerheadsprevail

    wise comment, appreciate your input
    Feb 15, 2013. 08:34 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
1,795 Comments
3,411 Likes