Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
  • The Judge Should Rule Favorably For Vringo On Motions  [View article]
    Dan and Modernist,

    I have appreciated your contrarian positions from a investor's aspect for the most part, yet it now seems that you are back pedalling and only repsonding to viscious attacks that warrant no response. Dan, I am sure you are a well respected scholar, yet you have been exposed where you should have exposed yourself. I will read your comments with great skeptical mind. Keep in mind, don't bash or undermine other authors. Please keep this a forum where investors can glean "good" information.
    Dec 18, 2012. 06:25 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Will Patent Office Eliminate Vringo's Right To Future Royalties From Google?  [View article]
    Very well put! I appreciate the well tuned adverse argument to evaluate my position.
    Dec 13, 2012. 02:59 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Vs. Google: Seeing The Forest For The Trees  [View article]
    This most assuredly does not assist now, yet this may set a precedent as to how juries calculate future damage assessments. It is a "show your work" mentality. As math is my love, I was one to always "prove" my work to complement the answer in which arrived. This mantra has been passed down to my sons only to be accompanied by certain contempt. The most astute mathematician will attempt to process figures in his/her mind only to be foiled by a calculator. Given the dollar amounts involved and the likelihood of them to increase in our litigious society, it should be tantamount that juries illustrate the machinations of their "infallible" math.
    Nov 13, 2012. 11:49 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Vringo Vs. Google: Take A Deep Breath, The Roller Coaster Continues  [View instapost]
    If future royalties are not at play, per a hypothetical Jackson decision, might VRNG seek an immediate injunction?
    Oct 31, 2012. 10:20 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment