<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>ChanelS's Comments</title>
    <description>ChanelS's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/5453761/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>How To Properly Think About Stock Prices In Today's Volatile Markets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1169701/comments?source=feed#comment-14782081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14782081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While I love how FAST graphs show valuation for traditional blue chips with stable earnings over long periods of time, i would question the logic behind using an earnings driven valuation model (FAST graphs) for boom/bust consumer technology stocks such as Apple. Earnings tend to be lagging indicators with these stocks, as a cheap stock will get cheaper as earnings fall. As we've seen with RIM, earnings can disappear very quickly when consumers decide your products are not cool anymore.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 12:30:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While I love how FAST graphs show valuation for traditional blue chips with stable earnings over long periods of time, i would question the logic behind using an earnings driven valuation model (FAST graphs) for boom/bust consumer technology stocks such as Apple. Earnings tend to be lagging indicators with these stocks, as a cheap stock will get cheaper as earnings fall. As we've seen with RIM, earnings can disappear very quickly when consumers decide your products are not cool anymore.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy The Unloved AeroSpace Sector On Its Pullback For Dividend Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1151921/comments?source=feed#comment-14515841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14515841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[helpful overall analysis :)<br/><br/>personally i prefer GD for the more diversified business mix. nice balance of cyclical and counter cyclical, from both govt spending, and economy PoV). i believe it helps smooth out their FCF. if i look at morningstar FCF since 2002, GD's is much steadier than other 2 for the past 10 years]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:39:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[helpful overall analysis :)<br/><br/>personally i prefer GD for the more diversified business mix. nice balance of cyclical and counter cyclical, from both govt spending, and economy PoV). i believe it helps smooth out their FCF. if i look at morningstar FCF since 2002, GD's is much steadier than other 2 for the past 10 years]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Beauty Of Holding These 3 Dividend Kings For Long Periods</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1135321/comments?source=feed#comment-14204881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14204881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[why are those without dividend returns so negative. that doesnt seem to make sense to me...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:05:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[why are those without dividend returns so negative. that doesnt seem to make sense to me...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend-Paying Stocks Are Not 'Bond Equivalents'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1132851/comments?source=feed#comment-14134581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14134581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[first thing that came to my mind when i read the title of the article was: yea, they arent bond equivalents, they're better!<br/><br/>risk isnt the odds of getting your capital back in the future. its the odds of getting present value equivalent or more of your capital back in the future]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:35:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[first thing that came to my mind when i read the title of the article was: yea, they arent bond equivalents, they're better!<br/><br/>risk isnt the odds of getting your capital back in the future. its the odds of getting present value equivalent or more of your capital back in the future]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Ways To Track Dividend Growth Of Individual Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1116951/comments?source=feed#comment-13826701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13826701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Canadian banks have typically in the past raised dividends every 2 quarters, resulting in twice a year raises of low/mid single digits vs previous quarterly per share dividend. it was pretty consistent until they were forced to freeze dividends in the financial crisis. since then most of them have resumed semi-annual hikes. <br/><br/>i use excel to keep track of investments goals, but similar to Dave, i use quicken to track actual performance/flows. <br/><br/>im not a strict seller on slowing dividend growth rates. it depends on the industry. some industries have very cyclical dividend growth patterns, while others are more consistent. KO can give you 7-10% consistently, but something like EMR will give you some years of 2-5%, and other years of 15%, depending on economic conditions. i only strict sell on dividend uncertainty or dividend cut.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:02:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Canadian banks have typically in the past raised dividends every 2 quarters, resulting in twice a year raises of low/mid single digits vs previous quarterly per share dividend. it was pretty consistent until they were forced to freeze dividends in the financial crisis. since then most of them have resumed semi-annual hikes. <br/><br/>i use excel to keep track of investments goals, but similar to Dave, i use quicken to track actual performance/flows. <br/><br/>im not a strict seller on slowing dividend growth rates. it depends on the industry. some industries have very cyclical dividend growth patterns, while others are more consistent. KO can give you 7-10% consistently, but something like EMR will give you some years of 2-5%, and other years of 15%, depending on economic conditions. i only strict sell on dividend uncertainty or dividend cut.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Team Alpha: Adding A Truly Great Company When The Stock Gets Hammered</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1116531/comments?source=feed#comment-13806711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13806711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[how did you arrive at 3.5% yield @ $67? I see the dividend at 48.5 cents per quarter, or 2.9% @ $67<br/><br/>agree that this is much ado about nothing :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:52:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[how did you arrive at 3.5% yield @ $67? I see the dividend at 48.5 cents per quarter, or 2.9% @ $67<br/><br/>agree that this is much ado about nothing :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Real Dividend Growth Machine: 2012 Review</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1111691/comments?source=feed#comment-13728181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13728181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[from a Canadian perspective, our 2 tax sheltered account types are TFSA and RRSP. TFSA is like Roth IRA. RRSP is the deferred tax type of account like 401K. <br/><br/>Canadians can withdraw from their RRSP at any time before 65. it simply is counted as income. there is no &quot;penalty&quot;, other than a default withholding amount, which you can partially get back at tax time if your actual payable taxes are lower.<br/><br/>so theoretically, even if we have most of our income producing assets inside an RRSP, we could still retire, and just withdraw amounts as needed, and have it taxed as income. keeping it in a taxable account is only more beneficial if the assets are canadian stocks. US stock dividends are taxed as income anyway. so for me, I keep funding my RRSP and just buy high quality US stocks in there :) ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:38:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[from a Canadian perspective, our 2 tax sheltered account types are TFSA and RRSP. TFSA is like Roth IRA. RRSP is the deferred tax type of account like 401K. <br/><br/>Canadians can withdraw from their RRSP at any time before 65. it simply is counted as income. there is no &quot;penalty&quot;, other than a default withholding amount, which you can partially get back at tax time if your actual payable taxes are lower.<br/><br/>so theoretically, even if we have most of our income producing assets inside an RRSP, we could still retire, and just withdraw amounts as needed, and have it taxed as income. keeping it in a taxable account is only more beneficial if the assets are canadian stocks. US stock dividends are taxed as income anyway. so for me, I keep funding my RRSP and just buy high quality US stocks in there :) ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kinder Morgan Inc.: Dividend Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102791/comments?source=feed#comment-13496481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13496481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[wow what a fantastic article! i learned a lot from this. thank you! :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:12:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[wow what a fantastic article! i learned a lot from this. thank you! :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividends: Still The Best All-Season Investment Strategy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1096551/comments?source=feed#comment-13394331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13394331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[im not a big fan of DIS's once a year dividend. if they change to quarterly i think i might be more interested. do like CMI very much though :) and my canadian darlings]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:47:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[im not a big fan of DIS's once a year dividend. if they change to quarterly i think i might be more interested. do like CMI very much though :) and my canadian darlings]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividends: Still The Best All-Season Investment Strategy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1096551/comments?source=feed#comment-13357311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13357311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[the first company that comes to mind when i read the critera (ex PE) was MCD from 10 yrs ago. big cap low yielding high dividend grower <br/><br/>i thought of a few more on my radar that fit the bill today: CMI and DIS, along with 2 canadian companies, THI and CNI]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:13:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[the first company that comes to mind when i read the critera (ex PE) was MCD from 10 yrs ago. big cap low yielding high dividend grower <br/><br/>i thought of a few more on my radar that fit the bill today: CMI and DIS, along with 2 canadian companies, THI and CNI]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Becton Dickinson Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1095331/comments?source=feed#comment-13351121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13351121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[generally true when time horizon is infinity, but in the short/medium term, a company can sustain above earnings growth dividend increases when payout ratio is low. MCD is a good example looking back 10 years where stock has gone up as well even tho their div has far outpaced EPS. INTC is another one where stock has languished a bit more. <br/><br/>in BDX case, its not like their earnings growth is going to 0. its slowing like any mature business does. they'll still be able to grow organically, thru pricing power, as well as  do bolt on acquisitions. between those 3, even if they grow earnings at 5-7% rate, it allows them to increase the dividend at 10% per year for many years. their payout rate is only 35-40%. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:46:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[generally true when time horizon is infinity, but in the short/medium term, a company can sustain above earnings growth dividend increases when payout ratio is low. MCD is a good example looking back 10 years where stock has gone up as well even tho their div has far outpaced EPS. INTC is another one where stock has languished a bit more. <br/><br/>in BDX case, its not like their earnings growth is going to 0. its slowing like any mature business does. they'll still be able to grow organically, thru pricing power, as well as  do bolt on acquisitions. between those 3, even if they grow earnings at 5-7% rate, it allows them to increase the dividend at 10% per year for many years. their payout rate is only 35-40%. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Becton Dickinson Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1095331/comments?source=feed#comment-13345291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13345291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[regardless of whether BDX is in line with its peers or not, I think paying 13x for a dividend yield of 2.5% that grows in the long term at ~10% (conservative estimates given doubling every 6 yrs since 70s is 12% per year) is a very attractive proposition. I initiated a position in the mid 70s, and hoping it pulls back a bit from here so i can add more :) i only got about 2/3 of my position established]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:32:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[regardless of whether BDX is in line with its peers or not, I think paying 13x for a dividend yield of 2.5% that grows in the long term at ~10% (conservative estimates given doubling every 6 yrs since 70s is 12% per year) is a very attractive proposition. I initiated a position in the mid 70s, and hoping it pulls back a bit from here so i can add more :) i only got about 2/3 of my position established]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banks In The Great White North: Bank Of Montreal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1093591/comments?source=feed#comment-13285261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13285261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[prefer TD and BNS due to a different geographical business mix and dividend growth profile, but BMO would be the definitive 3rd cdn bank if i had to pick one. slower div growth but bigger yield, good pick!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:25:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[prefer TD and BNS due to a different geographical business mix and dividend growth profile, but BMO would be the definitive 3rd cdn bank if i had to pick one. slower div growth but bigger yield, good pick!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Canadian National Railway: A Definitive Value Play</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1092281/comments?source=feed#comment-13271091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13271091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[one of the few companies in Canada worth holding for the long haul!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:49:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[one of the few companies in Canada worth holding for the long haul!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>House Republicans - including House Majority Leader Eric Cantor - are reportedly overwhelmingly opposed to the fiscal cliff deal approved by the Senate. The House appears poised to amend the deal and send it back to the Senate, setting up a legislative high-wire act.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/740481?source=feed#comment-13193651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13193651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[why does the fiscal cliff bill contains a hidden immediate pay raise for every govt worker?? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:52:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[why does the fiscal cliff bill contains a hidden immediate pay raise for every govt worker?? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend Investors Should Get Ready To Load Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1087151/comments?source=feed#comment-13115491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13115491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[always nice to have a shopping list ready to go for times like these ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:03:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[always nice to have a shopping list ready to go for times like these ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Blue-Chip Stock Failure Is Tolerable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1081321/comments?source=feed#comment-12985861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12985861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[no, DJIA is not a listing of 30 blue chips. you dont seem to understand the original concept of blue chip.<br/><br/>DJIA is a listing that is supposed to represent the breadth of the US economy. that by definition means it can not be entirely composed of blue chips. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:11:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[no, DJIA is not a listing of 30 blue chips. you dont seem to understand the original concept of blue chip.<br/><br/>DJIA is a listing that is supposed to represent the breadth of the US economy. that by definition means it can not be entirely composed of blue chips. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Blue-Chip Stock Failure Is Tolerable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1081321/comments?source=feed#comment-12985841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12985841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[im referring to the 21 companies in the original comment by the SA poster, not the stocks listed by the author (pretty sure he didnt even list 21 stocks)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:10:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[im referring to the 21 companies in the original comment by the SA poster, not the stocks listed by the author (pretty sure he didnt even list 21 stocks)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Blue-Chip Stock Failure Is Tolerable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1081321/comments?source=feed#comment-12967201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12967201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[out of the 21 companies named, not a single one is even a real blue chip company. the term blue chip and large cap is used to interchangeably these days. blue chip is supposed to refer to non-cyclical companies with well known brands, that have relatively stable earnings that do well in good and bad times. that basically rules out US banks &amp; financials (canadian banks could be considered, as the regulatory environment is totally different here), rails, airlines, commodities companies.<br/><br/>not many dividend growth investors would be too heavily invested in that list of 21 anyway. that poster is essentially cherry picking examples of failure from the past. not much different than a DGI who cherry picks success stories like MCD, KO, etc.<br/><br/>as you mentioned in your article, DGIs tend to get their income from diverse sources. its not a huge deal if some dont work out.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:03:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[out of the 21 companies named, not a single one is even a real blue chip company. the term blue chip and large cap is used to interchangeably these days. blue chip is supposed to refer to non-cyclical companies with well known brands, that have relatively stable earnings that do well in good and bad times. that basically rules out US banks &amp; financials (canadian banks could be considered, as the regulatory environment is totally different here), rails, airlines, commodities companies.<br/><br/>not many dividend growth investors would be too heavily invested in that list of 21 anyway. that poster is essentially cherry picking examples of failure from the past. not much different than a DGI who cherry picks success stories like MCD, KO, etc.<br/><br/>as you mentioned in your article, DGIs tend to get their income from diverse sources. its not a huge deal if some dont work out.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Build On Your Dividend Growth Portfolio's Core To Meet Current Retirement Goals</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1065931/comments?source=feed#comment-12686581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12686581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[great article on portfolio construction. i always felt this is an often under-appreciated aspect of investing :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:15:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[great article on portfolio construction. i always felt this is an often under-appreciated aspect of investing :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Bullish Signs In A Sea Of Negativity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1033761/comments?source=feed#comment-12398191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12398191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[simple. valuations in 2000 vs valuations now]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:50:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[simple. valuations in 2000 vs valuations now]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Bearish Signs In A Sea Of Negativity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1050871/comments?source=feed#comment-12398071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12398071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[move in CNR (CNI on NYSE) seems to indicate a rail turn though]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:47:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[move in CNR (CNI on NYSE) seems to indicate a rail turn though]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel's Dividend Safe, Even If It Seems Too Good To Be True</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1018781/comments?source=feed#comment-11827441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11827441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i visit computer parts stores now and then with my bf (he's into that stuff, im more of a shoes girl) and you'd be surprised what kind of people are buying from those stores nowadays. its the same crowd that used to buy systems from Dell, HP, Compaq, etc.<br/><br/>those stores like NCIX, Canada Computers, they can build desktops for a lot less than buying from Dell or HP. their laptop/tablet offerings from Asus, Acer, etc, are also cheaper.<br/><br/>dont get me wrong, i have iPad, iPhone but to do good old fashioned productive work, i still need a laptop or desktop. but between my bf and the parts stores, i doubt i will ever again buy either of those from HP or Dell]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:04:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i visit computer parts stores now and then with my bf (he's into that stuff, im more of a shoes girl) and you'd be surprised what kind of people are buying from those stores nowadays. its the same crowd that used to buy systems from Dell, HP, Compaq, etc.<br/><br/>those stores like NCIX, Canada Computers, they can build desktops for a lot less than buying from Dell or HP. their laptop/tablet offerings from Asus, Acer, etc, are also cheaper.<br/><br/>dont get me wrong, i have iPad, iPhone but to do good old fashioned productive work, i still need a laptop or desktop. but between my bf and the parts stores, i doubt i will ever again buy either of those from HP or Dell]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel's Dividend Safe, Even If It Seems Too Good To Be True</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1018781/comments?source=feed#comment-11806601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11806601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i believe INTC is one of the few companies not already fully involved in mobile that are set up well to become involved. they have competitive advantages that are not easily replicated, or eroded. it will help them break into and be competitive in any market they choose to enter<br/><br/>being able to buy this stock at a 4.6% dividend yield is crazy. even during 2009 the dividend yield at the bottom for the stock was about 4.7%]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:49:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i believe INTC is one of the few companies not already fully involved in mobile that are set up well to become involved. they have competitive advantages that are not easily replicated, or eroded. it will help them break into and be competitive in any market they choose to enter<br/><br/>being able to buy this stock at a 4.6% dividend yield is crazy. even during 2009 the dividend yield at the bottom for the stock was about 4.7%]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Potential Value Mirage In Western Union</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/992761/comments?source=feed#comment-11806281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11806281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i read the article and came away more bullish than i was before on WU, at least at $12]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:44:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i read the article and came away more bullish than i was before on WU, at least at $12]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel's Dividend Safe, Even If It Seems Too Good To Be True</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1018781/comments?source=feed#comment-11792891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11792891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[great article! picked some up for myself and my parents around $20 :) ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:27:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[great article! picked some up for myself and my parents around $20 :) ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In addition to its quarterly dividend announcement, Nike (NKE) announces a two-for-one split of both its Class A and Class B Common shares. The split will be in the form of a 100% stock dividend payable on December 24, to shareholders of record at the close of business December 10.  Upon completion, the outstanding shares of Nike Class A and Class B common stock will increase to approximately 178M and 720M, respectively. The company expects its common stock to begin trading at the split-adjusted price on December 26. Shares +1.3% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/669901?source=feed#comment-11667981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11667981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i actually know people who do not buy a certain stock because price is too high. makes no sense i know]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:28:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i actually know people who do not buy a certain stock because price is too high. makes no sense i know]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>McDonald's: Are The Golden Arches Tarnishing Or Should You Buy The Dip?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/992221/comments?source=feed#comment-11428151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11428151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[that makes no sense at all. even if EPS drops 30%, MCD dividend is more than adequately covered.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:01:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[that makes no sense at all. even if EPS drops 30%, MCD dividend is more than adequately covered.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Bank Of Canada: A Desirable Cornerstone Investment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/989681/comments?source=feed#comment-11400701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11400701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[i believe it should be 15%? At least as a Canadian, my US investments dividends have 15% withholding. <br/><br/>if you hold it inside 401k, the US equivalent of RRSP, the withholding is not taken, as it falls under a preferential tax treaty Canada has with the US. same for vice versa (canadians holding US stocks inside RRSP)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[i believe it should be 15%? At least as a Canadian, my US investments dividends have 15% withholding. <br/><br/>if you hold it inside 401k, the US equivalent of RRSP, the withholding is not taken, as it falls under a preferential tax treaty Canada has with the US. same for vice versa (canadians holding US stocks inside RRSP)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Bank Of Canada: A Desirable Cornerstone Investment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/989681/comments?source=feed#comment-11400491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11400491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Vancouver is more bubbly than Toronto. Vancouver might be a nice place to live if you have a lot of money already, but Toronto actually has the income to support the RE prices. the same job in Toronto will pay 15-20% less in Vancouver.<br/><br/>RY is the bank most exposed to canadian real estate slowdown. if someone thinks canadian RE will slow or crash, RY is something to stay away from.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:36:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Vancouver is more bubbly than Toronto. Vancouver might be a nice place to live if you have a lot of money already, but Toronto actually has the income to support the RE prices. the same job in Toronto will pay 15-20% less in Vancouver.<br/><br/>RY is the bank most exposed to canadian real estate slowdown. if someone thinks canadian RE will slow or crash, RY is something to stay away from.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
