<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Hammer1's Comments</title>
    <description>Hammer1's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/545969/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>James Altucher: Why The Stock Market Is A Sucker's Game Right Now (And What Stocks I Own)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1384441/comments?source=feed#comment-18282351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18282351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;The Mississippi Lime area will dwarf the Gulf.&quot; Huh? On the surface sounds like a very uninformed comment. Clarify and provide stats please.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:19:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;The Mississippi Lime area will dwarf the Gulf.&quot; Huh? On the surface sounds like a very uninformed comment. Clarify and provide stats please.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Very Bad Week For The Merchants Of Austerity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1380731/comments?source=feed#comment-18225611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18225611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[OK. So why doesn't someone just say it? Of course austerity impacts the economy. The point is, though, that after the economy corrects from the bloating effects of fiscal profligacy, it exits the other side much stronger with more available for private investment. There is also less burden on taxpayers from interest on the federal debt when we return to normal interest rates. Our citizens are capable of understanding this but where is the politician with the guts to discuss this long term view of returning to financial health? Canada did it, right?.... twenty years ago. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:35:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[OK. So why doesn't someone just say it? Of course austerity impacts the economy. The point is, though, that after the economy corrects from the bloating effects of fiscal profligacy, it exits the other side much stronger with more available for private investment. There is also less burden on taxpayers from interest on the federal debt when we return to normal interest rates. Our citizens are capable of understanding this but where is the politician with the guts to discuss this long term view of returning to financial health? Canada did it, right?.... twenty years ago. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Announces Monster Buyback And Boosts Yield To 3%</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1363951/comments?source=feed#comment-18009581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18009581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Buffett's app - Apple is not a Blue Chip? Are you serious?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:13:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Buffett's app - Apple is not a Blue Chip? Are you serious?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When The Fed Stops Buying These mREITs Could Be Flying</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1324291/comments?source=feed#comment-17402871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17402871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If the Fed slows QE and allows intermediate term rates to rise while holding short term rates low, the spread becomes more attractive. That is obvious. But, wouldn't that impact the valuation of existing securities and reduce the book value of securities held by the mortgage REITs? So, wouldn't there be some sort of transition period for the stocks....declining BV vs the prospect of higher spread income and dividends? Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:28:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If the Fed slows QE and allows intermediate term rates to rise while holding short term rates low, the spread becomes more attractive. That is obvious. But, wouldn't that impact the valuation of existing securities and reduce the book value of securities held by the mortgage REITs? So, wouldn't there be some sort of transition period for the stocks....declining BV vs the prospect of higher spread income and dividends? Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Interest Rate Risk And Duration Of A Bond</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1300071/comments?source=feed#comment-16820971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16820971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article and much needed. Being an old bond trader, I have tried to explain this to my friends but the concepts are difficult for the average investor. This will help. Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:49:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article and much needed. Being an old bond trader, I have tried to explain this to my friends but the concepts are difficult for the average investor. This will help. Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Specialty Mattress Companies - Revolutionizing The Mattress Industry</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1105671/comments?source=feed#comment-13591391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13591391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree on the Serta iComfort. Sealy has a relatively new entry in this segment also. We have been mattress shopping recently and didn't notice anyone paying attention to the TPX line. After we tested mattresses, we understood why. Retailers are pushing adjustable frames also. These can be used with all foam mattresses. It will be interesting to see how this impacts the market. Disclosure: it was a tough decision between brands and price levels but we bot an iComfort based on recommendation from one of our daughters....delivery next week.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:46:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree on the Serta iComfort. Sealy has a relatively new entry in this segment also. We have been mattress shopping recently and didn't notice anyone paying attention to the TPX line. After we tested mattresses, we understood why. Retailers are pushing adjustable frames also. These can be used with all foam mattresses. It will be interesting to see how this impacts the market. Disclosure: it was a tough decision between brands and price levels but we bot an iComfort based on recommendation from one of our daughters....delivery next week.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cap-Gain Expectations For 4 Passive, Active And Active/Leveraged MLP Portfolios</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1094011/comments?source=feed#comment-13307121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13307121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is a very helpful article, especially for those of us who would like to put this type of income stream in our IRAs. Have you done any work in the &quot;upstream&quot; MLP group? Some of those seem to offer the potential for higher growth in distributions as they develop their oil/gas properties. <br/>Companies like LINE are mentioned often on SA. Originally thought to be subject to large fluctuations in revenues, LINE and their brethren are hedging out commodity risk for up to 5 years and provide continuity of income similar to the midstream group. Not all are growing but a good manager could figure that out.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is a very helpful article, especially for those of us who would like to put this type of income stream in our IRAs. Have you done any work in the &quot;upstream&quot; MLP group? Some of those seem to offer the potential for higher growth in distributions as they develop their oil/gas properties. <br/>Companies like LINE are mentioned often on SA. Originally thought to be subject to large fluctuations in revenues, LINE and their brethren are hedging out commodity risk for up to 5 years and provide continuity of income similar to the midstream group. Not all are growing but a good manager could figure that out.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Can't Take Inflation Hawks Seriously</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1026431/comments?source=feed#comment-11946891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11946891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[L.T and 1234 - &quot; shorting the dollar, but the timing on that will be very tricky....still some hope (if &quot;hope&quot; is the right word) that the politicians can get things in order enough to &quot;merely&quot; further erode the buying power of the dollar over time rather than outright &quot;crashing&quot; it.&quot; - How does any serious observer of the current political/Fed situation not feel overwhelmingly cynical about prospects for a positive solution. As for the real estate play, the concept is historically valid, but I think, like you, that the liquidity of financial markets will trump a real estate scheme. My concern here is that history won't be a perfect guide. Financial flexibility will be paramount. We need to be prepared for another Black Swan. Don't know what it will be, but want to be positioned to take advantage of it. <br/><br/>&quot;The longer the procrastination prevails, the more difficult the unwinding becomes for everyone, as there are no exemptions for anyone in this mess.&quot; Well put, and an addendum to the dirty little secret.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:51:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[L.T and 1234 - &quot; shorting the dollar, but the timing on that will be very tricky....still some hope (if &quot;hope&quot; is the right word) that the politicians can get things in order enough to &quot;merely&quot; further erode the buying power of the dollar over time rather than outright &quot;crashing&quot; it.&quot; - How does any serious observer of the current political/Fed situation not feel overwhelmingly cynical about prospects for a positive solution. As for the real estate play, the concept is historically valid, but I think, like you, that the liquidity of financial markets will trump a real estate scheme. My concern here is that history won't be a perfect guide. Financial flexibility will be paramount. We need to be prepared for another Black Swan. Don't know what it will be, but want to be positioned to take advantage of it. <br/><br/>&quot;The longer the procrastination prevails, the more difficult the unwinding becomes for everyone, as there are no exemptions for anyone in this mess.&quot; Well put, and an addendum to the dirty little secret.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Can't Take Inflation Hawks Seriously</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1026431/comments?source=feed#comment-11935711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11935711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[L.T. Very nice job with the counterpoint comment. It should be titled &quot;Return from lala-land&quot;. <br/>As a bond veteran one the tumultuous 70's and 80's, the actions by our current crop of politicians and Federal Reserve in handling the budget and monetary policy have made me extraordinarily fearful. There is no logical end to this charade, in my experience, except inflation, no solution to the debt crisis I can see other than monetization. One day the bond vigilantes will decide the party is over and there will be little if any warning. Massively higher taxes and economic stagnation are on the way. It's just a question of how long the Fed can postpone our day of reckoning. <br/>The dirty little secret here is that we have to endure some economic austerity, tough times, to get our economic house in order. There is a void of political will/leadership to make this happen. So, we are trapped in a monetary death spiral. QE, and other countries like Japan racing us to the bottom, will postpone the serious consequences of  our fiscal largess and we probably have a couple of years to get ready. But, prepare we must.<br/>Your thoughts on the prep would be appreciated.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:05:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[L.T. Very nice job with the counterpoint comment. It should be titled &quot;Return from lala-land&quot;. <br/>As a bond veteran one the tumultuous 70's and 80's, the actions by our current crop of politicians and Federal Reserve in handling the budget and monetary policy have made me extraordinarily fearful. There is no logical end to this charade, in my experience, except inflation, no solution to the debt crisis I can see other than monetization. One day the bond vigilantes will decide the party is over and there will be little if any warning. Massively higher taxes and economic stagnation are on the way. It's just a question of how long the Fed can postpone our day of reckoning. <br/>The dirty little secret here is that we have to endure some economic austerity, tough times, to get our economic house in order. There is a void of political will/leadership to make this happen. So, we are trapped in a monetary death spiral. QE, and other countries like Japan racing us to the bottom, will postpone the serious consequences of  our fiscal largess and we probably have a couple of years to get ready. But, prepare we must.<br/>Your thoughts on the prep would be appreciated.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Retirement Strategy: Replacing Yield With More Yield</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/937291/comments?source=feed#comment-10744021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10744021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Helpful article, thanks. But, isn't there more to it than price to book and yield? It seems to me that it would be hard to analyze quality of a BDC's investments without knowing the regions and/or sectors of investment. For example, if a BDC was lending in the TX/southwest region, might that not be more attractive than some other parts of the country due to the resilience of businesses there? In your opinion, what's the best way to do this?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:09:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Helpful article, thanks. But, isn't there more to it than price to book and yield? It seems to me that it would be hard to analyze quality of a BDC's investments without knowing the regions and/or sectors of investment. For example, if a BDC was lending in the TX/southwest region, might that not be more attractive than some other parts of the country due to the resilience of businesses there? In your opinion, what's the best way to do this?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Safe Is Seadrill's Dividend?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/922521/comments?source=feed#comment-10515501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10515501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To amplify the point made by Lessner....most of SDRL's customers are major oil companies with investment horizons of 7-10 years. Short term swings in the oil price have no impact on their exploration budgets and, therefore, on SDRL's revenues. However, SDRL stock price is obviously impacted by the commodity price movement over the near term. For those interested in building a position, watch the cyclicality and be patient.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:29:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To amplify the point made by Lessner....most of SDRL's customers are major oil companies with investment horizons of 7-10 years. Short term swings in the oil price have no impact on their exploration budgets and, therefore, on SDRL's revenues. However, SDRL stock price is obviously impacted by the commodity price movement over the near term. For those interested in building a position, watch the cyclicality and be patient.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Budget Numbers Continue To Impress</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/922321/comments?source=feed#comment-10514191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10514191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/jr4l'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:43:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/jr4l'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Budget Numbers Continue To Impress</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/922321/comments?source=feed#comment-10514121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10514121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[For budget adjustment to work, there needs to be a reset period that could last several years. Canada went through this back in the 1990s. There was an article about this on Seeking Alpha this past Friday (author Nathan). I believe the American people would buy into this if properly explained. But no politician seems willing to ask for the short term sacrifices necessary. That's why printing money and inflating our way out of ours debt crisis will be the solution of choice. The boys at PIMCO will be right....eventually. Bill was just way early on his call concerning govt bonds.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:41:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[For budget adjustment to work, there needs to be a reset period that could last several years. Canada went through this back in the 1990s. There was an article about this on Seeking Alpha this past Friday (author Nathan). I believe the American people would buy into this if properly explained. But no politician seems willing to ask for the short term sacrifices necessary. That's why printing money and inflating our way out of ours debt crisis will be the solution of choice. The boys at PIMCO will be right....eventually. Bill was just way early on his call concerning govt bonds.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Budget Numbers Continue To Impress</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/922321/comments?source=feed#comment-10513871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10513871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent perspective but CP makes a point. The dirty little secret, that no politician wants to discuss, is that any move to balance the Federal budget, by tax increases or cuts in spending or both, will slow the economy. Just look at what's happening with austerity measures in Europe. That's why I don't see the political will for budget control and the end game will be to keep running the printing presses and $ devaluation. As long as other countries are pursuing similar strategies, it's a race to the bottom and the impact on prices is minimal. But the future looks ominous.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:27:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent perspective but CP makes a point. The dirty little secret, that no politician wants to discuss, is that any move to balance the Federal budget, by tax increases or cuts in spending or both, will slow the economy. Just look at what's happening with austerity measures in Europe. That's why I don't see the political will for budget control and the end game will be to keep running the printing presses and $ devaluation. As long as other countries are pursuing similar strategies, it's a race to the bottom and the impact on prices is minimal. But the future looks ominous.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9.9% BreitBurn Dividend Yield Is A 'Must Buy'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/855851/comments?source=feed#comment-9275041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9275041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;JustGiveMe...&quot; has a point. Todd, could you address his concerns please. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:51:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;JustGiveMe...&quot; has a point. Todd, could you address his concerns please. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If Oil Is Going Down Further, High Flier Rosetta Resources Will Go With It</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/669141/comments?source=feed#comment-6658381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6658381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nothing against ROSE. Agree the Alberta Bakken could be a game changer for them. But, realizations for gas liquids are down and if oil continues to slide, say below $70, the economics of all the liquids rich resource plays will go back under the microscope which means valuations will deflate. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:23:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nothing against ROSE. Agree the Alberta Bakken could be a game changer for them. But, realizations for gas liquids are down and if oil continues to slide, say below $70, the economics of all the liquids rich resource plays will go back under the microscope which means valuations will deflate. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If Oil Is Going Down Further, High Flier Rosetta Resources Will Go With It</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/669141/comments?source=feed#comment-6619721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6619721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[D.W. we need to remind people that, in the 2008-09 timeframe when energy tanked, stocks like ROSE at first dropped 50% from their highs. Then, when the markets paused and investors started to pile in, they went down another 40-50%. This is what I'm concerned about today. Perceived &quot;attractive&quot; energy stock prices could be a similar trap. I can justify some E&amp;P exposure due to concerns over a flare up in the Middle East. But I'm sticking to Gulf of Mexico producers who get Brent pricing. Disclosure: long EXXI and EPL]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:02:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[D.W. we need to remind people that, in the 2008-09 timeframe when energy tanked, stocks like ROSE at first dropped 50% from their highs. Then, when the markets paused and investors started to pile in, they went down another 40-50%. This is what I'm concerned about today. Perceived &quot;attractive&quot; energy stock prices could be a similar trap. I can justify some E&amp;P exposure due to concerns over a flare up in the Middle East. But I'm sticking to Gulf of Mexico producers who get Brent pricing. Disclosure: long EXXI and EPL]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SandRidge: Ward Probe Could Damage Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/652491/comments?source=feed#comment-6341261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6341261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bob,<br/>Agree with your comments on SD from short term perspective. But, realize that the SD asset base provides 2-3 bagger potential. Unless oil craters for extended period of time, I believe Ward will buy enough time with his balance sheet to get to cash flow positive (self funding). We will want a position in the stock well in advance of that time.<br/>What else do you like in the smid cap space. On recent pullback, I'm paying attention to CRZO and a couple of GOM producers- EPL and WTI. Among larger, I'm also a big fan of what's going on at EOG.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:10:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bob,<br/>Agree with your comments on SD from short term perspective. But, realize that the SD asset base provides 2-3 bagger potential. Unless oil craters for extended period of time, I believe Ward will buy enough time with his balance sheet to get to cash flow positive (self funding). We will want a position in the stock well in advance of that time.<br/>What else do you like in the smid cap space. On recent pullback, I'm paying attention to CRZO and a couple of GOM producers- EPL and WTI. Among larger, I'm also a big fan of what's going on at EOG.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Yielding, Undervalued $7 Stock Has New Large Insider Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/649451/comments?source=feed#comment-6311021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6311021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Interesting. It would be helpful to know what caused the slide in the stock and how it relates to its peer group in terms of valuation and business model. Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:54:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Interesting. It would be helpful to know what caused the slide in the stock and how it relates to its peer group in terms of valuation and business model. Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The EU's Systemic Risk: Why This Time Is Different</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/635081/comments?source=feed#comment-6128931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6128931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[G.S. <br/>It is surprising that there aren't more comments on your piece. This is a sincere, credible attempt to lay out the reality of the situation. Does no one want to face facts? <br/>Let me add that there is obviously no political will or courage to push an austerity agenda that would provide the belt tightening necessary to put us on the road to fiscal sanity. So, we careen toward our day of reckoning, postponed by a worldwide flight to the relative safety and liquidity of the Greenback. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:23:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[G.S. <br/>It is surprising that there aren't more comments on your piece. This is a sincere, credible attempt to lay out the reality of the situation. Does no one want to face facts? <br/>Let me add that there is obviously no political will or courage to push an austerity agenda that would provide the belt tightening necessary to put us on the road to fiscal sanity. So, we careen toward our day of reckoning, postponed by a worldwide flight to the relative safety and liquidity of the Greenback. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dreaded Bond Vigilantes Are Coming</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/634471/comments?source=feed#comment-6095231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6095231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[WMARKW - thanks for the excellent comment as add to CR article. You are looking at things from the economic perspective, however, and need to also factor in the politics of our situation. Right now, it's impossible to find the political will necessary to make the hard choices that will get our fiscal house in order. Doesn't that mean the only way out over time is to inflate the currency? Wouldn't that eventually mean higher interest rates? Coming at a time when our national debt will be 50% higher than today? At close to $50,000 pp, the average family of four now pays around $3,000 a year in taxes to service the interest on their share of the national debt. Five years from now, assuming no fiscal sanity, with rates at a more normal 4% and debt around $75k pp, that same family would be paying around $12k per year in interest alone. Wouldn't that bring out the vigilantes?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:09:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[WMARKW - thanks for the excellent comment as add to CR article. You are looking at things from the economic perspective, however, and need to also factor in the politics of our situation. Right now, it's impossible to find the political will necessary to make the hard choices that will get our fiscal house in order. Doesn't that mean the only way out over time is to inflate the currency? Wouldn't that eventually mean higher interest rates? Coming at a time when our national debt will be 50% higher than today? At close to $50,000 pp, the average family of four now pays around $3,000 a year in taxes to service the interest on their share of the national debt. Five years from now, assuming no fiscal sanity, with rates at a more normal 4% and debt around $75k pp, that same family would be paying around $12k per year in interest alone. Wouldn't that bring out the vigilantes?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dreaded Bond Vigilantes Are Coming</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/634471/comments?source=feed#comment-6092581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6092581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There are lots of comments being made to the effect that &quot;it's different this time&quot;. My forty plus years experience in both fixed income and equities reminds me that, yes it can be different until...all of a sudden....it isn't. I believe that's what is keeping veterans like Bill Gross up at night. The vigilantes? They will come but the reconing has been postponed due to investors seeking a temporary safe haven. Our economy? It reminds me of the old bumper sticker, popular when travelers were stuck on 2-lane highways, and on that truck ahead of them going up the hill... &quot;I may be slow but I'm ahead of you&quot;. The earnings yield on the S&amp;P vs the 10 yr Tsy are screaming BUY but stocks have tanked. There's a message here and IMO it says stay defensive and very liquid.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:03:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There are lots of comments being made to the effect that &quot;it's different this time&quot;. My forty plus years experience in both fixed income and equities reminds me that, yes it can be different until...all of a sudden....it isn't. I believe that's what is keeping veterans like Bill Gross up at night. The vigilantes? They will come but the reconing has been postponed due to investors seeking a temporary safe haven. Our economy? It reminds me of the old bumper sticker, popular when travelers were stuck on 2-lane highways, and on that truck ahead of them going up the hill... &quot;I may be slow but I'm ahead of you&quot;. The earnings yield on the S&amp;P vs the 10 yr Tsy are screaming BUY but stocks have tanked. There's a message here and IMO it says stay defensive and very liquid.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't Ignore EOG Resources' Potential</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/626741/comments?source=feed#comment-5979121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5979121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You can argue with the enthusiastic wording but not with the conclusion. EOG continues to demonstrate that it is simply one of the best managed domestic E&amp;P companies with large, high quality acreage positions in virtually every important play. They are transitioning from gas to liquids faster than investors realize yet retain the gas assets for the day natural gas returns to prominence. Because of their size, service companies favor them with best pricing and the balance sheet and cash flow provide all the flexibility they need. It's an easy nominee for core holding in the energy sector but it does trade with the commodity, so be careful with entry points. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:28:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You can argue with the enthusiastic wording but not with the conclusion. EOG continues to demonstrate that it is simply one of the best managed domestic E&amp;P companies with large, high quality acreage positions in virtually every important play. They are transitioning from gas to liquids faster than investors realize yet retain the gas assets for the day natural gas returns to prominence. Because of their size, service companies favor them with best pricing and the balance sheet and cash flow provide all the flexibility they need. It's an easy nominee for core holding in the energy sector but it does trade with the commodity, so be careful with entry points. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Surprising And Promising Trend In The U.S. Economy: Sharply Declining Oil Imports</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/617371/comments?source=feed#comment-5806731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5806731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Flash9---you make some good historical points, but we all need to keep in mind that the Royal Family needs roughly $80 oil to balance the budget. So, don't expect oil at $30 anytime soon. That doesn't mean it can't get back to the $60-70 range for a period of time, however. That's the big risk in energy stocks right now. Remember in '09, the average stock dropped about 50% from the peak in '08. A lot of investors started bottom fishing only to see prices fall another 50% (total 75% drop). Be on guard for further pressure on the oil price and another down leg - final washout - on these stocks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:35:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Flash9---you make some good historical points, but we all need to keep in mind that the Royal Family needs roughly $80 oil to balance the budget. So, don't expect oil at $30 anytime soon. That doesn't mean it can't get back to the $60-70 range for a period of time, however. That's the big risk in energy stocks right now. Remember in '09, the average stock dropped about 50% from the peak in '08. A lot of investors started bottom fishing only to see prices fall another 50% (total 75% drop). Be on guard for further pressure on the oil price and another down leg - final washout - on these stocks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Calm Before The Storm</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/610431/comments?source=feed#comment-5769901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5769901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To paraphrase a line from &quot;When Harry Met Sally&quot; , I want some of what truebrit is smoking. It seems to me that fritz 9346, hcstory3 and cutiger75 have it right. The big problem is that most politicians know the solution but don't want to ask their constituents to accept near term, severe austerity in order to insure longer term prosperity. Their slow fix amounts to the proverbial Chinese water torture and likely never achieves it's goal. <br/>In addition to accountability, we need leadership who can lead their countries in reform, not just kick the can. A family of 4 in the U.S. is now responsible for approximately $200,000 in national debt. Question: What happens when the cost of that debt goes from the current ~$4,000/yr to a more normal ~$8-10,000/yr? Entitlement programs? Defense spending? Taxes? Economic growth? Things get very ugly, fast. <br/>There is no political will to make the changes necessary. So, the logical solution is to print more money with the consequences that go with it. Dont know the timeframe. That's the tough part. But, we fail to prepare for this at our own peril. Where is the MSM?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:29:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To paraphrase a line from &quot;When Harry Met Sally&quot; , I want some of what truebrit is smoking. It seems to me that fritz 9346, hcstory3 and cutiger75 have it right. The big problem is that most politicians know the solution but don't want to ask their constituents to accept near term, severe austerity in order to insure longer term prosperity. Their slow fix amounts to the proverbial Chinese water torture and likely never achieves it's goal. <br/>In addition to accountability, we need leadership who can lead their countries in reform, not just kick the can. A family of 4 in the U.S. is now responsible for approximately $200,000 in national debt. Question: What happens when the cost of that debt goes from the current ~$4,000/yr to a more normal ~$8-10,000/yr? Entitlement programs? Defense spending? Taxes? Economic growth? Things get very ugly, fast. <br/>There is no political will to make the changes necessary. So, the logical solution is to print more money with the consequences that go with it. Dont know the timeframe. That's the tough part. But, we fail to prepare for this at our own peril. Where is the MSM?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/604511/comments?source=feed#comment-5686371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5686371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Where is Jon Corzine&quot; can be viewed as a symbol of the lack of accountability that has begun to erode our way of life. &quot;Fast and Furious&quot; and the political debacle over Fannie and Freddie are two other easy examples. I believe the average citizen wants scalps! The politician(s) that start to deliver accountability and return responsibility to public and corporate oactivities will become very popular. MSM could be vital in this process and regain a measure of prestige. Where are they?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:55:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Where is Jon Corzine&quot; can be viewed as a symbol of the lack of accountability that has begun to erode our way of life. &quot;Fast and Furious&quot; and the political debacle over Fannie and Freddie are two other easy examples. I believe the average citizen wants scalps! The politician(s) that start to deliver accountability and return responsibility to public and corporate oactivities will become very popular. MSM could be vital in this process and regain a measure of prestige. Where are they?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jim Grant Downgrades U.S. Credit Ratings?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/196899/comments?source=feed#comment-965288</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">965288</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The use of the &quot;alchemist&quot; analogy is brilliant. Now, if we could just trust him to do the right thing........]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:54:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The use of the &quot;alchemist&quot; analogy is brilliant. Now, if we could just trust him to do the right thing........]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8 Core Portfolio Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/196106/comments?source=feed#comment-959379</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">959379</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent list with one caveat. Why not add some energy exposure as a hedge against decline in value of our currency, M&amp;A activity and a potential conflagration in the Middle East? Domestic E&amp;P stocks are best choice to for this strategy due to lack of geo-political risk and political focus on energy independence. Unfortunately, most of our domestic companies are levered to natural gas not oil, and gas market dynamics might not produce the desired result. Still, bigger names like DVN are available ~15% off of recent highs. Mid-sized companies like CHK, HK and RRC are off even more. The oily names are even smaller like PXP, WLL, SFY and EXXI. Lack of dividend offset by the hedge factor. And, don't forget XOM purchase of XTO. We can expect more of this as the majors move to reestablish themselves in our gas market. (disclosure: long PXP and EXXI)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:59:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent list with one caveat. Why not add some energy exposure as a hedge against decline in value of our currency, M&amp;A activity and a potential conflagration in the Middle East? Domestic E&amp;P stocks are best choice to for this strategy due to lack of geo-political risk and political focus on energy independence. Unfortunately, most of our domestic companies are levered to natural gas not oil, and gas market dynamics might not produce the desired result. Still, bigger names like DVN are available ~15% off of recent highs. Mid-sized companies like CHK, HK and RRC are off even more. The oily names are even smaller like PXP, WLL, SFY and EXXI. Lack of dividend offset by the hedge factor. And, don't forget XOM purchase of XTO. We can expect more of this as the majors move to reestablish themselves in our gas market. (disclosure: long PXP and EXXI)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March Madness in Natural Gas</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/192782/comments?source=feed#comment-930926</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">930926</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[When discussing nat gas situation we need to be mindful of the folowing: increased drilling in shales (like Haynesville) is primarily being driven by need to hold expensive leases but also by the contango which allows the bigger players to plan their drilling and sell their new gas forward at more attractive prices; low oil service costs are also contributing to adequate rates of return at gas prices as low as $4.00. If gas prices stay at $4.00 or below, drilling activity is likely to decline as lease requirements are satisfied. DEMAND is the challenge. Hard to believe with spot gas selling at a 67% discount to oil on a Btu basis. For first time in past 30 years we have abundance and visable supply to satisfy current needs and substantial growth in use. Washington needs to wake up to this opportunity.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:15:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When discussing nat gas situation we need to be mindful of the folowing: increased drilling in shales (like Haynesville) is primarily being driven by need to hold expensive leases but also by the contango which allows the bigger players to plan their drilling and sell their new gas forward at more attractive prices; low oil service costs are also contributing to adequate rates of return at gas prices as low as $4.00. If gas prices stay at $4.00 or below, drilling activity is likely to decline as lease requirements are satisfied. DEMAND is the challenge. Hard to believe with spot gas selling at a 67% discount to oil on a Btu basis. For first time in past 30 years we have abundance and visable supply to satisfy current needs and substantial growth in use. Washington needs to wake up to this opportunity.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Government Is Risking a Double Dip</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/192425/comments?source=feed#comment-928606</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">928606</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Informative article. But everytime we have this discussion, we must also acknowledge the current historically low interest rate environment. If rates were at more normalized levels, our Federal and household debts would be much more onerous. This is the deficit trap for future generations.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:25:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Informative article. But everytime we have this discussion, we must also acknowledge the current historically low interest rate environment. If rates were at more normalized levels, our Federal and household debts would be much more onerous. This is the deficit trap for future generations.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
