<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Danaplus's Comments</title>
    <description>Danaplus's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/5471931/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>"Investors are worried about iPhone demand, iPad mix, Mac sales and most importantly margins," says BTIG's Walter Piecyk, discussing concerns going into Apple's (AAPL +1.4%) FQ1 report today. Piecyk took a lot of heat for downgrading Apple to Neutral last April, but shares are down 20% since then. He thinks an "old-school" revenue beat is needed to calm investors, but with shares now below 8x FY13 EPS exc. cash and earnings expected to show the first Y/Y drop since '03, expectations have come down. Revenue is expected to grow 18% Y/Y to $54.7B.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/776191?source=feed#comment-14049951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14049951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have for the last couple of months been reading a continuous flow of articles and statements - all trying to justify why Apple is down by almost 30% since it peaked. One seem to be more clever than the other explaining by various methods, thinking and analysis why this dramatic drop is justified.<br/>As a private investor and dedicated user of all Apple products I try to lean back and take a more pragmatic look at this. Here we have a company which is first class, making the very best products within its category, without discussion a company having a design and production philosophy influenced and educated deep down by its former CEO - Steve Jobs. <br/>I am convinced that we would not have seen this decline had he been in his chair today. I do not think we would have seen all the articles about the company no longer being an evolution company. So the real question is - do we believe the company will continue having the same smart people as before - and can they continue creating great products without Steve. I think they can.<br/>So I stay long in Apple - and I bet that we soon will start reading a bunch of articles now explaining to the same detail why Apple is undervalued and why it will continue to grow in value.<br/>So good luck to all of you who have stopped reading all these articles and still believe the company is outstanding by any means.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:02:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have for the last couple of months been reading a continuous flow of articles and statements - all trying to justify why Apple is down by almost 30% since it peaked. One seem to be more clever than the other explaining by various methods, thinking and analysis why this dramatic drop is justified.<br/>As a private investor and dedicated user of all Apple products I try to lean back and take a more pragmatic look at this. Here we have a company which is first class, making the very best products within its category, without discussion a company having a design and production philosophy influenced and educated deep down by its former CEO - Steve Jobs. <br/>I am convinced that we would not have seen this decline had he been in his chair today. I do not think we would have seen all the articles about the company no longer being an evolution company. So the real question is - do we believe the company will continue having the same smart people as before - and can they continue creating great products without Steve. I think they can.<br/>So I stay long in Apple - and I bet that we soon will start reading a bunch of articles now explaining to the same detail why Apple is undervalued and why it will continue to grow in value.<br/>So good luck to all of you who have stopped reading all these articles and still believe the company is outstanding by any means.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
