<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Adam Ritt's Instablog</title>
    <description>Director of Communications at BetterInvesting (www.betterinvesting.org), a nonprofit dedicated to investment education. Our focus is on long-term investing in growth stocks using fundamental analysis. Companies are mentioned for educational purposes only. No investment recommendations are intended.</description>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Ritt</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>Texas Instruments: Chipping Away at Old Image?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/566255-adam-ritt/80498-texas-instruments-chipping-away-at-old-image?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">80498</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The most recent meeting of <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting Magazine</a>'s Editorial Advisory and Securities Review Committee meeting centered on revisiting a company that I doubt you've thought about much over the past few years:&nbsp;Texas Instruments. My memories of TI go back to the 1970s and a row of calculators chained to a table at my dad's office, and my impressions haven't changed much since then. Indeed, one can infer by looking at the company's sales growth over the last several years that this is a mature company with unexciting investment potential. But the committee found much to be intrigued about regarding the company's prospects over the next several years. The company has managed to reinvent itself, committee members said, and when this happens, it's an opportunity to revisit the stock. Today TI&nbsp;holds strong positions in several markets, such as analog and embedded processing, Value Line reports, and long-term sales growth is expected to exceed 10 percent annually. Analysts are looking at 10 percent long-term EPS growth--not spectacular, but OK&nbsp;for a company of this size. Coupled with a decent dividend yield, TXN&nbsp;could be an attractive investment over the next five years, committee members said.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:12:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The most recent meeting of <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting Magazine</a>'s Editorial Advisory and Securities Review Committee meeting centered on revisiting a company that I doubt you've thought about much over the past few years:&nbsp;Texas Instruments. My memories of TI go back to the 1970s and a row of calculators chained to a table at my dad's office, and my impressions haven't changed much since then. Indeed, one can infer by looking at the company's sales growth over the last several years that this is a mature company with unexciting investment potential. But the committee found much to be intrigued about regarding the company's prospects over the next several years. The company has managed to reinvent itself, committee members said, and when this happens, it's an opportunity to revisit the stock. Today TI&nbsp;holds strong positions in several markets, such as analog and embedded processing, Value Line reports, and long-term sales growth is expected to exceed 10 percent annually. Analysts are looking at 10 percent long-term EPS growth--not spectacular, but OK&nbsp;for a company of this size. Coupled with a decent dividend yield, TXN&nbsp;could be an attractive investment over the next five years, committee members said.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/txn/instablogs">txn</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Semiconductors">Semiconductors</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AECOM's History Pleasing to the Eye</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/566255-adam-ritt/75432-aecom-s-history-pleasing-to-the-eye?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75432</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This month's meeting of <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> Magazine's Editorial Advisory and Securities Review Committee reminded me why I enjoy these meetings so much. <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/betterinvesting-magazine-releases-august-stock-to-study-and-undervalued-stock-choices-for-investors-informational-and-educational-use-95647724.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The committee selected AECOM&nbsp;Technology</a> (ACM) as the Stock to Study, a company I never would have known about if it weren't for these gatherings. ACM&nbsp;provides a variety of construction-related services and in its relatively short history has displayed excellent growth with great opportunities for additional expansion over the next several years. <br><br>In the <a href="http://tools.betterinvesting.org/stockanalysis/StockGuide.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Stock Selection Guide for ACM</a>, you see what BetterInvesting members look for in companies they study:&nbsp;sales and earnings growing year by year at relatively high annual rates. (Sales growth should be studied more carefully in this case, however, because the company's gross sales includes a lot of pass-through costs &mdash; look at the net revenues.) BetterInvesting members also will consider the company's narrow profit margins and relatively short history (five years of financial results is a minimum requirement), and they'll also be skeptical that the company can continue growing at its historical pace, but there's no doubt a quick look at the Stock Selection Guide's Visual Analysis section will lead many to investigate further.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:25:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This month's meeting of <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> Magazine's Editorial Advisory and Securities Review Committee reminded me why I enjoy these meetings so much. <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/betterinvesting-magazine-releases-august-stock-to-study-and-undervalued-stock-choices-for-investors-informational-and-educational-use-95647724.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The committee selected AECOM&nbsp;Technology</a> (ACM) as the Stock to Study, a company I never would have known about if it weren't for these gatherings. ACM&nbsp;provides a variety of construction-related services and in its relatively short history has displayed excellent growth with great opportunities for additional expansion over the next several years. <br><br>In the <a href="http://tools.betterinvesting.org/stockanalysis/StockGuide.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Stock Selection Guide for ACM</a>, you see what BetterInvesting members look for in companies they study:&nbsp;sales and earnings growing year by year at relatively high annual rates. (Sales growth should be studied more carefully in this case, however, because the company's gross sales includes a lot of pass-through costs &mdash; look at the net revenues.) BetterInvesting members also will consider the company's narrow profit margins and relatively short history (five years of financial results is a minimum requirement), and they'll also be skeptical that the company can continue growing at its historical pace, but there's no doubt a quick look at the Stock Selection Guide's Visual Analysis section will lead many to investigate further.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acm/instablogs">acm</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/construction">construction</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Teva Stands Out in Generics Industry</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/566255-adam-ritt/66398-teva-stands-out-in-generics-industry?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66398</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, a producer of generic drugs, was selected as BetterInvesting Magazine's latest <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/betterinvesting-magazine-releases-julys-stock-to-study-and-undervalued-stock-choices-for-investors-informational-and-educational-use-92539009.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Stock to Study</a>. The company has managed to excel in a highly competitive industry and maintain high, fairly consistent growth in sales and earnings over the long term. It would be unreasonable to expect annual growth to continue in the historical range of 25 percent to 30 percent, but Teva should have plenty of opportunities for strong growth in the years ahead. Teva faces an important issue, however, and ironically it's related to its branded-drug business. Copaxone, the MS drug that's accounted for $2.8 billion of the company's $13.9 billion in sales in 2009, is facing patent challenges. For long-term investors, Teva will have to show that it can offset the expected drop in revenues from Copaxone, but they should be encouraged by management's strong historical performance. <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> members have been building their positions in Teva for several years. The company ranked No. 11 in this year's <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org/Public/StartLearning/BI+Mag/Articles+Archives/0410publictop100.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Top 100 Survey of Investment Clubs</a>.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No position]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 09:19:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, a producer of generic drugs, was selected as BetterInvesting Magazine's latest <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/betterinvesting-magazine-releases-julys-stock-to-study-and-undervalued-stock-choices-for-investors-informational-and-educational-use-92539009.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Stock to Study</a>. The company has managed to excel in a highly competitive industry and maintain high, fairly consistent growth in sales and earnings over the long term. It would be unreasonable to expect annual growth to continue in the historical range of 25 percent to 30 percent, but Teva should have plenty of opportunities for strong growth in the years ahead. Teva faces an important issue, however, and ironically it's related to its branded-drug business. Copaxone, the MS drug that's accounted for $2.8 billion of the company's $13.9 billion in sales in 2009, is facing patent challenges. For long-term investors, Teva will have to show that it can offset the expected drop in revenues from Copaxone, but they should be encouraged by management's strong historical performance. <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> members have been building their positions in Teva for several years. The company ranked No. 11 in this year's <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org/Public/StartLearning/BI+Mag/Articles+Archives/0410publictop100.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Top 100 Survey of Investment Clubs</a>.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No position]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/teva/instablogs">teva</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/pharmaceuticals">pharmaceuticals</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Health Care Can Still Provide Shot in the Arm for Portfolios</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/566255-adam-ritt/65857-health-care-can-still-provide-shot-in-the-arm-for-portfolios?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">65857</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[With the market recovery since last March, investors who seek high-quality equities selling at reasonable prices need to spend more time finding appropriate investments. The low-hanging fruit is mostly gone these days. For those who take a top-down approach, however, trends in nominations by <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> Magazine's Editorial Advisory and Securities Review historically have provided some clues. The committee looks for reasonably priced stocks of well-managed companies growing sales and earnings at a relatively high level (depending on company size). Recent meetings have focused mainly on health care companies: For the February issue, Allergan and Medtronic were the featured stocks; in March, Boston Scientific was the Undervalued Stock selection; and in May, Immucor was the Undervalued Stock. Our meeting on April 30 will include even more conversation about opportunities in this sector. For their part, based on investment club transactions at ICLUBcentral's <a href="http://www.iclub.com/products/myiclub.asp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">myICLUB.com</a>, BetterInvesting members have been adding to their positions in Stryker and Johnson &amp; Johnson.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>None]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:28:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[With the market recovery since last March, investors who seek high-quality equities selling at reasonable prices need to spend more time finding appropriate investments. The low-hanging fruit is mostly gone these days. For those who take a top-down approach, however, trends in nominations by <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> Magazine's Editorial Advisory and Securities Review historically have provided some clues. The committee looks for reasonably priced stocks of well-managed companies growing sales and earnings at a relatively high level (depending on company size). Recent meetings have focused mainly on health care companies: For the February issue, Allergan and Medtronic were the featured stocks; in March, Boston Scientific was the Undervalued Stock selection; and in May, Immucor was the Undervalued Stock. Our meeting on April 30 will include even more conversation about opportunities in this sector. For their part, based on investment club transactions at ICLUBcentral's <a href="http://www.iclub.com/products/myiclub.asp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">myICLUB.com</a>, BetterInvesting members have been adding to their positions in Stryker and Johnson &amp; Johnson.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>None]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/agn/instablogs">agn</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mdt/instablogs">mdt</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/blud/instablogs">blud</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bsx/instablogs">bsx</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj/instablogs">jnj</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/syk/instablogs">syk</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Health Care">Health Care</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For S&amp;P's Stovall, Market Rebound a Three-Stage Process</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/566255-adam-ritt/65747-for-s-p-s-stovall-market-rebound-a-three-stage-process?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">65747</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I spoke recently with Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard &amp; Poor's and the author of the Seven Rules of Wall Street, about the current market, which after a strong run beginning in March 2009 paused earlier this year before starting its run again (recent worries notwithstanding). The typical bull market rebound, he says, has three stages: recovery, retest, resumption. If the market pattern continues, we'll have seen a fairly typical recovery and retest already, with resumption the final stage. <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> members, who continued <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org/Public/StartLearning/BI+Mag/Articles+Archives/0410publictop100.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">accumulating high-quality stocks such as IBM throughout 2009</a>, should be in great position to benefit. By June, when Stovall will speak in St. Louis at the <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org/biconvention" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting National Convention</a>, we'll likely know whether there was nothing new under the sun about this recovery.<br><br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>Long-term holder of IBM]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:09:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I spoke recently with Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard &amp; Poor's and the author of the Seven Rules of Wall Street, about the current market, which after a strong run beginning in March 2009 paused earlier this year before starting its run again (recent worries notwithstanding). The typical bull market rebound, he says, has three stages: recovery, retest, resumption. If the market pattern continues, we'll have seen a fairly typical recovery and retest already, with resumption the final stage. <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a> members, who continued <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org/Public/StartLearning/BI+Mag/Articles+Archives/0410publictop100.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">accumulating high-quality stocks such as IBM throughout 2009</a>, should be in great position to benefit. By June, when Stovall will speak in St. Louis at the <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org/biconvention" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting National Convention</a>, we'll likely know whether there was nothing new under the sun about this recovery.<br><br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>Long-term holder of IBM]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm/instablogs">ibm</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/S P 500">S P 500</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/market forecasts">market forecasts</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No Time for the Small Type</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/566255-adam-ritt/58826-no-time-for-the-small-type?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">58826</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Last week I was at a conference in New York City focused on best practices for securities litigation settlements. I learned a great deal about the process, which could use some standardization. For the retail investor, the main problem is that the process for participating is confusing and time-consuming, with the payout for damages suffered often perceived as not worth the effort. My impression is that the efforts of the securities litigation community, which I found to be quite concerned with ensuring a fair process that get funds in the hands of those who have suffered damages, would be more productive by focusing on the value of people's time. A typical retail investor who receives a notice in the mail is overwhelmed by the agate type, then immediately calculates the amount of time required to read the notice, track down the information and finally provide it. In the end, many investors decide that going through the process isn't worth the $20 or $50 they'd receive. If investors can receive notices that are based on an inverted pyramid and written for a general audience, access their ownership information easily and provide this information quickly, participation rates would increase. I'm sure the members of <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a>, many of whom are in investment clubs that received distribution funds last year, would be interested in that were the case.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>None]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:00:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Last week I was at a conference in New York City focused on best practices for securities litigation settlements. I learned a great deal about the process, which could use some standardization. For the retail investor, the main problem is that the process for participating is confusing and time-consuming, with the payout for damages suffered often perceived as not worth the effort. My impression is that the efforts of the securities litigation community, which I found to be quite concerned with ensuring a fair process that get funds in the hands of those who have suffered damages, would be more productive by focusing on the value of people's time. A typical retail investor who receives a notice in the mail is overwhelmed by the agate type, then immediately calculates the amount of time required to read the notice, track down the information and finally provide it. In the end, many investors decide that going through the process isn't worth the $20 or $50 they'd receive. If investors can receive notices that are based on an inverted pyramid and written for a general audience, access their ownership information easily and provide this information quickly, participation rates would increase. I'm sure the members of <a href="http://www.betterinvesting.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BetterInvesting</a>, many of whom are in investment clubs that received distribution funds last year, would be interested in that were the case.<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>None]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Securities Litigation Settlements">Securities Litigation Settlements</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
