fran

Opportunities in the Wind Energy Value Chain

china is to be the NEXT SIGNIFICANT growth area for Vestas, both in application and manufacturing.


On Nov 11 04:31 PM wind4me wrote:

> Two other component companies I would have added would be Woodward
> Governor (WGOV) and Keydon (KDN),both USA companies that sell components
> to the Wind industry.
>
> of course U know my largest holding is (APWR) and I look for APWR
> to make news with the Obama China trip in 3 days! Vestas is building
> four new wind turbine plants here in Colorado making the USA the
> next Vestas growth market!

Chinese Rare Earth Rationing Shouldn't Sink Wind Power Sector

HELLO GARETH.

LOTSA WEAK AUTHORS AND READERS ON SA. IT TAKES A BIT OF TIME SORTING BUT THERE'S A GOOD CORE--DEPENDING ON SUBJECT. I COULD NOT MAKE THE REFERENCED LINK.


On Sep 01 09:28 AM Gareth Hatch wrote:

> For some comments on this, from someone at a vertically integrated
> Chinese "mine to magnet" company with a US presence, check out my
> notes on this subject here at Seeking Alpha via bit.ly/H4f6e

Why I'm Long Uranium and Nuclear / Power Engineering

expand your thinking to the worldwide situation; get the USA out of prominance in your mind. also, remember, like oil, uranium is somewhat fungible in the commodity market.


On Aug 17 12:30 PM epeon wrote:

> Your analysis is way too simple. First, the majority of existing
> power plants were built in the 70s and early 80s with 30 to 40 year
> old licenses. Under current law, they are supposed to be shutdown
> over the next decade. So, if new plants are built, it just means
> that they would replace existing plants.
>
> Secondly, in the US there are no real plants under construction.
> Rather, you have plants that have a permit to be designed. This is
> a big difference. They are going for permits to construct but that
> is four to five years away if they are successful.
>
> Thirdly, your analysis only works if current plants get an extension
> on their current life (possible, some have gotten that in the past
> and some have not) and the plants being designed are actually converted
> into construction. But, construction is five years away and having
> one built is, at least, four years after that (assuming some judge
> doesn't issue an injunction as they have in the past).
>
> My bottomline, Uranium is way too early now.

Smart Grid: Powering Us Out of Recession

i read the first two paragraphs then stopped, rejecting the remainder. would you supply specifics and extents of these other "advanced" countries with implemented sophisticated/intellig... grid structures. i don't believe your information will be extensive.

meantime,search the implementation actions/development trials in the USA, by state, by utility, by the major technology sponsor. compare that list with others you find throughout the world. you will begin your education, leading towards competency in this subject.

i do not claim the USA actions are complete nor adequate for achieving total benefit from your subject matter. this subject is broad and deep enough for a dozen textbooks and thousands of sound papers/journals.

but your entry here demonstrates a shallowness undesrving persuit beyond two paragraphs.

may you prepare better in the future or modify your introductory writing style and content.

The Green New Deal: Stocks That Stand to Benefit

during the recent presidential election campaign, mr. Obama stated he had a plan to create 2+ million "green" jobs. let him be on with it, post haste. will this "Obama green plan" be part of our current "stimulus" effort?

should be easy and quick! there was a plan? right?

Boone Pickens' Holdings

BILLP37--

your point is ???

New Wind ETF Cools Off Sunburned Portfolios

20 xctns x $9 per==?

2% x $20000==?

with $20000 to risk, your concern is what ?

what is anticipated return and what is timeframe?