Book Review: Robert Hefner's 'The Grand Energy Transition' [View article]
H2 from gasification, electrolysis, extraction from gasoline,etc. many sources/processes. how clean[carbon free] do you wish to achieve?
On Mar 12 03:56 PM jimmy46 wrote:
> Hydrogen, the holy grail of energy, is the simplest and cleanest > of all fuels."""""""" > > WHAT TRIPE!!! > > SO HOW DO WE GET HYDROGEN? > DOES IT GROW ON TREES? > CAN WE DRILL FOR IT? > > OR DO WE HAVE TO BURN SOMETHING TO PRODUCE ELECTRICITY > TO PRODUCE.....
Book Review: Robert Hefner's 'The Grand Energy Transition' [View article]
fitz--[comment to jamup]-- most heavy duty, long range,or high torque reqts will require LNG. REFERENCE CLNE[two current high capacity LNG plants[TEX/CALIF]. Westport and Westport Cummins web sites. also ngvammerica. taxi, auto fleets, trash/utility, buses focus on CNG. the toughies use LNG. many large facility stations supplying both CNG, LNG will use LNG feeders.
On Mar 11 10:32 PM Michael Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Jimbo: sorry to hear about your Seven Seas investment. i guess i > should investigate the matter as i must plead ignorance. i agree > with the rest of your comment only to add why stop at buses and fleets? > natural gas goes to 63 million homes..why not refuel why we sleep? > we could reduce oil imports by 6-7 million barrels within 5 years > if we put our minds (and our industry) to it, and create lots of > good jobs at the same time. > > jljamup: in this time of US economic, environmental, and energy crisis > your comment is, well, simply not helpful. if you care to debate > the logic contained in the book, then i'm happy to oblige. if you'd > like to present your own solution, i am all ears. otherwise, i just > assume that you are happy with the status quo and therefore a waste > of time. > > tedfoo: you said "LNG" (liquified natural gas), did you mean CNG? > i don't mean to nitpick, but natural gas produced in the US doesn't > need to be liquified, just put it in the pipelines, and use compressors > to fuel the CNG tanks in the cars, buses, trucks, etc. etc. no need > for costly liquification. wrt particulates, you are onto something. > everyone focuses on CO2 emissions from coal, but anyone who has visited > kingston, TN lately can see the results of over 50 years of coal > burning. as you are aware, natural gas is clean CH4, no particulates! > i share your concern with obama wrt natural gas....i don't think > he GET's it. time will tell.
Making Natural Gas Transportation a Reality [View article]
nicely done for all.
anyone looking for NG entry in Asia of the types covered here could look into:
CHNG, OTC.OB
SNEN, NASDAQ
WPRT has already partnered up in China i believe.
Book Review: Robert Hefner's 'The Grand Energy Transition' [View article]
On Mar 12 03:56 PM jimmy46 wrote:
> Hydrogen, the holy grail of energy, is the simplest and cleanest
> of all fuels.""""""""
>
> WHAT TRIPE!!!
>
> SO HOW DO WE GET HYDROGEN?
> DOES IT GROW ON TREES?
> CAN WE DRILL FOR IT?
>
> OR DO WE HAVE TO BURN SOMETHING TO PRODUCE ELECTRICITY
> TO PRODUCE.....
Book Review: Robert Hefner's 'The Grand Energy Transition' [View article]
most heavy duty, long range,or high torque reqts will require LNG. REFERENCE CLNE[two current high capacity LNG plants[TEX/CALIF]. Westport and Westport Cummins web sites. also ngvammerica. taxi, auto fleets, trash/utility, buses focus on CNG. the toughies use LNG. many large facility stations supplying both CNG, LNG will use LNG feeders.
On Mar 11 10:32 PM Michael Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Jimbo: sorry to hear about your Seven Seas investment. i guess i
> should investigate the matter as i must plead ignorance. i agree
> with the rest of your comment only to add why stop at buses and fleets?
> natural gas goes to 63 million homes..why not refuel why we sleep?
> we could reduce oil imports by 6-7 million barrels within 5 years
> if we put our minds (and our industry) to it, and create lots of
> good jobs at the same time.
>
> jljamup: in this time of US economic, environmental, and energy crisis
> your comment is, well, simply not helpful. if you care to debate
> the logic contained in the book, then i'm happy to oblige. if you'd
> like to present your own solution, i am all ears. otherwise, i just
> assume that you are happy with the status quo and therefore a waste
> of time.
>
> tedfoo: you said "LNG" (liquified natural gas), did you mean CNG?
> i don't mean to nitpick, but natural gas produced in the US doesn't
> need to be liquified, just put it in the pipelines, and use compressors
> to fuel the CNG tanks in the cars, buses, trucks, etc. etc. no need
> for costly liquification. wrt particulates, you are onto something.
> everyone focuses on CO2 emissions from coal, but anyone who has visited
> kingston, TN lately can see the results of over 50 years of coal
> burning. as you are aware, natural gas is clean CH4, no particulates!
> i share your concern with obama wrt natural gas....i don't think
> he GET's it. time will tell.