Morpheus Tradin...'s  Instablog

When buying breakouts of growth stocks, one of the three main techniques of our momentum swing trading system, there are certain technical criteria we look for because all the best stock breakouts share the same traits.

Last week (May 17), we sold a breakout swing trade in Pandora Media ($P) for a net gain of 14% with a holding period of less than three weeks. Prior to buy entry on May 1, the stock possessed the top 5 technical traits for breakout buying, which we have listed below (see the first chart below for a visual reference):

1. High volume gap - On March 8, the stock gapped sharply higher to close the day with an 18% gain. Most importantly, volume spiked to approximately 700% its 50-day average level. When stocks score such a massive one-day gain that is accompanied by a monster surge in volume, it is undeniably the footprint of institutional buying (which we always want to see on the long side).
2. 20-day MA > 50-day MA - During the formation of the base of consolidation that followed the March 8 gap, the 20-day exponential moving average remained above the 50-day moving average the entire team. This is a sign that the uptrend technically remains solid.
3. Tight base above 50-day MA - As $P was forming its base, the 50-day moving average was rising up to meet the price. When that occurred, the stock touched and held key support of its 50-day MA several times. Simultaneously, the base began tightening up, which is typically a precursor to a breakout.
4. First base after reversal off lows - This was the first real base that $P formed since its big reversal off the late 2012 lows (around $8). The first stage bases often have the highest odds of a successful breakout because the momentum of the new uptrend is just ramping up.
5. IPO - Although not a requirement of breakout setups, one bonus is that $P recently launched as an IPO in 2011. If strong earnings growth and momentum exists, IPOs have a tendency to make explosive moves because of the lack of overhead supply (resistance).

Below is the daily chart of $P, as it looked at the time of our breakout buy entry:

(click to enlarge)

After we determined that a valid base of consolidation had formed, we then focused on determining exactly when to buy. The technical factors that helped us drill down to a precision entry point were:

• A "higher low" formed within the base (second touch of the 50-day MA)
• Price broke out above the 6-week downtrend line started by the May 8 high
• A tight range formed immediately upon breaking out above the downtrend line

The technical signals above told us it was the proper time to stalk $P for potential swing trade buy entry. In the May 1 issue of The Wagner Daily, we told subscribing members we would be buying $P if it traded above $14.18 (just above the April 30 high).

As anticipated, the stock triggered our buy entry that day, and we were long at an entry price of $14.20. The chart below shows our entry point, the subsequent price action, and our eventual exit point a few weeks later:

(click to enlarge)

As $P began climbing higher, our plan was to hold the swing trade as long as the price held above the steep uptrend line that formed on the hourly chart (similar to the way we recently trailed a stop to maximize gains on our swing trade of $SMH).

On the close of May 16, we raised the stop to just below that day's low because we observed "stalling" action over the preceding two days and wanted to protect our profits. An analyst downgrade caused $P to gap down and hit our tightened stop on the open of May 17, but our sale at $16.17 still allowed us to lock in a nice 14% gain on the trade. This was just a bit less than the usual 20 to 25% gains we typically seek to achieve with breakout momentum trades.

Want to profit from the next profitable breakout swing trade? Sign up for our swing trading newsletter today at: http://www.morpheustrading.com.

Follow Us:

Original Source

DISCLAIMER: There is a risk for substantial losses trading securities and commodities. This material is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. Morpheus Trading, LLC (hereinafter "The Company") is not a licensed broker, broker-dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. A stock's actual results could differ materially from descriptions given. The companies discussed in this report have not approved any statements made by The Company. Please consult a broker or financial planner before purchasing or selling any securities discussed in The Wagner Daily (hereinafter "The Newsletter"). The Company has not been compensated by any of the companies listed herein, or by their affiliates, agents, officers or employees for the preparation and distribution of any materials in The Newsletter. The Company and/or its affiliates, officers, directors and employees may or may not buy, sell or have positions in the securities discussed in The Newsletter and may profit in the event the shares of the companies discussed in The Newsletter rise or fall in value. Past performance never guarantees future results.

© 2002-2013 Morpheus Trading, LLC
Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.

Yesterday, we sold our swing trade in DB Gold Double Short ($DZZ), a "short ETF" that inversely tracks the price of spot gold, for a solid gain of 9% over a two-week holding period. Since the trade followed through as anticipated, we thought it would be helpful to share an educational technical review of why we originally entered the trade and subsequently sold when we did.

For several months prior to entering this trade, we had been closely monitoring the price action of SPDR Gold Trust ($GLD), an ETF proxy for the price of spot gold. Specifically, we were expecting $GLD to eventually break down below major horizontal price support around the $150 level. The trade idea was originally mentioned in this March 18 blog post, and then again on April 29.

The breakdown we were planning for finally occurred on April 12, which led to a massive drop of 13% over the course of just two days. But since the April 12 decline was so large, and because we run an end-of-day swing trading service, we were unable to immediately take advantage of selling short the breakdown in $GLD (or buying the breakout in $DZZ). However, we were not really concerned because we knew we would probably get a second chance.

Whenever a stock or ETF experiences a massive drop within a very short period of time, it will typically make a substantial counter-trend bounce shortly thereafter. When that bounce occurs, traders and investors who got stuck and did not sell for one reason or another sell into strength of the bounce, hoping to minimize their losses. It is this "overhead supply" that prevents the equity from moving higher in the near-term, which subsequently attracts the bears who start selling short.

The end result of all the selling into strength of the bounce is that the recovery attempt is usually short-lived. What happens next is that the price will typically head back down to at least re-test the prior low before stabilizing. There are exceptions, of course, but it is highly unusual for a stock or ETF to experience a huge plunge, bounce off the lows, and not subsequently fall back down to test the prior lows at least once. It is this knowledge that prompted our short sale of gold as it bounced into resistance of its 20-day exponential moving average, then started heading back down.

On the chart of $DZZ below, we have annotated our entry and exit points, which will make it easy to understand the concept above. Since our entry was into an inverse ETF, the price action is opposite of $GLD. Therefore, our entry was on a pullback from the highs, rather than a bounce off the lows:

(click to enlarge)

As you can see, we bought $DZZ on May 1, after it gapped above the previous day's high. When buying a pullback to support (or selling short a bounce into resistance), we always wait for price confirmation that the dominant trend is likely to resume. The confirmation we are looking for is either a big, ugly reversal bar or a substantial opening gap in the direction of the dominant trend.

The fact that we always patiently wait for such price confirmation is the reason we did not immediately buy $DZZ on its first touch of support of its 20-day exponential moving average (beige line) three days prior. Entering before the price confirmation occurs is always riskier because there is no confirmation that the counter-trend move is finished. Therefore, we happily give up a bit of the trade's profit potential in return for a lower-risk entry point.

The initial protective stop was set at $5.49. We set the stop at this price because it was below convergence of the low of the pullback (intraday low of April 26) and support of the 20-day EMA. After the gap up of May 1, we did not want to see the price action break below that convergence of support, so we set the stop below that level, including some "wiggle room" below the exact price of the low.

Finally, as for the exit point, our target on this type of momentum trade is simply a retest of the prior swing high (or prior swing low if selling short). As such, we set a target price of $6.40 going into yesterday's session (just one cent shy of the April 15 high). Gapping higher on the open, $DZZ neatly hit that target and we sold.

Although $DZZ could go on to set a new high from here, that was not the intention of the trade at the time of entry. Rather, we were simply looking to catch a substantial piece of the first move back in the direction of the dominant trend. Furthermore, the odds of $DZZ going to a new high are much lower than the odds of it simply going back to retest its prior highs because now there is resistance of a major swing high (support of a key swing low in $GLD).

Don't miss our next big ETF and stock pick winners. Sign up for your 30-day risk-free membership to The Wagner Daily swing trader newsletter today.

Follow Us:

Original Source

DISCLAIMER: There is a risk for substantial losses trading securities and commodities. This material is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. Morpheus Trading, LLC (hereinafter "The Company") is not a licensed broker, broker-dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. A stock's actual results could differ materially from descriptions given. The companies discussed in this report have not approved any statements made by The Company. Please consult a broker or financial planner before purchasing or selling any securities discussed in The Wagner Daily (hereinafter "The Newsletter"). The Company has not been compensated by any of the companies listed herein, or by their affiliates, agents, officers or employees for the preparation and distribution of any materials in The Newsletter. The Company and/or its affiliates, officers, directors and employees may or may not buy, sell or have positions in the securities discussed in The Newsletter and may profit in the event the shares of the companies discussed in The Newsletter rise or fall in value. Past performance never guarantees future results.

© 2002-2013 Morpheus Trading, LLC
Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.

Being a consistently profitable swing trader is a juggling act that requires one to constantly be focused on a variety of key elements of success: picking the right stocks, managing risk, determining when to sell, and even mastering the psychology of trading.

In this educational trading strategy article, we will dive into the topic of knowing how and when to sell winning ETF and stock swing trades for maximum profit, using the example of an actual swing trade we are currently positioned in. As for when to sell losing trades, there's frankly not much to say other than always have a predetermined stop before entering every trade and simply honor it.

Since April 12, the model trading portfolio of our swing trading newsletter (The Wagner Daily) has been long Market Vectors Semiconductor ETF ($SMH). We initially alerted traders of the technical reasons we were bullish on the semiconductor sector (and $SMH) in this March 28 blog post. Since then, we have also reminded regular readers of our trading blog several more times about the increasing relative strength in semis.

In the "open positions" section of today's (May 13) Wagner Daily, subscribing members will notice we have trailed our $SMH protective stop higher for the fourth consecutive day. Because the ETF is already nearing our original target area of $40, while remaining on a very steep angled climb, we have been continually squeezing the stop tighter in order to protect gains, while still allowing for maximum profit.

On the daily chart of $SMH below, we have labeled the increasingly higher stop prices we have used in each of the past four sessions:

(click to enlarge)

As you can see, our stop in each of the past four trading sessions has been raised to just below the low of the prior day's session. Whenever an ETF or stock is nearing your target area and you wish to maximize profits while still protecting gains, setting a stop just below the previous day's low (allowing for a tiny bit of "wiggle room") is a great strategy. This is because basic technical analysis states the prior day's lows and highs act as very near-term support and resistance (respectively).

By using this method for trailing stops, you will be out of a winning position before the start of a significant pullback, while still allowing the gains to build as long as buying momentum remains. This system also provides an objective way for knowing when to close a winning swing trade, rather than guessing and potentially leaving significant profits on the table.

Of course, there are many different ways to manage exits on winning momentum trades, and some of those methods are equally as effective as what is explained above. The reality is that any trading system can be a great one if the trader proves to be profitable with it over the long-term (even if the system involves trading by the cycles of the moon).

As such, we would never imply that our system is absolutely the best way to manage stops on winning swing trades. But what we truly love about our exit strategy is its utter simplicity; simple trading strategies are the easiest to follow and thereby profit from. Why complicate a technique that has already been proven to work so well? Become a member of our swing trading service to learn more.

Follow Us:

Original Source DISCLAIMER: There is a risk for substantial losses trading securities and commodities. This material is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. Morpheus Trading, LLC (hereinafter "The Company") is not a licensed broker, broker-dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. A stock's actual results could differ materially from descriptions given. The companies discussed in this report have not approved any statements made by The Company. Please consult a broker or financial planner before purchasing or selling any securities discussed in The Wagner Daily (hereinafter "The Newsletter"). The Company has not been compensated by any of the companies listed herein, or by their affiliates, agents, officers or employees for the preparation and distribution of any materials in The Newsletter. The Company and/or its affiliates, officers, directors and employees may or may not buy, sell or have positions in the securities discussed in The Newsletter and may profit in the event the shares of the companies discussed in The Newsletter rise or fall in value. Past performance never guarantees future results.

© 2002-2013 Morpheus Trading, LLC
Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.