<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Jeffrey Gall's Comments</title>
    <description>Jeffrey Gall's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/608354/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Why It's Time To Sell Baytex Energy And Consider These 3 Alternatives</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1326391/comments?source=feed#comment-17886781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17886781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[aretailguy -- The FFO per share isn't the metric you should look at.  It's how much you are willing to pay for a buck and 4 cents of FFO per share.  BTE trades at 10x FFO per share.  The other guys mentioned here trade between 3 and 4x.  BTE is a lot more expensive for a little more FFO. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:23:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[aretailguy -- The FFO per share isn't the metric you should look at.  It's how much you are willing to pay for a buck and 4 cents of FFO per share.  BTE trades at 10x FFO per share.  The other guys mentioned here trade between 3 and 4x.  BTE is a lot more expensive for a little more FFO. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Business Development Companies: The Good, The Bad, And The Maybe? Part 1</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1128111/comments?source=feed#comment-14083721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14083721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[yawn]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:38:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[yawn]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Armour Residential: Strong Dividends Set To Continue</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1122811/comments?source=feed#comment-13987121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13987121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is a fluff article.  Where's the analysis?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:27:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is a fluff article.  Where's the analysis?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time For A BDC Swap: One Stock To Sell And Another To Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1069041/comments?source=feed#comment-13394461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13394461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[you're right.  It should read 102 cents on the dollar.  Apologies for the typo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:51:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[you're right.  It should read 102 cents on the dollar.  Apologies for the typo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Probability Of A Special Dividend Or Dividend Increase From Prospect Capital</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/843121/comments?source=feed#comment-12357351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12357351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Don't mean to say I called it, but...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:44:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Don't mean to say I called it, but...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Annaly Capital - The Slippery Slope Continues</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1010491/comments?source=feed#comment-11639721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11639721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Was there any worthwhile analysis in this article?  No, not really.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:39:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Was there any worthwhile analysis in this article?  No, not really.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are The Companies In Prospect Capital's Portfolio Healthy?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1000141/comments?source=feed#comment-11513511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11513511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[you are right.  Should be thousands USD.  Thanks for letting me know]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:23:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[you are right.  Should be thousands USD.  Thanks for letting me know]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Gladstone Capital Is A Short Candidate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/816601/comments?source=feed#comment-9184061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9184061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Their PFDs are probably ok.  Wouldnt touch the common though]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:33:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Their PFDs are probably ok.  Wouldnt touch the common though]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gladstone Capital: 3 Reasons To Buy This $8 Stock With A 10% Yield</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/851591/comments?source=feed#comment-9170381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9170381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Does &quot;solid financial results&quot; mean a precipitous drop in NAV QoverQ?   This company is a worst in class BDC that has done nothing but erode NAV faster than it can pay out divies.<br/><br/>How can you say they have solid portfolio companies?   Chinese Yellow Pages?   That's a good business model.  They have 5 or 6 companies valued at 30-50 cents on the dollar that are currently generating income.  You tout BAS broadcasing - their debt is valued at 30 cents on the dollar. This company won't be diversifying their portfolio for long when it goes on non-accrual.  <br/><br/>Do your homework before you pump garbage stocks such as GLAD.    See here and here for reference:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/hi3d'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/c4rd'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:17:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Does &quot;solid financial results&quot; mean a precipitous drop in NAV QoverQ?   This company is a worst in class BDC that has done nothing but erode NAV faster than it can pay out divies.<br/><br/>How can you say they have solid portfolio companies?   Chinese Yellow Pages?   That's a good business model.  They have 5 or 6 companies valued at 30-50 cents on the dollar that are currently generating income.  You tout BAS broadcasing - their debt is valued at 30 cents on the dollar. This company won't be diversifying their portfolio for long when it goes on non-accrual.  <br/><br/>Do your homework before you pump garbage stocks such as GLAD.    See here and here for reference:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/hi3d'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/c4rd'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Armour Residential REIT Will Maintain A Big Dividend Through 2014</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/816711/comments?source=feed#comment-8572611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8572611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[How was this article well written?  No comment on any of the metrics relevant to how REITs make money - net interest spreads, sensitivity to interest rates, book value, dividend covered (or not covered) by earnings, etc.  Who looks at P/E when valuing REITs?!?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:14:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How was this article well written?  No comment on any of the metrics relevant to how REITs make money - net interest spreads, sensitivity to interest rates, book value, dividend covered (or not covered) by earnings, etc.  Who looks at P/E when valuing REITs?!?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Would Avoid Gladstone Capital: Q1 2012 Earnings Breakdown</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/566041/comments?source=feed#comment-8437101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8437101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I havent dug into their latest 10-Q yet, but will be posting when I do so.  Stay tuned.<br/><br/>Jeff]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:15:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I havent dug into their latest 10-Q yet, but will be posting when I do so.  Stay tuned.<br/><br/>Jeff]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Consequences Of Prospect Capital's Secondary Offering</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/717961/comments?source=feed#comment-7337111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7337111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[PSEC is paying out 10+%.  The divy alone provides outperformance relative to S&amp;P given a flat stock price.<br/><br/>Questions to ask:<br/><br/>Is PSEC growing book value?  Ans:  Yes.  Check out the NAV movement the last 5 quarters.<br/><br/>Is PSEC covering its divies with NII?  Yes.  Check out the latest earnings release for this piece of info.<br/><br/>They havent written down an investment in something like 2+ years.  The fact that they can price this SPO above the most recent book value is a positive in that it increases book value on a per share basis.  <br/><br/>My cardinal rule for buying BDCs is make sure to buy at or below NAV.  I always keep some powder dry for drops below NAV.  By holding and reinvesting the divies, you can easily outperform the market.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:48:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[PSEC is paying out 10+%.  The divy alone provides outperformance relative to S&amp;P given a flat stock price.<br/><br/>Questions to ask:<br/><br/>Is PSEC growing book value?  Ans:  Yes.  Check out the NAV movement the last 5 quarters.<br/><br/>Is PSEC covering its divies with NII?  Yes.  Check out the latest earnings release for this piece of info.<br/><br/>They havent written down an investment in something like 2+ years.  The fact that they can price this SPO above the most recent book value is a positive in that it increases book value on a per share basis.  <br/><br/>My cardinal rule for buying BDCs is make sure to buy at or below NAV.  I always keep some powder dry for drops below NAV.  By holding and reinvesting the divies, you can easily outperform the market.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Yield Canadian Oil And Gas Dividend Cuts Are Looming</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/682471/comments?source=feed#comment-6787571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6787571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I want to echo Livingstone's comment.  You assume that because the stock price is declining that a dividend cut is coming.  How about some actual analysis?  What impact does a 10 dollar decline in oil have on PGH/ERF/PWE/BTE's cash flow?  etc etc.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:58:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I want to echo Livingstone's comment.  You assume that because the stock price is declining that a dividend cut is coming.  How about some actual analysis?  What impact does a 10 dollar decline in oil have on PGH/ERF/PWE/BTE's cash flow?  etc etc.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is The Enerplus Dividend Sustainable?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/547281/comments?source=feed#comment-6362761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6362761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not surprised about the cut.  A little larger than I thought they would do.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:40:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not surprised about the cut.  A little larger than I thought they would do.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred CEF Showdown, Part 1: Flaherty &amp; Crumrine - My Top Pick</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/379501/comments?source=feed#comment-3770731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3770731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My first rule of CEF investing:  There are no rules in CEF investing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:15:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My first rule of CEF investing:  There are no rules in CEF investing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>mREITs' Golden Era Is Over - Part I</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/381451/comments?source=feed#comment-2819791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2819791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Where is the analysis for why the golden age is over?  This is one of the worst articles I have read on SA.  Shame on SA for publishing this.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:00:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Where is the analysis for why the golden age is over?  This is one of the worst articles I have read on SA.  Shame on SA for publishing this.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Central Securities Corp.: This CEF Is Still Offering Good Value</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/381191/comments?source=feed#comment-2817031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2817031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice analysis, thanks for introducing me to this one]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:02:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice analysis, thanks for introducing me to this one]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred CEF Showdown, Part 1: Flaherty &amp; Crumrine - My Top Pick</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/379501/comments?source=feed#comment-2816911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2816911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[HPF, another preferred CEF trades near NAV.  Why should I pay such a premium?  Not convinced the substantial premium is warranted.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:54:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[HPF, another preferred CEF trades near NAV.  Why should I pay such a premium?  Not convinced the substantial premium is warranted.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GLAD To Not Own Gladstone Capital: A Business Development Company In Danger</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/344381/comments?source=feed#comment-2424681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2424681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi Rich,<br/><br/>Appreciate the comment.  As far as other BDCs go, I don't follow too many others.  I am most familiar with GLAD, followed by PSEC and FSC.  I am planning articles on both PSEC and FSC post their earnings release.<br/><br/>Of the ones you mentioned, are any monthly payers (I prefer these to own)?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:56:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi Rich,<br/><br/>Appreciate the comment.  As far as other BDCs go, I don't follow too many others.  I am most familiar with GLAD, followed by PSEC and FSC.  I am planning articles on both PSEC and FSC post their earnings release.<br/><br/>Of the ones you mentioned, are any monthly payers (I prefer these to own)?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scott's: High-Yield, North-Of-The-Border REIT</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/308254/comments?source=feed#comment-2392751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2392751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[zach -- Good to hear.  I think the drop may have been some tax loss selling because it seemed as soon as the calendar hit January that it rebounded nicely.<br/><br/>I unloaded about a third of my position about a week ago.  Best of luck,<br/><br/>Jeff]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:48:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[zach -- Good to hear.  I think the drop may have been some tax loss selling because it seemed as soon as the calendar hit January that it rebounded nicely.<br/><br/>I unloaded about a third of my position about a week ago.  Best of luck,<br/><br/>Jeff]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 Reasons To Sell Alpine Total Dynamic CEF</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/316706/comments?source=feed#comment-2392681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2392681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well, I guess I must be wrong then.  Caution with statements on performance over the short-term.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:41:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well, I guess I must be wrong then.  Caution with statements on performance over the short-term.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alpine Global Premier Properties Fund, Revisited</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/328062/comments?source=feed#comment-2283232</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2283232</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Robert, I am intrigued by AWP, but what are your thoughts on the Alpine management team?  Their dividend capture funds (AOD/AGD) are complete garbage IMO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:53:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Robert, I am intrigued by AWP, but what are your thoughts on the Alpine management team?  Their dividend capture funds (AOD/AGD) are complete garbage IMO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tortoise North American Energy: An Attractive Energy MLP Closed-End Fund</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/320042/comments?source=feed#comment-2181968</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2181968</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi George -- I'm just not convinced why I should by this fund versus the underlying stocks.<br/><br/>Jeff]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:27:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi George -- I'm just not convinced why I should by this fund versus the underlying stocks.<br/><br/>Jeff]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sizing Up My Trading Record In 2011</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/318541/comments?source=feed#comment-2163588</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2163588</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are amazing!!!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:14:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are amazing!!!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10%-Plus-Yield CEFs: 3 To Buy And 1 To Avoid</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/315763/comments?source=feed#comment-2136615</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2136615</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[coach g,<br/><br/>I never have commented on PHK.  Best of luck of AOD.  Buyer beware.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:38:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[coach g,<br/><br/>I never have commented on PHK.  Best of luck of AOD.  Buyer beware.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tale Of Two Very Different BDCs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/308590/comments?source=feed#comment-2046704</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2046704</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Zach, <br/><br/>I may have been a bit sloppy in my wording and interchanged NAV with book value.  The book value numbers are pulled directly from the earnings reports of both GLAD and PSEC.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:09:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Zach, <br/><br/>I may have been a bit sloppy in my wording and interchanged NAV with book value.  The book value numbers are pulled directly from the earnings reports of both GLAD and PSEC.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8 Reliable Monthly Dividend Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/288000/comments?source=feed#comment-1840762</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1840762</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Todd --<br/><br/>If I own shares of STUXF.PK how does it work when it starts trading on the nasdaq?  Do my shares of STUXF.PK get converted to the new symbol?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:08:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Todd --<br/><br/>If I own shares of STUXF.PK how does it work when it starts trading on the nasdaq?  Do my shares of STUXF.PK get converted to the new symbol?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Dividend Stocks With Potential to Double Within 5 Years</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/287563/comments?source=feed#comment-1839620</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1839620</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If the stock price doubled, you would have to pay capital gains as well.  I should have added &quot;Before taxes&quot; to the title.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:29:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If the stock price doubled, you would have to pay capital gains as well.  I should have added &quot;Before taxes&quot; to the title.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Top Performing U.S. Dividend Champions</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/272579/comments?source=feed#comment-1683811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1683811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[guraaf -- check out RMT.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:24:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[guraaf -- check out RMT.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Top Performing U.S. Dividend Champions</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/272579/comments?source=feed#comment-1680923</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1680923</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Schwab provides the total return (including dividend reinvestment) at 1, 3 and 5 years.  There stated returns at these periods for MCD, for example, are 26.3%, 55.8%, and 191.1%.  These values are similar to my calculated returns of 25.8%, 52.5% and 191.0%.  So yes, I am confident the annualized returns are correct.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 22:50:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Schwab provides the total return (including dividend reinvestment) at 1, 3 and 5 years.  There stated returns at these periods for MCD, for example, are 26.3%, 55.8%, and 191.1%.  These values are similar to my calculated returns of 25.8%, 52.5% and 191.0%.  So yes, I am confident the annualized returns are correct.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
