<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>citizenleung's Comments</title>
    <description>citizenleung's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/609729/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Volkswagen (VLKAY.PK) says it will boost its global workforce to 600K to 550K as it keeps a firm foot on the gas in a race to produce more cars than any other automaker. Naturally, the focus will be on adding jobs in China - not Europe where demand is sluggish.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/917461?source=feed#comment-17062041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17062041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Volkswagen sure manufactures a lot of vehicles with -50K employees.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:36:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Volkswagen sure manufactures a lot of vehicles with -50K employees.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Accomplished Dividend Growth Investors Can Ignore Price Volatility</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1293441/comments?source=feed#comment-16621351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16621351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You will always win some and lose some in the market.  If you focus on dividend growth stocks, you will likely win a bit more and lose a bit less.  I'd take that deal.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:34:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You will always win some and lose some in the market.  If you focus on dividend growth stocks, you will likely win a bit more and lose a bit less.  I'd take that deal.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's 'Project Glass': An Over-Hyped Hobby</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1263221/comments?source=feed#comment-16150321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16150321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Google is the master of the &quot;good enough&quot; product.  Google products are usually inferior to their competitors, but Google grabs market share anyway because it gives many of them away for free.  Is Google clearly the best at anything it does?  iOS is far better than Android.  Office is far better than Google Docs.  Netflix is far better than YouTube.  Facebook is far better than Google+.  Amazon keeps far better information than Google (knowing how someone is willing to part with money is more valuable than knowing what he is searching for).  Firefox is better than Chrome.  Fine, Google Fiber is far better than Comcast or AT&amp;T, but a piece of turd is better than Comcast or AT&amp;T.<br/><br/>Google has hit an embarrassing new low with Google Glass.  It appears Google is leaving inferior behind and heading straight for useless.  With Google Glass' endless potential to 1) put its user in danger from accidents and health problems, and 2) invade everyone else's privacy, Google should finally give up once and for all any pretense that it does no evil.<br/><br/>I would not be surprised if Google Search is dethroned soon.  I prefer Bing, but I'm obviously in the minority.  I'm waiting for IBM to use Watson as some kind of consumer search engine that will provide 3-5 answers rather than 100,000,000 links--most of which are useless.  When that day comes, Google will collapse faster than Nokia or Blackberry.  Until then, Google will continue be the world's other vampire squid.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:50:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Google is the master of the &quot;good enough&quot; product.  Google products are usually inferior to their competitors, but Google grabs market share anyway because it gives many of them away for free.  Is Google clearly the best at anything it does?  iOS is far better than Android.  Office is far better than Google Docs.  Netflix is far better than YouTube.  Facebook is far better than Google+.  Amazon keeps far better information than Google (knowing how someone is willing to part with money is more valuable than knowing what he is searching for).  Firefox is better than Chrome.  Fine, Google Fiber is far better than Comcast or AT&amp;T, but a piece of turd is better than Comcast or AT&amp;T.<br/><br/>Google has hit an embarrassing new low with Google Glass.  It appears Google is leaving inferior behind and heading straight for useless.  With Google Glass' endless potential to 1) put its user in danger from accidents and health problems, and 2) invade everyone else's privacy, Google should finally give up once and for all any pretense that it does no evil.<br/><br/>I would not be surprised if Google Search is dethroned soon.  I prefer Bing, but I'm obviously in the minority.  I'm waiting for IBM to use Watson as some kind of consumer search engine that will provide 3-5 answers rather than 100,000,000 links--most of which are useless.  When that day comes, Google will collapse faster than Nokia or Blackberry.  Until then, Google will continue be the world's other vampire squid.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dell (DELL) enters into agreement to be acquired by Michael Dell and Silver Lake for $13.65/share, or $24.4B, a 25% premium over the Jan. 11 price before rumors began. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/804381?source=feed#comment-14592401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14592401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[$13.65 is quite a premium to its low of $8.69.<br/><br/>DELL shareholders are lucky they're getting $13.65.  What they should be angry about is DELL spending so much on buybacks.  Based on today's sale price, Dell probably could have bought itself once or twice already.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:25:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[$13.65 is quite a premium to its low of $8.69.<br/><br/>DELL shareholders are lucky they're getting $13.65.  What they should be angry about is DELL spending so much on buybacks.  Based on today's sale price, Dell probably could have bought itself once or twice already.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The House will vote on the unamended Senate bill at 9 PM&amp;nbsp;ET, reports CNN's Dana Bash. Any attempt to alter the bill by adding spending cuts has reportedly been abandoned for now. Update at 9:10: The vote has been pushed back to 11 PM&amp;nbsp;ET.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/740511?source=feed#comment-13200701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13200701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Geoff:<br/><br/>Note that I said &quot;conservative,&quot; not &quot;Democratic&quot; or &quot;Republican.&quot;  Clinton and Rubin did their part in redistributing wealth from the middle class to the rich.  They weren't nearly as good as Reagan or Bush 43, though.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:43:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Geoff:<br/><br/>Note that I said &quot;conservative,&quot; not &quot;Democratic&quot; or &quot;Republican.&quot;  Clinton and Rubin did their part in redistributing wealth from the middle class to the rich.  They weren't nearly as good as Reagan or Bush 43, though.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The House will vote on the unamended Senate bill at 9 PM&amp;nbsp;ET, reports CNN's Dana Bash. Any attempt to alter the bill by adding spending cuts has reportedly been abandoned for now. Update at 9:10: The vote has been pushed back to 11 PM&amp;nbsp;ET.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/740511?source=feed#comment-13199481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13199481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The conservative redistributionists have bent over the American middle class for the last thirty years--taking their money and giving it to the rich in the U.S. and the poor in China.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:51:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The conservative redistributionists have bent over the American middle class for the last thirty years--taking their money and giving it to the rich in the U.S. and the poor in China.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Over 2M iPhone 5 units have been sold thus far in China, Apple (AAPL) boasts. China Unicom's (CHU) healthy pre-order activity probably had a lot to do with this figure. Sparse crowds for the Friday launch stoked fears initial sales were light, but weather and pre-ordering requirements seem to have played a role. For reference, Apple announced in September over 5M iPhone 5 units had been sold 3 days after the device went on sale in the U.S., Japan, and 7 other locales. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/722411?source=feed#comment-12671351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12671351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As of Friday's close, people who bought Intel, one of your favorites, at $29.27 are more foolish than people who bought Apple at $705.07.<br/><br/>Apple treats its shareholders wonderfully--just look at the incredible gains over the last ten years.  Look at Apple's unparalleled transparency, at least among tech companies, in reporting sales, revenues, earnings, and profits.  As for the dividend, I'm as happy with Apple's dividend as I am with Philip Morris or Kinder Morgan's dividend.<br/><br/>You begin to lose credibility when you claim that Apple has no innovative products.  The only innovative products over the last 5-6 years in the mobile space have been the original iPhone and the original iPad.  Every device since, whether by Apple or another manufacturer, have been evolutionary rather than innovative.  If you consider Samsung's devices &quot;innovative&quot;, you have a most curious interpretation of the word.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:32:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As of Friday's close, people who bought Intel, one of your favorites, at $29.27 are more foolish than people who bought Apple at $705.07.<br/><br/>Apple treats its shareholders wonderfully--just look at the incredible gains over the last ten years.  Look at Apple's unparalleled transparency, at least among tech companies, in reporting sales, revenues, earnings, and profits.  As for the dividend, I'm as happy with Apple's dividend as I am with Philip Morris or Kinder Morgan's dividend.<br/><br/>You begin to lose credibility when you claim that Apple has no innovative products.  The only innovative products over the last 5-6 years in the mobile space have been the original iPhone and the original iPad.  Every device since, whether by Apple or another manufacturer, have been evolutionary rather than innovative.  If you consider Samsung's devices &quot;innovative&quot;, you have a most curious interpretation of the word.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Achilles' Heel: Samsung Has An Arrow Pointed Straight At It</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1060721/comments?source=feed#comment-12670981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12670981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;There are more developers using Android ...&quot;<br/><br/>Perhaps, but they don't appear to be interested in developing apps for Android tablets.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:42:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;There are more developers using Android ...&quot;<br/><br/>Perhaps, but they don't appear to be interested in developing apps for Android tablets.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Over 2M iPhone 5 units have been sold thus far in China, Apple (AAPL) boasts. China Unicom's (CHU) healthy pre-order activity probably had a lot to do with this figure. Sparse crowds for the Friday launch stoked fears initial sales were light, but weather and pre-ordering requirements seem to have played a role. For reference, Apple announced in September over 5M iPhone 5 units had been sold 3 days after the device went on sale in the U.S., Japan, and 7 other locales. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/722411?source=feed#comment-12669501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12669501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Cook didn't announce this to support the stock--they announce great sales figures regardless of whether the stock is zooming up or collapsing.<br/><br/>That's one of reasons I like Apple--they treat the fools on Wall Street the way they deserve to be treated.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:24:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cook didn't announce this to support the stock--they announce great sales figures regardless of whether the stock is zooming up or collapsing.<br/><br/>That's one of reasons I like Apple--they treat the fools on Wall Street the way they deserve to be treated.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Achilles' Heel: Samsung Has An Arrow Pointed Straight At It</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1060721/comments?source=feed#comment-12533631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12533631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sure, Android's tablet share will outpace Apple's in 2013. However, how many of those Android tablets are either 1) shipped but not sold or 2) serving as glorified paperweights on their owners' desks or, worse yet, forgotten in a drawer or closet? Based on usage statistics compiled by numerous third parties, there are huge piles of Android e-trash lying around.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:41:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sure, Android's tablet share will outpace Apple's in 2013. However, how many of those Android tablets are either 1) shipped but not sold or 2) serving as glorified paperweights on their owners' desks or, worse yet, forgotten in a drawer or closet? Based on usage statistics compiled by numerous third parties, there are huge piles of Android e-trash lying around.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's R&amp;D Numbers - Something Good Brewing, Or Something Wrong?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1031551/comments?source=feed#comment-12012701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12012701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Apple is doing more and more in-house (designing chips for mobile devices, maps, etc.), which probably necessitates greater R&amp;D spending.<br/><br/>On innovation, the only developments over the last 5-6 years in the mobile space that qualify as &quot;innovations&quot; are the original iPhone and the original iPad.  All mobile devices since, whether by Apple or any other manufacturer, have been evolutionary rather than revolutionary products.  The Surface is innovative for Microsoft's standards, but tiles and a kickstand are not, in and of themselves, &quot;innovative.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:58:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Apple is doing more and more in-house (designing chips for mobile devices, maps, etc.), which probably necessitates greater R&amp;D spending.<br/><br/>On innovation, the only developments over the last 5-6 years in the mobile space that qualify as &quot;innovations&quot; are the original iPhone and the original iPad.  All mobile devices since, whether by Apple or any other manufacturer, have been evolutionary rather than revolutionary products.  The Surface is innovative for Microsoft's standards, but tiles and a kickstand are not, in and of themselves, &quot;innovative.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Has the iPhone lost its "wow" factor, and if so, is it something for Apple (AAPL +1.2%) to be truly worried about? A day after the iPhone 5 launch, the press is alight with commentary declaring the device a good upgrade, but nothing more. Some think the effectiveness of the Apple rumor mill might be to blame. Either way, the big question is how much a lack of excitement will affect sales when Apple can still claim an edge in customer loyalty and apps, and can tout hardware features that often match or exceed those of rivals.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/537131?source=feed#comment-9433891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9433891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You must be easily wowed.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:05:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You must be easily wowed.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BofA's (BAC) Wealth Management division is holding a conference call tomorrow with Paulson &amp;amp; Co.'s John Paulson, giving the firm's retail advisors and clients a chance to take a shot at his disappointing year-to-date performance. So far in 2012, Paulson's Advantage Plus fund is off 18%, while his Advantage fund is down 13%. Remember, this is on the back of declines in 2011 of over 50% and 36%, respectively, and comes just days following Citigroup's (C) announcement that its Private Bank was pulling $410M out of Paulson's funds.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/509551?source=feed#comment-8841621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8841621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wow--my buy and (mostly) hold portfolio outperformed Paulson's Advantage Plus by 235% over the same period!  When can I start a hedge fund?  If only Goldman Sachs would have let me short some hand-picked, AAA-rated securities backed by nonperforming loans.  Oh well.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:12:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wow--my buy and (mostly) hold portfolio outperformed Paulson's Advantage Plus by 235% over the same period!  When can I start a hedge fund?  If only Goldman Sachs would have let me short some hand-picked, AAA-rated securities backed by nonperforming loans.  Oh well.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> More on Apple's FQ3: The company is guiding for FQ4 revenue of $34B and EPS of $7.65, below a consensus of $38B and $10.22. iPhone sales miss consensus, iPads beat. Gross margin of 42.8%, down 460 bps Q/Q (due to mix shift towards iPads) and up 120 bps Y/Y.&amp;nbsp; 6.8M iPods sold, -10% Y/Y. Americas revenue +26%, Europe +16%, Japan +33%. Asia-Pac (led by China) +25% Y/Y but -22% Q/Q. Retail +17% Y/Y. $2.65/share dividend declared. CC at 5PM ET (webcast). AAPL -4.9% AH. (PR) </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/433851?source=feed#comment-7715911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7715911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[At $570, AAPL's P/E is 13.4.  No need to panic.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:52:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[At $570, AAPL's P/E is 13.4.  No need to panic.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is The Perfect Storm Here?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/735771/comments?source=feed#comment-7593451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7593451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot; ... China, where capitalism now thrives unfettered.&quot;<br/><br/>This statement reveals stupidity, foolishness, or ignorance (or perhaps all three).  The Chinese leadership is currently hard at work constructing the next 5-year plan.  The plan will be executed by state-owned enterprises that march to Beijing's orders.  Very capitalistic.<br/><br/>Are you so deep in Tea that you've lost your common sense?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:49:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot; ... China, where capitalism now thrives unfettered.&quot;<br/><br/>This statement reveals stupidity, foolishness, or ignorance (or perhaps all three).  The Chinese leadership is currently hard at work constructing the next 5-year plan.  The plan will be executed by state-owned enterprises that march to Beijing's orders.  Very capitalistic.<br/><br/>Are you so deep in Tea that you've lost your common sense?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> General Electric (GE -1.2%) may look attractive on the surface, with its industrial and capital services units both poised for cyclical gains should the economy kick into gear. However, the mega-conglomerate is a unique financial-industrial hybrid, says Morgan Stanley's Nigel Coe, and if you back out GE Capital from the numbers, you'll find that both units are actually trading at a large premium to comps., and with a little pricing competition, the company could face serious headwinds. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/416811?source=feed#comment-7436591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7436591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The financial crisis has revealed Jack Welch's stupidity in turning a champion industrial company into a GE Capital-dominated monstrosity.  Until Immelt creates a more balanced company by divesting more of GE Capital, troubles emanating from the financial sector will continue to punch GE investors right in the gut.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:58:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The financial crisis has revealed Jack Welch's stupidity in turning a champion industrial company into a GE Capital-dominated monstrosity.  Until Immelt creates a more balanced company by divesting more of GE Capital, troubles emanating from the financial sector will continue to punch GE investors right in the gut.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Charlie Munger: Civilized People Don't Buy Gold</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/563301/comments?source=feed#comment-5161451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5161451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I own gold and a gold stock, and I agree with Munger.  I own them not because I believe in gold's intrinsic value (it has little or none) or in gold's ability to store wealth (it doesn't).  Instead, I believe that, for the foreseeable future, there will be ignorant/foolish/crazy people who will periodically bid gold prices up from absurd to ridiculous.  Why not be along for the ride?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 16:30:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I own gold and a gold stock, and I agree with Munger.  I own them not because I believe in gold's intrinsic value (it has little or none) or in gold's ability to store wealth (it doesn't).  Instead, I believe that, for the foreseeable future, there will be ignorant/foolish/crazy people who will periodically bid gold prices up from absurd to ridiculous.  Why not be along for the ride?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> The President is speaking about his proposals to crack down on manipulation in the oil market. Watch live here. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/254931?source=feed#comment-4505951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4505951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So regulating hydraulic fracturing is the same as a war on fossil fuels?  I guess testing car seats would be a war on babies in your book.<br/><br/>The oil and gas industry praised the EO for gathering the disparate regulatory bodies under one roof, which would simplify regulations and reduce the red tape.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:05:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So regulating hydraulic fracturing is the same as a war on fossil fuels?  I guess testing car seats would be a war on babies in your book.<br/><br/>The oil and gas industry praised the EO for gathering the disparate regulatory bodies under one roof, which would simplify regulations and reduce the red tape.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> The President is speaking about his proposals to crack down on manipulation in the oil market. Watch live here. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/254931?source=feed#comment-4505561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4505561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A war on fossil fuels?  What planet are you living on?  The U.S. produces more oil now than in 2003, and is producing more and more every day.  We now import 45% of our oil as opposed to 57% in 2008 when Big Oil's best friend was in office.<br/><br/>Obama has voiced support for natural gas.  If you want to blame somebody for the failure of the Natural Gas Act in the Senate, blame the 39 myopic Republicans who voted no and Big Oil, which stuffs their campaign coffers full of cash.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:59:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A war on fossil fuels?  What planet are you living on?  The U.S. produces more oil now than in 2003, and is producing more and more every day.  We now import 45% of our oil as opposed to 57% in 2008 when Big Oil's best friend was in office.<br/><br/>Obama has voiced support for natural gas.  If you want to blame somebody for the failure of the Natural Gas Act in the Senate, blame the 39 myopic Republicans who voted no and Big Oil, which stuffs their campaign coffers full of cash.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> The President is speaking about his proposals to crack down on manipulation in the oil market. Watch live here. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/254931?source=feed#comment-4505371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4505371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No one can reasonably claim that the current price of oil lies anywhere near the intersection of supply and demand.  Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil and hardly a socialist, has said many times that the price of oil should be much lower and that the elevated price is due to speculation.  Saudi Arabia, the largest oil exporter, has repeatedly voiced similar sentiments.  Something should be done to curb oil speculation, which only benefits investment banks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:55:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No one can reasonably claim that the current price of oil lies anywhere near the intersection of supply and demand.  Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil and hardly a socialist, has said many times that the price of oil should be much lower and that the elevated price is due to speculation.  Saudi Arabia, the largest oil exporter, has repeatedly voiced similar sentiments.  Something should be done to curb oil speculation, which only benefits investment banks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Take Profits Before You Lose Them</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/474321/comments?source=feed#comment-4093521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4093521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I was severely tempted to sell AAPL (less than 10% of the total) yesterday.  After seeing what happened in the premarket, I pulled the trigger.  AAPL was pushing 20% of the portfolio, and as much as I love it, I had to sell some.<br/><br/>Internally debating whether to sell AAPL is a good problem to have.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:04:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I was severely tempted to sell AAPL (less than 10% of the total) yesterday.  After seeing what happened in the premarket, I pulled the trigger.  AAPL was pushing 20% of the portfolio, and as much as I love it, I had to sell some.<br/><br/>Internally debating whether to sell AAPL is a good problem to have.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Pfizer Pfinished?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/458041/comments?source=feed#comment-3856121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3856121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Many large companies acquire and divest parts of their businesses, but for the frequency and size of its deals, Pfizer takes the cake.  It must be disheartening to work as a scientist or researcher at Pfizer.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:07:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Many large companies acquire and divest parts of their businesses, but for the frequency and size of its deals, Pfizer takes the cake.  It must be disheartening to work as a scientist or researcher at Pfizer.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Cash Should Be Used For These Acquisitions Instead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/457611/comments?source=feed#comment-3854001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3854001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I love how people continue to think of inventive ways for Apple to set fire to large piles of its cash.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:07:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I love how people continue to think of inventive ways for Apple to set fire to large piles of its cash.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> As spring blossoms bloom A cool million readers Watch their stocks grow too. Enter our Seeking Alpha 1 Million User Haiku Contest, by Tuesday at midnight, and a new iPad could be yours! (earlier) </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/220611?source=feed#comment-3853091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3853091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Collectively, a<br/>Million seekers have gains <br/>In the billions.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:25:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Collectively, a<br/>Million seekers have gains <br/>In the billions.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Germany Actually Preparing To Leave The Euro?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/429741/comments?source=feed#comment-3426531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3426531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Germany would not hold fare much better.  The combination of the new Deutsche Mark, which would instantly be one of the strongest currencies in the world, and the newly weak euro would choke Germany's export-based economy by dramatically reducing the purchasing power of its biggest trade partners.  This damage would far outweigh any debt relief Germany would enjoy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:16:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Germany would not hold fare much better.  The combination of the new Deutsche Mark, which would instantly be one of the strongest currencies in the world, and the newly weak euro would choke Germany's export-based economy by dramatically reducing the purchasing power of its biggest trade partners.  This damage would far outweigh any debt relief Germany would enjoy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trade With The Ultimate Insider (It's Perfectly Legal)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/387221/comments?source=feed#comment-2878191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2878191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Wide economic moat,&quot; &quot;wonderful companies at fair prices&quot; and the like become interpretive dance cliches because they have held true over the years.  After all, what is more important to a company's survival and prosperity than significant and sustainable competitive advantages?  Also, isn't buying a great stock at $75 better than buying it at $90?<br/><br/>That purchases of Wells Fargo, IBM, Visa piqued your interest says much about your skills as an investor and your understanding of the &quot;interpretive dance cliches&quot; you dismiss.  These stocks are great under any style of analysis, and each fits perfectly with Buffett's investment philosophy.  Wells Fargo is the financial institution Buffett knows best outside of Berkshire, and he already owns a hefty stake in the company.  Wouldn't you buy a dip to add to an existing position you like?  IBM is by far the biggest player in the high-margin, sticky business of consulting and analytics, almost guaranteeing strong cash flow and dividend growth.  It is quickly becoming an indispensible part of the information-industrial complex, and its moat is wide and deep.  Visa, a toll booth operator with no credit risk, might have the biggest moat of the three.  One does not need any influence in Washington or &quot;insight that only Warren Buffet brings to the table&quot; to realize that these are great companies that were on sale.<br/><br/>As for BNSF, Buffett has had its eye on the company for a long time.  By the time Berkshire acquired BNSF, Berkshire already owned over 20% of the company.  Berkshire purchased this stake through 2007.  Regardless of the timing of the final acquisition, what's so unusual about one company buying another company in which the first company owns a significant stake?<br/><br/>Buffett certainly does not need me or anyone else to defend him from the likes of you.  He makes turds that are better investors than you.  I commented because your article is full of innuendo and even more full of ignorance.  Hopefully, you wrote it only as an enterprising attempt to generate hits, like the 10 tired Apple-bear articles that Seeking Alpha approves every day.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:02:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Wide economic moat,&quot; &quot;wonderful companies at fair prices&quot; and the like become interpretive dance cliches because they have held true over the years.  After all, what is more important to a company's survival and prosperity than significant and sustainable competitive advantages?  Also, isn't buying a great stock at $75 better than buying it at $90?<br/><br/>That purchases of Wells Fargo, IBM, Visa piqued your interest says much about your skills as an investor and your understanding of the &quot;interpretive dance cliches&quot; you dismiss.  These stocks are great under any style of analysis, and each fits perfectly with Buffett's investment philosophy.  Wells Fargo is the financial institution Buffett knows best outside of Berkshire, and he already owns a hefty stake in the company.  Wouldn't you buy a dip to add to an existing position you like?  IBM is by far the biggest player in the high-margin, sticky business of consulting and analytics, almost guaranteeing strong cash flow and dividend growth.  It is quickly becoming an indispensible part of the information-industrial complex, and its moat is wide and deep.  Visa, a toll booth operator with no credit risk, might have the biggest moat of the three.  One does not need any influence in Washington or &quot;insight that only Warren Buffet brings to the table&quot; to realize that these are great companies that were on sale.<br/><br/>As for BNSF, Buffett has had its eye on the company for a long time.  By the time Berkshire acquired BNSF, Berkshire already owned over 20% of the company.  Berkshire purchased this stake through 2007.  Regardless of the timing of the final acquisition, what's so unusual about one company buying another company in which the first company owns a significant stake?<br/><br/>Buffett certainly does not need me or anyone else to defend him from the likes of you.  He makes turds that are better investors than you.  I commented because your article is full of innuendo and even more full of ignorance.  Hopefully, you wrote it only as an enterprising attempt to generate hits, like the 10 tired Apple-bear articles that Seeking Alpha approves every day.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Jamie Dimon (JPM) continues to rail against over-regulation, telling Fox Business that policies coming out of Washington have led to a slower and rockier recovery: "It could have been better. I do think we have made this recovery slower and worse by uncoordinated policy, the debt ceiling crisis and tons of other things that were misguided." </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/146521?source=feed#comment-2633841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2633841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dimon prefers the good old days of 1999-2007 when banks could do whatever they wanted.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:17:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dimon prefers the good old days of 1999-2007 when banks could do whatever they wanted.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Cisco And Dell Strategy That Apple Should Avoid</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/364661/comments?source=feed#comment-2632821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2632821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You can't say that Chambers is overpaid--he had to have worked many hours a day to come up with all of Cisco's financial engineering schemes over the years.  Too bad all of that work resulted in a horrible company and stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:47:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You can't say that Chambers is overpaid--he had to have worked many hours a day to come up with all of Cisco's financial engineering schemes over the years.  Too bad all of that work resulted in a horrible company and stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Dick Bove is furious over "the mortgage deal from hell" that provides $25B in relief for distressed borrowers, states and the U.S. government. "Those people lucky or smart enough to stop making payments on their homes may get their loan balances reduced,"&amp;nbsp;Bove fumes; headline risk for banks - particularly BAC - will continue since the DOJ is sketching up another lawsuit over  securitization irregularities. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/138961?source=feed#comment-2521771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2521771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dick Bove has repeatedly shown through his unintentionally hilarious appearances and comments that he knows less than shit about banks.  Analyst indeed.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:16:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dick Bove has repeatedly shown through his unintentionally hilarious appearances and comments that he knows less than shit about banks.  Analyst indeed.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> CNBC's Mark Koba steps inside Ron Paul's fantasy of world of a world without a Fed and doesn't paint a pretty picture. A return to the gold standard, as Paul wants, would leave the dollar hostage to the whims of traders. Or, letting the Treasury manage the money supply would cause an "earthquake over who would be Treasury Secretary." </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/138561?source=feed#comment-2509281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2509281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Paul only wants the gold standard because he is heavily invested in gold and gold miners.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:25:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Paul only wants the gold standard because he is heavily invested in gold and gold miners.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
